Let’s Talk About Jabari Blash
Of the 338 Triple-A hitters who have recorded at least 200 plate appearances this season, only two have an isolated-power (ISO) mark north of .300. The first is Richie Shaffer, an interesting Rays prospect who spent some time in the big leagues this season. The second is a player by the name of Jabari Blash. No, that’s not a character from Harry Potter, or even an Edith Wharton novel. Jabari Blash is a real, live outfielder in the Mariners organization.
Blash has hit a ridiculous .246/.370/.624 in 50 games at the Triple-A level this year. Prior to that, he slashed a similarly ridiculous .278/.383/.517 in 60 Double-A contests. But it’s his very recent performance that really stands out. Since August 6th, the 6-foot-5 slugger has put together a .292/.395/.785 performance on the strength of his 10 home runs. Those are essentially peak Mark McGwire numbers.
Blash’s stats are great. His downside, however, is that he just turned 26. Players who are 26 don’t normally come up in prospect discussions. Most 26-year-old baseball players are either big leaguers or minor leaguers who aren’t worth thinking twice about. Blash, however, might be worthy of a second thought.
I first became aware of Blash a couple of months ago, when his name turned up in my search for the next Paul Goldschmidt. Blash’s performance at Double-A this year was very similar to Goldschmidt’s the year he made his debut. Both were relatively old for the Double-A level, hit for a ton of power, and went down on strikes in over 20% of their trips to the plate.
It goes without saying that Paul Goldschmidt is some mighty fine company. However, although their Double-A numbers are similar, comparing Blash to Goldschmidt wouldn’t be fair to anyone involved. For one, comparing any minor leaguer to Goldschmidt is a bit silly since hardly anyone develops the way Goldschmidt did. Furthermore, Blash is two years older than Goldschmidt was when he put together his tremendous Double-A campaign.
Blash may not be the next Paul Goldschmidt, but that’s not to say he can’t be a productive big leaguer. After all, he’s already proven he’s an excellent minor leaguer; and many of the best minor leaguers also find success at the game’s highest level. Let’s dive into the stats to see what his odds look like.
The Mariners took Blash in the eighth round out of Miami-Dade College way back in 2010, and he’s hit for crazy amounts of power ever since. Blash’s rattled off 224 extra base hits as a pro, leading to a .237 ISO. This year, he’s really outdone himself by posting an even better .284 ISO. In addition to his mammoth power, Blash also draws walks (12% walk rate this year) and swipes the occasional base, which helps diversify his offensive skill set.
As is with many powerful minor-league hitters, though, Blash’s power comes with loads of strikeouts. He’s whiffed in 27% of his career trips to the plate, including 26% this year. The power is great, but Blash’s lack of contact is very concerning.
As a result, KATOH isn’t really buying what Blash is selling. My system pegs him for a meager 1.3 WAR through age 28 with a 56% chance of cracking the big leagues over that span. It’s worth noting that Blash is closer to his age-28 season than most prospects, but even so, 1.3 WAR over the next three years isn’t particularly appealing.
The statistical comps echo KATOH’s pessimism. We basically see a few platoon hitters surrounded by a bunch of Quad-A types. Using league-adjusted, regressed stats, along with age, I calculated the Mahalanobis Distance between Blash’s performance in Double-A this year and every season in Double-A since 1990 in which a batter recorded at least 400 plate appearances. Below, you’ll find a list of historical players whose performances were nearest and dearest to Blash’s, ranked from most to least similar.

| Rank | Mah Dist | Player | Career PA | Career WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.68 | Tarrik Brock | 16 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 0.77 | Deik Scram | 0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | 1.06 | Mike Wilson | 28 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 1.15 | Pork Chop Pough | 0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 1.17 | Michael Hollimon | 25 | 0.1 |
| 6 | 1.26 | Donny Leon | 0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | 1.36 | Keon Broxton* | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | 1.37 | Joe Koshansky | 55 | 0.0 |
| 9 | 1.38 | Stefan Gartrell | 0 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 1.56 | Kinnis Pledger | 0 | 0.0 |
I also repeated the exercise for Blash’s Triple-A numbers.

| Rank | Mah Dist | Player | Career PA | Career WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.01 | Chad Rupp | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 1.66 | Jose Oliva | 264 | 0.0 |
| 3 | 1.98 | Mike Carp | 1,000 | 1.3 |
| 4 | 2.16 | Mike Simms | 744 | 1.9 |
| 5 | 2.26 | Andy Thompson | 9 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 2.45 | Jay Canizaro | 648 | 0.0 |
| 7 | 2.60 | Brooks Conrad* | 515 | 0.6 |
| 8 | 2.66 | Casper Wells | 758 | 3.0 |
| 9 | 2.76 | Luke Montz* | 56 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 2.79 | Mike Busch | 105 | 0.0 |
Kiley McDaniel had the opportunity to see Blash earlier this season, and ultimately came to the same conclusion. He reported average speed and 55-60 grade power and arm strength, labeling him an “NFL type dude” due to his size and athleticism. But despite his raw physical tools, Blash’s deep load and long arms make him an all-or-nothing hitter, which explains his plentiful strikeouts. Overall, Kiley isn’t fan of Blash’s late-count, low-contact hitting style, noting that hitters with this profile destroy minor-league pitching, but usually don’t fare as well in the majors. This is one of those instances where both the stats and the scouts agree. The major leagues aren’t kind to high-minors sluggers with contact problems who are in their mid-20s.
With an OPS north of .850 in more than 500 minor-league games, it goes without saying that Blash has earned his shot. And given his recent performance, along with the looming roster expansion, that shot will almost certainly come sooner rather than later. More likely than not, Blash will go down as yet another Quad-A slugger who couldn’t make enough contact to have sustainable success in the big leagues. But according to the data, there’s a reasonable chance he turns into a useful platoon bat. I, for one, hope he takes after Mike Carp or Casper Wells and sticks around awhile. If for no other reason, Major League Baseball could use a guy named Jabari Blash.
Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.
No way I am a real person
Who’d name a guy after a dog?
I love some of the names that come up in these comps lists. Nothing will ever top Motorboat Jones.
Except for…
http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=monds-001won
I can’t even get a mention in a group like these guys.
His daddy played football
Just like his big brother. (Younger, but bigger)
Expect him to turn into another Paul Goldschmidt if he moves to another organization (really, any of the other 29 will do, but the Blue Jays might do best). Otherwise, yes, he’ll likely join Pork Chop Pough in the AAAA Names of Fame.
Hmmm? There are other teams in the majors with good pitching parks besides the Mariners. While he’d likely do better in some other parks, it’s all relative, which is why they have park factors.
He’s talking about the First Universal Rule of baseball, which says that any hitter who leaves the Mariners organization immediately breaks out.
Oh, the “they always get better when they leave” thing. Yeah, I suppose it looks that way and I do get the joke. However, it is less of a real thing than an actuality.
I’ll put that on my Hall of Fame plaque
This has zero to do with park factors, and everything to do with player development. You could move the Mariners organization to Coors, Arlington, or Toronto and their position-player prospects would still bump along the bottom of the wOBA charts. And you probably could send all the best hitting prospects from every other org to the Mariners and watch them crash and burn their way into AAAA fodder at best and completely out of baseball at worst.
Some reason why rookie seasons are significant? What a player does in his rookie season doesn’t neccessarily have anything to do with how good they become. I’m also not sure what significance there is in choosing 2006 as a starting point. I guess because that’s one decade? People like to choose things in multiples of five, so I get why you might have chosen it for that reason, but that puts it right in the middle of Bill Bavasi’s time as GM, so it seems an odd choice. Mostly because you’re talking about Blash in the present, and the leadership of the M’s in 2006 is long gone, so they have nothing to do with Blash.
But to illustrate my point, in 2006 the M’s debuted two players in Adam Jones and Shin-Soo Choo who combined for -0.4 WAR, which means they sucked, right? Except we know they’ve both had excellent careers, combining for over 50 WAR so far. Looking at only the first year of the M’s rookie class of 2006 would lead one to conclude that they put out a very poor rookie class that year. Except we know it was anything but. It turned out to be a terrific rookie class, and we wouldn’t know that by looking solely at their rookie years.
Sure. And if Jabari Blash starts looking remotely like the next Adam Jones or Shin Soo Choo, you can count on the Mariners immediately trading him (and several other prospects) for a pitcher whose arm falls off, or a middle reliever who’ll soon be out of baseball, or a past-35 slugger who doesn’t take walks and can’t field.
He gets extra credit in my book for sounding like a character from a cheap science fiction novel:
“When he saw the massive Crondobeast dashing towards him, Jabari Blash lifted his phase gun, coolly estimating how many macrons he needed to set for his Gnomophotolizer scope. This time there would be no running for the spacepod.”
The Adventures of Grandmaster Jabari Blash and the Furious Fringe Five
Your Nerd score has just skyrocketed Humber! Thanks
Very nice.
Does Katoh account for the increasing strikeout rates in the majors? For example, a 25%+ K rate in the majors is much less of a problem than it would have been in the past. Does Katoh know this?
I hope KATOH doesn’t KNOW anything. The last thing we need is a self-aware baseball projection system.
Too late durn. Now get off your $@#$ and get me that sandwich!!
Yes, all minor league numbers are adjusted to league average for each year. So Blash’s ~25% strikeout rate is counted the same way a ~22% rate would have been a few years ago.
The Mariners actually have two Jabaris. Jabari Henry is currently at AA Jackson.
Right, and they occasionally trotted out a dual-Jabari OF in Jackson this year. Also interesting is that both Jabaris – Blash and Henry – were initially drafted in the same year by Texas, and then later drafted (albeit in different years) by the Mariners.
“Which Jabari was it that the scouts liked?”
“I don’t know, get both of them just to be sure.”
UPDATE players SET team = “Mariners” where first_name = “Jabari”
*2 rows updated*
Oh man, there was more than one?!
Trying to outdo the rest of baseball, Zduriencik has taken a page from Jay Gould and attempted to corner the Jabari market.
While it can be said that any of the other 29 teams wishing to transact in Jabaris has to “pay any price,” it cannot be reasonably determined what that price might be (and by extension if it has risen and therefore made the corner profitable.)
The international Jabari market can therefore be concluded to have not satisfied the requirements of possessing both a willing BUYER and a willing seller.
I just want to take a moment to state that this may be one of the best blog posts, and uniformly best group of replies, in the history of the internets.
Kudos to all of you.
Thank you for mentioning my BB’s.
I wonder what KATOH would have thought of a 26 year old Nelson Cruz.
Or is that a bad example ?
Not a bad example at all. Cruz showed a little more speed and BABIP, but otherwise, they looked pretty similar. Cruz is kind of an exception to the rule, though.
Josh Donaldson was 26 when he first saw any real playing time, 27 in his first full season.
Given Jeff’s general GIF-making prowess and internetting skills, I was shocked when this article did not include a remake of the Salt ‘n’ Pepa song to accompany the title.
Not even a mention?