Dallas Keuchel Contract Extension Could Prove Difficult
Dallas Keuchel’s continued progress into an ace is one of the major reasons Houston is contending earlier than anyone predicted. After a good year in 2014, he is a Cy Young candidate, and perhaps front-runner, for the first place Houston Astros. The left-hander recently expressed interest in a contract extension, and Houston Astros general manager Jeff Luhnow provided a stock response about continually re-evaluating players for potential extensions. However, an extension for Keuchel is not an easy one to figure out given his proximity to arbitration and an uncertain award once he gets there.
Keuchel might have been overlooked few years ago because he lacks a fastball above even 90 mph, and there might have been some skepticism about his success last year due to a 6.6 K/9 rate that placed in the bottom third of qualified starters, but Keuchel uses an array of pitches to keep getting better. Keuchel has spent time working with Astros pitching coach Brent Strom, and that work has paid off in a big way. His 2.28 ERA ranks second in the American League and he excels at aspects of the game not picked up by peripheral statistics — although those same peripheral statistics also rank among the best in the game.
Keuchel strikes out only eight players per nine innings, but due to his efficiency, using K/9 for Keuchel distorts his effectiveness. Consider: Keuchel’s 22.8% strikeout rate ranks 10th in the American League. Combined with a great walk rate, Keuchel’s 2.66 FIP is third in the AL and his 5.4 WAR ranks just behind Chris Sale’s 5.6 mark this season. With his low ERA, Keuchel is first in the American League in RA/9 WAR and as the only AL pitcher in the top three of both, he has a very good chance at taking home the Cy Young award after the season. As a first-time arbitration-eligible player, Keuchel is looking for his first big payday after making near the minimum thus far in his career.
Determining how much Keuchel will receive in arbitration is still up in the air at this point. Last year’s arbitration numbers should be able to provide some comparison for Keuchel. The below chart shows a few of the first-time arbitration-eligible starting pitchers after last season.
| WAR | 2015 $M | |
|---|---|---|
| Jake Arrieta | 7.6 | 3.6 |
| Carlos Carrasco | 4.5 | 2.3 |
| Alex Cobb | 8.3 | 4.0 |
| Nathan Eovaldi | 5.5 | 3.3 |
| Miguel Gonzalez | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Chris Tillman | 6.2 | 4.3 |
| Wade Miley | 7.4 | 3.5 |
| Lance Lynn | 10.5 | 7.0 |
| Dallas Keuchel | 10.8 | ? |
The salaries for Lynn and Miley were part of three-year contract extensions both players signed for around $20 million, with Miley’s deal including a team option potentially buying out a free-agent season. Unlike the arbitration process, where salaries escalate every year, Lynn’s contract provided an equal amount of money over the contract. In arbitration, Lynn likely would have made closer to $5 million than the $7 million he is receiving this season. Given Keuchel’s great year, he likely will be in line for a little bit more than Lynn, although it does not appear any first-year pitcher has actually gone to arbitration and received more than the $4.35 million Dontrelle Willis received a decade ago, which could suppress Keuchel’s number by a little. If we estimate Keuchel receiving $6 million in arbitration, we could see the base of a potential extension around Lynn’s $22 million deal — and perhaps about double that for a year or two of free agency. The problem with these estimations is that, at this point, Keuchel’s arbitration award is subject to considerable fluctuation.
If Keuchel were to take home a Cy Young award, his arbitration award could rise well above $6 million as arbitrators treat award-winners differently than the rest of players. Over the last ten years, only four players have won Cy Young awards in either league and not already been under contract for the following season or a free agent: Max Scherzer, David Price, Tim Lincecum, and Clayton Kershaw. The chart below shows the players’ progress through their arbitration years.
A few notes: 1) Lincecum and Price were super-two eligible so their first year of arbitration occurred earlier than the rest. 2) Kershaw signed a two-year contract to avoid his first two seasons of arbitration, followed by his massive extension before his final season of arbitration. 3) Lincecum signed a pair of two-year contracts to avoid all four years of arbitration.
| Player | Super-2 | Arb-1 | Arb-2 | Arb-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Lincecum | $8.0 | $13.0 | $18.0 | $22.0 |
| Clayton Kershaw | — | $7.5 | $11.0 | Extension |
| Max Scherzer | — | $3.8 | $6.7 | $15.5 |
| David Price | $4.4 | $10.1 | $14.0 | $19.8 |
The teams that had winners heading into their first year of arbitration signed those players to two-year contracts with first-year salaries close to double typical first-year salaries, while Price and Scherzer more than doubled their previous salaries after winning the Cy Young. In every case, the teams reached agreement prior to arbitration and avoided a hearing. Given that two-year guarantees were given to Lincecum and Kershaw, an arbitration award might have been even higher, and those first-year salaries are nearly half-a-decade old for that pair. A Keuchel Cy Young award could increase his arbitration award by several million dollars this season, potentially reaching eight figures. The increases carry over to the following seasons, as well. Good, but not great pitchers like Doug Fister, Jeff Samardzija, and Mat Latos all received close to $10 million this season while Cy Young winners have received or would receive around double that amount.
This uncertainty could amount to a $20 million difference over just three years of arbitration, and that could make it very difficult for both parties to come to a consensus on the value of a contract. Placing value on free-agent years that are four seasons away is difficult regardless of the player, and they would be very difficult even if Keuchel’s Cy Young situation was already known. Adding the uncertainty of the award at this point in the negotiations compounds the difficulty. The Astros have carried low payrolls for several years and should be in very good position to add salaries. Keuchel is exactly the type of player the team should be looking to lock up long-term, but given how close Keuchel is to a large, guaranteed payday, there might not be enough motivation on both sides to get a deal done. There might have been some uncertainty about Keuchel entering the season, and that uncertainty might have created the best opportunity to get a long-term deal done. Now that Keuchel has erased doubts about his performance and gotten so close to his first million-dollar payday, the opportunity for a long-term team-friendly deal is likely past.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
pretty sure DK is a lefty bro
Duh-Thanks.
He’s a lefty.
“After a good year in 2014, he is a Cy Young candidate and perhaps front-runner for the first place Houston Astros. ”
Is he the front runner for the Houston Astros or the front runner for the Cy Young? What are you trying to convey with this sentence? Grammar dude.
I think you’re looking for “Grammar, dude”, unless you’re inferring he is a dude of grammar.
Lolz you showed him
You mean “implying.” The writer implies; the reader infers. Unless you are suggesting that he is inferring when he read the article?
Mr. McNamee told me that he believes the Grammar Dude was implying that he is the runner at the front of the sentence and is thus not only the Grammar Dude but also the Felix of Phonics.
Looking forward to a Kike vs. Keuchel matchup.
Careful what you say, man.
I’m not one for sensitivity but that seemed pretty tasteless. Of course there’s the possibility that you were implying a statistical comparison, for whatever reason, but aside from initials I’m not sure there are two pitchers that are more different from one another than those two.
I am glad we have people like you on the internet.
His name is Enrique
Dallas “Brandon Webb” Keuchel.
The similarities are incredible IMO
He has been born again
Are we sure that Brandon Webb didn’t just grow a beard and start throwing with his left hand?
you should sort the first chart
probably should have, although this is a good time to mention that the chart is sortable by clicking on it.
ah! wasn’t as clear on my phone. perfect
you just HAD to slip Lance Lynn in there
ANOTHER Craig Edwards Cardinals puff piece
Dallas Keuchel is having a career year like RA Dickey had.
Doubt Any team Will pay him any Ace type of money. I’m sure he’ll win the Cy Young, and wouldn’t be surprised if the money he makes in arbitration because of it will be the highest yearly salary of his career.
The comparison to Dickey is bizzare. Not only are they completely different pitchers repertoire wise and batted ball profile wise, but Dickey had his career year when he was around 37. Keuchel is 27.
Think you just pulled a name out of a hat there.
A left hander who will lead the league in ground ball rate two years running…. being compared to an ancient knuckle baller.
Keuchel almost has to be signed to an extension. 5/75 6/85 sounds reasonable. I am a stros fan though so may be blinded a bit. He doesn’t have the pedigree or long track record to go much beyond that.
I’d bet as a FA he would get 6/120ish.
35 mil now that I look at it is a lot of money. Although he is under control so you have to deflate it a bit.
6/120? You are way off. He doesn’t have the “pedigree” but MLB teams won’t care nearly as much as his performance. Look at what Lester and Scherzer got last year and then add inflation. Keuchel would get 200 milliom plus on the FA market.
What he would get on the market now, has absolutely nothing to do with his contract. He is under team control, with slow moving arbitration money.
You end up weighing risk vs reward, for both parties. Does he become a superstar who would get the 200 million dollars at age 31 or does he fall back into a 3 win pitcher or blow his elbow out.
I would assume max he would make in his arbitration years would be 35 million and that is pushing it. But that money isnt guaranteed. It does if you sign a contract. That is why players give up years before hitting free agency.
I can’t see that deal happening.
The moment when it could make sense for a player to take a deal like that is when they’re in a position similar to Jon Singleton’s when he signed his deal a few years back: earning the major league minimum, and several seasons removed from arbitration.
It can make sense to take a below-market deal then, because the players secures some guarantee of financial security. It ensures that if Jon Singleton bats .200 now and for the rest of his life, he’ll still have enough money to never work another day.
Keuchel could need Tommy John surgery after his next start and he’d still make several million in arbitration in a few months’ time. He’s past the point where he needs to worry about having enough money to live comfortably, so there’s little reason for him to sign away his age-31 or age-32 seasons for a pittance.
He’s set to become a FA following his age-30 season, and that’ll probably be the only major payday he gets. At that point, the extra year or two can make all the difference. The value of hitting the market at 30 rather than 32 is far greater than the value of his potential earnings with a 5/75 or 6/85 extension over what he’d make in arbitration. He could well land a 5-year deal at 30, and maybe even push some team into going a 6th year. At 32, several years into his decline, his odds of a long-term deal will be very slim.
Does he get to keep his stupid beard?
Id expect the Hamels contract to be the basis if this happens.
Let me clear this up.
09 after the world series MVP they bought out his arbitration
2009: $4.4M, 2010: $6.6M, 2011: $9.5M
Add 2 to each number
6.5 8.5 11.5 – Then buy 3 years $19.5M $22.5M $22.5M
That would be roughly 6 years 90 million. So bump it to 6 years 100 million. Which would leave him to hypothetically still hit FA at age 33.
He’s locked up through his age 30 season. Why extend past that? 2 good-great years in what should be his prime years don’t justify spending 10-20M a year locking up a pitcher into his early 30s. Especially not when that’s the time you’ll need to start locking up the bats. The bats like Correa who are more likely to keep producing in 4 years.
Play the arbitration game for 3 years, if he’s still an ace, congratulations you got 5 good years out of him. Now he’s 30 and someone else will pay him 25M to decline while you’re extending/paying Correa.