Let’s Talk About Miguel Sano
There are a lot of rookies getting attention this season. And with good reason — it’s been a pretty good year for rookie position players. But while Kris Bryant, Kyle Schwarber, Joc Pederson, Jung-Ho Kang, Randal Grichuk are Carlos Correa getting lots of pub, it seems as though Miguel Sano has not generated the same volume of coverage nationally as have his peers. And that’s a shame, because he’s just as deserving of praise.
Perhaps you’ve heard some variation of that old saying, “no matter what you do, there will always be someone better.” And perhaps that’s keeping Sano out of the spotlight. For instance, he’s not the youngest rookie this season. That honor goes to Correa. Francisco Lindor and Addison Russell are also younger than Sano. Sano has also not been the best rookie hitter, in terms of either cumulative or rate stats. In terms of cumulative stats, the reason why is obvious — he’s only been in the majors for about a little over a month, while plenty of the aforementioned rookies have been up since at least June, and many even earlier. In terms of rate stats like wRC+, he comes in behind Schwarber, and not by a small margin — Schwarber has been 25% better at the dish so far in their respective careers. In terms of slugging percentage, Grichuk and Sano are 69 points behind Schwarber, and Sano comes up 23 points behind Schwarber in terms of OBP. But once you look past the fact that Sano has been second-best to Schwarber, you can see a different pattern emerging.
Namely, that Schwarber and Sano are pretty far ahead of the rookie pack, so much so that it’s beginning to look like a Brett Lawrie situation. Brett Lawrie, if you’ll recall, came up in August of 2011 and promptly lit the world on fire. In 171 plate appearances in those last two months of the 2011 season, Lawrie hit .293/.373/.580, good for a .477 wOBA and a 157 wRC+, and it looked like the Blue Jays had a future star on their hands. Lawrie, of course, hasn’t come anywhere near that season since. In his four seasons since, he’s hit .262/.312/.403, for a .314 wOBA and 97 wRC+. There’s nothing wrong with that, of course, but it’s not the superstar level that his rookie performance seemed to foretell.
Getting back to this year’s rookies, I took a look at all the rookies since baseball integrated in 1947 who recorded between 100 and 250 plate appearances in their rookie season, to approximate the playing time that guys like Lawrie got and Schwarber and Sano are getting right now. I found there were 2,119 such players, and only a handful of them had gone to town — “going to town” defined, in this case, as a 150 wRC+ or better:
| Best Rookie Hitters, 100-250 PA in Rookie Season, 1947-Pres. |
|---|
| Season | Player | G | PA | HR | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | wRC+ | WAR |
| 1957 | Bob Hazle | 41 | 155 | 7 | 11.6% | 9.7% | 0.246 | 0.420 | 0.403 | 0.477 | 0.649 | 0.486 | 207 | 1.8 |
| 2015 | Kyle Schwarber | 31 | 119 | 8 | 11.8% | 26.1% | 0.291 | 0.406 | 0.330 | 0.420 | 0.621 | 0.442 | 187 | 1.6 |
| 1959 | Willie McCovey | 52 | 219 | 13 | 10.0% | 16.0% | 0.302 | 0.379 | 0.354 | 0.429 | 0.656 | 0.467 | 185 | 3.1 |
| 1988 | Gregg Jefferies | 29 | 118 | 6 | 6.8% | 8.5% | 0.275 | 0.309 | 0.321 | 0.364 | 0.596 | 0.420 | 180 | 1.4 |
| 2005 | Mike Jacobs | 30 | 112 | 11 | 8.9% | 19.6% | 0.400 | 0.294 | 0.310 | 0.375 | 0.710 | 0.449 | 179 | 1.1 |
| 1990 | Frank Thomas | 60 | 240 | 7 | 18.3% | 22.5% | 0.199 | 0.421 | 0.330 | 0.454 | 0.529 | 0.437 | 178 | 2.4 |
| 1991 | Phil Plantier | 53 | 175 | 11 | 13.1% | 21.7% | 0.284 | 0.376 | 0.331 | 0.420 | 0.615 | 0.448 | 175 | 2.3 |
| 1970 | Gene Tenace | 38 | 128 | 7 | 18.0% | 23.4% | 0.257 | 0.368 | 0.305 | 0.430 | 0.562 | 0.435 | 175 | 1.5 |
| 1991 | Bret Barberie | 57 | 162 | 2 | 12.3% | 13.6% | 0.162 | 0.400 | 0.353 | 0.435 | 0.515 | 0.418 | 169 | 2.0 |
| 1954 | Bill Skowron | 87 | 237 | 7 | 8.0% | 7.6% | 0.237 | 0.344 | 0.340 | 0.392 | 0.577 | 0.429 | 166 | 2.1 |
| 1968 | Bill Sudakis | 24 | 102 | 3 | 14.7% | 13.7% | 0.195 | 0.300 | 0.276 | 0.382 | 0.471 | 0.386 | 166 | 1.3 |
| 2006 | Luke Scott | 65 | 249 | 10 | 12.0% | 17.3% | 0.285 | 0.383 | 0.336 | 0.426 | 0.621 | 0.436 | 165 | 2.9 |
| 2009 | Randy Ruiz | 33 | 130 | 10 | 7.7% | 26.9% | 0.322 | 0.366 | 0.313 | 0.385 | 0.635 | 0.431 | 164 | 1.0 |
| 2008 | Chris Dickerson | 31 | 122 | 6 | 13.9% | 28.7% | 0.304 | 0.410 | 0.304 | 0.413 | 0.608 | 0.436 | 164 | 1.4 |
| 1994 | Rico Brogna | 39 | 138 | 7 | 4.3% | 21.0% | 0.275 | 0.411 | 0.351 | 0.380 | 0.626 | 0.427 | 163 | 1.3 |
| 2015 | Miguel Sano | 34 | 141 | 7 | 16.3% | 33.3% | 0.267 | 0.406 | 0.284 | 0.397 | 0.552 | 0.405 | 162 | 1.1 |
| 2013 | Khris Davis | 56 | 153 | 11 | 7.2% | 22.2% | 0.316 | 0.293 | 0.279 | 0.353 | 0.596 | 0.406 | 158 | 1.1 |
| 2003 | Jason Michaels | 76 | 125 | 5 | 12.0% | 17.6% | 0.239 | 0.378 | 0.330 | 0.416 | 0.569 | 0.421 | 158 | 1.6 |
| 2011 | Brett Lawrie | 43 | 171 | 9 | 9.4% | 18.1% | 0.287 | 0.318 | 0.293 | 0.373 | 0.580 | 0.407 | 157 | 2.6 |
| 2011 | Allen Craig | 75 | 219 | 11 | 6.8% | 18.3% | 0.240 | 0.344 | 0.315 | 0.362 | 0.555 | 0.395 | 154 | 2.3 |
| 1989 | Mark Carreon | 68 | 147 | 6 | 8.2% | 11.6% | 0.180 | 0.318 | 0.308 | 0.370 | 0.489 | 0.387 | 153 | 1.2 |
| 1996 | Brian Giles | 51 | 143 | 5 | 13.3% | 9.1% | 0.256 | 0.358 | 0.355 | 0.434 | 0.612 | 0.435 | 153 | 1.4 |
| 1997 | Aaron Ledesma | 43 | 104 | 2 | 12.5% | 8.7% | 0.148 | 0.372 | 0.352 | 0.437 | 0.500 | 0.414 | 152 | 0.8 |
| 1986 | Kal Daniels | 74 | 207 | 6 | 10.6% | 14.5% | 0.199 | 0.356 | 0.320 | 0.398 | 0.519 | 0.402 | 151 | 2.0 |
| 1999 | Erubiel Durazo | 52 | 185 | 11 | 14.1% | 23.2% | 0.265 | 0.385 | 0.329 | 0.422 | 0.594 | 0.430 | 151 | 1.6 |
| 2003 | Jason Bay | 30 | 107 | 4 | 17.8% | 27.1% | 0.241 | 0.389 | 0.287 | 0.421 | 0.529 | 0.412 | 151 | 1.2 |
| 1991 | Dave Hollins | 56 | 172 | 6 | 9.9% | 15.1% | 0.212 | 0.325 | 0.298 | 0.378 | 0.510 | 0.392 | 150 | 1.5 |
Here, we have 27 players of varying quality, making it easy to draw the conclusions you like from this table. If you’re an optimist, you look at this table and see players like Willie McCovey, Frank Thomas and Brian Giles and conclude that Schwarber and Sano are destined for greatness. If you’re a pessimist, players like Bob Hazle, Phil Plantier and Chris Dickerson look like cautionary tales. And there are plenty of players in between.
What we can take away from this list is that even among the outliers, Sano has a pretty good walk rate. That’s not necessarily a surprise, as both before and after his injury, Sano had a great walk rate. Sano swings at five percent fewer pitches than the league average hitter, and his 4.25 pitches seen per plate appearance ranks ninth in the majors among hitters with at least 100 PA. Sano is willing to wait for his pitch.
The question he will need to answer heading into next season is whether he is too willing to wait for it. Sano has swung at less than 60% of the pitches in the strike zone, and as such pitchers are not having a tough time getting ahead of him in the count. Sano has worked a 3-0 count in just 3.55% of his plate appearances, and an 0-2 count in 34.75% of them. Contrast that with a player like a similarly patient hitter like Joey Votto, whose respective marks are 7.98% and 14.31%, and we see that Sano has some work to do to get the count in his favor. Now, that’s obviously a tough comp — Votto is basically the master of the strike zone — but even a rookie with a similar plate-discipline profile such as Joc Pederson is faring better getting into ideal counts and avoiding the opposite. Pederson has generated 3-0 counts in 5.43% of his PAs this season, and only landed in 0-2 in 21.09% of them.
One thing to keep in mind is that it won’t take Sano long to bring his percentages up, but until he does, he is going to face an uphill battle to get his strikeout rate in check. One thing that helped him this season at Double-A compared to his time there in 2013 was that he cut down his strikeouts by more than five percentage points. That hasn’t translated to the majors, but hope springs eternal that he’ll adjust. It’s the only major flaw in his game at the moment.
Among other possible flaws that his debut-season data reveals, the biggest seems to be his performance against changeups, and he hasn’t been so bad against them as to suggest some sort of fatal flaw. Likewise, he looks like he may need some work on getting to pitches up in the zone, but that’s not a big deal quite yet. As a young major leaguer, pitchers could bust Matt Holliday on the inside corner of the plate with ease. These days, that’s not really the best idea. One other thing that isn’t a flaw, per se, is that Sano isn’t going to post a .400+ BABIP for his career.
Sano doesn’t hit a ton of grounders, he is capable of taking the ball the other way, he has proven adept at handling most pitches (for instance, he ranks 27th against four-seamers, 10th against two-seamers and 18th against curveballs at the moment) and he has even done well in clutch situations. Oh, and he can do this:
There are lots of great rookies this year. But even with the Twins slowly sliding out of the playoff picture, let’s not forget to talk about Miguel Sano.
Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.
I knew it! I remember saying to myself when I first saw Sano play that we were looking at the next Rico Brogna.
I’d like to see you further break down Sano (and other comparable rookies + Votto) based on situations with runners on base and runners in scoring position vs empty bases. I’ve been watching Sano for the last month and if memory serves, he has a more aggressive approach when there are runners on base. Also, pitchers tend to pitch around him if 1st is open.
I look forward to your thoughts and analysis…
You can look at the splits here on FG… the data doesn’t support this, as Sano has similar BB rates with and without men on, lower K rates with men on and a MUCH higher wRC+ with men on (same true for men on in scoring position.)
Though you did not address it, it should be noted that if you consider leverage and not “men on,” it is tougher to tell — mostly because the low/med numbers are similar and the high leverage data only has n=8.
“I like looking at a lot of pitches,’’ Sano told USA TODAY Sports in a far-ranging interview in Spanish. “I don’t like to swing in 0-0 counts. I don’t feel confident. I prefer to hit with a strike on. I always like getting to a full count.’’
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2015/07/21/miguel-sano-next-top-power-hitting-prospect/30468615/
What really gets me is that line-drive rate: 28.2%
Kind of remarkable given how often he swings and misses.
About those homers, obviously his 29.2% HR/FB rate is not sustainable, but if this fella learns to hit a few more fly balls, look out!
Sano may hit more HR in 2016 than any of the current rookies.
I’m rurprised that you would write this kind of piece in an era in which I thought everyone was familiar with the concept of small sample size. Sano has
only been up for about a month and he’s off to a great start, but so what?
Claiming that, “Schwarber and Sano are pretty far ahead of the rookie pack” is
nonsense. They’re like a couple of runners who jump into the Boston Marathon
at about the 15 mile mark. It’s not so hard to be the best runner if the
other runners have already been running for over an hour!
If you compare Scrwarber and Sano’s stats to what Pederson and Bryant and Franco had at a similar point in their seasons you’ll find that the “race” is
a lot more competitive than your article suggests.
The entire point of noting a sample size is to explain away something that has no verifiable precedent. In this case, a guy who has done nothing but crush older and more advanced competition is… crushing older and more advanced competition.
The piece was a lot more devoted to illustrating areas that can be improved upon than it was showering praise on Sano. Furthermore, not a single soul reading this would so much as bat an eyelid if Sano turns out to be the best rookie from this class.
Long story short, the point was to put a guy whom we all know as an absurdly gifted player and tell us the only thing that can change our minds. And it’s slim, slim pickens.
This was about position player rookies, so noted.
But just for interests sake Osuna is ~4 months younger than Correa.
Is there some reason why it seems like all or most rookies he high BABIP’s?
they hit the ball hard, probably run everything out a little harder, and are at their peak speed. for instance kris bryant per kiley was a 55/50 runner.
Probably an age thing
Non-pitchers this year have a .299 BABIP throughout the MLB
Non-pitcher Rookies have a .309 BABIP
Players 35+ have a .266 BABIP
Players 30-34 have a .296 BABIP
Players 25-29 have a .301 BABIP
Players 24- have a .315 BABIP
The above ages are all for non-pitchers. Not surprisingly BABIP seems to lower as you age.
There’s probably some selection bias, too. Teams are more likely to stick with a veteran hitter through a low-BABIP slump (if only because they can’t just option him down), but a rookie who isn’t getting hits is likely headed back to Triple-A.
Also, shallower meaningful data on where the player hits certain types of pitches and what not. Over time, they get reliable data of where to position the fielders against them, and where to pitch them.
babip is blown out of proportion. It is not a good way to measure a hitter. You can only see signs if a guy his hitting way over (or under) his career babip numbers
Just dropped Maikel Franco to pick up Sano in a 10-team mixer, but other than Franco’s recent wrist bruise, I’m not sure there is much air between them.
in an obp theres a huge difference
But there’s also a huge difference in sample size.
If Sano starts hitting .250 (like Bryant has), the OBP will be much closer.
Keep in mind how very little can go poorly when a rookie sees more pitches. His production would obviously be higher if he went into aggressive mode, but the distinction between the two is excellent production and overwhelming. He’s clearly doing it on purpose and there is ample precedence that supports what he says. I get the feeling that if his team was in a more competitive position that he would adapt a different strategy. Again, precedence being his numbers with runners on, as stated in the article. If his exceedingly patient approach isn’t a strategy to adapt to the rigors of MLB pitching, it’s certainly a beneficial side effect.
Not all of the greats come up smashing the ball like this, but every piece of evidence he has ever presented indicates that we’re witnessing just that; a superstar in the first leg of his career. And most importantly, the few minor flaws we have seen are entirely under his control.
So Sano hit a home run last night on a first pitch
Will he have SS eligibility in Yahoo leagues next year? I read their page on eligibility and can’t figure it out… thanks for any advice.
No, he would need to start 5 games there to get it. Or play in 10 games (such as be switched into the position in the middle of a game.) So, short answer, no. Enjoy the ride this year.