Let’s Watch Yoenis Cespedes Steal Third Base
Ask Joe Maddon, and he’ll tell you what’s wrong. To this point, the Cubs have simply been out-played. The Cubs have been out-pitched, they’ve been out-hit, and they’ve been out-executed in between. The Mets have played quality baseball, not giving the Cubs very many openings of any significance, and that’s a sure-fire way to end up with a 3-0 series standing. When a team like the Mets blends ability with smarts, that makes for a hell of a foe.
Quietly, over the course of the year, the Mets were an above-average baserunning team, but they weren’t much of a stolen-base team. In the playoffs, and especially against the Cubs, the Mets have turned their aggressiveness up, responding to worse hitting conditions by trying to squeeze everything they can out of being on base. Tuesday night, a pivotal play was Yoenis Cespedes stealing third base in the sixth inning of a tie game. The Mets didn’t used to do much stealing of third, but Cespedes would come in to score on a wild third strike, and his would be the winning run. It was an important event, and somewhat stunning for the ease with which Cespedes advanced.
This is the kind of thing that could use some background. Here’s Cespedes, sliding in safely:
It might be hard to tell from that, but Cespedes was safe by a mile. We’ll come back to that later, but consider now some of the other examples of the Mets’ in-series aggressiveness. I apologize for all the screenshots but I’m afraid there’s no other way. Here we have David Wright stealing second base:
Wright was stealing against Jon Lester, and I don’t need to tell you any more about that. The throw beat Wright to the bag, but it bounced and it wasn’t cleanly handled, so Wright wound up safe. Here’s Juan Lagares stealing third base:
Lagares, also, was stealing against Lester. The throw beat Lagares to the bag, but it was off-line, forcing Kris Bryant out of position. Lagares wound up safe. Here’s Lagares subsequently scoring on a sacrifice fly:
Little bit of a theme here. Lagares was testing the arm of Kyle Schwarber. The throw beat him home, but it short-hopped, putting Miguel Montero in a sub-optimal position. Lagares scored. Moving on, here’s Curtis Granderson stealing second base:
Close play. Granderson was stealing against Jake Arrieta, who’s allowed an 82% success rate the last two years. The throw beat Granderson to the bag, but it wasn’t caught cleanly, so Granderson wound up safe. Here’s Granderson stealing third base:
The throw beat Granderson to the bag, but it was just a little off, so Granderson wound up safe. We’ve still got more! Here’s Granderson getting thrown out trying to steal second:
The throw beat Granderson to the bag, and this time it was right on the money. Granderson also had his hand blocked by an opponent’s foot. So that was an out, but the Mets remained aggressive. Later on, Daniel Murphy scored on a contact play:
The throw from Anthony Rizzo beat Murphy home, but it was too far up the line and on the other side of Montero’s body, so Murphy was safe. Rizzo came that close to turning a 3-2 double play. Instead, Montero couldn’t sweep over in time.
The point is not that the Mets kept getting lucky. It’s just, in all these cases, the baserunners were beaten by the throws. Thankfully for them, most of the throws were off-target, buying the baserunners extra time to get in safe. Many throws are off-target. Perhaps the majority of throws are off-target. It’s not like you should ever expect the opponent to be perfect. But for the most part, the Mets’ aggressiveness was paying off by a slim margin. With better throws, all these runners are out. And then the aggressiveness doesn’t look so smart. It’s a difficult game, in other words. So many baserunning plays are bang-bang, and heroes are separated ever so slightly from goats.
So many close plays. So many of them working out in the Mets’ favor. In contrast to those plays, Cespedes could’ve practically walked to third on Tuesday:
The throw was pretty good, but it didn’t matter. The pop time was pretty good, but it didn’t matter. It didn’t matter because Miguel Montero might as well have been entirely uninvolved. Cespedes stole that base on Trevor Cahill, and he stole that base on the Cubs’ middle infield. Look at the jump that Cespedes got:
You see Trevor Cahill, at release. And you see Yoenis Cespedes, in a full sprint, somewhere in the vicinity of half the way to third. I saw Statcast measured Cespedes’ time to third at 2.9 seconds. That’s not very many seconds. No one bothered to hold Cespedes on, and Cahill didn’t give him much of a different look, so Cespedes felt secure. And once he saw how slow Cahill was to home, the door was wide open.
Cespedes ran on the second pitch. Here’s the first one:
Cespedes didn’t threaten to go. He was in strict observation mode, and he would’ve observed Cahill’s high leg kick. He would’ve observed that Cahill took 1.7 seconds (or thereabouts) to get the ball to home. Cahill gave Cespedes one look, and that was it, and there didn’t appear to be any middle-infielder activity. So the opportunity was right there, and Cespedes took immediate advantage. You saw the steal above. Here’s a different angle of it:
It’s just an absurd jump that Cespedes got. And as a matter of fact, something might look strange to you. Something definitely looked strange to me. So let’s slow that initial sequence down a bit:
Cespedes actually took off before first move. Before Cahill had done anything but return his view to the catcher, Cespedes was turning and beginning his sprint. He didn’t wait on the leg to come up. On the first Cahill pitch Cespedes watched, he started bringing the leg up as soon as he turned back to face the catcher. On the second pitch, Cahill turned back to face the catcher and paused for a moment or two before bringing the leg up, but Cespedes seemed to break as if Cahill would do the same thing the second time as he did the first time. The fact that he didn’t actually made Cespedes’ steal easier. That delay gave Cespedes more time to cover ground, ultimately making his steal a gimme. In theory Cahill could’ve wheeled around and tried to pick Cespedes off, but he wasn’t paying the runner enough attention.
After the game, Maddon said the Cubs practically allowed Cespedes to steal third base. It’s hard to know exactly what he meant by that, but I’m guessing the Cubs just made it too easy, by not paying Cespedes more attention. They didn’t run any infielder decoys, they didn’t attempt a pick-off, and Cahill was sufficiently slow to the plate to make Cespedes’ job relatively simple. Cespedes’ jump was so good I kind of want to call it a mis-read. I’m not sure, but it seems like Cespedes took off a moment too early. Sometimes, runners pay for that, but the Cubs didn’t do anything, so now it just looks like Cespedes can see the future. He broke before the pitcher did, and he stole a huge base.
It improved the Mets’ odds of winning by five percentage points. I calculated a break-even rate of 65% — that is, it made sense for Cespedes to go, if he thought he’d be safe more than 65% of the time. Given the jump he ultimately got, there was nothing the Cubs could do, once Cahill neglected to turn around. Maybe they could’ve hoped for a ticky-tacky replay review, to see if Cespedes came off the base for a blink. But the play wasn’t even close enough for that. And in the end, getting to third is what allowed Cespedes to get to home. The Mets, to some extent, have gotten some good fortune with their NLCS baserunning. And the Cubs have probably deserved that.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.









Am I the only one who sees Joe Maddon as racially divisive?
Yes.
There’s an enormous difference in how Mr. Maddon treats his white vs. non-white players. I’m just not comfortable with him at the helm.
Care to elaborate? What does he do differently with Castro, Fowler, Baez that he doesn’t do with others?
So where would I stand with Maddon?
Ignore CSW. He’s freaking out about pornography in the comments on the Cliff Pennington post. He’s either a particularly abstruse troll, or just your garden variety wandered-in-from-Fox nutbar.
Because I’m a Republican, then I automatically came over from Fox? What are you saying? FACIST.
yes, i am a FACIST. there’s just something about people with faces….
If Cespedes can see the future, it must suck to know the Cubs will win the next four to face Miami in the World Series.
Now, remember Marty. After you came with me to 2015, we went back to 1985 and 1885, subsequently changing the space-time continuum altering the 2015 we observed to a completely unknown 2015.
You mean the $500k I dropped at my Casino (Biff’s) on the Cubs at 50:1 never happened?
It took an annoying amount of searching just now to figure out how the hell the Cubs theoretically wound up playing Miami in the World Series.
But just to be annoying he ran 24mph to 3rd base. That was nice.
Very doubtful that is accurate
Based on the data provided in this very article, it was 10.6 mph
That may be his average speed, but Statcast listed his max speed at 23.6 mph.
http://m.mlb.com/news/article/155125940/statcast-yoenis-cespedes-shows-off-speed
ThornyVainGreendarnerdragonfly
Cespedes had Cahill’s sequence down. Cespedes knew whether Cahill normally (or on this night) checks the runner once, twice etc. and simply went after he checked the first, second, or third time. Players are taught to leave as soon the pitcher turns his head. Thats how you steal second base.
steal third base***
Turning the head toward home plate is also the “go” for a timed pickoff play … for the same reason.
That’s the best jump I’ve ever seen. I spent so much time staring at the first GIF that I almost missed the much better-view GIF later in the article.
In baseball, a fielder who makes an accurate throw is called… sharp
Great steal, great baserunning overall from the Mets in the series. But this steal wouldn’t have meant anything at all except for a bizarre rule that I’ve never understood.
The next batter struck out! He was the third out, so the inning ended and Cespedes was stranded on third, right? No, because the ball got away from the catcher, so the guy was allowed to “steal first” despite the inning being already over.
Nothing illegitimate about it – that’s the rule. But can anyone explain it to me? It seems an anachronistic relic that is completely incongruous with the concept that offensive players who get out are, well, out.
Its not very complicated. On a dropped third strike the fielding team has to complete the out via a tag of the batter or force play at first. This goes for all situations except with a runner on first and less than 2 outs. I’m not sure there is really a ‘why’ here. That’s just how a strike out is completed, and honestly, I kind of like it. Its just part of baseball, you have to catch the ball to get an out. A runner at first isn’t out if the first baseman doesn’t catch it right? Why not the same with the catcher and the third strike?
The reason the batter is automatically out if there is a runner on first with less than two out is the same as the reason for the infield fly rule: it prevents the defense from dropping the ball on purpose in order to get a double play. If the batter were not automatically out, after a dropped third strike the runner would be forced, and the catcher could throw to second to start a 2-6-3 (or 2-4-3) double play.
A first baseman who scoops a ball out of the dirt still completes the out. A catcher who scoops the ball out of the dirt still has to complete the play by tagging the batter or throwing to first. It’s not consistent at all.
I believe the original purpose of the rule was to keep the completion of the out “clean” by requiring the catcher to make a clean defensive catch of the pitch. It’s an archaic rule meant to make things look nicer.
And yet the batter gets to attempt to take first after swinging at a pitch that was so far out of the strike zone it hit the dirt before the catcher’s glove.
Sure its consistent. Think of the ball after batter swings as any ordinary live ball. If it hits the ground, you gotta throw to first to get a force out. If you catch it before hitting the ground, its a fly-out. Not sure why that is “archaic”. Couldn’t we say most rules in baseball are archaic? I mean aren’t most rules archaic?
Not the rule that says no selfies while Fox Sports announcers are judging you.
It’s actually been in the rules since the very, very beginning: see “Rule 11th” in the Knickerbocker rules from 1845.
There are a lot of things that change after the batter has two strikes against him (foul balls don’t count as additional strikes, foul bunts are an out). This is just one more.
Personally, I’d actually like to see the rule expanded so the batter has the option to try to take first after any swinging strike, no matter the count. So if the batter thinks he can make it (passed ball/wild pitch) and he swung at the pitch, let him take off and try to “steal” first base. Would be one way to counter the low strike zone and the trend towards all the breaking pitches in the dirt, and give fast players with bad contact skills a chance to make baseball a little more exciting.
I really like this idea. The old saying “You can’t steal first base” would go out the window.
Speed hitters with good or bad contact skills would certainly see a little bump up in their production as pitchers would be less inclined to throw pitches out of the zone to them. Especially, as you say, those “waste a pitch” breaking balls in the dirt.