Luis Arraez Belongs on the Mountaintop

In early November, MLB Trade Rumors and Baseball Prospectus released their top 50 free agents lists, which included guesses about where each player would end up. Our focus in this article is on Luis Arraez, and in those two lists, seven very smart people and one random number generator made their best estimations about his likeliest destination. Only two of those experts picked the same team for him. The next week, MLB.com’s Mike Petriello broke down a whopping seven potential landing spots for Arraez. Only one of those teams was on either of the two previous lists. Lastly, just this weekend, a Fox Sports article with no byline explained why three teams would make the best fit for Arraez, and only one of those teams had any overlap with the previous three articles. By my count, that’s eight different experts, one robot, and one I-don’t-know-what making a total of 18 predictions. Somehow, those 18 predictions included 15 different landing spots for Arraez. That’s half the league! Only three teams got multiple votes, and no team got more than two. We’ve got a genuine mystery on our hands.
To some degree, all of this is understandable. Most projections have Arraez signing for either one year or two with an average annual value of $11 or $12 million. That means even the stingiest teams can afford him. And although Arraez is a poor defender who only projects for roughly 1.5 WAR (depending on your projection system), he’s never once put up a below-average season on offense. With the possible exception of the Dodgers, there is no such thing as a team that couldn’t find a spot for a hitter of Arraez’s caliber. ZiPS is slightly higher on Arraez than most systems, projecting him for 1.8 WAR in 2026. That’s more than we have projected in our Depth Charts either at first base, DH, or both for 21 different teams. Everybody can afford him. Almost everybody could use him. He really could end up anywhere.
While I don’t have any special insight about where Arraez will end up, I do have a strong preference. I want him to sign with the Rockies, and I want this for a very simple reason. I want to see Luis Arraez be the most Luis Arraez he can be. His skill set is unique in today’s game, and Coors Field is the perfect environment to let him flourish.
Let’s get the fit part out of the way early. Unsurprisingly, the Rockies have room on their roster for Arraez. After DFA’ing Michael Toglia, our Depth Charts expect them to get a nice round 0.0 WAR at first base from a combination of Troy Johnston, Blaine Crim, Charlie Condon, and the injured Kris Bryant. Likewise, the Rockies are projected to get 0.1 WAR from the DH position. Both marks are the worst in baseball. Even at his worst, Arraez represents a big upgrade from the replacement-level-by-committee the Rockies are currently set to roll out at those two spots.
I’m sure you already know Arraez’s résumé well, so I will stick to the highlights here. He won three consecutive batting titles from 2022-24, and last year, his .292 average ranked fourth in the NL. He has led his league in hits twice. He has posted the game’s lowest strikeout rate in each of the past four seasons. Year in and year out, he’s at the very bottom of the game in bat speed, exit velocity, and hard-hit rate, and right at the very top in contact rate, squared-up rate, and batting average. He does this by staying back, shortening up, and slapping the ball the other way. His average attack angle of six degrees – which just about perfectly matches the incoming angle of the average pitch – allows him to smack line drive after line drive into left field. Sports Info Solutions has been tracking line drive rate since 2002, and Arraez’s career line drive rate of 26.9% is the third highest over that period.
Arraez’s contact-above-all approach carries two main drawbacks. The first is that when you’re capable of hitting anything, you tend to swing at everything. Arraez has grown more and more chase-happy in recent years, and he’s finished in the bottom 20 in walk rate among qualified players in each of the last three seasons. The second drawback is that this approach precludes any chance for slugging.
Put those two factors together, and you find that the path to success is narrow, and it’s paved with so, so many singles. For most of Arraez’s career, that has worked out just fine. He has led baseball in singles in each of the past three seasons. In fact, he leads all hitters with 805 singles since his debut in 2019, even though he didn’t play anything approaching a full season until 2022. And he’s not just leading — he’s way, way in front. With 734 singles, Trea Turner is the only player who is within even 100 of Arraez. His entire game revolves around dumping the ball over the left side of the infield. Cal Raleigh may be the biggest dumper, but Arraez is the most prolific.
From 2019 to 2023, Arraez ran a combined 123 wRC+ with a .326 batting average, but more recently, the singles have dried up just a bit. He put up a 109 wRC+ in 2024 thanks to a career-low .078 ISO. In 2025, his hard-hit rate dropped to a minuscule 16.7%, the second-worst mark from a qualified hitter this decade. Accordingly, his BABIP dropped to .289, and he ended with a career-worst 104 wRC+. It’s worth noting that Arraez played through a painful thumb injury for much of 2024, got surgery last offseason, and then suffered a concussion early in the 2025 campaign. It’s hard to say how much time he has spent at or near 100% over the last two years. He is only 28, and it’s at least conceivable that, if fully healthy, he could go right back to winning batting titles in 2026. But even in his ugly 2025 season, he posted the best contact, whiff, and squared-up rates in baseball, hit more line drives than anybody else, and finished as an above-average contributor at the plate.
Part of the problem is that defenses are on to Arraez. Over the past several years, as outfielders across the league have played deeper and deeper in order to gobble up extra-base hits, they’ve been playing Arraez shallower and shallower. For the first five years of his career, left fielders played either 282 or 283 feet deep when Arraez was at the plate on the road. In 2024, that dropped to 280. In 2025, it dropped a whopping six feet, to 274. That was the second-shortest mark in baseball, behind only Chandler Simpson at 273. Not coincidentally, since his debut in 2019, Arraez leads all of baseball with 102 outs on balls that traveled between 235 and 260 feet. These are balls that just fail to drop in front of the outfielder. Year after year, Arraez hits more balls within this distance than anybody else in the league, and since 2022, only Steven Kwan has hit into more outs on these batted balls than Arraez, presumably because Kwan plays his home games at Progressive Field.
So Arraez is coming off a down season, he’s always going to be BABIP dependent, and outfielders are now playing him absurdly shallow because they know he’s not even interested in hitting it over their heads. You know what would be great? If we could deposit him gently into a ballpark that’s known for high BABIPs. A ballpark with an outfield so big that the fielders have to play deep, lest a ball in the gap or down the line sneak past them and turn into a triple. A ballpark where all those deep outfielders create the biggest dumping ground for singles the mind can imagine. Am I ringing any bells here?
Welcome to Coors Field, where the powers that be have pushed the fences way back in order to accommodate the would-be home run balls floating drag-free through the thin air. Coors is the best offensive park in the league. More specifically, with a park factor of 116, it’s the most singles-friendly park in the league. No other stadium has a mark above 108. That gap of eight points between first and second place is the largest of any type of base hit. Over the past three years, visiting left fielders have positioned themselves at an average depth of 308 feet at Coors Field, tied with Truist Park for the deepest in the league. (I excluded home teams from this because they play so many games at their own ballpark that if they have any particular tendencies, they’ll skew the results.)
During that same period, line drives between 230 and 260 feet to left field have a .993 batting average at Coors, compared to .854 at Petco Park, Arraez’s home for most of the last two seasons following his trade from the Marlins to the Padres in early May 2024. That’s a difference of 139 points! No one has hit more balls that fit those exact parameters over the past three seasons than Arraez, either in total or on a rate basis. If we narrow our search to line drives to left between 250 and 270 feet, Arraez leads the majors with 24 outs. That may sound like a small difference, but we’re talking about something like 13 points of batting average in a season. And keep in mind that if fielders decide to keep playing Arraez so shallow in that spacious Coors outfield, then they’re likely to let a few more balls skip past them, and those balls will keep on rolling while Arraez rounds the bases and pads his slim slugging percentage.
Coors also suppresses strikeouts, and back in November, Petriello pointed out that over 53 plate appearances in Denver, Arraez has never once struck out. Not once. When I raised the possibility of a mountain-dwelling Arraez, Dan Szymborski ran the numbers. That 1.8 projected WAR from ZiPS that I mentioned earlier assumed a neutral ballpark. During Arraez’s career-worst 2025 season, he called Petco Park his home. With a park factor of 97, Petco suppresses singles. Move Arraez from a neutral park to Coors, and ZiPS ups his projections from a 110 OPS+ to 117 and 1.8 WAR to 2.1. All of a sudden, Arraez projects as not just a major upgrade, but also as an above-average regular. And if it turns out that injuries were holding him back over the past two seasons, and he’s now back to his three-straight-batting-crowns form, who knows what kind of crazy batting average he could post in Colorado?
Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.
Could Arraez hit .400 in Colorado and still have a 99 wRC+?
No, lol. 2017 DJ LeMahieu hit .310/.374/.409 for a 94 wRC+. Arraez actually has almost the same ISO as Coors LeMahieu (.096 vs .109) so let’s give .400 Arraez a .400/.440/.510 line.
2016 LeMahieu hit .348/.416/.495 and scored a 130 wRC+, so I’m comfortable saying .400 Arraez is at least in the 150 range.
.400+ OBPs are valuable even at Coors, it turns out.
Using an online wOBA calculator that’s probably not up to date weights-wise but is close enough, if Arraez hits .400/.400/.400, reaching base only on singles, that puts him at a .352 wOBA. That’s exactly what Blaine Crim put up for the Rockies in 61 PAs last year and he had a 110 wRC+.
Roughly anything .375 or over guarantees an average line even at Coors with a .000 ISO and no walks.
but if he hits 50 sac flies…
(kidding, no one will be on third base)
(this is unfair as the Rockies’ offense was much better than their pitching, even adjusting for park, and also I am a Pirates fan and in no position to talk smack. wait no their offense was worse. hm)
Rockies 2025 team batting WAR: -3.7
Rockies 2025 team pitching WAR: 1.0
Say again?
you may have caught me in between edits
Not even in the pre-humidor Coors era would this happen. In 1998, Derrick Gibson hit .429 with an ISO of .048 and had a wRC+ of 140. And the Colorado-in-1998 park factor is probably closest to the biggest stadium-by-era adjustment that occurred in recent memory.
I always thought every single playoff team should try to trade for him as an elite pinch hitter. When every out matters, if you need a ball in play no matter what, he’s the guy.
This feels like the best usage case for Arraez, given his deficiencies in so many areas. But because BA is still sexy to so many people, he will never either be paid like a pinch hitter or get used like one.
Let’s say Arraez declines to where he is a true-talent 80-85 wRC+ player. Does that mean he surely isn’t a good pinch hitter option? If he’s only deployed in favorable matchups and when you want contact, especially if he can bring his same approach to pinch hitting, I think he could be a better option than an ostensibly more talented hitter.
The thing is he does make a lot of outs, as his OBP attests.
Yes, there are very specific situations where putting the ball in play is paramount, but idk if they’re frequent enough to carry a specialist player
It would be interesting to see Arraez extend his career for a while by becoming Terrence Gore but for pinch hitting instead of pinch running. It’s unlikely to happen but there are probably worse recent examples of the 13th man on playoff teams
I always think about this silly, hyperspecific, situation: you have a guy on third, one out, bottom of the ninth, tie game. SLG is useless. A strikeout is really bad. Any kind of contact gives you a chance to win.
BY GAWD, THAT’S LUIS ARRAEZ’S MUSIC!!!
Yes. Ichiro was great in this situation as well.
His bunting ability was a nice bonus there as well. The squeeze was always at least a consideration when he was up in those spots.
This brings me back to when Daniel Murphy signed with the Rockies 7 years ago. Even with his declining hard hit rate, I thought he might .330 in Coors with his elite contact rate and launch angle. Boy did that not work out.
Operation Get Luis Arraez to 3000 Hits and the Hall of Fame
No.
Why do you hate fun?
I would have thought that my comment would be immediately read as sarcasm, but sarcasm on the internet is hard.
Feels like that upgrade from 1.8 to 2.1 WAR doesn’t really accomplish much considering all Rockies hitters benefit from their home park in similar ways. I mean, it accomplishes a lot for Arraez, especially in how much he’s likely to get paid, but does it really help the team?
Can we just admit that Arraez is a fascinating but extremely flawed player who’s probably best used as a fancy pinch hitter and occasional DH?
The fact that his projected wRC+ gets a boost though means he does uniquely benefit in a way that the average player does not.
Yes, if the average boost isn’t 0.0 then something is wrong with the calculation.
Let’s see. He doesn’t really score or drive in any runs, has below average speed, no power, and is a defensive liability at any position. Definitely something a bad rebuilding team should spend 8 figures to put in a uni and move the needle from 61 wins to 62.
I get that he’s an anomaly so he’s “fun”. Hasn’t the whole point of sabermetrics been to show that players with this limited of a skill set aren’t really that valuable? If I was a Rockies fan and they spent any millions on this guy I’d be bitter.
Sometimes I don’t understand the fascination on this site with certain players. I remember when we couldn’t go a week without seeing an article about Logan Morrison.
Sure I’ll get plenty of down votes so GET OFF MY LAWN!
Grumpy old man rant over, lol. Flobble-dee-floo.
I think it comes down to the fact that the games are played on the field and not in a spreadsheet. Sure, the two wins aren’t going to do anything for them, but what’s wrong with making a move that might make the team more enjoyable to watch? And why you’d concern yourself with the Monforts paying out a one-year salary barely in the eight figures is beyond me.
If you get to rant, I get to pick nits
It feels odd to say Arraez doesn’t really drive in any runs. Arraez gets hits, not walks. If anything, relative to his wRC, he should be great at driving in runs.
Of course, if he’s miscast as a leadoff hitter (hello Padres), or on a team that won’t have people on base (hello Rockies), then it might not matter either way.
He moves runners up one base at a time because the outfielders play so shallow. Other hitters will drive in runners on second base with a single, while Arraez is less likely to do so. When he hits a single, it’s less valuable than when the average player hits a single. And hitting singles is about all he does.
I guess pointless hypotheticals are more fun articles to write than major trade news
Professional sports are an entertainment industry & Arraez in Colorado would be entertaining… and improves a weak roster.
Unfortunately this is such an obvious positive decision for that franchise that it seems certain that they’ll pursue a different path.
But maybe if they don’t sign him he’ll go to Mexico City & hit .450 there.
I’m surprised we didn’t get the two people with a line drive rate higher than his since 2002!! I’m curious who the ultimate line drive kings are!
Assuming the stats are the same as on this site, Cory Sullivan and Harold Castro. Who are… apparently real guys who exist? And both one-time Rockies, so there you go.
Awesome post. This is such a great idea I can’t believe it hasn’t happened yet, even making due allowance for the Rockies being the Rockies.
I love this idea! The Rockies should try to squeeze every bit of advantage they can out of their park.
If hitters that put a lot of balls in play have an advantage at Coors, should the Rockies also focus on outfield defense? Is the platonic ideal of a Rockies player a plus plus centerfielder who hits like Arraez?
Yeah, 3 Ichiros in the OF at Coors would have been fun to watch. I’ve often pondered which MLB player, if cloned 25 times would fill out the best roster (hitters and pitchers, 1 guy). Some pitcher who could hit, and or a hitter who could pitch. Obviously need to have the speed and athleticism to play SS, CF, etc. The Ichiros would be tough to beat, I imagine. Although the Ohtanis and Ruths would be…formidable, haha.
I don’t think anyone but the Ohtanis, Ruths, and Bullet Rogans would come anywhere close to them, it’s just too rare of a feat to be that simultaneously great at both hitting and pitching.
Smoky Joe Wood would be another good one as long as the hitting and pitching versions don’t have to be from the same year
Martin Dihigo says hi.
I just looked up Ichiro’s home/road splits… Shocked to see that other than his transcendental 2004, he hit consistently better at home. Despite playing in a notorious pitchers park.
Looks like his strikeout rate was higher at home – maybe he was swinging harder at home, or (perhaps more likely) his bat would miss weak contact entirely
I always thought Nolan Arenado was literally the most ideal Colorado player possible
This is something I’ve been thinking they need to do for a long, long time. But the only guy who I think they might be able to grab who could be a perfect fit for them as giving them double-plus defense in any outfield position plus a high batting average is Steven Kwan, and he’s going to be way too expensive for them. They are definitely going to have to “create him in the aggregate” (to paraphrase Moneyball).
For DH, you have Arraez.
In the outfield: As fun as it would be to see Ceddanne Rafaela in CF for them it’s definitely not happening. But Brenton Doyle is a great fit in CF for them, and Jake Meyers would also be interesting. Jacob Young and Kyle Isbel could form a vaguely interesting platoon.
For the infield, their ideal guy would be Nico Hoerner, but he’s going to be too expensive for them. I don’t see Jacob Wilson coming free anytime soon either.
And the X-Factor: I think they shoud get Chandler Simpson to play left field. His instincts are clearly terrible so he can’t play in center field, and he might be a disaster in that massive outfield. But he ran a .295 average last year with only an 88 wRC+. And I don’t think he’s going to be a core player for the Rays much longer.
The Rockies are the only team where I would be specifically focusing on BIP rates, simply because of that ginoromous OF and the fact with the BABIP, it does make a K that much worse (offensively).
**Jack Nicholson in The Departed nodding gif**
sickos_yes.jpg
Minor league contract invite to spring training
I think everyone agrees here!
I have always thought the Rockies should focus on guys that are very hard to strikeout. Those guys have less home road splits. If they also have plus defense I think you are looking at ideal players for that park and team.
Continuing on this path, I present the Ultimate Colorado Rockies:
M. Betts (RF)
J. Ramirez (1B)
L. Arraez (DH)
A. Bregman (3B)
C. Bellinger (CF)
A. Kirk (C)
N. Hoerner (SS)
S. Kwan (LF)
E. Clement (2B)
This 1-9 would be significantly cheaper than the 1-9 of the Dodgers and the Mets.
“With the possible exception of the Dodgers, there is no such thing as a team that couldn’t find a spot for a hitter of Arraez’s caliber. ZiPS is slightly higher on Arraez than most systems, projecting him for 1.8 WAR in 2026. That’s more than we have projected in our Depth Charts either at first base, DH, or both for 21 different teams. Everybody can afford him. Almost everybody could use him.”
What are you trying to say here? You’ve acknowledged that 9 teams already have better options at DH and 1B and thus couldn’t find a spot for him, contradicting your first sentence. There are likely a number of teams that are better at one position and close at the other, meaning they’d spend $11M for a marginal upgrade. The Cubs project worse with Ballesteros but they aren’t going to block him even if Arraez would play for close to nothing; and despite the WAR difference both project to 8-10% above average as hitters. Then you pivot back to “almost everybody” could use him.
The problem, and reason he isn’t signed, is that really few teams could use him. Sure he’d likely make the Cardinals, Nationals, or White Sox better but those teams are going to finish 15 games out of a playoff spot and finishing 13 games out doesn’t help. Plus they’re better off looking at a prospect or AAAA guy even if he only puts up 1 WAR. Maybe half the league could use him, with a generous definition of “use”.
Max Dumper