Mad Max Heads to Texas

One of the biggest names on the trade market found a new home on Saturday evening as the Texas Rangers picked up pitcher Max Scherzer from the New York Mets in return for shortstop prospect Luisangel Acuña, per Andy Martino. Scherzer’s contract runs through 2024 at a hefty $43.33 million per season, with the Mets covering a little more than $35 million of his remaining deal. Per Jeff Passan, Scherzer won’t exercise his player opt-out and will remain with the Rangers through the end of his contract.
Scherzer isn’t just one of the deadline’s most famous names, of course, but one of the elite pitchers of his generation. And while he’s no longer at his peak, his 3.65 xERA takes some of the sting out of him posting his first ERA north of 4.00 since 2011 (the zERA that ZiPS uses sas 3.73). Indeed, as Mets’ disasters go, Scherzer’s season has been a fairly mild one. His strikeout and walk rates are unimpressive by his standards, but they didn’t dive off a cliff; a lot of the problem has been gopher balls, which tend to be quite volatile for pitchers.
The Rangers’ motivation here is obvious. Their success this season has been a pleasant surprise, but their breakout is mostly due to the team’s offense leading the league in runs scored rather than its pitching prowess. With Jacob deGrom’s injury, only Nathan Eovaldi and Dane Dunning have been standouts in Texas. Jon Gray has been pitching like a serviceable mid-rotation starter, but Martín Pérez and Andrew Heaney aren’t likely to inspire dread in opposing lineups come October. It remains to be seen whether the Rangers can hold off the Astros, but some kind of playoff appearance is likely, and Texas had a real need to firm up its postseason rotation. It certainly doesn’t hurt that adding Scherzer can help the Rangers keep the Astros from sneaking into the division lead in the meantime.
ZiPS expects Scherzer to pitch better than he has so far this season, though not quite to the level of his best years.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RoS 2023 | 4 | 3 | 3.36 | 11 | 11 | 64.3 | 55 | 24 | 10 | 15 | 77 | 130 | 1.2 |
| 2024 | 9 | 8 | 3.94 | 24 | 24 | 141.7 | 127 | 62 | 25 | 36 | 159 | 109 | 2.2 |
| Percentile | ERA+ | ERA | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 173 | 2.47 | 4.4 |
| 90% | 150 | 2.84 | 3.8 |
| 80% | 134 | 3.19 | 3.3 |
| 70% | 124 | 3.46 | 2.9 |
| 60% | 114 | 3.75 | 2.5 |
| 50% | 109 | 3.94 | 2.2 |
| 40% | 101 | 4.22 | 1.9 |
| 30% | 94 | 4.57 | 1.4 |
| 20% | 87 | 4.94 | 1.0 |
| 10% | 79 | 5.39 | 0.6 |
| 5% | 72 | 5.97 | 0.0 |
There’s a pretty big projected drop-off from 2023 to 2024, as any player approaching 40 represents a significant risk. However, even a rather middling 2024 projection is likely to be beneficial to the Rangers.
The Mets still have a non-zero chance of making the playoffs, but owner Steve Cohen didn’t spend a bazillion dollars to try and limp into the postseason. To my mind, trading Scherzer doesn’t signal a change in approach so much as a temporary tactical retreat so they can fight another day on terrain more to their liking.
If the Mets hadn’t included any money, they likely wouldn’t have received a significant prospect in return and might not have been been able to close the deal at all. Instead, the $35 million headed to Arlington helped them fetch Acuña. Thanks to his very famous brother, Acuña has a lot of name recognition for a prospect of his level. But he’s not riding on anyone’s coattails, as he’s an excellent prospect who has blossomed upon repeating Double-A this year. Acuña is an aggressive player with impressive physical tools and plate discipline that isn’t a tire fire. He already has 42 stolen bases in the minors this year, and in a full season in the majors, has a good shot at challenging for the league lead in swipes. And a .280/.319/.381 translation for a 21-year-old shortstop who isn’t merely faking the position? Yes, please.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | .240 | .297 | .337 | 513 | 68 | 123 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 59 | 41 | 137 | 41 | 78 | -2 | 1.6 |
| 2025 | .240 | .298 | .344 | 529 | 70 | 127 | 21 | 2 | 10 | 62 | 43 | 134 | 41 | 80 | -2 | 1.8 |
| 2026 | .239 | .300 | .349 | 539 | 73 | 129 | 22 | 2 | 11 | 65 | 46 | 130 | 40 | 81 | -1 | 2.1 |
| 2027 | .239 | .301 | .352 | 545 | 75 | 130 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 67 | 48 | 126 | 39 | 83 | -1 | 2.2 |
| 2028 | .238 | .301 | .353 | 547 | 75 | 130 | 23 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 49 | 123 | 37 | 83 | -1 | 2.2 |
| 2029 | .234 | .298 | .348 | 546 | 74 | 128 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 67 | 49 | 119 | 34 | 81 | -1 | 2.0 |
| 2030 | .238 | .302 | .353 | 538 | 74 | 128 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 67 | 49 | 118 | 32 | 83 | 0 | 2.2 |
| Percentile | 2B | HR | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% | 30 | 17 | .287 | .349 | .430 | 113 | 4.3 |
| 90% | 28 | 15 | .279 | .335 | .409 | 106 | 3.7 |
| 80% | 24 | 12 | .265 | .323 | .385 | 98 | 3.0 |
| 70% | 22 | 11 | .257 | .317 | .367 | 91 | 2.5 |
| 60% | 21 | 10 | .245 | .307 | .351 | 85 | 2.0 |
| 50% | 19 | 9 | .240 | .297 | .337 | 78 | 1.6 |
| 40% | 18 | 8 | .231 | .289 | .325 | 73 | 1.2 |
| 30% | 17 | 8 | .222 | .282 | .315 | 68 | 0.8 |
| 20% | 15 | 7 | .215 | .273 | .305 | 63 | 0.5 |
| 10% | 13 | 6 | .203 | .259 | .284 | 56 | -0.2 |
| 5% | 12 | 5 | .190 | .249 | .268 | 47 | -0.9 |
Acuña’s offensive comp list is all over the place, as one might expect for such a raw talent. The best names in the top 20 or so include Rafael Furcal, Dave Concepcion, Trea Turner, Rod Carew, and Tim Anderson. On the bad side, you see players like Donell Nixon, Alfredo Griffin, and Wilton Guerrero.
Michael Baumann will be along shortly with more on this trade, so stay tuned.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Max Scherzer’s FIP is 4.73. I think he meant his xERA is 3.65
That is correct, good catch! ’twas a fast write.
Acuña is listed as a 50 FV on this site, which over on the board are listed as worth $28 million. Looks like that’s pretty accurate!
Are you using Zips’ estimate of Scherzer proving 3.4 wins for the Rangers this year and next and multiplying by $8M? Don’t you have to subtract the $22M the Rangers are paying him?
I look at this as better than the Reds getting a 40+, a 40, and a 35 for Tyler Mahle last year — another 2-win pitcher with 1.5 years of control. That return was considered low but the 40+ turned out to be Spencer Steer and the 35 Christian Encarnacion-Strand. I think Longenhagen thought he might have been low on Steer at the time.
Well, the Mets and Padres have taught us that buying all the $30M+ AAV FA’s doesn’t get a team to the playoffs. Though the Rangers are saying, maybe it can.
Well, they diversified their spending across pitchers and middle infielders. Everybody is playing where they’re best.
The Mets are paying $35 million of Scherzer’s salary and getting back Acuña. Don’t need to do anything other than that.
The deal is NOT $35M for Acuna. It’s $35M + Scherzer.
Right but Scherzer does not have surplus value because he is already being paid market rate. If the Mets had not been willing to pay down any of his salary they would have gotten very little in return. Instead they decided to pay $35 million to get Acuna back.
The Mets aren’t getting 6’0″ Ronald Acuna. They’re getting 5’8″ AA prospect who probably won’t last beyond a cup of coffee in the big leagues.
yeah, when has a 5’8” or shorter baseball player ever worked out, other than altuve, albies, cedric mullins, yoshida, kolten wong….
So height does measure heart? Looks like Marcus Stroman was right to say Mets fans didn’t understand him!
Donell Nixon and Wilton Guerrero also had brothers who played MLB. Weird.
You must be amazing at immaculate grid, I mean holy shit
Given how close to the bigs he is he can be expected to play 2B, right?
My understanding is that he looks like an average shortstop, and that he has enough range and more than enough arm for second.
Plus Lindor is still squatting at SS.
He doesn’t look to be too far away so he needs a home for 2024.
You can definitely quibble with individual moves that the Mets have made under Cohen, but the fact that a multi-billionaire seems to be primarily focused on making wise, aggressive baseball decisions with an eye on his team’s on-field performance, both now and in the future — that’s really refreshing. No wonder some of the other owners have grumbled a bit. Even when his plans fall through, he kinda makes them look bad.
The Mets are finishing under .500 despite a $363 million payroll, while in 3 years under Cohen the farm system has vaulted all the way from #23 to…
…#21.
“Aggressive,” sure. “Wise”? Not a chance. He hasn’t been able to assemble a real front office, and even the ‘general manager’ serving as his front admits having to go to Cohen for permission to cut Darin Ruf in ST. Not to mention the entire 2021 season would have fit in snugly with the most embarrassing of the Wilpons’ worst years.
Sure, that’s fair. Some of the moves weren’t actually wise. I (along with many others) was skeptical of the “sign aging and nearly-retired stars” strategy, but I think we have to be careful of hindsight bias. All those signings weren’t enough to vault them up to pre-season favorite status in the NL East as per ZiPS, for instance, but they pulled somewhat close to what might be the best team in baseball.
The minimal improvement in the farm system is a valid criticism, but that’s also the aspect of a baseball club over which most owners exercise the least direct influence and control, year-to-year. I suspect Cohen is approaching a large enough sample by which to judge his front office’s performance in that area, and nothing in his behavior suggests he’d be reticent to make changes if he’s unhappy with their drafting and development.
As a Brewers fan, it’s seemed like Stearns is his de facto pick for the front office for awhile. Milwaukee didn’t give the ok on discussions, so they’ve got a lame duck at the moment, waiting out Stearns’ contract.
It’s good to see Cohen being willing to pay for prospects as well as immediate wins. A lot of owners are very particular about *how* they spend their money. Moreno’s willing to spend huge sums on name-brand superstars, but much less on building a good dev system. Reinsdorf is willing to run a $190M payroll (1/3 is just the bullpen), but not on a $100M+ contract.
These types are willing to spend some money as they should, as the second teams in big markets, just like the Mets. But the arrogance in demanding control in silly ways over *how* it is spent screws over their front office and thus on-field product not much less than the cheapskate owners. I’d argue it’s vastly better to have a cheapskate owner who gives free rein of the modest budget to a decent FO, than it is to have a moderately generous budget with ridiculous restrictions on usage. I’m glad for Mets fans that Cohen is letting his FO make the correct baseball moves with his gobs of money.
Reinsdorf also won’t spend on minor league development, foreign scouting, or a full power modern analytics department. All of which would be much cheaper than spending on the major league roster and would save him money in the long run by developing cheap young players instead of hiring journeymen at market rate.
I think that we’re giving Eppler way too much credit for acquiring a 5’8″ AA middle infield prospect for a 3 WAR pitcher + $35M. And it’s only because that prospect’s name is Acuna.
If you’re expecting Max to go another 64-1/3 innings, or 172 innings total, with a 130 ERA+ the rest of the way AND have anything in the tank for a 3- or 4-round postseason, I do believe you (or the machine) are dreaming. —As for the Rangers, if they’re overpaying based on evaluating each of the ROS, the postseason, and then 2024 as if the last isn’t substantively contingent on the first two, they’re very likely to be disappointed. A 39 year old pitcher who goes (say) 170 innings in the regular season, with a HOF-caliber, 130 ERA+ kick at the finish, then goes another 30-40 innings in the post, does not seem terribly likely to be useful in his age 40 season for 140 innings or so. Not even the Max.
I like it. Two very aggressive teams. The ZiPS projections on Scherzer aren’t great, and Acuna has some stuff to figure out to be much better than an average regular. But there’s upside on both sides.
Oh, I remember Alfredo Griffin. Someone should make up an immaculuate grid solely of Dodger IFs in the 90s. Who doesn’t remember the steady hitting of Hiram Bocachica? The transcendental glovework of Jose Offerman? The legitimacy of Dodger Legend Eddie Murray?
There’s Remembering Some Guys, and then there’s Remembering the Jose Offerman Experience. Even as a non-Dodger fan, he was a whole thing.