Madison Bumgarner: Elite Fastball Pitcher

Not long ago, a prominent national baseball writer declared that Madison Bumgarner is the one pitcher you’d want starting a must-win game for your team in the playoffs. The statement’s certainly debatable, but at the same time the feeling is understandable — Bumgarner’s tough as nails, and he’s been on a hell of a run. He’s been on the radar for years, having spent plenty of time pitching in the postseason, and there’s something that comes to mind when you think about Bumgarner: his signature cutter. Or slider. Whichever. No matter the name, they describe the same weapon, and it’s something Bumgarner has thrown before almost 40% of the time. Madison Bumgarner? Awesome cutter. Yeah. The association’s automatic.

Regarding that, I want to show you a table. You know our pitch values? You know our pitch values. Positive numbers are good. Bigger positive numbers are more good. Here are Bumgarner’s year-to-year pitch values, from his player page:

Season Fastball Cutter Curve Changeup
2009 -0.8 1.5 0.0 0.3
2010 -5.8 -0.3 2.4 5.0
2011 2.2 17.7 -5.4 -2.3
2012 -0.2 16.0 -1.4 0.4
2013 13.6 15.1 2.1 3.6
2014 16.5 1.5 -6.0 -0.9

Based on that, a year ago, Bumgarner really improved his fastball. And this year, his cutter wasn’t much of a weapon. Let’s do more! Here are 2014 season splits:

Split Fastball Cutter Curve Changeup
1st Half 0.1 0.5 -3.0 -1.2
2nd Half 16.4 1.0 -3.0 0.3

All that fastball value came in the second half. As a matter of fact, after the All-Star break, Madison Bumgarner’s fastball was the most valuable pitch in baseball. The cutter? It was fine, and it’s still fine, but it’s not what it has been. And Bumgarner doesn’t seem to mind. Despite the cutter association, the Madison Bumgarner we’ve been seeing for months is, more than anything else, an elite fastball pitcher.

This is a story that’s a little bit jumbled, with a lot of different elements combining to lead us to the present day. It’s going to be helpful to re-read Eno’s Bumgarner breakdown from a couple weeks ago. Of note: in this season’s first half, Bumgarner allowed a .307 wOBA. His ERA was three and a half, and he was looking to make some adjustments. He made one immediately, and we might as well start there.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Bumgarner shifted his position on the mound, to be more on the third-base side of the rubber. He explained to Eno that the idea was to get more inside against righties, and the effect, of course, is that Bumgarner wound up with a different release point. He’s also subsequently raised his arm angle a little bit, and in this screenshot from Thursday’s NLCS Game 5, you see Bumgarner’s fastball release, and a point approximating his old 2014 fastball release:

bumgarnerrelease

Using information from Brooks Baseball, you can see what this has done to Bumgarner’s location. It didn’t happen immediately, but over time, Bumgarner started adjusting his strategy. He realized he could pitch to the sides differently, so to start with, here are his cutter locations against righties before and after the end of August:

BumgarnerCutter

I’m realizing now I forgot to label these, but before, against righties, Bumgarner would commonly pitch to the inner half. He’s since shifted to different spots, and with more cutters ending up away, that goes along with Bumgarner also using his fastball differently against righties. The same kind of unlabeled .gif:

BumgarnerFastball

Bumgarner’s fastball has stayed up, but over time he’s come more inside with it, instead of living up and away. With the shift on the mound, Bumgarner has been able to use his fastball inside more effectively against righties, and then that means he’s had a reverse of the old approach: instead of cutters in and fastballs away, he’s had fastballs in and cutters more away. Bumgarner’s inside fastball tails toward the zone. His cutter away hangs around the edge.

So, all right, there’s still more. Bumgarner has moved on the mound, and he’s also used his fastball and his cutter differently. But his pitch mix, additionally, is dramatically different from his recent track record. Eno talked about this at the end of September, and the trend has continued into the playoffs. Bumgarner’s pitch frequencies, from 2012 on:

bumgarnerpitches

It’s sudden, that change toward the end. Instead of almost evenly mixing fastballs and cutters, recent Bumgarner has been fastball-first. Out of all his starts since 2012, his eight starts with the highest fastball rates have all come since August 21. Through August 20 this year, Bumgarner threw 40% fastballs and 37% cutters. Since August 21, he’s checked in at 57% and 25%. Batters have slugged .247 against the fastball, and .487 against the cutter. On Thursday, Bumgarner threw exactly 57% fastballs, keeping up his recent pattern.

And there’s one more thing. Bumgarner made an adjustment seemingly to improve his fastball. He’s pitched with his fastball with more confidence. And he’s also recently pitched with his fastball with more force. You might remember that, in the 2012 playoffs, Bumgarner was inconsistent and his velocity was down. This year’s been the opposite of the story. Here’s a comparison of fastball velocity trends:

Month 2012 2014
August 92.4 92.9
September 91.4 93.1
October 90.4 93.8

In 2012, Bumgarner lost a tick in September, and he lost another in October. It might well have been fatigue. This year, he’s gained a tick since August, such that, between the Augusts, 2014 Bumgarner threw harder by half of one mile per hour. Between the Octobers, 2014 Bumgarner has thrown harder by three and a half miles per hour. On Thursday, Bumgarner’s fastball averaged 94. In the wild-card game against the Pirates, Bumgarner’s fastball also averaged 94. Those are his highest average fastball game velocities over the past three years. A few years ago in the playoffs, Bumgarner wore down, physically and presumably mechanically. This year he’s only gotten stronger, showing absolutely no signs of fatigue despite a career-high in regular-season innings. Maybe it’s adrenaline, or maybe it’s better preparation from having more experience. The important thing is that this October’s Bumgarner looks little like the 2012 October version.

That is, in terms of velocity, and in terms of approach. Also, in terms of results: 2012 October Bumgarner allowed an .835 OPS. 2014 October Bumgarner has allowed a .444 OPS. 2012 Bumgarner showed signs of already wearing down in September. This past September, Bumgarner raised no such concerns.

This is something Bumgarner told Eno in September:

I’m big on doing whatever’s working at the time.

What that implies is that Bumgarner’s style has bounced around, and he might change things up again soon if he senses there’s greater success to be had. But something about this recent pattern feels more significant, and less temporary: Bumgarner has dramatically shifted away from his cutter, more in favor of his fastball. His fastball’s been outstanding, he’s located it differently, and if anything it’s picking up steam. Thursday he threw his average fastball as hard as Danny Duffy. Madison Bumgarner’s got a good cutter, and he throws it a lot. He’s able to manipulate just how much it moves, and just how fast it comes off the fingers. But make no mistake about it — this version of Bumgarner we’re seeing is fastball-first, and he’s among the very best fastball pitchers in baseball. Sometimes, I suppose, you have to change to stay awesome. Not every awesome player could pull that off.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Andrew Follow the Money Friedman
11 years ago

Elite pitcher, period. And probably baseball’s best value/contract.

Edwin Encarnacion
11 years ago

Hello

Jose Bautista
11 years ago

don’t forget me

the 2 of us make 24M

scottydgMember since 2020
11 years ago
Reply to  Jose Bautista

True, but he’s signed for 5/$52MM, and $24MM of that is coming as player options in 2018 and 2019. So his next 3 years are coming at 3/$28MM.

Compton
11 years ago

Mike Trout’s not a pitcher, nor was this article about him.

Pre-All Star Break Salvador Perez
11 years ago

Hi guys!

Andrew Follow the Money Friedman
11 years ago

Brian Sabean is getting harder and harder to dislike, eh..?

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago

I loved him for years and cheered every two year extension he got while most Giants fans gave him catcalls and boos.

Shows how much they didn’t know.

Danmay
11 years ago

Why would he ever have gotten boos? He’s had nothing but solid to great years his whole career.

MrKnowNothing
11 years ago
Reply to  Danmay

He would get food just for the AJ trade.

Danmay
11 years ago

Nevermind, you were talking about Sabean, not Bumgarner. I’ll withhold my thoughts on Sabean.

channelclemente
11 years ago

You see Bumgarner as a ‘snapshot’, you lose track of the fact he’s been crafted by the Giant’s system, and the way Righetti approaches the game. Early he threw 95+ and Righetti and he started to change his arm slot to get him under the ball.and get control and command into his game. Tidrow pushed the arm angle idea as well. IMO, he’s a work in progress, and ever nuance he works on opens up other options to sharpen. He’s truly a work in progress.

Bhaakon
11 years ago

Every pitcher is like that to a greater or less extent, but I think Bumgarner might actually be on the lesser end of that spectrum. He was an EXTREMELY polished product straight out of the draft. The team helped refine his breaking ball, but the command and fastball were there from the first professional pitch he threw.

andrew l
11 years ago

When HR numbers go up people think steroids, is it at all a possibility for pitchers and velocity gains to be tied to some performance enhancing substance? does anyone have an explanation why guys who should theoretically be wearing down under big workloads like him and Shields are throwing harder than ever this deep into a season?

Pumpsie Green
11 years ago
Reply to  andrew l

Economy of pitches, perhaps? Bumgarner has 94 in him, but maybe he knows he doesn’t have an unlimited supply of 94’s? He knows from experience that his body will peak once a year, but only once a year, and he definitely wants that peak to come right now. I’m sure he’s tried to sustain the peak for longer, but knows he is simply physically unable (not unlike almost every other athlete). He has realized his limitations, and has capitalized on his strengths.

ElJimador40
11 years ago
Reply to  andrew l

I don’t know about Shields but my theory on Bumgarner would be that he’s a horse who just barely turned 25. Does there really need to be any further explanation for how a pitcher can throw 217 innings in the regular season and still be peaking in the postseason?

ValueIsEverything
11 years ago
Reply to  andrew l

Bumgarner, like a lot of the younger Giants pitchers who came up under Raghetti don’t reach back on every pitch. Its much the opposite. He has these guys staying in the low 90’s consistently and be able to control their stuff. Cain was the same way and so was Timmy. Cain could throw a lot harder then he was throwing. That is not what Raghetti wants. Bum is the same way. He sits between 91 93 with some 94 and 95 depending on the game and the gun and the moment. Bum is a full on specimen. 25 years old and in the prime of his career and built like a truck. He can throw a lot harder then what he typically sits at. Him hitting 94s is nothing. He could do it more if Raghetti let him and wanted it that way.

RainBall
11 years ago

Bruce Bochy took it upon himself to limit Bumgarner down the stretch, keeping him at or below 100 pitches for each game through September (exception for the final game against LA to try to keep the NL West crown alive). We all remember, Bochy notwithstanding, that Bumgarner at 23 wore down badly in the playoffs, before skipping a start and then destroying the Tigers in the WS.

The extra rest for a big guy like Bum goes a long way, and the Giants Coaching staff was preparing for the playoffs long before the time arrived. HOF Manager? Yes, and for so, so many reasons.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
11 years ago

Great article on Bumgarner, very interesting, thanks!

Daniel Schwartz
11 years ago

Just tweeted you on this too (i posted this on Bumgy yesterday: http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/what-happens-when-madison-bumgarner-is-really-on/). His more distinguishable pitches (>2″ from his mean release point) (which happened to be CU/SL) were the hits and homers. Of the 56 fastballs, only 12 were put in play; 2 were pop-ups and one was a sac bunt and 2 were double plays. Really +FT/FF

Darth Dipoto
11 years ago

Want this.

Michael
11 years ago

I read an article by a Giants beat writer who mentioned that the drop in velocity in 2012 was due to a mechanical issue, but I’m sure fatigue played a role.