Manny Machado Gets Dirty
Last night, Manny Machado scored the decisive run in an extra-inning walkoff victory to tie the NLCS at two games a piece and put the Dodgers within two wins of the World Series. When discussing Machado and last night’s game, we’d ideally be focusing on his key hit, his smart and aggressive take of second base on a wild pitch, and his impressive dash from second to home on a single to right field that barely beat a strong throw from Christian Yelich.
We aren’t talking about that, though. We’re talking instead about a play in the 10th inning of last night’s game on which Manny Machado made contact with Brewers first baseman Jesus Aguilar:
In real time, it looked really awkward, but not necessarily malicious. After the game, the Brewers said the play was dirty or insinuated as such by questioning Machado’s general attitude about playing hard. From the MLB.com story:
“It’s a dirty play by a dirty player,” Brewers right fielder Christian Yelich said.
“It looked like it,” Aguilar said. “I’ve known Manny for many years and I don’t know why he would act like that.”
Brewers manager Craig Counsell threw shade at Machado when asked if the play went beyond the grounds of hard play.
“I don’t know,” he said. “I guess they got tangled up at first base. I don’t think he’s playing all that hard.”
Machado didn’t really back down either:
“If that’s dirty, that’s dirty,” Machado said. “I don’t know, call it what you want. I play baseball. I try to go out there and win for my team. If that’s their comments, that’s their comments. I can’t do nothing about that.”
Let’s start by giving Machado the benefit of the doubt and assume, for sake of argument, that it was just a weird play. In that spirit, let’s take a few closer looks at it to see what kind of determinations we might be able to make. Here’s another angle from directly behind Machado.
From this perspective, the contact still looks more awkward than malicious, even if it does appear a little more violent than the first one. For comparison’s sake, let’s take a look at an extremely similar play from earlier in the game.
Aguilar’s heel isn’t exposed in quite the same way, but his foot is definitely still on the bag when Machado crosses it — and Machado manages not to swipe the Brewers’ first baseman. Machado is still running inside the first-base line, but he doesn’t make any contact. Here’s a screenshot from both plays just before Machado touches the bag.

Following the moment depicted on the right, Machado harmlessly moved his left foot over Aguilar’s right. Following the one on the left, however, Machado eventually hit Aguilar’s foot with his own.

So what was different about the 10th-inning grounder? Let’s take a look at the play from the outfield.
This makes the play look a lot worse. Right before Machado reaches the bag, he glances down. This is what the play looked like right as Machado directed his gaze to the ground.

If this were Machado’s first downward glance, we might actually lean away from the conclusion that the play was dirty. Some sort of collision looks inevitable. Machado’s right foot is about to touch the bag and his left foot is off the ground behind him — nor does it appear as though there is a lot room for his left foot to go. To see what happens next, let’s take a different view of the play from the visitor’s dugout.
Here’s where things begin to look more suspicious. In the screenshot, we see Machado’s right foot about to touch first. He’s looking down and his left foot is in the air. What the last gif shows is Machado putting his foot down and dragging his toe directly into Aguilar’s foot. Machado looks like a wide receiver trying to make a catch before he goes out of bounds. We know Machado doesn’t normally run like that because he didn’t do it earlier in the game. Dragging the toe is an intentional action and not the result of simply running through the bag. For a closer look at the toe drag, there’s this.
Machado had just planted his right foot and had barely raised his left foot off the ground when he began dragging it. There’s little to suggest that the move was anything but purposeful. As for the intent, Machado could claim the dragging of his foot represented an attempt to give Aguilar a little more time to get his foot away from the bag. Given that Machado didn’t say anything of the sort, however — and that he managed to avoid Aguilar in the first inning on a similar play — it’s fair to conclude that’s not what Machado was doing.
After an examination of the other ground-ball outs that concluded with a throw to Aguilar, I feel comfortable saying that the latter’s foot was in a fairly normal position for this play. So what was Machado doing? He intentionally changed the path of his foot so he would hit Aguilar. The Brewers first baseman was exposed and Machado intentionally made contact. Given the huge number of plays that end with throws to first basemen and the relatively rare instances of events like this, it’s reasonable to conclude that such a thing can be easily avoided. The play, in other words, was dirty — and likely carried a certain risk of injury.
As for any kind of suspension, that seems unlikely either now or in the future. Back in 2015, Chase Utley was suspended two games for a slide against Ruben Tejada in the playoffs that broke the latter’s leg. Utley appealed the decision so that it would not take place during the playoffs. Once the season was over, the league opted not to suspend Utley for any 2016 games, as the original appeal had made the suspension somewhat meaningless. The league then changed the enforcement of the slide rule to prevent further injuries. Yuli Gurriel was suspended five games this season for racist gestures made during the 2017 World Series, but such an arrangement seems less likely in Machado’s case due to his impending free agency.
While Machado did create this situation himself, it seems doubtful the league wants a marquee player on the verge of signing a massive contract to join a new club only to miss the first few games of next season. Assuming MLB takes action against Machado, a fine seems the most likely outcome. The umpires might also want to issue warnings to both benches before the start of any game the rest of this series.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
I’m seeing lot’s of “Page not found … Looks like this page doesn’t exist!” messages.
Thanks. Should be better now.
Do you utilize a pay~pal account.. in case you do you can make an extra 650 /week to your account working at home for a few hours each day, check out this site
.??????O OPEN~JOB~START
Not defending Machado, but why didn’t Aguilar pull his foot off the bag once he caught the ball? Most 1B pull off to get out of harm’s way…maybe a little gamesmanship from Aguilar that Machado reacted to. There is no defense for Machados childish reaction but the opportunity to swipe the leg should not have been present to begin with.
Righty first baseman have their foot like that, which also can make it appear as if their foot didn’t touch the bag. He left it so the ump could see it, it’s a typical righty first baseman move, one Aguilar does almost every play…
Unless he “gamesmanship”s every single runner…
Tb25 – I completely disagree. This is not a righty/lefty issue at all, almost every 1b pulls their foot after the putout to avoid this very scenario
Bull! Going after the leg of a defenseless player is dirty and gutless.
Jeez, just suspend him for the first few games of the next season and get it over with. You can’t possibly run any system of discipline where only the peons get punished.
Why wait til the regular season? If you’re going to suspend him, make it a part of the playoffs.
I understand WHY the MLB would want to wait. They want Manny Machado on the field, and they don’t want a decision like this to affect the postseason. But it’s not even a remotely controversial decision. If he’s gonna play dirty in the postseason, suspend him during the postseason.
You can’t do that to the Dodgers after Yuli. Would be fucked.
I agree with statbook. If Aguilar had been injured, he would have missed the postseason, not the opening of next season. When the payoff for intentional injury is higher, the deterrent needs to be more significant. (EDIT: Others have pointed out that the possibility of injury might not have been that high. I don’t see what the intent could have been otherwise, though.)
Something as mild as a shove can get someone’s attention without any chance of actual injury. This was not an injurious infraction and not a suspension type of thing. It was stupid, nothing more.
Intent and potential for injury, along with history, are the only things that matter. It was a potentially injurious infraction, carried out by a guy who has no issue with throwing his bat at the other team when his panties get in a twist. He needs to be sent a message.
It was not potentially injurious.
Yeah but MLB let Yuli Gurriel play in the last WS even though he exhibited Ty Cobb levels of racism at Darvish. If they suspend Manny, Dodger fans will go crazy.
Ty Cobb level? Seriously.
Yuli deserved a suspension, but he exhibited middle-school levels of immaturity, at worst.
Ty Cobb yelled the n-word during games. Yuli used an anti-Asian racial slur at Darvish and mocked Asian eyes. Seems pretty similar to me.
It’s really silly to equate the two. I’m not a member of either ethnic group, so maybe I’m not qualified, but “chino” and the n-word are not the same. Chino is used as a type of pants, the name of a fairly large city, in the name of several restaurants in my city, and a common Latino nickname.
Let’s just say none of those apply to the “n-word.” Sure, Gurriel was wrong. But someone from a country not known for open-minded education using an insensitive term is not the same as, say, Josh Hader’s Twitter account or Boston fans.
I think overall the Gurriel situation was handled well. It sent a message to him and society, he was immediately repentant, and a great World Series went on unhindered.
Interestingly, Ty Cobb’s level of racism, while probably greater than zero, is by no means as high as most people think. The majority of the really juicy stories seem to be fabrications.
https://www.mlb.com/news/ty-cobb-history-built-on-inaccuracies/c-178601094
Yeah, Cobb was definitely a racist ass, but a deeper dive leads to the conclusion that he wasn’t that much more racist than the average player of his time (he was significantly more of an ass than the average, though). Stump turned out to be a completely unreliable source in every way, and virtually everything he wrote has to be discounted without other verification.
Are you sure he was really a racist? He supported integration of baseball and attended Negro league games. Seems an odd thing for a racist to do.
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/who-was-ty-cobb-the-history-we-know-thats-wrong/
“Ty Cobb’s level of racism, while probably greater than zero, is by no means as high as most people think’
Just exactly how do you classify someone’s ‘level’ of racism? Do you have a system that determines where an individual should place on some spectrum ranging from low level racist to high level racist? Such a concept seems rather odd to me.
Racism Above Replacement, obviously. The question is whether you use an absolute value or normalize by season/park.
THey already set a bad precedent with Yuli Gurriel
You are allowed to break precedent.
“I would like to break precedent”
– Melania
Very, very different situation.
As everyone else noted below, I think that the Yuli Gurriel precedent weighs heavily here. The one difference that could justify an immediate suspension is the risk of injury. But I get the sense that if Machado went after an umpire, he would have been suspended immediately.
The one thing I don’t want is for him to not get punished at all. That would be an incredibly bad precedent, and would lead to a lot of in-game targeting of Machado for a long, long time.
I hate the “precedent” argument in these situations. The only relevant question is whether Machado’s actions warrant a suspension now. If they do, then suspend him.
“We don’t want to break precedent” (or “We’ve always done it that way”) has justified more BS than any excuse in history. Yes, every time a baseball rule or standard is changed, it can be considered “unfair” that some person or some team in the past was not subject to the same standard. But suck it up, that’s life. We can’t fix the past. All we can do is make things better going forward.
For the sake of the argument, Chino is a lot more racist in the USA than it likely was where he is from. My wife is Colombian and the only word she knew for Asian was Chino until she moved to the USA. Not that it makes it right, but if you haven’t encountered many people of a certain ethnicity there isn’t much background to draw off of.
Yup – it was a vernacular issue, not a slur.
Problem is thats the exact opposite of how they handled it with Gurriel last postseason
Lots of the images are not rendering. Seems like there ought to be more intelligent penalties on dirty plays, essentially the lost economic value to the player in question, with a floor for hurting players that are not worth much. But if he had successfully injured Aguilar, that would have a large, important impact on the game. There should be penalties that assign appropriate cost for trying to do that.
It’s hard to think of proper precedent for a “play” like this. When have we seen a player do something so petty and senseless, without even a pretense of competitive motives, to a player with whom he is reportedly on good terms, and with that player in such a vulnerable position?
I have nothing against Machado. I know nothing about him personally, and I certainly don’t mind it when young, prodigiously talented athletes have a bit of swagger. The game needs more of that. But this was mean-spirited in a way that I find sort of disquieting.
You’re probably right that he won’t get a suspension, especially since Aguilar wasn’t hurt, but he absolutely deserves one.
He did throw a bat at a player a few years back because he was getting inside pitches, that’s your precedent. He’s a repeat offender in my mind be shouldn’t see another game in this series.
“He did throw a bat at a player a few years back because he was getting inside pitches, that’s your precedent.”
Fair enough. I meant precedent in terms of disciplinary action. Even so, even that isn’t really the same thing, because what was he mad at Aguilar for?
He also fought with the Royals and Yordano Ventura. He also hit the catcher in the helmet multiple times in one series v Oakland. Nobody is even talking about these things, they just add to the mountain of evidence that Machado really isn’t someone I’d want on my own team, all other things being equal.
Don’t forget intentionally hitting Derek Norris twice on long follow throughs in the same series.
A-Rod glove slap circa 2004
Except that the goal of the glove slap was baseball-related (i.e. to make him drop the ball so he’d reach safely). There was no possible motive other than to hurt and/or annoy (to put it lightly) Aguilar.
Thought about the A-Rod play, but there’s a competitive motive there. Definitely bush league, but not senseless. And hard to argue he was trying to hurt somebody.
Puts me in mind of a seven year old child who hasn’t developed empathy and goes around pinching classmates for kicks. In a grown man it’s a nasty little thing.
This is his ‘A-Rod slapping the ball out of Arroyo’s hand’ moment. Guy is about to make a huge amount of money, and when you combine that with not looking great in the playoffs but getting in the news every day for some sort of on field shenanigans, and absolutely no contrition, he is on a very similar trajectory in terms of public opinion.
On the stupid little touches of Arcia’s leg on the slides at 2nd base, I immediately thought of the ARod slap. I think those are very equivalent. The kick of Aguilar was a little worse.
Not looking great in the playoffs? He has a 140 wRC+
It was unquestionably intentional and I suppose “dirty”. I will say that I don’t think the intent was to hurt Aguilar, and I think the likelihood of an injury on that play was vastly overstated by Joe Buck last night. Spikes in the ankle would be a different story. This swipe was not going to hurt anybody.
That said, I am a Dodger fan and that play really pissed me off. So stupid and childish. I don’t want Manny Machado anywhere near my team next year. In fact if the Dodgers sign him I may have to consider taking my rooting interest elsewhere.
I’m a Yankee fan and you and I have a lot in common when it comes to our 2019 rosters.
First of all, that 100% could have resulted in injury. Ankles are just flimsy like that.
And Manny’s intent is exactly what disturbs me, because I have no idea what it possibly could have been.
Disagree. 1 in 10000 chance of injuring Aguilar there.
I very much agree with Icebox.
For those in doubt, look at the last video in the post (the close-up of the feet from foul territory). Aguilar’s ankle twists on the play, and it looks like that’s a probable injury if the front of Aguilar’s foot would have stuck in the ground.
Spoken like someone who has never turned his ankle before. Very easily could have done that at the bare minimum.
That play simply would not injure Aguilar.
I’d say it *could* have resulted in injury, but that it was unlikely and that it wasn’t done with intent to injure.
Not to say that it wasn’t dirty, because it was, but throwing at a dude for hitting a HR his last at bat is so much worse.
Similar to tripping someone after the whistle in other sports.
He is an asshole and I hope they break his arm with an accidental “wild pitch”. This is why having some real actual fighting like hockey (instead of the mostly fake baseball fights) would help clean up dirty stuff like this and Utley’s slide last year.
An even more ideal solution would be the league could just grow some balls and actually execute some discipline/control over the field, but so few sports seem to want to do that (soccer diving, this stupid garbage, etc).
You know what’s better than fighting or hitting him? Continually getting him out. Winning the series.
Retaliation is dumb. Winning is much sweeter.
“Oh, the best revenge is living well.”
“…well there’s really no chance of that.”
His reputation precedes him, therefore he doesn’t earn the benefit of the doubt. This is far from his first incident. Throwing a bat at the mound comes to mind
I thought he threw the bat towards third base?
That’s where it went, but he was likely trying to get it to go towards the pitcher, given the inside pitches right before it
Manny been practicing fighting techniques with the Cobra-kais too much
He might want full body armor the next time he faces the Brewers in the regular season….. He’s going to get hit that game easily.
Good. Maybe he’ll learn to stop this crap (probably not though)
I think he did what he did because he did not want to slash the back of his foot with his spikes. That can cut someone open easily with a guy that big moving that fast.
Forget baseball, do you know how the mechanics of basic running work?
This isn’t a Davis Jr./Hudson situation. Machado was in no position to step on Aguilar’s foot. Did you even read the article? All the finer points of foot positioning were covered in great detail…
Jesus could have really gotten hurt if Manny was hustling on that play
Good thing we know that’s not his cup of tea.
Pretty sure Jesus could just heal himself.
What with his raising the dead, changing water into wine, etc.
Don’t fuck with the Jesus.
If you’re GM of your favorite team, what contract would you offer him? And does this incident affect that number?
The only deterrent I can even fathom GMs might have would be that his risk for suspension is higher than most.
Honestly, if they can get him in an environment where there is a strong leader at the helm, I think these could be the last of Machado’s antics.
I’m not convinced that the leadership vacuum in Baltimore or that Dave Roberts did much good for him in the area of helping him mature.
There are certain teams that will absolutely have no interest in him, for sure. He doesn’t fit the mold for many teams that can afford him.
Well, you mean (I believe): absolutely no interest at a price close to what he will end up costing. It’s safe to say that all 30 MLB teams would happily take him on a 5-year, $5 Million contract.
Also, the “Immanuel vs. Jesus” angle has been criminally under-reported.
His given name is Manuel. Would be funny, though.
Fair enough. I guess I got them crossed up.
How soon we forget that Manny Machado once threw his bat at someone because he felt like he was ‘tagged too hard’ by Josh Donaldson.
It would be BONKERS to suspend someone over this. Yes, he did it on purpose. He did it because Aguilar was too far over the bag and he wanted to send a message. But all of the evidence that shows you he did it on purpose is the evidence of the effort he went to to NOT hurt him. If he wanted to hurt him, he would have stepped on his ankle and spiked him, risking real ankle/Achilles damage. It would have looked way more natural that way, because Aguilar DID put his ankle up over the center of the base, where it had no reason to be. It probably would have been easier for him to “get away with it” even.
SHOULD he have “sent the message?” Probably not — it was still a play where he risked injury to himself and Aguilar, even if the risk was somewhat small, because either of them could have tripped awkwardly. At the same time, what else should he do if Aguilar is going to needlessly occupy the center of the bag while the runner is madly sprinting trying to reach it? I don’t know the answer.
I don’t think he should have done it, but this is akin to a hard tag on a runner that’s dancing around, or an inside fastball to try to keep a guy from crowding the plate. This is not, IMO, an intent to injure a player, such as intentional beaning or running over a catcher, etc.
“Your honor, I shot at the man to send him a message. I never intended to hurt him!”
More like, “I punched a man to send him a message.” You still get in trouble, but you don’t get treated like you shot at him.
Fair enough.
A) That’s actually the most plausible explanation for this that I’ve read so far–that he was annoyed by Aguilar’s foot placement.
B) “the effort he went to to NOT hurt him?” Woof. The problem isn’t that he meant to injure him. It’s that he was seemingly indifferent to the very real potential for injury.
C) If the hard tag was to the runner’s face, or if the inside fastball was thrown as the batter was calling time a little too late or stepping out of the box one too many times, then you’d have an analogy working.
Again, I’m not saying it was smart or advisable, but it took more effort to do what he did than it would have taken to hurt him. He deserves criticism, but not to be labelled as intentionally trying to injure someone. Different levels of wrongdoing
Definitely different. I meant that his offense was indifference to potential injury, not intent to injure. And it sounds like we agree on that. Cheers!
Machado’s history means that he no longer gets the benefit of doubt. He’s established a baseline immaturity that obviously hasn’t improved.
The effort was to make it look like he didn’t intend to injure.
The play I was immediately reminded of was Eric Young Jr. running over Tim Hudson’s ankle in 2013. It was a truly horrible injury, but in that case no one claimed it was intentional. I’m not sure whether that’s because there was a clear difference in what happened and how intentional it actually was (it certainly looks like Machado had a moment or two more to react than Young did), or because of the difference in how Young handled it, apologizing immediately (and of course his prior reputation, and the way the media treated it) — or some combination of the two. But it seems worth considering as a parallel case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNHL9qdtDtI
You’re right, and this is exactly why you are supposed to NOT put your foot over the base when you cover. This is why Manny took umbrage in the first place. Aguilar did something against fundamental baseball that put himself and the runner at risk, and Manny reacted in an obnoxious and immature way, but very clearly NOT trying to do what EY accidentally did to Hudson.
I don’t think it necessarily exonerates Machado (which you seem to be halfway suggesting) but I agree that Aguilar’s footwork is noticeably bad, bad enough that it could lead to him getting unintentionally injured.
That case was in no way similar. Davis, a guy who hustled constantly, was trying to beat out the ball and Hudson was right on top of the bag.
Machado fully intended to do what he did, and knew he was going to be out.
Superficially similar, but watching the two videos they’re very different on whether or not it’s reasonable that the runner made contact.
– Hudson’s foot was on the foul side of the bag. It was difficult – if not impossible – for Young to touch the bag without hitting Hudson. Look at the RF angle above, and Machado had a good 2/3 of the base available to him without hitting Aguilar.
– The appearance that Machado only “had a moment or two more to react than Young did” is almost certainly an illusion due to the different camera editing of Machado’s ground ball to SS. Machado appears to have “a moment or two more” because the camera follows the ball and then the throw. Based on when Aguilar should have been positioned on first base, Machado had far more than an extra moment or two to see where Aguilar’s foot was positioned as Machado ran to first base.
Initially thought Aguilar had gotten spiked because I’ve only ever seen first basemen get spiked in instances like these (I’ve been a victim twice), whether intentional or not. I wonder if the play looked awkward because Machado wanted to cause some sort of “mild disturbance” without going so far as actually spiking Aguilar.
Hey, remember when this clown effectively ended Dustin Pedroia’s career?
The article made sense right up until this point:
“it seems doubtful the league wants a marquee player on the verge of signing a massive contract to join a new club only to miss the first few games of next season.”
What would that have to do with anything? Much like the Utley (non)suspension, it only shows that they don’t really care about imposing consequences, only the immediate optics of doing so. There are 162 games. Holding players accountable, even if it has to wait until next season, should be the goal. His new team should bear the pains of having a dirty (and admittedly lazy) player, whom they pursued immediately after his flaws were displayed on the biggest possible stage. That’s part of what you’re buying.
Respect for the game and the fans is what needs to be in mind, nothing else.
Not only that, but it creates a different set of rules for different players.
If I’m still under contract, do I get the same benefit? Or what about if I just sign a minor-league deal?
That we basically never see this happen “by accident” in the course of regular play ever is pretty damning. Players run to first dozens of times per game and getting tangled up with the 1B almost always happens on races to the bag or bad throws. To try and pass this off as an accident insult’s everyone’s intelligence. I have not disliked an active mlb player for his on-field antics this much since A-rod.
Another aspect of the age of replay, whereas players used to be able to know they could come off the bag as they caught the ball and the umpire would never call the runner safe, at least not on a play like this.
I agree with the comment that Machado was annoyed with Aguilar’s foot position on the middle of the bag and the fact that Aguilar didn’t remove his foot after he caught the ball and recorded the out.. I was taught that proper technique is to slide your foot up and down the second base side of the bag to receive the ball. That also allows you to receive the ball more quickly. Both the runner and the batter are entitled to the bag so the common etiquette is to share the bag as I described. Did it rise to the level of obstruction? I say no. Against Machado is that he wasn’t running in the lane which is designed to protect against such collisions. And finally it was obvious that he was pissed off the way Aguilar chose to play it. It takes two to create an accident and Aguilar is not without some blame. But at the end of the day, Manny chose to be a douche and he was the one who got fined, justifiably.
This almost never happens by accident, but I’m surprised MLB hasn’t considered adding a safety base at 1st like many rec leagues use for exactly this reason. Compared to the controversies over the various slide and collision rule changes, seems like it would be relatively harmless and wouldn’t change how the game is played.
“Back and to the left. Back and to the left”
One other possibility for why he did it: he was pissed at grounding out in a big moment and acted petulantly. Kind of like throwing something, but instead of throwing something, he kicked Aguilar’s ankle because it was there (and maybe because Aguilar’s foot was covering too much of the bag).
He could have easily broken Aguilar’s ankle. I’m a little frustrated that he comes away with what will probably just be a small fine, especially when he could be making around $400M on his next contract. Send a message that intentionally trying to injure opposing players isn’t okay and suspend him for a playoff game or a few.
No this never in a million years would have broken somebody’s ankle. Except Mr Glass from Unbreakable.
Can I come kick you in the ankle with a running (okay, jogging) start?
Yes, if you do it with the top part of your shoe into the fat part of my calf. This was not a “kick” as much as a “swipe”. My ankle would not break.
The league could police this but has decided that they’ll just stick with the “drill someone at the time and place of our choosing” instead.
I have gone through the comments and did not see one mention of the spiking incident with Dustin Pedroia that may have ended Pedroia’s career. At the time Pedroia waived it off but he was about the only person who didn’t see it as an attempt to injure. I wonder if he would give Machado the same benefit of the doubt after Machado’s other incidents.
There’s a comment to this effect by rhswanzey but it bears repeating. He nearly did in Holt the same way.
This looks like a baserunner facing an impending collision and having to make a split-second decision to go over, around or through. Players used to be taught to go through and that was called hard-nosed. They were supposed to be hardnosed. There was a degree of difference between hardnosed (aggressive) and dirty (malicious). It went without saying that a player should never intend to injure another player on a baseball field. Though I am no admirer of the way Machado plays the game, I can’t see how it is “reasonable” to get inside his head in this bang-bang play and decide that he went over the line into malice.
We know this wasn’t just a result of playing hard because Manny gave an interview before the game in which he explicitly said that playing hard and running out grounders to first base isn’t his thing. Did he have to make extra effort to get to the base at this point, compared to his other ground ball plays? I have the feeling it may have been even more premeditated than we’re giving it credit for.
Judging from the rest of the commentary, this will be an unpopular opinion, but…I’m not entirely comfortable tallying this as a dirty play, and I say that as someone who likes both teams.
Yeah, he’s not running at full effort on that play, and yeah, he looks down at the base before the contact occurs, and yeah, he drags the toe of his left foot.
Thing is, not running at full effort is still running fairly fast, and when your feet and legs are in motion at a run, it’s difficult to change up your stride – in the replay that shows him from the outfield foul line perspective (facing him), it kinda looks like his right leg short-stepped in order to hit the bag rather than stride over it, and it could be argued that he looked down to ensure that he *would* hit the bag.
Looking at that last replay (the closeup of their feet), it seems to me that had he made a regular stride with his left foot (i.e. not dragging his toes), said contact might’ve been a lot worse since there would have been no “brake” applied (or drag coefficient, heh).
Regarding his commentary after the fact…how many of us have heard people talking shit about something we’ve done and then react nonchalantly or defensively rather than try to explain ourselves?
To be clear, I’m not saying this particular play wasn’t dirty, and I’m not trying to defend Manny – I’m just not entirely sure that he was intentionally trying to hurt Aguilar or pull his foot off in order to receive a call of “safe”, and can see plausible rationale for both sides of the argument.
EDIT: Before I wrote this, I wasn’t aware of Manny’s reputation for being a shit or his history of outbursts. I’m mostly a casual fan of baseball these days; I get my fix almost entirely from reading articles here on Fangraphs. Still…I dunno, man. Maybe.
Maybe it’s cause I’m from Minnesota, but if you kick somebody on accident the first thing you do is go apologize to him and make sure he’s ok. If Manny had done that we’d be seeing a very different result.
Lived there for a few years in the early 00’s; loved it to pieces. I hated having to leave.
Aguilar stayed on the bag too long, he got bumped, much ado about nothing. I know, I’ll probably get killed on this. Maybe it is because I’ve been watching more soccer than baseball as my daughter is currently playing soccer. Last night I was watching Concacaf final. This wouldn’t even of received a whistle in soccer. Slides and kicks, shoves and grabs. Just your average game.
He seemed to wander a bit towards Aguilar. Aguilar didn’t move. He got bumped. Next.
This shows an appalling lack of good judgment.
His actions were intentional and designed to at least anger Aguilar (if not hurt him). Watching the replay though you can see how easy it would have been for Machado to hurt himself in the collision.
Three possible outcomes from the action: (1) nobody is injured but the Brewers are pissed off, (2) Aguilar is injured and the Brewers are pissed off, and (3) Machado is injured, the Dodgers are upset at him and he costs himself serious money in FA.
Any way you look at it, it was just a stupid, stupid move. No upside and all downside.
It looked like a playground cheap shot. Aguilar had his foot much more on the base than you should and machado was letting him know that he was taking too much of the base.
Machado was immature, but I don’t know why Aguilar needs to be that far into the base or why he wasn’t already pulling his foot off. Making a runner touch the far right side of the base, instead of the middle exposes the runner to injury
You wonder about this type of behavior, including the non-hustle, BEFORE he gets paid?? Many teams will just ignore this and he will get his millions, but what if he really gets worse?
Manny is carrying on his cowardly and gutless dirty play in the WS. Game 3 needlessly high slide into second trying to break Bogart’s leg. Game 4 he tries to step on first baseman’s foot. What a complete wuss to gutlessly go after defenseless players. What a loser. Glad he does not play for my Red Sox.