Mark Canha, the Newest Brewer

Sam Navarro-USA TODAY Sports

Baseball is a game of uncertainty. Half an inch here or there can be the difference between a strikeout and a home run. Balls bounce strangely. Matchups don’t even out. The wind is blowing just the wrong way one day, or just the right way the next. But two things reoccur like Haley’s comet in the modern game: the Brewers are a few hitters short of a potent lineup and Mark Canha posts an above average but unexciting batting line. Today, those two things are teaming up – the Mets traded Canha to the Brewers in exchange for prospect Justin Jarvis.

It’s not that the Brewers plan on a punchless lineup. They’ve drafted plenty of hitters in recent years, and made trades to secure others besides. In the past few years, they’ve traded for Willy Adames, Jesse Winker, Rowdy Tellez, and William Contreras. They’ve promoted Sal Frelick, Brice Turang, Garrett Mitchell, and Joey Wiemer. Carlos Santana joined the team last week. Through it all, though, they’ve always seemed a few bats short. Someone gets injured. Someone regresses. The end result? An offense scuffling around or below league average, with a few spots providing downright embarrassing production.

This year, the entire infield has failed Milwaukee. Luis Urías hit his way back to the minors; Adames has a .202/.287/.388 line, good for an 82 wRC+. Turang is even worse, hitting .208/.278/.314 (61 wRC+). Brewers first basemen have a decidedly not nice 69 wRC+ in aggregate. Having an extra batter in the lineup hasn’t softened the blow, either: Brewers DHs have hit .205/.301/.308, the second-worst DH production across the majors. Despite a gaping hole at the top of the NL Central where the Cardinals usually feature, the Brewers have fallen out of first place thanks to the upstart Reds. They need more firepower, and the sooner, the better.

Canha might not be what you picture when you hear “more firepower.” His maximum exit velocity this year ranks in the 48th percentile across baseball. That’s nothing new; he’s been bouncing around between the 40th and 60th percentile for the past four years. He’s only eclipsed 20 homers once, in dinger-mad 2019. He’s not even a Mookie Betts type whose raw power plays up; his barrel rate hasn’t beaten the league average since that same 2019 season.

That’s all true, but Canha still gets his because he has a tremendous sense of the strike zone. He rarely chases bad pitches. He makes a ton of contact when he does swing. A career double-digit walk rate makes sense given those skills. He strikes out more than you’d think given that rosy description of his plate discipline, but that’s just because he works a lot of deep counts. The total package is basically what you’d expect: solid on-base numbers, subpar slugging, and overall production somewhere between 10 and 20% better than average.

Canha’s 2023 has been no exception. While the Mets have fallen out of contention, he has authored a customarily solid season. He’s striking out less frequently than in any previous season, which has buoyed his line despite just six homers and a .279 BABIP. Only two Brewers have out-hit Canha this year over 150 plate appearances or more, which is honestly shocking. Five different Mets have, and the Mets are awful!

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

All of that to say, the Brewers have a lot of holes to fill and Canha fits many of them just fine. He can DH. He can spell both outfield corners (Frelick and Christian Yelich), or center field in a pinch. When Tellez returns, they’re a natural right/left platoon. Perhaps I’m not selling this strongly enough, but that’s a really nice player, the kind of hitter the Brewers have been missing for years. Canha’s not a superstar, or even a star, but it’s hard to look at his results and see anything worse than a good bat.

To sweeten the pot, the Mets stapled a bag of money to Canha’s jersey. More specifically, they’re paying all of his salary except the league minimum, as Mark Feinsand reported. The Brewers generally operate with a tight budget and they’ve already made some trades this year. Next year’s team option – a $2 million buyout or one year for $11.5 million – provides a possible bonus and a definite small cost, but most likely he’s just a rental.

To add Canha, the Brewers sent the Mets an intriguing pitching prospect. Jarvis wasn’t really on the radar before this year, and Eric Longenhagen explained to me why: He’s one of those pitchers who looks quite average when he’s sitting 90-92 and unhittable when he’s 92-94. (Guess how hard he’s throwing now.) His best pitch is a four-seamer with huge vertical movement. He sports an almost perfectly over-the-top delivery; picture a catapult laying siege to a medieval castle, and you’re most of the way there. That means a fairly high release point, and hence a less-shallow vertical approach angle than is ideal for four-seamers, but the movement and a bit of deception make it an excellent pitch nonetheless.

After that fastball, he throws a slider/splitter/curve mix, with the slider probably the best of the bunch. Truthfully, the fastball is doing a lot of the heavy lifting, and he throws his slider as much as his splitter and curve combined. His command is inconsistent – he got his walk rate under control for the first time in his career this year in Double-A, but then walked 12 batters in three starts in Triple-A. In a lot of ways, he’s a two-pitch reliever waiting to happen.

I pointed this out to Eric, but in his mind, the Mets will likely continue to use him as a starter while he has minor league options remaining. There are more chances to catch lightning in a bottle that way, more chances that he’ll master his command. In the meantime, he can pop down from Syracuse to Queens for a low-inning spot start or some long relief when the major league pitching staff is exhausted. There’s a lot of value in having swingmen with options remaining. That feels like it could be his role as soon as next year; he’ll need to be on the 40-man roster this winter to avoid the Rule 5 draft.

Jarvis didn’t make our preseason Brewers list, but his performance this year has put him back on the radar. He’s a 40 FV pitcher per Eric — right on the starter/reliever borderline — on the back of that fastball and the hope that he can find enough strikes and enough secondaries to complement it.

Sometimes, a team’s needs are just boring. That’s the case here. I don’t have a ton of earth-shattering new information to convey to you about Canha or how he’ll fit on the Brewers. He’s offense in a can, and they’re wildly short on offense. He’s probably roughly an average player all-in at this point in his career, his future contract isn’t compelling, and he’s pushing 35. No one’s going to write a tick-tock of how this trade went down.

That’s true, but this is a great example of two teams getting what they need out of a small deal. The Brewers wants to give fewer plate appearances to truly dreadful hitters, and they don’t particularly care what position they’re replacing: check. The Mets are on a mission to spend Steve Cohen’s money to buy prospects, any prospects (though they’ve mostly gotten good ones): check.

Even if I can see why both teams are doing this, I think I’d prefer to be the Brewers. The Mets are just getting what they can; they were unlikely to exercise Canha’s option and they don’t have anything left to play for this year. That’s smart business, particularly given how willing Cohen is to pay down salaries to get more prospects. But Milwaukee’s end? Mark Canha is a pretty good player to get back for a Rule 5-eligible pitcher with command questions.

Let’s put it this way: It’s probably easier for the Brewers to draft and develop a pile of Jarvises than it is to find consistent, Canha-level offense. If rentals like him – roughly average, cheap (post-Cohen), reliable, versatile – are on offer at this rate, why in the world would you go sign a Josh Bell or a Brandon Belt in free agency? They got to try out internal options – whoops, yeah, those didn’t work – and still ended up with a solid hitter at a bargain basement price. If pitchers keep fetching huge returns in trade at the deadline, the optimal behavior seems clear: focus on getting some pitching in free agency, then acquire rental bats as appropriate.

The ever-pragmatic Brewers have stumbled upon a pretty good strategy here. The Mets are taking what the market will give them. Jarvis might end up great (certainly possible) and Canha might disappoint (relatively unlikely), but putting your team in a position where you get to make trades like Jarvis-for-Canha instead of Quero-for-Giolito is something to aspire to. If and when David Stearns takes over in Queens in a few years, maybe he can replicate the strategy there.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think Ben does a pretty good job of explaining the Brewers’ tire fire of an offense this year. The Brewers have tried to make do with journeymen and role players for a while now and it finally caught up to them.

The Brewers’ offense features only two players with a wRC+ above 100 and more than 150 PAs–Yelich and Contreras. Using the same parameters for other teams with similar records in the NL, the D-Backs have 6 players who match. The Reds have 6. The Cubs have 7. The Giants have 7. The Marlins–the Marlins!!!–have 6. That’s the competition.

Guys low on the defensive spectrum and have a league-average bat like Canha and Santana shouldn’t have a lot of value for a team with playoff aspirations but in this case they do. It’s unbelievable that they’re even in a position to buy, between that and the fact that they’ve received 29 starts from Colin Rea and Julio Teheran.

tomerafan
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If the Mets had shown any ability to develop pitching in the last 5 years, I’d be excited since Jarvis seems like he might be a guy with another level to unlock.

hebrewMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  tomerafan

so much this. I love the moves from a Mets organization perspective but they’ve shown ZERO ability to develop ANY pitching whatsoever

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Also, if the only thing the Mets are getting out of this is an FV40 pitcher and a couple million dollars on the buyout next year, that would suggest to me there was not a lot of demand.

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago

Hard to argue with Ben’s take on the Brewers side — solid ‘need’ add at minimal cost. But I think it’s worth noting the true downside of the supposed pragmatic strategy of waiting to acquire league-average bats until Aug. 1.

The Crew missed the playoffs by 1 game last year. They are currently behind the Reds in the NL Central and failed to distance themselves from the Cubs enough to force the latter to sell. They will need good fortune to win the division. Conversely, the Mets won 101 games in 2022 because they invested in multiple players such as Canha from the start of the season. No, it hasn’t worked out for them this year. But if you give the Brewers an extra $20M to spend on Jan. 1, are they 3 games better now? And might those 2-3 losses cost them a playoff appearance for the third time in four years?

Value-wise, Stearns and Arnold look like geniuses. But at the end of the day, it’s been a trash approach to accomplishing what should be the real goal.

DLHughey
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

Absolutely this. Needing to make a deadline trade for a very affordable player they obviously needed and could have signed in the winter is not smart, and it’s a huge part of the reason why the recent brewers teams have failed to capitalize on the soft NL central despite developing some exceptional pitchers. It’s negligent team building at best, and acting like $/WAR is the barometer for a job well done is silly.

dangledangleMember since 2024
2 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

One of their issues is that the Brewers are not getting production out of players that looked solid specifically Adams and Urias. The trade for Winkler is obviously a dud but he was another bat that they were counting on to produce at least a wRC+ of100 or a little higher.

g4Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

All true, Ben. As a local fan, it’s hard not to get upset about that payroll crunch when every article we read is “Brewers come out ahead in trade!” “Brewers have solid draft!” “Brewers among few teams that’ve cracked the code on developing pitchers!” etc. Yet every season is fingers and toes crossed, injury-to-one-stud dependent, please please please let us eke out 87 wins only to be completely overmatched in October tenuous.

Your job is to report on actualities, and as it stands the Brewers do operate with payroll constraints. My complaint should have namechecked Attanasio, not the GMs who certainly are doing a fine job of making chicken salad. And if Attanasio can’t afford the extra 10M, 20M, 30M to boast at least half of the Top 5 payrolls, then MLB should give it to them.

That’s right, G4 bait n switched into another pointless rant for Better Revenue Sharing. (Enter those counterpointing with references to Nutting and Fisher.)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  g4

I find it incredible that the Brewers developed all these starting pitchers and didn’t go get them adequate run support. I’m not sure this offseason was the time, and there are a lot of players on pricey contracts that made sense for the Brewers at the time that are underperforming (like Schwarber). But it’s crazy to me that the Brewers spent this many offseasons and repeatedly decided that yes, this offense was good enough to get by. They could have had a multi-year championship window but they just didn’t see the urgency.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“All these starting pitchers” haven’t been contributing much in 2023. Burnes has been fine, Woodruff has been hurt, Peralta has underwhelmed.

The only year “all these starting pitchers” were healthy and effective was 2021, when they combined for 490 IP and 17.0 rWAR

In 2018 they combined for 158 IP and 2.3 rWAR. (just breaking in, good job, went to NLCS)

In 2019 they combined for 255 IP and 0.3 rWAR (software slump, made Wild Card anyway)

In 2022 they combined for 433 IP and 10.9 rWAR. (those six lost wins would have come in handy)

This year they are at 253 IP and 4.5 rWAR combined.

Adames, Tellez, Winker, Urias and Taylor all simultaneously cratering at the plate has been the main reason the Brewers haven’t run away with the NLC already, but their Big Three starting pitchers (who they have apparently wasted by only winning the 6th most games in MLB since 2018) haven’t been pitching up to their reputations either.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

The only guys who “cratered” were Adames and Urias, and in Adames’ case it was offset by Yelich becoming good again after looking weak for several years. The other guys were role players and reclamation projects who were dicey to rely on to begin with. The fact that the Brewers got away with journeymen and role players playing so far over their heads for years is the remarkable story.

jandys
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Well if Tellez and Winker are role players and reclamation project, doesnt every small market team, not just the brewers, rely on them for like half of the lineup or rotation spots? This season problem is purely because all Adames, Urias, Tellez and Winker hitting in their 20-30 percentile at the same time and not because part of the lineup is occupied by rookies or guys like Taylor/Miller etc…
You can live with below average production at 6-9 spots, but you need at least two of Adames/Urias/Tellez/Winker to not suck. And all of them suck. If you predicted this offseason all these four hitters would suck, it would be very very bold prediction.

dangledangleMember since 2024
2 years ago

Canha is the definition of a cromulent player. I like the trade for both sides the Brewers window is closing with their rotation getting closer to free agency and swapping Canha’s production in the place of sub replacement level is smart business.

On the Mets side of things the arbitrage of eating salary for a better prospect return is smart. I’ve never understood why more sellers don’t make the same play.

dumdogMember since 2024
2 years ago

whats the difference between a sirp and a mirp and what do they stand for?

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  dumdog

Single-inning relief pitcher and multi-inning relief pitcher.