Mark Teixeira Has No Use for BABIP

For hitters, luck can sometimes explain a poor batting average on balls in play (BABIP), especially in short time frames. Players generally reach the majors with an apparent skill at hitting the ball hard enough and far enough so that hits drop around 30% of the time. If a hitter coming up through the minors lacks this ability, it’s very difficult for him to receive the promotions necessary to reach the majors. There are 126 active players in the majors with at least 3,000 plate appearances and every single one has gotten a hit on at least 27% of the balls that were hit in play. Since the beginning of 2011, however, Mark Teixeira has nearly 2000 plate appearances and he’s a hit on just 23% of balls hit in play, the lowest figure among MLB hitters with at least 1500 plate appearances. He’s the rare hitter who can survive without a decent BABIP.

The bottom of this season’s leaderboard in BABIP is littered with players getting off to rough starts, hitters who have lost their ability to hit major-league pitching, and Mark Teixeira.

Name BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+
Stephen Drew .183 .171 .244 .329 56
Mark Teixeira .191 .243 .365 .588 155
Luis Valbuena .200 .201 .263 .421 89
Jose Ramirez .202 .183 .261 .238 45
Chase Utley .207 .192 .271 .308 54
Evan Gattis .212 .205 .240 .441 83
Jimmy Rollins .215 .202 .274 .345 75
Lonnie Chisenhall .217 .203 .237 .336 56
Marlon Byrd .222 .213 .286 .460 101
Chris Coghlan .223 .214 .290 .435 92

Marlon Byrd has hit for enough power to be roughly average, but Teixeira has walked and powered his way to be one of the best 20 hitters in the league. Only Bryce Harper and Nelson Cruz have more than Teixeira’s 14 home runs, and Teixeira is one of just six players with more walks than strikeouts this season. The very low BABIP looks unusual, but it’s the natural byproduct of hitting more home runs than singles. Teixeira is currently on pace to hit 35 more homers this season, for a hypothetical total of 49 home runs. Our Depth Chart Projections have him hitting 21 more home runs the rest of the season, however. If he’d hit at that projected pace in the early going, he’d have eight home runs so far; the six non-homers, were they converted into other sorts of hits, would place Teixeira’s BABIP at .231, right in line with his recent career numbers.

Heading into the season, Mark Teixeira’s decline seemed apparent from all angles. The wrist injury that cost him most of the 2013 season had seeped into his power numbers in 2014. He turned 35 in April, an age where few power hitters retain usefulness, with no player at least 35 years of age having hit more than 35 home runs in the last six seasons (David Ortiz hit exactly 35 last year). The shift has long been a problem for Teixeira and its increased use had robbed him of the ability to hit many singles. The FanGraphs Depth Chart projections looked for Teixeira to hit .229/.319/.422, slightly above average for a hitter, but with the positional adjustment at first base set to make him an average to slightly below-average player.

Teixeira has stubbornly refused to change his game for the shift. In 2011, he said “I would be a pretty ugly slap hitter.” His hit charts from 2012 to 2014 against right-handed pitchers shows his insistence on pulling the ball.


Source: FanGraphs

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

After missing most of 2013 with an injury and then struggling last year to a league-average batting in a power-hitting position, there were calls for Teixeira to change his approach, but again Teixeira refused. In the offseason, Teixeira discussed his plan to beat the shift.

“We’ve talked about it ad nauseam,” he said. “Every time I try to slap the ball the other way, it just doesn’t go well for anybody. And that’s what the other team wants. They want to take the middle-of-the-order power hitter and turn him into a slap hitter. So if I can hit more home runs, more doubles, walk more, that takes care of the shift.”

Teixeira has been hitting more home runs with a few to the opposite field and his current 15.5% walk rate is higher than any other season in his career, although not too far off from his 11.5% career number. His strikeouts are down almost 10 percentage points this season from last year when his 22% strikeout rate was the highest of his career and four points above his career average. In the offseason, Nikhil Chaturvedi authored a Community blog post hypothesizing that part of the reason for Teixeira’s decline was an inability to catch up to the fastball. Taking away the shortened 2013 season, last year was the first year that Teixeira was below average on fastballs.

From 2008 to 2012, when Teixeira swung at hard pitches, he whiffed around 10% of the time. In 2014, that number jumped to over 14%, per Brooks Baseball. Here he is whiffing on a high fastball against Jacob deGrom in May of last year.

Teixeira was late on the pitch, but given where it is on the zone, it was going to be difficult for him to do anything with it even if he had made contact. Last season, Teixeira swung at more pitches out of the zone than in any other season in his career. The number of swings outside the zone has dropped from 28% in 2014 down to 21% this year. When he swings at pitches in the zone, even if they are coming quickly, Teixeira can do some damage.

Here he is launching an upper-90s fastball this year:

The Best Shape of his Life (BSOHL) narratives run strong in winter and Teixeira’s story is no different.

“We really attacked all of the issues I’ve been having,” he said. “I got myself really strong. I was weaker than I’ve probably ever been in my entire career last year because of the [wrist] injury the year before, not being able to work out like I usually do . . . I feel like a kid again.”

Injuries take a toll on all players, especially as they age, and losing strength in the wrist can sap a player’s power. Teixeira’s lack of health likely contributed to his average season last year, and his good health coupled with a better approach has helped him this season. By laying off pitches outside the zone, Teixeira is able to take more walks and do more more damage on pitches in the zone despite seeing fewer pitches per plate appearance compared to last year. Teixeira is probably never going to get his batting average back from a half-decade ago and his BABIP is never going to approach .300, but if he can continue to take a free base when it is given and hit home runs at even half his current pace, he is going to be an above-average player for the Yankees and give hope to other aging sluggers that it’s possible to get healthy and recover some of their previous form.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
yk3
11 years ago

In 2011 Teixeira’s BABIP is a full 9 points lower than his average! Insane!

CircleChange11
11 years ago

This really is interesting.

.191 BABIP ===== 155 wRC+

HIs BABIP before 2010 was essentially .300 or better …. now it just keeps getting lower. Can it really all be due to the shift?

I’m not an expert on anything batted ball data, but his O-Zone contact % is going up, which I would imagine for many hitters means weaker contact, or outs. Rolling over on grounders or getting under for weak fly outs. It seems weird because his walk % is increasing. So, it’s hard to tell if his plate discipline is getting better. [1] He walks more, [2] He chases (and contacts) more.

Looks like he’s being floated with a HR/FB% that’s 4 % points higher than his career best.

It’s an interesting situation.

Gold Hat
11 years ago

BABIP, to god-damned hell with BABIP! I have no BABIP. In fact, I don’t need BABIP.

Babyspittle
11 years ago

a possible career year at 35, with improved walk and strikeout rates.
inconceivable!

nj
11 years ago
Reply to  Babyspittle

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Tubes
11 years ago

Qualified seasons with 120 wRC+ and a BABIP below .215:

Roy Cullenbine 1947 (.206 BABIP, 131 wRC+)
Roger Maris 1961 (.209 BABIP 162 wRC+)
Gene Tenace 1974 (.213 BABIP 135 wRC+)
Mark McGwire 1989 (.214 BABIP 131 wRC+)

TWTW
11 years ago

This is an intriguing article. Perhaps BABIP doesn’t have the broad explanatory power that we’ve been led to believe it has. It seems there are all sorts of players that defy its logic, Mr. Teixeira being a prime example. This article has definitely given me alot to think about.

http://twtwsports.blogspot.com/2015/05/danville-kentucky-folks-by-now-youre.html

Paul
11 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

I think you don’t understand babip or use it correctly if you think it purports to say every player will regress to the mean.

Also, that article has given me nothing to think about. Stop spamming Fangraphs with your own advertising.

CircleChange11
11 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

It seems there are all sorts of players that defy its logic, Mr. Teixeira being a prime example.

There are many more that follow the pattern.

The term “outlier” comes to mind.

A-Taur
11 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

I’m almost convinced that article is an attempt at satire.

arc
11 years ago
Reply to  A-Taur

Unfortunately, he takes himself seriously. But that doesn’t mean we have to!

RichW
11 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

Your handle should be Don Quixote.

Peter R
11 years ago

As Mike Axisa has pointed out on his RAB blog numerous times there is a precedent for a return to form. Jose Bautista took a whole season after his same wrist surgery to recover his power stroke. The wrist is so key in bat speed and power it’s not surprising. Seems Mark may be experiencing something similar combined with his insane BABIP thing.

tz
11 years ago

Looking at the last two guys in that chart makes me wonder if Chris Coghlan is trying to become the next Marlon Byrd.

In all seriousness, he’s increased his FB% and his HR/FB to new highs over the first 45 games of 2015. Byrd made a similar shift when he was with the Mets a few years back.

Poor Mans Rick ReedMember since 2016
11 years ago

Would batting average on contact (to include HR) show Teixeira in a different light? What’s the reason behind using BABIP instead of BACON, especially when it’s being used to infer something about contact authority? I mean, that acronym is just so tasty…

Homer Simpson
11 years ago

Mmmmmmm . . . BACON.

Homer Simpson
11 years ago
Reply to  Homer Simpson

Mmmmmmm … sacrilicious.

Cool Lester Smooth
11 years ago

WHY DO YOU ONLY WRITE ABOUT THE CARDINALS?!!!!!

Oh, wait, never mind. Awesome article, man.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

Heh. THE CARDINAL WAY.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

“By laying off pitches outside the zone, Teixeira is able to take more walks and do more more damage on pitches in the zone despite seeing fewer pitches per plate appearance compared to last year.”

I think you need to develop this. I think you buried the lede on this one… How has he been pitched differently and why is he seeing fewer pitches?

I get no bottom line or take away from this article.

Stuck in a Slump
11 years ago

Is he? Or is he just not fouling off as many pitches outside the zone? It seems to me that the author is saying he’s been pouncing on pitches in the zone and driving them more frequently, but because he’s not getting overly defensive in his swings, he’s seeing fewer pitches while taking more walks. Or at least, that’s one possibility of what he’s trying to say.

busy scouting t-ball
11 years ago

One of my favorite articles. Now talk anout a eods trade value for fun please 🙂

Green Mountain Boy
11 years ago

Here’s the problem I’ve always had with BABIP – it doesn’t count a HR as being a ball in play. This defies logic to me. A fly ball that Mike Trout jumps over the fence to catch is a ball in play, but the same fly ball that travels a foot farther so Trout can’t quite get it isn’t a ball in play? Of course it is. Just because a HR isn’t catchable shouldn’t make it not be a ball in play. It’s in fair territory, isn’t it?

And yet no one has a problem with the fast runner vs slow runner aspect of BABIP. It’s just accepted as fact that fast runners beat out more infield hits than slow runners and have higher sustainable BABIPs. So why does BABIP favor fast groundball hitters and penalize slow power hitters? It makes no sense!

Re-run all the BABIP stuff counting all HRs as balls in play, and THEN I’ll attribute more credence to all the BABIP arguments.

PersonMember since 2024
11 years ago

Just use strikeout rate then.

CircleChange11
11 years ago

I thought we just used BABIP to try and see if a player was getting more/less lucky than usual? (i.e., how they would regress)

I didn’t think anyone got any value or recognition in BABIP that they wouldn’t already have received from other stats.

I guess I’m asking, what do we really use BABIP for that it needs to be reconfigured?

Geius
11 years ago

BABIP, WAR, these are numbers for people who have too much time on their hands. Get a job! Be productive! BABIP means little. Obviously, you’re going to have a higher BABIP if you hit line drives all the time. That doesn’t mean you’re going to “regress” later. It just means you’re hitting the ball harder so that the fielders won’t catch it. WAR? It has nothing at all to do with wins. Statistics, some of them, are good tools for professional baseball people. Losers — get a life!