Matt Kemp Has Actually Been an Asset

Between injuries that sapped his speed, a monster contract that hasn’t aged well, and a reputation as a clubhouse problem (deserved or not) that has followed him from team to team, Matt Kemp has more often been considered a liability than an asset over the past few years. Improbably, the 33-year-old outfielder is now back where his major-league career began in Los Angeles, one of the hottest hitters on a team desperate for a big bat in the absence of Justin Turner.

Once upon a time, Kemp was a superstar, a homegrown lineup centerpiece on a club teeming with young talent. A sixth-round draft pick out of an Oklahoma high school in 2003, he was just 21 when he debuted with the Dodgers on May 28, 2006. He hit seven homers in his first 15 games before cooling off, and while he was limited to 98 games the next year by a season-opening return to Triple A and a two-month absence due to a right shoulder separation, he hit a sizzling .342/.373/.52. Once the Andruw Jones experiment ended, he took over the team’s center-field job in 2008, and in his first two full seasons, he totaled 44 homers, 69 steals, and 8.3 WAR while helping the team to back-to-back NLCS berths. He even won a Gold Glove in 2009, his only season in center after which both his DRS and UZR were in the black.

Kemp’s game fell apart in 2010, a time during which he later conceded he lost focus amid the temptations of Tinseltown. As the Baseball Prospectus 2011 annual summarized, “He incited the ire of Joe Torre and his staff by giving up at-bats, failing to hustle out of the batter’s box, blundering on the basepaths and in the field, and showing a general lack of intensity.” Then came a 2011 turnaround in which he more than lived up to the hype, with an NL-leading 39 homers and the league’s second-best wRC+; he fell one steal shy of the fifth 40-homer/40-steal season in history. He won another Gold Glove, finished second in the NL MVP voting, and in November of that year, signed an eight-year, $160 million extension — which, at the time, was the largest contract in NL history and the seventh-largest overall.

Then came injuries, an endless litany: both hamstrings, a torn labrum and rotator-cuff damage in his left shoulder, a severe left ankle sprain. And surgeries, too: two for the shoulder, plus one for the ankle, including a microfracture procedure. Over the 2102-13 seasons, he played just 179 games, and the Dodger outfield, which now included Yasiel Puig and (occasionally) Carl Crawford, as well as Andre Ethier, learned to get along fine without him. Though Kemp returned to hit .287/.346/.506 with 25 homers and 141 wRC+ in 2014, his defensive woes (-22 DRS, -13 UZR) spelled the end of his time in center field and limited him to 2.5 WAR.

By the end of 2014, they also spelled the beginning of his time as a write-off. Amid a Winter Meetings whirlwind in December of that year, the new Andrew Friedman/Farhan Zaidi regime traded him, backup catcher Tim Federowicz, and $32 million to the Padres for Yasmani Grandal and pitching prospects Zack Eflin (soon flipped to the Phillies) and Joe Wieland. On July 30, 2016, the Padres sent him to the Braves along with $10.5 million in exchange for infielder Hector Olivera, who was under suspension for a domestic-violence incident and owed $28.5 for 2017-20 once he was reinstated — even though he was immediately released. The trail of bad paper finally came full circle on December 16, 2017, when the Braves dealt Kemp back to the Dodgers for Charlie Culberson, Adrian Gonzalez, Scott Kazmir, Brandon McCarthy — the last three owed more than $50 million for 2018 — and another $4.5 million.

Though Kemp homered 77 times for the Padres and Braves over the 2015-17 span, he hit just .269/.310/.470 (107 wRC+) and produced 1.4 WAR for his $64.5 million salary, his value further suppressed by the majors’ worst outfield defense in two different flavors (-50 DRS, -33 UZR). And everywhere he left, allegations that he was a negative influence inevitably surfaced.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

While Kemp’s return to the Dodgers helped them get below the $197 million competitive-balance tax threshold for 2018, he didn’t seem to fit into the playing time picture with an outfield pool that included Puig, Chris Taylor, Joc Pederson, Kiké Hernandez, Andrew Toles, Trayce Thompson, and Alex Verdugo. Reports that he’d lost 40 pounds and was in the best shape of his life were greeted with the usual eyerolls. The industry-wide assumption was that the Dodgers would eventually find an AL destination for Kemp or simply release him, either way absorbing the bulk (if not the entirety) of the $43 million remaining on his deal.

But Kemp looked good enough this spring that the Dodgers, who lost Turner to a broken left wrist — opening up time for Hernandez in the infield — began the season with him in left field. Through Monday, he had started 14 games there and two in right field. Though he’s struck out in 29.5% of his plate appearances, he’s slashed .321/.361/.536 thanks to a sizzling .417 BABIP while hitting three homers (tied for the team high) and recording a 150 wRC+ (second only to Grandal’s 177). With manager Dave Roberts generally pulling him for a defensive replacement around the seventh inning, he hasn’t embarrassed himself afield.

It’s early, and there’s no way Kemp’s .417 BABIP is sticking around. That said, for the first nine seasons of his career (2006-14), he did carry a .351 BABIP across 4,496 plate appearances, injuries and all. While some of that was the product of good contact, it was also probably the result of footspeed, too: during that same period, Kemp’s infield-hit rate ranked somewhere above the 80th percentile among all qualifiers. With that in mind, it’s probably worth noting, as MLB.com’s Mike Petriello did, that there’s at least something to this “best shape” stuff: via Statcasst, Kemp has recorded the largest gain in the majors by sprint speed, outpacing last year’s mark by 1.7 feet per second; his 26.6 ft/sec is higher than his top average speeds in any season from 2015-17. (His 25.9-second mark in 2015 was his best.) He’ll never threaten to go 40/40 again, but if the wheels are in better shape than they’ve been in recent years, that should help him on both sides of the ball.

As for how he’s getting to .417, fortune is certainly part of it. But Kemp has also raised his launch angle (to 16.9 degrees, compared to 8.2 last year and an average of 11.8 degrees from 2015-17) while also recording a higher rate of barrels per batted ball than over 80% of the league. That’s always likely to produce good outcomes, and the numbers bear this out: his .353 xwOBA is still clearly above the league-average mark.

Perhaps of some benefit in this regard is that he’s gone opposite field more often that he’s pulled the ball, in contrast to his career-long tendencies:

Matt Kemp Batted Balls
Year GB% Pull% Cent% Oppo%
2017 48.5% 39.1% 36.8% 24.1%
2018 35.9% 25.6% 46.2% 28.2%
Career 42.0% 41.9% 34.9% 23.2%

So far, much of the damage Kemp has wrought, including all three homers, came at the expense of the Padres and A’s, neither of which has been anything special save for Sean Manaea’s no-hitter. By the time he gets around the league, his hot start may well be a distant memory. But so long as Turner sits, so long as Taylor, Pederson and Puig struggle, Kemp is part of the Dodgers’ solution instead of their problem. In 2018, who would have thought that?





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

57 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago

I assume there are not any suckers out there actually willing to buy into this dead cat bounce. He started last year with an amazing two months (174 and 147 wRC+ in April and May respectively), and the Braves presumably could not find any takers, though the possibility exists that Coppy got greedy.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Kemp was hurt last year. I don’t think you should write off his good months as the outliers. It won’t show up in all DL stints – it was much worse than that as he would miss a game or two, talk about a retroactive DL stint, then appear in a game only to realize he is still hurt. That was about 2/3 of his season – that bad part. if you think this is just noise, then what do you think the remainder of his season looks like? I think they will keep him – why would they want to sell? They are seeing his value and the argument against Kemp as a player is just too well known for anyone to buy. His contract may be garbage, but dude can hit.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Sure, buddy. And he was hurt in 2016 and 2015, too?

And Kemp’s injuries seem to be more of the chronic and progressing kind. To the extent that you want to blame his injuries, why do you think he’s suddenly going to stay healthy when he’s older than ever (I know, we’re all older than ever)?

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I get what you are saying, but losing 40lbs is a real thing. If you’ve ever gone from fat to thin it is amazing how much better you feel, and how much less pressure you are putting on things like your back, and your knees.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Why even follow up with this? I get it, we don’t agree. I think he was a valuable hitter in the years which you mention. It was above average production based on metrics that don’t particularly favor his skillset (low BB). He hit 35 HR in 2016, I am not trying to call that out as poor. There is a reality that he gets pitched tough every at bat – it is a bit problematic to compare his counting stats to those that don’t. People looking at numbers don’t respect him, but the pitcher on the mound does. As the commenter below said, he lost 40 lbs. It is odd to me that we want to bury a players and other times we love stories of redemption.

Ivdown
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Didn’t injuries basically wreck his 2017 season after mid-June?

TWTW
8 years ago

too late to jump back on the Kemp bandwagon, nerds. No website did more to trash his reputation than Fangraphs. I’ve been saying the Dodgers needed to bring him back for years. http://twtwsports.blogspot.com/2016/12/wouldnt-it-be-nice-how-to-take-2017.html

ShowTime98
8 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

I am a huge Dodgers fan and thats such a terrible piece linked. It makes you look even worse. Mark Trumbo really…..Comedy. Them trading Aj Ellis literally won them a playoff series. You should look at the hits Carlos Ruiz gots in the NLDS again. Joe Blanton also imploded last seaso.

bensnider94
8 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

Can you give me evidence of even one person complimenting your work?

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  bensnider94

This is just a personal attack, no? Upvotes… I guess.

bensnider94
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Oh it definitely is. He’s been posting this trash on here and Twitter for long enough that
a) It probably isn’t a joke and
b) Reason doesn’t resonate

So that’s where the personal attack comes from

JoserMember since 2021
8 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

I’m not going to the website but are we sure this isn’t just another (bad) parody account?

FrodoBeck
8 years ago
Reply to  TWTW

The most bewildering part of this is the suggestion to re-sign Utley on a 4 year $60 million deal….

Gotta be a troll

radiohead
8 years ago

Honestly, this doesn’t seem like a Fangraphs article…Translation: I’m not buying Kemp as an asset.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

Technically, he has been an asset: worth 0.4 WAR in 61 PAs. It’s just very unlikely that portends anything significant in the future, despite his improved speed score.

JoserMember since 2021
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Twice the WAR (and almost twice the wRC+) of Corey Seager. Does anybody expect them to end the season in that relation?

Luy
8 years ago
Reply to  Joser

I don’t think anyone expects Kemp to be better than Seager over the course of a season.

But I’m not sure why that reasonable opinion would lead anyone to the unreasonable position that the things Kemp has already done weren’t an asset to the Dodgers.

The title isn’t “Kemp Will Be a Great Asset for the Dodgers”. It’s “Kemp HAS BEEN…” And it’s really hard to argue that 0.4 WAR in 61 PAs hasn’t been valuable.

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Dead cat bounce.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I assume that’s what “this doesn’t seem like a Fangraphs article” means — “this seems like an article that is purely retrospective and doesn’t even try to be predictive”?

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago

It’s April 24th. I guess you gotta write about something.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

There really ought to be two separate categories of posticle here — a “news” category and an “analysis” category — so we can be clear about whether we’re just checking in on an interesting thing that happened or actually trying to make some kind of argument. It’d cut down on the confusion.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I would argue that he has brought more value than that to LAD so far. WAR is just an approximation and engineered to de-value players with Kemp’s skill-set. WAR has almost been the death of Kemp’s career, but that doesn’t change that he is a legitimate middle-of -the order bat and those are increasingly rare.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Prior to this season, Kemp’s wRC+ was 100 in 2017 and 109 in each of 2015 and 2016. That’s not a legitimate middle of the order bat.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Whoosh. The same things that fuel the offensive side of WAR also fuel wRC+. You are making the mistake of thinking that a player is his wRC+. wRC+ is an approximation that places too much weight on BB for me. Its one model. I mentioned this earlier but another real problem with a stat like that is that Kemp actually has to earn what he gets – he always gets pitched tough, scouting reports are going to be pretty good, etc – his outcomes are well-earned as opposed to someone that is going to get challenged a bunch. Most players would embarrass themselves in the offensive role that Kemp occupies in a lineup. Whenever Kemp comes up in a big spot, the other team holds their breath – that is a middle of the order bat – not someone with a bunch of walks. Like I said, he doesn’t fit the model well. The model RC+ does a good job of identifying value where it isn’t/wasn’t really obvious, but it doesn’t accurately quantify actual value.

FrodoBeck
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

I suppose one could argue that with advanced defensive positioning, bats are trending more valuable than defense. So if they can somewhat hide Kemp out there, his bat can speak for itself.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

His bat has been worth 109, 109, and 100 wRC+ the last three years, his age 30-32 seasons. Why on Earth would you expect it to do anything better at age 33? The best case scenario is that his selling out for power gets him a decent chunk of home runs and he is above replacement level. The many strikeouts and few walks, two things that are unlikely to change, keep his potential to “below average player” at best.

FrodoBeck
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I’m generally not a huge fan of “best shape of his life” stuff, but you can’t deny that Kemp certainly looks a lot better off than he has the past few years. How much that translates to performance, there’s no telling. Short-term it appears to be having some sort of positive benefit.

I don’t expect him to keep up a 150 wRC+, but if he can maintain 110-120 wRC+ with hopefully not miserable defense he’s got value. His average exit velocity is 89.1, max 107, so he’s still hitting it reasonably hard. That coupled with his increased launch angle could reasonably suggest he’ll be a bit more valuable as a hitter than he has been over the past couple years.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

If he was hurt, which happens more as you age, then that would justify it. Heck, 109 is better than 100 and you know I am making the injury argument last year at least. Guys have fluky years all the time, so that could certainly happen even if he didn’t actually improve which he could have as well. Around these parts, people get offense all mixed up with the rest of the very muddy picture. He is not below average offensively in my book and I don’t think that is going to happen.

Ivdown
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Not that I begrudge you for standing your ground, but you seem very intent on proving anyone wrong who might be at all high on Kemp.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

I don’t think people actually understand the difference between elite and atrocious LF defense – it doesn’t add up to much over a year. What are we talking 20 more outs spread over 160 games? Probably almost all singles. Nobody goes from 1st to third and no triples – pretty low stakes stuff. Its not even about advanced positioning, but that doesn’t hurt at all. More flyballs helps as well.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

No, we actually do understand the difference pretty well. DRS and UZR are both pretty consistent in rating Kemp as about 15 runs worse than an average defensive corner outfielder over the past few years, give or take a few runs either way. An elite defensive corner outfielder is 10 or more runs better than average, so Kemp’s defense is about 25 runs worse per season worse than an elite fielder. I don’t know exactly how that translates into outs, and some of the difference is that outs turn into extra base hits, not just singles, and also that balls that a good fielder would cut off for a single instead turn into doubles.

And more flyballs does the exact opposite of help Kemp’s defensive value: the more fielding attempts there are in a fielder’s zone, the more defense at that position matters.

tung_twista
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Remember, though, Kemp was one of the most notable beneficiaries of the updated UZR.
His UZR in the past three seasons were -11.7, -12.1, -9.2, so “15 runs give or take” is really inaccurate.
In the same time span, Alex Gordon leads all left fielders with 18.9 UZR.
So compared to literally the best left fielder, Kemp’s defense was worse by 17 runs per season.
Still terrible, but also significantly different to your claim of 25 runs per season.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Change Kemp’s numbers to UZR/150, and you get Kemp averaging -12.8 UZR/150 over 2015-17. And there are corner OF’s, specifically Betts and Heyward in RF, who are better than +10 UZR/150 over that same period. So what I’ve put forward is in fact a pretty good approximation of just how much worse Kemp is than an elite defensive corner OF.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Comparing LF and RF is absurd. RF is much higher stakes. I would not argue that RF defense is not high stakes. Mistakes in RF lose games – those are triples and runners getting to third base.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Thanks for that data. It always goes that direction when you talk about the details of defense data – way less than people want to say it is. I am actually pretty knowledgeable (have looked a bit and asked questions of people that should know) and the more you look at it, the more obvious it becomes to me that there isn’t much value there. Maybe lack of value is the wrong term, but we really shouldn’t be taking it too seriously or attaching meaningful numbers to it. If you want to rank them, well… fine go do that but you can’t tell me how many runs they saved, caused, etc with any accuracy. The fact that these metrics get updated significantly should slow all enthusiasm a lot. Let’s put it this way, how many runs has Kemp actually cost his team this year? I would bet on zero. I know what it means to play LF and I just can’t understand how it has much bearing on the outcome of a game. If Billy Butler was standing out there, then I could, but these are MLB players.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

I openly question all of the methodology. I don’t think you “know” anything – no insult intended there, just saying this is anything but facts. Flyballs are easy to catch… everybody catches those.

Ingtot
8 years ago

As a Dodgers fan, I honestly am not sold that Kemp is having anything other than a decent hot streak that might last as long as 6 weeks or so.
But just an fyi, in 2011, I believe he had over 40 steals and was one home run shy of 40/40. I remember that there was a game near the end of the season against the Nationals that was rained out and it ended up not making a difference instandings so they never made it up and each team only played 161 games that year. I remember this because I thought if they played that game, he hit a homer and made it to 40/40, that he would have most likely won the mvp over Braun that year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

I’m willing to buy that a .353 xwOBA reflects something sort of sustainable. That would indicate that he’s going to be an asset of some kind. Not wRC+-of-150-asset, more like a wRC+-of-120-asset. With some-level-of-bad defense and some inevitable regression, that means he might deserve a spot on the 25-man roster, which is something I never thought I’d say over the last couple of years. This is dependent on his wheels staying on though, which I am about 70% sure isn’t going to happen.

mrdog61Member since 2017
8 years ago

Jay, WHat kind of WAR does Kemp need this season to cement his Hall of Fame cred? =p

david k
8 years ago
Reply to  mrdog61

He’d probably need to hit at least 200 HRs and bat .420 to push his career numbers into HoF discussion! OK, maybe .420 isn’t necessary, but I don’t even think 200 HRs gets him in, although that would be one amazing season!

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  mrdog61

He’d have to get back to his 2008-2011 form for maybe three seasons.

Which doesn’t seem very likely.

WerthlessMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  mrdog61

He’s gotta wait in line behind Chase Headley and Howie Kendrick first.

Note: they each have higher WAR in fewer games.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
8 years ago

“He hasn’t embarrassed himself afield”

Oh, you just wait Jay…

bartelsjason
8 years ago

I love the first month numbers and trying to decipher if numbers are real. Does Heyward suck in the OF now? Is Machado a terrible SS? Mazara is doing great against lefties and on the road, but has been terrible in TEXAS and against righties…..

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

Don’t forget that Corey Dickerson in an elite OF

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

Yes, Machado is terrible at SS, but that isn’t based on April 2018. Dude plays 3B really well though.

Weird to see how players with smaller samples generate tons of excitement.

tung_twista
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Before 2018, Machado had DRS of 2 and UZR of 0.4 in 413 innings at SS.
A sample more than double of his 2018 numbers.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Average is not good. Easy to imagine how average could actually be bad especially considering the inaccuracy of the metrics. He is not old but aging and defense is probably not improving.

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

The principle that’s often cited on stabilization is that it takes about 3 years of defensive stats to tell us as much about “true talent” or predictiveness as one year of batting stats, so looking at one month of defensive stats is more or less useless in telling us anything about a player’s defensive ability.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

Kemp is part of the Dodgers’ solution instead of their problem. In 2018, who would have thought that? Me, me, me… I did! He has always been a great hitter when he is healthy. He is looking a lot like he did last year before the injuries set in. I have literally never seen his 2017 splits pointed at – basically, he did this through May and then was terrible. There is and always will be a great deal of value to a masher that doesn’t provide other value as long as he is at the bottom of the defensive spectrum. What happens in LF really doesn’t add up to much – just ask the Cubs!

Dave TMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

He did this through May last year with a BABIP of around .380 – .390, which was obviously a candidate to regress heavily, and with a BB rate of only ~5% paired with a K rate of ~20%. It was a hitting profile that looked incredibly unsustainable.

ShowTime98
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

His contract is terrible and thats why the Dodgers traded him away in the first place. And why they would trade him in a second to anyone willing to take it on. Stop pretending they acquired him for his skillset.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  ShowTime98

The missing piece from their roster last year was a right-handed bat. What is your point? I really don’t get it. They acquired him because they acquired him in a salary dump – I am sure they are happy with what they have at this point. You are thinking that they are itching to get someone else’s bat in the lineup (Joc, Toles, Verdugo)? I don’t. What is your issue exactly? You are just that dead-set on calling the Dodgers dumb and Kemp garbage? I am simply saying that it is working out well and this is what they needed.

Monsignor Martinez
8 years ago

Abril

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago

Listed at 210 lbs, and he’s lost 30 lbs? (Presumably from something more like 240 lbs.) I’m dubious that losing 1/7th of your body weight is a good thing for a 33 year old athlete. And his new-found extra foot or so of sprint speed still only brings him up to a fringy sort of 45 scout rating on corner outfielder speed.

Nah. I think I’ll pass on this one.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

I am guessing that you may not be 33? Your concern is his health? Average speed sounds OK – he won’t be winning any gold gloves, but thats not why he is in MLB. You shouldn’t compare RF to LF for whatever that is worth.

Mean Mr. Mustard
8 years ago

Me, I’m pulling for the guy to continue a minor resurrection. Regardless of analysis, there’s something cheer-worthy in a 33 year old guy on his way out having his best season in years.
I certainly don’t expect it to continue, but I hope it does.