Maybe This Time It’s the Nationals’ Year

The Nationals haven’t simply been building a franchise since 2005, they’ve been building traditions. Traditions like the running of the presidents, or whatever #Natitude was. These days, the fans cheer “N-A-T-S, NATS, NATS, NATS!” when something good happens, which is, yes, entirely co-opted from the NFL’s New York Jets.

But the most enduring tradition of the Nationals’ brief history is what has happened after each time they’ve reached the playoffs: They lose, sometimes horribly, and always crushingly.

This year, having clinched a spot in the NL Wild Card game, the Nationals are preparing to do it again.

But this time, oh ho boy, it’ll be different.

Maybe.

Before we get to why, here’s how it’s gone down the last four times:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

2012
98-64 (Best in MLB), 23.7 WAR (6th in NL), 101 wRC+ (T-3rd in NL), 194 HR (2nd in NL), 105 SB (T-5th in NL)

Top pitcher: Jordan Zimmerman (5.5 WAR)
Top position player: Bryce Harper (5.2 WAR)

When the team with the best record in baseball is up 6-0 in a deciding NLDS game 5, you’re probably okay to keep the plastic up in the clubhouse. “Not so fast,” said noted slugger Pete Kozma.

2014
96-66 (Best in NL), 26.2 WAR (3rd in NL), 99 wRC+ (T-3rd in NL), 152 HR (4th in NL), 101 SB (T-6th in NL)

Top pitcher: Jordan Zimmerman (4.9 WAR)
Top position player: Anthony Rendon (6.6 WAR)

Pete Kozma is one thing, but running into an even-year Giants team between 2010-14 was asking to get gut-punched. The Nationals lost the deciding NLDS game on an Aaron Barrett wild pitch, which the Giants couldn’t possibly have planned for, and yet, is somehow the only way those teams won the World Series three times.

2016
95-67 (2nd best in NL), 22.2 WAR (5th in NL), 96 wRC+ (T-5th in NL), 203 HR (4th in NL), 121 SB (5th in NL)

Top pitcher: Max Scherzer (6.5 WAR)
Top position player: Daniel Murphy (4.5 WAR)

The deciding game of the NLDS against the Dodgers took four and a half hours — the longest nine-inning postseason game of all time — and a Clayton Kershaw save, but once again, in 2016, a Washington-based baseball team failed to win a playoff series—for the 92nd year in a row.

2017
97-65 (2nd best in NL), 24.5 WAR (5th in NL), 99 wRC+ (6th in NL), 215 HR (7th in N), 108 SB (3rd in NL)

Top pitcher: Max Scherzer (7.5 WAR)
Top position player: Anthony Rendon (5.9 WAR)

The Nationals struck late all NLDS long, scoring 10 runs in the eighth inning. Playoff series are typically where closers go to die, and yet, Wade Davis of the Cubs went 3-for-3 against the Nats, despite their success in his domain and him having to get six outs in the deciding Game 5. Davis got ‘um all, despite the Nats cutting the Cubs’ lead to one run.

Four straight L’s to four different teams: The annoying Cardinals, the Even Year B*llshit-fueled Giants, the dominant Dodgers, and the team-of-destiny Cubs. It became, officially, A Thing.

But that’s what happened all those other years. This year is this year, if not the year, and it still has the potential to be different. On Tuesday night, the Nationals punched a hole straight through the Phillies in both games of a double-header. The jumbotron at Nationals Park immediately flickered to life, broadcasting the last out of the Cubs’ 9-2 loss to the Pirates, which mathematically sealed the October fate for yet another Nationals squad.

How they differentiate themselves from their failed predecessors is all about what happens next.

Here’s what we’re looking at this time around:

2019
88-69 (five games to play), 24.0 WAR (4th in NL), 102 wRC+ (T-4th in NL), 223 HR (6th in NL), 109 SB (2nd in NL)

Top pitcher: Stephen Strasburg (6.4 WAR)
Top position player: Anthony Rendon (6.5 WAR)

Here’s one thing that’s different about the Nationals this time: They’re playing in the Wild Card game. That means all they have to do is win a single game to advance! There will certainly be people who point out that the dictionary definition of a “series” indicates that it is comprised of more than one event, so the Nats still won’t have won a playoff series. But still. Baby steps.

Fortunately, they’ve armed themselves with some new features to protect against the forthcoming postseason.

But first:

What’s the Same

Anthony Rendon gives the Nationals league-high WAR (6.4) from third base. But this team’s gone to the postseason with Rendon leading the charge before. He had 120 wRC+ in the 2014 NLDS with no hits for extra bases and only one RBI, which is a quiet indicator of the failures of the team surrounding him. He was far less impactful in 2016 and 2017, though the Cubs did walk him five times in 2016, having clearly learned they should avoid throwing him a litany of hittable pitches. But the past has no meaning here. Rendon, a veteran slugger who has 154 wRC+ since August 1, should be of great use to the Nationals in the postseason. It’s just that, you know, he also might not be; we’ve seen him go through this before.

And then there’s the pitching staff: It is good. Again. It has a dominant top three that includes Scherzer and Strasburg. Again. The most compelling repeated element of this process is that the Nationals have had a scalding hot rotation, which makes their early exits even more flummoxing. Teams with devastating starting pitching are built specifically for deep playoff runs, yet the Nationals keep running into dragon slayers like Pete Kozma or Gregor Blanco who manage to stick them in their one weak spot.

You can’t plan for that. The best thing you can do is what the Nationals have always done: charge into the playoffs with the best pitching in the Senior Circuit, led by Max Scherzer’s terrifying hetereochromic stare. You can also — and credit to the Nationals here, because they did — add Patrick Corbin to your rotation. He made 32 starts for Washington that were good for 6.0 WAR, and in the last two months he has a 3.43 FIP, 10.6 K/9, and 2.8 K/BB. And when hitters do make contact off him, it’s going on the ground just over 57% of the time.

This Nationals team has been hamstrung by bullpen problems since early on this season, when they housed Trevor Rosenthal’s infamous ERA of “[oblivion].” The Nats at least have Sean Doolittle and Daniel Hudson for the late stuff, but Dave Martinez has some precarious roster-building to do in the next couple days.

In the first half, Rosenthal wasn’t the only ineffective Nationals reliever, but he was the most ineffective one. That being said, the bullpen amassed a collective 1.3 WAR and 4.80 FIP in the first half, being credited with the loss on 25 occasions (The Nationals lost 42 times in the first half). At the trade deadline, Mike Rizzo brought in Hudson, Roenis Elías, and Hunter Strickland. Hudson has been prolific, with a 3.87 FIP, a 20.0% K% and 6.00 K/BB since July 31—exactly the kind of reliever you want riding with you into the postseason. Elias (6.00 HR/9) and Strickland (9.1 BB%) are not.

That’s probably why Martinez is “…still figuring out who he can trust in the sixth and seventh innings, even in late September,” according to Nationals beat writer Jesse Dougherty. In the second half, the Nationals have a sixth inning walk rate of 12%, the highest in baseball, and the lowest K/BB at 1.7. The seventh inning doesn’t get much better, with a 5.01 FIP.

Inevitably, the NL Wild Card game is going to have a sixth and seventh inning. So what’s new about this team that could break the binds of tradition? What do the Nationals have now that could help neutralize yet another faulty bullpen?

What’s New

Like most of the NL East this season, the Nationals had a rookie manager. Unlike most of the NL East this season, they will still be playing in October. That’s not to say that Dave Martinez has had a flawless, or at times even watchable, rookie season. It’s been something of a roller-coaster, and while he deserves the credit showered on him by his GM, you wouldn’t be blamed for taking in his postseason managerial debut out of more curiosity than anything else.

And of course, we know who won’t be there.

Bryce Harper’s not going to the postseason with the Nationals this time (or at all in 2019), and the team really did a magnificent job of replacing the wins Harper took with him to Philadelphia, investing in Corbin and developing Juan Soto and Victor Robles into defensive assets.

Robles actually got a postseason at-bat in 2017, so he won’t be entirely new to this (he struck out), and it’s fair to assume that reaching the postseason could become something of a habit for him. At just 22 years old, he has earned the trust of his coaches and taken command of the outfield defense.

The last time Washington went to the postseason, center field had been manned by Michael Taylor and six other transients throughout the season, and collectively cost them -5 runs. This year, Robles, getting the large majority of the playing time, has saved 24. Thanks largely the defense he’s provided in 138 games, the position has saved 6.3 runs for the Nationals, as opposed to what they’ve gotten from their center fielders in past playoff years:

Nationals Center Field UZR (Postseason Years)
Year UZR
2012 5.7
2014 -0.2
2016 3.7
2017 3.8

In fact, it was one of Robles’ tremendous catches that actually clinched the Nationals’ postseason spot.

Another reason this postseason could be different stands one spot in the Nationals’ outfield, where a 20-year-old named Juan Soto waves at us.

Left field cost Washington a lot of runs in 2012, over 20. In 2014, the only two of the seven players to man the position and not generate negative WAR were Harper (1.6 WAR in 100 games) and Ryan Zimmerman (1.1 WAR in 61 games), both of whom were giving weightier contributions at the plate. The acquisition of Jayson Werth stabilized the bleeding, and he made the position worth 0.3 wins in 2016, but by the next season, there had been an eight-man committee out there, with Adam Lind (1.0 WAR in 100 games) getting the lion’s share of the playing time.

You will not be surprised to learn that Soto, at the plate and somewhat even more crucially in the field, has been an improvement to all of this. His defense had to be calibrated to the setting — until this season, he was clinging to the outfield wall and never got too creative with the Nationals’ defensive game plan — and making those adjustments has made him an even more absurd asset to take into the playoffs. While his defense is not as reliable as Robles, left field belongs to him, as does the 143 wRC+ and 4.8 WAR he’s accrued while playing it.

If the Nationals bullpen keeps giving up the third highest fly ball rate in baseball (40.1%), at least there will be a couple of spry young outfielders out there to catch them.

The Nationals are mired in A Thing. It is a A Thing they have both earned and not deserved, but it is their Thing, and this postseason, they will re-embark on an attempt to escape it. Their hope to change the course of franchise history may lie on the youthful improvements in their outfield, in addition to what has always worked: A terrifying rotation, a powerful regular season offense, and the hope that they only need an inning or two from the bullpen.





Justin has contributed to FanGraphs and is a contributor to Baseball Prospectus. He is known in his family for jamming free hot dogs in his pockets during an off-season tour of Veterans Stadium and eating them on the car ride home.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
NDSox12Member since 2019
6 years ago

Uhh… this is Dave Martinez’s second season.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  NDSox12

yeah and it’s also Calloway and Kapler’s 2nd seasons as well… (and probably last)

v2miccaMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

And fourth season for Snitker if you count his year as an interim Manager. And Mattingly has been with Miami since 2016. So not sure how most of the NL East had a rookie manager this season.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

That’s really amazing for Snitker and Mattingly being in their 4th years already.

v2miccaMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Particularly in the case of Snitker, who still feels like an interim type while the front office looks for their guy, until you realize he has been the manager for 4 years now.

Spencer JonesMember since 2020
6 years ago

Martinez is in his 2nd year

wilbon
6 years ago

This is not Martinez’s rookie year

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

Werth wasn’t an acquisition, he was returning from injury in 2016.

tylerdurden31
6 years ago

Grandy is a sadist

Reflect
6 years ago

As a Mets fan I really hope this Thing continues, it gives me joy and almost makes up for the fact that my own team is a complete mess

JoeMember since 2016
6 years ago

Rendon got walked 5 times by the Cubs in 2017, not 2016, when they played the Dodgers. Your numbers for this 2019 team also appear to be two days old. Understandable, as I’m sure you didn’t write this in one morning. Just might be worth updating the piece.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

I think the bench is by far the best the Nats have had going into a playoff. 2 of Zimmerman/Kendrick/Adams, Dozier, Parra, and Suzuki/Gomes. Maybe Michael A Taylor for defense.

You missed a guy that’s been pretty big for the Nats in a setup role- Fernando Rodney. When they haven’t tried to overwork him, he’s been pretty good. With 0 days rest, he’s got a 7.71 ERA. 8 runs in 9.1 innings. All other times with the Nats a 2.74 ERA.

riibettMember since 2020
6 years ago

In fact, none of the NL East managers are rookies

Will H.
6 years ago

“but once again, in 2016, a Washington-based baseball team failed to win a playoff series—for the 92nd year in a row.”

This honestly isn’t trying to be snarky, but the Washington Homestead Grays – who were a professional baseball team – last won their league’s World Series in 1948.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

Hey, this is Dave Martinez’s sec…hang on, lemme read the comments first…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Update: Yes, this is definitely Dave Martinez’s second season!

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

this is second season’s dave martinez

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

so looking at Robles in CF….

2017- Michael A Taylor- CF 16.2 UZR/150
2019- Victor Robles- CF 5.2 UZR/150

You say that the Nats had a 3.8 UZR rating in 2017. Well, I just looked in 2019, and the UZR there? 3.8. Seeing pretty darn to the close number there.

Now I looked at RF. in 2017 with Harper, it was 0.7. This year with primarily Eaton it is 0.7.

The big improvement in OF defense- LF. In 2017 it was mostly 6 guys. Raburn, Heisey, Lind, Goodwin, Kendrick, and Werth. -5.0 UZR. This year it’s been mostly Soto. +0.4 UZR.

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago

You’d think it is Scherzer, and it would be crazy if it isn’t but Scherzer in the WC game, right?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  carter

I think because of reputation yes, it’ll be Scherzer. But realistically, Strasburg has thrown better than him the last quarter of the season..
Strasburg last 8 starts 3-1 1.76 ERA 2.91 FIP
Scherzer last 7 starts 2-2 4.74 ERA 3.75 FIP

You could even make a case for Corbin
Corbin last 8 starts 5-2 1.98 ERA 3.38 FIP

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

now on the flip side- Scherzer has dominated Milwaukee with the Nats. Had that near perfecto in Milwaukee with 16 k’s in 2015.

And his numbers are interesting with respect to Yelich….

Scherzer vs Yelich- 10-29 3 hr
vs everyone else on Brewers- 16-114(.140) 2 hr

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Ya, he has certainly faltered down the stretch. I’d go him vs Brew Crew, though. With that said, I’d imagine it is all hands on deck and Corbin/Stras are ready as well

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  carter

true, although Corbin’s numbers historically vs the Brewers not great.

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

If you watch the way these last few weeks have played out, I feel there is a pretty good chance they are playing STL

caesar_solid
6 years ago
Reply to  carter

the Brewers were a completely different team in 2015, what is this, ESPN?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  caesar_solid

well his start this season he gave up 2 runs(1 earned) in 6 innings with 10 strikeouts. 6 hits and 1 walk. Pretty good.

MorboTheAnnihilator
6 years ago

Might be worth the extra effort to clarify that you are using bWAR and not fWAR.

MuadDib
6 years ago

Is that why the numbers are so low? Team WARs in the mid-20s every year seems impossibly low for a playoff team. But I’m not as familiar with bWAR, so maybe that’s the norm?
Or is he just looking at hitter WAR?

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago

Why would any writer do that here on Fangraphs? I don’t even understand why Jaffe does it, to be honest. Makes no sense. If you believe in the methodology enough to work here, use their system.

It’s like working for the A’s and saying “I hate analytics.”

warkol
6 years ago

linking the wrong Michael Taylor, should be Michael A. Taylor

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  warkol

Wrong Zimmermann, too.

Anon21Member since 2018
6 years ago

Much as I hate the Nationals and hope they get absolutely demolished in the Wild Card game, I will take up the argument that winning it would count as a playoff series win. Like it or hate it, this is a full postseason round according to MLB.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon21

I’m a Nats fan and I wouldn’t count it. It’s one game, and they’ve won games in the playoffs before. To me, a series implies multiple games, so while of course I want them to win the WC game, the curse won’t be lifted until they at least make it out of the divisional round, and a pennant victory would be nice too.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

I kind of agree with you, but I hope the Nationals actually play it up.

Paul G.Member since 2016
6 years ago

“…the hope that they only need an inning or two from the bullpen…”

Ask the Mets how that worked out for them.

DDMember since 2020
6 years ago

Don’t forget 2015, when they lost a heartbreaker on the last day of the regular season and didn’t get into the playoffs.

Da Bear
6 years ago
Reply to  DD

The loss on the final day of the season to the first-place Mets was immaterial, as they had already been eliminated on September 26. All that loss meant was they finished 7 games back instead of 5, and their draft position the following year was one slot higher (but the Nats forfeited their first round pick anyway after signing Daniel Murphy when he was tagged with a QO).

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Da Bear

yeah. Night before was the Scherzer 17 strikeout no hitter vs the Mets.

Psychic... Powerless...
6 years ago

I’m sorry, but taking into account recent factual errors, logic errors, data-presentation errors, and chronic grammatical/proofreading/usage issues, the editing on this site is an embarrassment.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 years ago

The bullpen is atrocious. An “inning or two” is enough to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Unless the starters pull a Bumgarner or they turn over huge leads to the bullpen the Nats are eminently beatable by a good offense.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

If Rainey, Doolittle, and Hudson can pitch like they have in September- the Nats may be ok. Those 3 with 4 er in 29.1 innings in the month of September- a 1.23 ERA. In October you can use fewer relievers with all the days off. And Rodney largely has gotten hurt when he’s been overused.

caesar_solid
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Wander Suero is way underrated, you could easily make a case that he is the Nats best reliever

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
6 years ago

N A T S Nats Nats Nats isn’t a Jets rip-off

It’s a Caps rip-off. Now, where the Caps got it from is a different question

cass
6 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

It’s also not something Nats fans have done just “these days” unless “these days” goes back a decade or so. And it’s not done when “something good happens”, it’s done after the Nats score a run, every time they score a run, once for each and every run. It’s been like that for like a decade and there have been articles in the Washington Post and elsewhere about it. I stopped reading this article when I saw that and from the comments, I made the right choice as it seems the article is full of factual errors like this and the author did not do enough research and is not very familiar with the team.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2014/09/08/how-a-fan-cheer-became-a-part-of-a-nationals-park-wall-woo/

This article was written 5 years ago and the chant was already “a few years” old.

lilpudgeMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  cass

Yeah, I’m not typically one to rag on an article or author, but this one reeks of “I’m a fan of a division opponent so I guess I have all the info I need in my head #lfgm”

JayMember since 2023
6 years ago

It’s always been strange to me that so many people remember Kozma as the villain of that 2012 series. He had the last big hit but fellow scrappy utility infielder Descalso had the more important one: the 2 out, 2 run single to tie the game in the 9th. Descalso also had a much better game, going 3-5 with a home run, double, stolen base and 3 runs scored to help the Cardinals come back from the 6-0 hole. Kozma just had 2 singles.

cass
6 years ago
Reply to  Jay

To me, they’re linked forever in my mind. Descalso and Kozma. The former had a much better career, of course, but both have middle names beginning with an F among Nats fans I know.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
6 years ago

This is a sloppy article

Gus
6 years ago

It’s the curse of Youppi! The Nats will never win a postseason series until Montreal gets their team back. Bring back the Expos!

Connor Grey
6 years ago

I have absolutely no memory of Ryan Zimmerman ever playing LF

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago

Zimmermann was definitely not their best pitcher in 2012. It was Gio with 5.0, followed by Strasburg’s 4.0. Zimmermann had 3.4. Are you looking at a different year for him?

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

Bryce Harper didn’t take any wins with him to PHI. This is a good time to reflect on WAR not equating to winning games. WAS is a better team without him.