Meet the Extraordinary Freddy Peralta
Sometimes, when players are first promoted, their teams try to ease them in. After all, there’s already plenty of pressure, and you don’t want to give someone the shakes. Might as well give a guy the opportunity to get comfortable. Other times, whether by design or necessity, there’s no such special treatment. A few weeks ago, Eric Lauer became the 27th starting pitcher to make his big-league debut in Coors Field. You might remember Lauer for half-smiling after allowing a grand slam. Lauer was charged with seven runs in three frames, which is not good, but the history of these debuts is predictably not good — starters have allowed 6.9 runs per nine innings. Coors Field is a beast. Nothing in the minors can prepare you for major-league bats in Colorado.
Sunday afternoon, 21-year-old Freddy Peralta became the 28th starting pitcher to make his big-league debut in Coors Field. It wasn’t really supposed to happen that way, but Chase Anderson fell ill, and Peralta was scheduled to pitch in Colorado Springs. He was actually going to pitch in front of his family for the first time in his career. The sudden change of plans abruptly sent everyone to Denver. One would assume that expectations were modest. And yet, in the bottom of the sixth, this is how Peralta left the mound:
As a rule of thumb, starting pitchers generally aren’t happy to see their managers. Starters, as a breed, want to pitch until their arms fall off. But Peralta left beaming after 98 pitches, because he left with a 7-0 lead. He’d only just allowed his first hit of the game, and out of the 21 Rockies batters he’d faced, 13 of them had struck out. Peralta became just the fifth pitcher in recorded history to pick up at least 13 strikeouts in his debut. Peralta was no stranger to strikeouts in the minors, but nothing he’d done could compare to this, shutting down a lineup of big-leaguers in the league’s most hitter-friendly ballpark. And of Peralta’s 98 pitches, 90 were fastballs, which averaged about 92 miles per hour.
Peralta dominated the Rockies, in Colorado. He dominated them in his first game in the majors. And he dominated them with one pitch.
The game is tremendously useful for the purpose of understanding what Peralta is as a pitcher. He does have a breaking ball. He does occasionally mess around with a changeup. But the fastball is Peralta’s bread and butter, very obviously, and look at this plot of swings and misses, from Baseball Savant:
The fastball generated 18 whiffs alone. There are whiffs off the plate, and there are whiffs up. But you also see that assortment middle-middle. That tells you two things. One, Peralta doesn’t have pinpoint command. No one wants to pitch middle-middle. But two, he was fooling hitters anyway. Freddy Peralta, pitching in Coors Field, was getting away with middle-middle low-90s fastballs. He has his delivery to thank.
Here’s a middle-middle swing and miss:
Here’s another:
Here’s another:
And for a change of pace, here’s an ugly swing and miss off the plate away:
It should be noted that Peralta doesn’t have a slow fastball. He also throws a fastball that doesn’t have much horizontal movement to it, making it look kind of like a cutter. The fastball is atypical, and since Peralta was pitching his first game, the Rockies hadn’t seen him. The first time through the order, the Rockies went hitless, with five strikeouts. On the other hand, just one of the remaining 12 Rockies batters recorded a hit, and eight of them struck out. Peralta wasn’t figured out on Sunday. And Jesus Aguilar offered an insightful remark:
“It was unbelievable. I’ve never seen their second baseman [DJ LeMahieu] look like that, or Blackmon. They didn’t see the ball. It was unbelievable. Good for him. These are really good hitters, and he dominated, easy, with the fastball.”
They didn’t see the ball. I think that’s exactly right. We don’t write all that much about deception, because we don’t have particularly useful measures of deception, but some pitchers have more of it, and some pitchers have less. Peralta has a sneaky fastball, which is what allowed him to succeed over the middle of the plate. That Nolan Arenado swing posted above — that’s not the swing of someone who’s seeing the ball clearly. Peralta was doing something tricky, and it’s all just part of his motion.
There’s some crossfire to it. That helps, but it’s far from the full explanation. This isn’t just about a guy who throws a little across his body. Allow me to excerpt from Eric Longenhagen’s December write-up of the Brewers’ top prospects:
Peralta generates seven feet of extension, which is up in Tim Lincecum territory, and does so with a cross-body delivery that begins on the third-base side of the rubber. He also has a low arm slot and loose, whippy arm action that further adds to hitters’ confusion.
Here’s a poor-quality slow-motion side view of Peralta going to the plate:
Very usefully, Baseball Savant allows us to search for extension. Not directly, but we can search for the difference between perceived and actual velocity. The closer to home plate a pitch is released, the faster it’ll seem to the hitter, since it spends less time in the air. Last year, when we last saw Carter Capps, he was adding about 2.4 perceived miles per hour to his fastball, because of his jump off the rubber. That’s an extreme perceived velocity bump. And Peralta? On Sunday, Peralta’s fastballs gained 2.2 perceived miles per hour. He was right there in Capps territory, without the silly quirk. For reference, here are all of 2018’s pitchers, with their perceived velocity gains or losses, and their heights:
Only Tyler Glasnow adds more to his fastball than Peralta does, and where Glasnow stands 6’8, Peralta stands 5’11. It’s easier for Glasnow to generate that extension, because he’s simply a big guy. Peralta’s extension comes from his lower body, and the ball gets up on the hitter quicker than the hitter expects. And as the last part, Peralta’s ball is pretty well hidden. Eno Sarris wrote about Yusmeiro Petit’s “invisiball” in October of 2014. Petit has long been considered to be a pitcher with deception on his side. Look at Peralta just prior to release:
The ball is behind his head. Then the ball is behind his elbow. Then the ball is shown to the hitter, just as it’s about to come out. This is what Eric was referring to with the whippy arm action. The hitter loses sight of the ball, and then, all of a sudden, the ball explodes on the plate. An unusual delivery delivers a fastball with unusual movement, and it’s not just the Rockies who couldn’t figure the fastball out. The fastball is why Peralta has been a strikeout machine in the minors.
It’s not that Peralta is obviously a finished product. He could stand to add some refinement, polishing a second or third pitch. It’s not that Peralta is definitely the best starting pitcher right now in the Brewers’ rotation. He needs to make more starts, and he needs to repeat some opponents. But I don’t think the Brewers were planning on Peralta being much of a factor in the 2018 season at all. Peralta has forced his way into the conversation, on the basis of one start alone. Pitchers will tell you when they’re ready for a greater challenge. Peralta looks ready before the Brewers expected, in large part because hitters can’t easily see his pitches. Turns out that’s a useful trait to possess.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.




A question that comes to mind is: does this delivery put more stress on his elbow than that of other pitching deliveries?
If anything I would think that it would be better for the elbow as there is probably way more drag on the arm from a lower slot.
Can you succeed as a fastball-fastball pitcher? He threw 90% fastballs. 90%. Here is the list of guys who threw more than 80% fastballs as starters (minimum 200 innings) since 2000:
Bartolo Colon
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=all&qual=200&type=4&season=2018&month=0&season1=2000&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=3,d
I kept on dropping the # of innings to see how far I had to go to find another starter other than Colon. I had to go all the way down to 20 IP minimum as a starter who broke the 80% barrier (the immortal Ben Diggins).
So yeah, he’s gonna need to lean on the slider and/or the changeup more. The other part of Eric’s write up was that the slider is actually pretty good but the changeup is not. But here’s the money quote from Eric’s article:
“It’s not easy to repeat a delivery that tests the upper bounds of one’s athleticism on every pitch. Peralta will spot his fastball and slider where the catcher requests semi-frequently, his worst struggles with control coming and going in waves, varying heavily from start to start.”
I don’t know what’s going to happen with this guy next, but whatever happens is going to be interesting.
Honestly, for right now, he strikes me as a right-handed version of 2017 Josh Hader. That version of Hader found his greatest success in the bullpen. That version of Hader also discovered a better slider in the 2017-2018 offseason and basically became perfect. Very interested to see what Peralta does over more starts, and how he does it. Threw almost nothing but fastballs in Colorado, but on the other hand, they gave him no reason to change things up.
So Peralta’s big league double is either me, or a skinny lefty half my age with great hair.
Looks like the kid isn’t just baffling the Rockies hitters.
Without looking up the exact numbers, Lance Lynn essentially threw nothing but fastballs in STL. Now, some of them sank, and some of them cut, so maybe the comparison doesn’t totally work. But he didn’t have a single quality pitch other than the fastball. And it seems like most pitchers have no problem learning to throw a sinker or cutter, so maybe we’ll see that in future seasons.
Lance Lynn threw 85% fastballs in 2015. And he put up 3 wins there. Other years, not so much.
This makes me wonder if there are other seasons like that, even if a whole career isn’t.
https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=y&type=4&season=2018&month=0&season1=2000&ind=1&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=4,d
Well, that’s a lot of late-career Bartolo Colon there. Some Justin Masterson and Aaron Cook, and they were both 3-win pitchers at during that stretch. Jarrod Washburn had a 4-win season throwing 80% fastballs. So the short answer is that this is doable over a season, if not a career.
He’s really throwing two pitches, though. A four-seam fastball, and a cutter. That Arenado gif above is clearly a cut fastball, and it looks to have as much horizontal glove side run as a slider. If a pitcher can cut a fastball and make it look like a slider, the 80+% fastball thrower comps don’t hold much water.
He does have Capps’s delivery quirk though, kinda! He definitely jumps toward the plate and drags his toes down the mound as he delivers. Not as exaggerated as Capps; I didn’t notice it from the center field angle.
Agreed. He’s definitely well off the rubber when his front foot finally plants.
You’re definitely right. He does what Capps is *supposed* to do. It’s just really subtle.
Also, the pitches that the superimposed Subaru Strikezone registered as down the middle may have started across the plate there, but looked like they were tailing when they reached the catcher’s glove.
IIRC Capps basically hopped off the rubber and then upon landing, threw the ball. Peralta’s foot appears to have moved off right right after his arm starts going forward. I think that as long as Peralta’s foot stays on the ground it’s legal, based on this:
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/mlb-has-clarified-its-carter-capps-position/
But he looks like he’s about to fall flat on his face. It’s definitely fun to watch.
These gifs are soooo much fun to watch! Just brutal swings from a group that can usually hunt fastballs with the best of them, specially at home in Coors.
I think it was a brilliant call by the Brewers front office — you’ve got Peralta pitching in C-Springs already, so he used to pitching at altitude, he relies on the FB so good fit with a Coors start — rare situation where giving a rookie his first start at Coors as an away team makes a ton of sense.
Woodruff on the other hand had a rougher go of it in Coors.
But the Brewers have to love where they are. First place. Peralta’s a cool wild card. Woodruff’s peripherals look ok and he’s promising. Guerra pitching decent. Chacin is Chacin. Anderson just ill, should be back, hopefully back to last year.
But then they’ve got Corbin Burnes pitching in AAA, polished and a top 40 or so guy. Finally, Jimmy Nelson rehabbing. They could suddenly have some starting depth and a returning ace.
With the Pirates also surprising, Card and Cubs, could be a 4 team dogfight. Reds are out of it but even they have started to win some games, with some decent young arms.
It’s a real shame that the Mariners traded him for Adam Lind. Jerry Dipoto has made some good trades, but this one sucks.
Meanwhile, this trade was the first one for David Stearns as Brewers GM. Much of the Crew fanbase was puzzled with the return for Lind, a decent hitter coming off a solid season. Peralta was one part of a package of three teenage pitching prospects who were not even on the Mariners’ top 30 at the time (per MLB pipeline, anyway).
It’s fun to see someone remind us there’s still ways to succeed that analytics can’t fully capture yet. Even with a 3mph bump in perceived velocity Peralta’s fastball is only mid-90s, which every single MLB hitter is capable of catching up to, so that delivery is clearly doing a lot that we can’t measure. Blackmon doesn’t miss fastballs like that, especially not from righties.
His command sounds like it’ll be a problem and people will probably start seeing that fastball a little better with time but I’m excited to see how he develops, baseball can always use more weird players.
Good for Peralta but I think this says as much about the Rox hitters as his offering and I’ve been to plenty ‘o games at Coors. Plate discipline / situational hitting is anathema to Colo. hitters. Everything’s a three run bomb or a K. Me personally, if I’m seeing a kid fresh up from AAA for the first time, I might go up there, shorten up and try to make some contact, maybe drop a bunt down, get some base path traffic…you know, see if you can rattle him. Not the Murders Row clone of CarGo, Desmond, Story, Wolters and Cuevas. Sure, I’m old school but I really miss some of the game’s nuances. Joey Gallo is not a proper role model.
Ian Desmond is running a sub-.200 BABIP. Normally I’d just chalk this up to SSS it is really, really low. Here’s a fun question: What is the lowest BABIP a Rockies hitter has ever posted? (Minimum: 400 PAs)
It turns out, a whopping two hitters have ever posted less than a .250 BABIP for the Rockies. The lowest was .239. And Charles Johnson was a catcher, and Clint Barmes was a slick-fielding shortstop.
Ian Desmond. This guy…
Actually, Joey Gallo is terrific role model. Hard-working, quiet, works through struggles to get better, and has played any position the Rangers have asked him too, without complaint.
Think it’s worth dropping Soroka for him in a redraft league? Soroka had always been more highly regarded on prospect lists, but it’s hard to ignore Peralta’s debut.
I did.
#noregerts
So basically he struck out 13 hitters just throwing fastballs down the middle
That would be your, REAL basic, interpretation, yes.
Jeff Sullivan says YAY! to Peralta. Jeff Zimmerman says NAY! to Peralta.
Which Jeff do I believe?
Well, I picked him up anyway. I hope to get a hot run of starts and then trade him before the league figures him out, if they do.
It’s not necessarily a matter of who you believe, but they both provide unique insights that you can use to understand a player’s upside/downside.
No not ‘necessarily”, but in this instance, the answer is “Sullivan”. Zimmerman admitted he doesn’t even know who Peralta was before this start. So nearly all of his report was skepticism. Fans can already do that.
Not that I blame him, but this piece showed why and how Peralta did it.
Statcast reports a well above average spin rate too, so this looks like the best of all worlds vis-a-vis deceptive fastballs (cross fire, extension, spin)
I stand by Eric’s loose Lincecum stride comparison fully.
Watching the side view slo-mo made it even more evident in my eyes, Peralta’s delivery from breaking his hands to release looks very similar to Tim circa 2010 minus the 3/4 arm slot. Same launch, same stride into the back toe lift-and-drag, and one of my favorite parts of Tim’s delivery, hiding the ball behind his body and butt before the reach back to help keep timing and consistency. Peralta’s debut delivery looks a lot sharper than last year’s BA prospect video’s I’ve been able to see, too.
Sooo. what happens when the other teams manager points out to the umpires that Peralta is basically doing the same think Capps USED to do before he was told that it’s illegal?
The umpires tell him he’s wrong?
MLB clarified the rule specifically for Capps:
An addition to Rule 5.07 stipulates that a pitcher may not take a second step toward home plate with either foot or otherwise reset his pivot foot in his delivery of the pitch.
What Peralta is doing is clearly not a second step, and you can’t really argue that he’s resetting his pivot foot either. It’s actually just an elongated version of what every other pitcher does.
Check out Jake Arrieta’s pivot foot on this pitch, and you’ll see the same slide prior to the release of the ball:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqNxpOppOWs
Peralta’s next start in Minnesota Saturday will be an interesting tell. I think his fastball action and delivery are real assets. I’m looking to see if he breaks out his slider more at normal altitude and what it does for him.
Sid Fernandez had a similarly deceptive delivery (tho he slung it sidearm), got a lot of mileage out of it.
Meet the Extraordinary Jordan Ly… right-hander facing the Rockies.
Even before continuing to read the next paragraph, Peralta’s delivery brought Carter Capps to my mind. Peralta does not actually jump forward as much as he extends his left foot so far forward that he carries his body quite a distance away from the rubber before he releases the ball. Many other pitchers do this to some degree but Peralta, who conceals it beautifully, gets as far out as anybody other than Capps.
i wonder what a data-driven approach to deception even looks like. sale, scherzer, kershaw, and cueto (just to cherry-pick a few names from the top of my head) seem to use it very effectively, although the vast majority of pitchers seem to favor minimalist windups that conserve power and eliminate quirks.