Mets Add Marte, Canha, Escobar in Thanksgiving Weekend Shopping Spree
Like many Americans last weekend, the Mets took out their credit cards once the Thanksgiving turkey was digested, coming to terms with three free agents on multi-year contracts. Starling Marte, coming off the best season of his career, received the most lucrative package, a four-year deal worth $78 million. New York also clarified its third base situation considerably with the addition of Eduardo Escobar on a two-year, $20 million contract. And the team’s revamped outfield may have been completed with the final of the three signings, a two-year, $26.5 million pact with former Athletic Mark Canha. Neither Marte nor Escobar was eligible for a qualifying offer, and Canha did not receive one from Oakland, so the Mets have clear sailing in terms of draft pick compensation.
The Mets were busy, but then again, they kind of needed to be, given their losses in free agency. Coming off a disappointing 2021 season, a collective 11 WAR-worth of players walked off into the sunset of the open market, resulting in a lot of needs to address this winter. All three of these signings fill holes on the roster, and along with the obvious interest in Steven Matz given some very angry words, they indicate that the Mets are focused on adding as many pieces as they can (with Max Scherzer set to join the rotation as well; more on that to come).
A centerfielder entering his age-33 season isn’t typically the most likely candidate for a long-term contract, but like Lorenzo Cain when he signed with the Brewers, Marte starts from a high enough perch to give him plenty of room to decline before he’s a drag on the team. He never had that crazy breakout year that seemed possible in his early days with the Pirates, but he’s also never truly had a bad season; he was only below 2 WAR in 2017 due to a suspension stemming from a positive test for Nandrolone, and he was well above a two-win pace in the shortened 2020 season. His power has faded from his peak, but he’s compensated with improvements as a more selective hitter making more contact. Most veteran players aren’t quick enough to “unwind” launch angle gains and reap a benefit from hitting more high-BABIP grounders, but Marte is still very quick, finishing just out of the 80th percentile in sprint speed and above the 90th-percentile cutoff for speed to first base. Before he and Whit Merrifield did it in 2021, the last player 32 or older to steal 40 bases in a season was Alex Rios back in 2013.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | .273 | .334 | .422 | 498 | 78 | 136 | 26 | 3 | 14 | 57 | 33 | 31 | 107 | 1 | 3.1 |
| 2023 | .268 | .329 | .410 | 456 | 70 | 122 | 23 | 3 | 12 | 51 | 30 | 25 | 102 | 1 | 2.5 |
| 2024 | .266 | .325 | .407 | 428 | 64 | 114 | 21 | 3 | 11 | 46 | 26 | 22 | 100 | 0 | 2.1 |
| 2025 | .262 | .319 | .385 | 397 | 56 | 104 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 40 | 23 | 19 | 93 | -1 | 1.5 |
| 2026 | .257 | .307 | .370 | 346 | 46 | 89 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 32 | 17 | 14 | 86 | -2 | 0.7 |
ZiPS projects decline from Marte, but the contract’s terms reflect that of a player in decline. At $7.3 million per win with 3% annual growth (which I’m assuming for other contracts in this article as well), ZiPS projects a $77.7 million deal over four years, basically indistinguishable from what he got. Brandon Nimmo had surprisingly good defensive stats in center for a change in 2021, but even if you think he’s now underrated defensively there, he’ll be excellent in right, and hopefully less injury-prone at a lower-impact position.
The Escobar signing would have been an odd one before the 2021 season, but the Mets have considerably less reason these days to have faith in Jeff McNeil’s abilities. Leg issues helped dive-bomb his season, but his approach at the plate of swinging at seemingly everything anywhere in the zone and successfully but frequently making indifferent contact hasn’t helped matters. He was toward the bottom of the league in Statcast’s hard-hit percentage and various barrel-rate stats, sapping his power and leaving him very BABIP-dependent. The Mets, who fully intend to be contenders, had an interest in a less risky option, and outside of a shockingly poor 2020 season, Escobar has been a pretty good bet for a three-win season.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | .247 | .306 | .465 | 531 | 71 | 131 | 25 | 5 | 27 | 84 | 45 | 1 | 108 | 1 | 2.9 |
| 2023 | .241 | .299 | .443 | 490 | 62 | 118 | 23 | 5 | 22 | 73 | 40 | 1 | 101 | 0 | 2.0 |
| 2024 | .237 | .292 | .420 | 459 | 55 | 109 | 20 | 5 | 18 | 64 | 35 | 1 | 93 | -1 | 1.3 |
Escobar is not going to bring much in the way of OBP to the table, but he’ll hit for power and can handle third, and at $10 million per, he makes for a solid bargain (ZiPS suggests $35.9 million, considerably more than the $20 million guarantee) and has a club option for 2024. McNeil will likely still get a nearly full slate of plate appearances given his versatility, Nimmo’s injury record, and the possible starting second baseman (aka Robinson Canó) being a 39-year-old who just missed an entire year due to a drug suspension.
Along with Marte, Canha’s signing practically guarantees that Michael Conforto will not return to the Mets in 2022. Another very dependable, non-star veteran, Canha will likely get the bulk of his playing time in left but could be used elsewhere in the outfield as needs arise, or he could fill in at first if Pete Alonso is injured. As with Marte, ZiPS sees his deal as one that reflects his projections quite well.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | .237 | .356 | .418 | 443 | 76 | 105 | 20 | 3 | 18 | 60 | 64 | 7 | 113 | -4 | 2.1 |
| 2023 | .234 | .348 | .402 | 415 | 68 | 97 | 19 | 3 | 15 | 54 | 57 | 6 | 106 | -4 | 1.5 |
One complicating factor for the Mets and their outfield is that they have to make non-tender decisions well before anybody knows if the National League will have a designated hitter in 2022. So a versatile player like Canha has some additional value, albeit one that’s hard to put a dollar figure on but remains very real. Dominic Smith likely has more value if there’s a DH in 2022, but he’s also a prime candidate to be non-tendered; with Canha added to a team that still retains McNeil and J.D. Davis, New York can comfortably fill out a lineup card with a DH and without Smith.
The Mets came into the offseason with a long list of things to accomplish, and these three things were all essential items to check off. Even more crucial is filling the holes in the starting rotation, something they’re doing by, as mentioned above, signing Scherzer, but that, friends, is a tale for another day.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
More like a turducken than a turkey…
Mets are not being shy in spending. It’s good for the health of the league when “1B” big-market teams like the Mets (and Angels, White Sox, Rangers, etc) spend big, like they well should. The best solution to the long-standing fear of Yankees/Dodgers swooping in to buy every good player and forming mercenary juggernauts is not to keep lowering the CBT ceiling, but for the rest of the teams with genuinely deep pockets— of which there are a lot more than they let on— to act like it.
As for the Mets on the field… these moves look like they make a lot of sense, as does Scherzer. My doubts about the Mets now are solely that they are the Mets, and have managed to stumble and/or shoot themselves in the foot to an incredible degree the past few years.
I’m keeping an eye on the Rangers. I can see them adding the two local boys (Kershaw and Story) to go with Semien, Gray and Calhoun. That would make the AL west *really* interesting.
Seager! Holy cow!
A whole herd of ’em.
The AL West *is* more interesting.
Still need a starter or two.
Probably two starters and an outfielder.
OF are cheap to find.
Unless you’re Cleveland.
I think that the Marte and Canha deals are my favorite ones after the E-Rod deal this offseason. They’re a little older so there’s some risk there but they both turned in pretty strong seasons in 2021. I don’t want to see what they do in 2024 but not so much in 2022. They probably need another outfielder, preferably a guy who can cover CF in the event of an injury or two (or three) but if so they don’t really need anyone better than Kevin Pillar to do it.
Escobar is very clearly a bridge to Brett Baty (who looks great). The deal isn’t exciting, but they did need someone in case they decided they didn’t trust JD Davis at third. I’m guessing Kris Bryant probably lost his best chance to score a megadeal with Escobar in the fold. Without the Mets feeling they have to add him he’s probably looking to Philadelphia, the Blue Jays, the Dodgers (only if they lose Seager), and maaaaybe the Brewers.
If I were a team that needed to try something different at first base I’d at least look into Dominic Smith. Cleveland, the D-Backs, Red Sox, Brewers, Pirates, and Padres are all kind of making things up as they go along at first base. So are the Royals and Cubs. I think there’s a chance you might be able to trade Smith for a guy who is barely a prospect. JD Davis would probably fetch more, but I kind of think the Mets should hang on to him. He’s an adventure in the field but in case of rule changes he’d be a fine first baseman or DH with Alonso covering the other one. And in theory he can still play in the corners.
They do absolutely need another OFer. Games in 2021: 92, 120, 141 (iirc). Not to mention the chance that Canha, particularly, continues to decline, and that you don’t want to stretch Nimmo and Marte’s fragility any more than you have to. The Mets if they want to contend probably do need to add a starting caliber OFer. Given their minor league OFers, fg’s Top 50 FA column’s estimate of 4/40m to Seiya Suzuki is an excellent idea.
Otherwise, faking LF with someone like Soler at 1/8m when one of the front 3 is hurt might work. The alternative is Plummer, a Cardinals discard the Mets slotted in as their new #9, or Lee, who it would be a shame to waste as a 4th OFer before seeing if he sets up as an MLB regular by putting up another half like he did in Syracuse after flopping outright with the Mets last season.
The Mets are probably gonna be really good this year, but dang, they’re old now, huh? Scherzer, marte, Escobar, canha, carrasco, degrom, lugo, may…I’m not even counting Cano cause I don’t think he’s gonna have an everyday role unless there’s a DH. Even their young guys are not that young. Nimmo and McNeil will be 29 on opening day, lindor 28, and Alonso 27. I’m here for the old guy ball, but that’s certainly a less than ideal circumstance.
They should bring back Rich Hill, or get JA Happ. And get Brett Gardner to back up center field. Keep Robinson Chirino’s number on speed dial, too. They could also use another reliever, I bet Mark Melancon would like Steve Cohen’s money.
That would indeed be very Padre-like.
Depths Charts has them right up there with Dodgers, Yankees and Padres but they’d do well to get a whole bunch of depth given how much they’re counting on DeGrom, Walker and a bunch of old guys. They should be interesting if nothing else.
The idea of giving more than 2/3s of their starts to Walker, Carrasco, Megill, and Peterson should chill the blood of any Mets fan. If they do this, they’re sunk.
Really like the Canha and Escobar moves and obviously love the Scherzer and Marte deals. Here’s hoping Marte ages here like Grandy did or better just without the not good first year Grandy had here. I read on mlbtr that Escobar has been worth just under 2 war less than Bryant since 2018, which is amazing. Canha has a .377 obp the last three years so that’ll play. I’m very much looking forward to seeing Nimmo and Marte at the top of the lineup.
Ben Clemens’ projection for Bryant, a 2.7 fWAR player in 2022 acc to Steamer, is 8/$200m. Bryant’s a good player, but a 30 yo corner guy, really, in decline. $200 million? Even with the numbers flying around this offseason surely there are no GMs left who believe Bryant is still the 2015-2017 version?
If the Mets hadn’t signed Escobar, would you give Bryant as much as 4/$80m? I’d hesitate. He totaled -9 OAA by Statcast. He can play multiple positions, but he hardly excels at them.
Doubt Cano starts at second base he’s likely the dh in the likely event we get the universal dh.
The Mets long to become the Padres of the East Coast.
That first line is gold *chef’s kiss*. Love your writing and insight Dan!
absolutely no shot the Mets non-tender Smith
Yeah, he’s not going to be making that much next year and he’s a good candidate for a bounceback season. He’s worth keeping on the bench, even as what looks like an overpay; and it’s very easy to envision him sharing the 1B/DH position with Alonso if he’s hitting well.
Smith was barely in Alonso’s league as a defender even before Alonso’s improvement in 2021. Dom looks smooth, scoops well, but Pete cleans his clock on balls out of a 1Bman’s typical zone.
If only there was a website that tracked all that stuff…
Which statistic are you using to judge range, just for my edification? I’m not super well-versed, and I see that UZR/150 shows Alonso at -3.0 last year, whereas Smith was at +12.5 in a much smaller sample.
Anyway, I’m not shocked if there are stats that show Alonso has better range, and I’m not saying it isn’t true- but it’s also hard to compare the two when Dom hasn’t had anywhere near the consistent playing time that Alonso has at the position- he hasn’t cracked 200 innings at the position since 2017. Saying that he was “barely in Alonso’s league” feels awfully hyperbolic.
I don’t think you have to be too much of a Dom Smith apologist to suggest that he is a capable 1B; it’s a long season, and being able to give Alonso a couple of days a week at DH doesn’t seem like an awful idea- even if Alonso is better both offensively and defensively.
Smith may not be great in LF, but his UZR/150 there last year was pretty similar to Mark Canha. So, if his bat rebounds, he offers some versatility off the bench, or insurance in the case of injury. The bat also offers a lot more upside than you’re likely to get in most bench players- this is a guy who got MVP votes in 2020. And he has minor league options and multiple years of control, and is a good clubhouse guy.
What is the case for non-tendering him, other than not wanting to pay $3-4M for a bench piece? Can you bring someone with similar upside in for the same cost?
I think there’s a chance. You can’t play him anywhere in the field, nor has he shown much over a larger sample size with the bat. Not sure there’s a major leaguer here
Interesting trio: they lost 11 WAR, added 11.1. 😀
(Plus Scherzer.)
They way tbey’re going with proven veterans and spending money, the ChiSox should be talking to them about a certain big name reliever. Maybe for Smith?
They didn’t, sadly. With the projections for Marte, Escobar, and Canha, and with Escobar a wash with Villar, the Mets added 4-5 WAR with these three players. As for Scherzer he replaces Stroman and adds roughly a win and a half.
Mets fans who think they’re in the Braves tier, let along the Dodgers, are in for a huge disappointment. Just look at who’ll be making 110 of their starts in 2022, and at their 4th OFer, who may well start more games than the current starters.
With all this you still have to deduct the contributions, however modest, of Baez, Hill, Familia, Lucchesi, et al.