Mets Continue to Tweak Roster with Bader Addition

Kareem Elgazzar/The Enquirer/USA TODAY NETWORK

Here’s an attempt at selecting some adjectives to describe the last year or so in Queens. After a bonkers 2022–23 offseason, a 2023 regular season that was nothing short of catastrophic, and a frantic trade deadline effort to mitigate some of the damage, this offseason, new Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns and company have so far taken an approach that could be described as measured. Last offseason, the Mets signed seven multi-year deals, including four valued at over $75 million. On Thursday, the club agreed to terms on just its second eight-figure contract of the winter, signing center fielder Harrison Bader to a one-year, $10.5 million deal.

The addition of Bader is the latest in an offseason of conservative one-year deals for Stearns’ group. They took a $13 million flier on Luis Severino, who will move over from the Bronx and slot in somewhere in the starting pitching mix after Kodai Senga and Jose Quintana (and perhaps future rotation additions). They made budget-friendly additions to a depleted bullpen, swinging a trade with Milwaukee for Adrian Houser, claiming a handful of arms off of waivers, and offering one-year deals to Michael Tonkin, Jorge López, and Austin Adams. They added to their position player depth with infielders Joey Wendle and José Iglesias (on a minor-league deal) and alliterative outfielders Tyrone Taylor and Trayce Thompson (also on a minors deal), who now have Bader looking down from above on the depth chart.

The Mets were in pretty dire need of another outfielder – particularly a strong defensive one – and they got one of the best defensive center fielders in baseball. Bader’s arm strength has been in the top 10% of outfielders in three of the last four seasons. He ranked in the 93rd percentile in fielding run value last season despite playing only 98 games, with his burst speeds continuing to rank among the best in baseball and contributing to overall strong range metrics:

Bader’s Fielding Percentiles
Year Fielding Run Value Percentile
2018 18 99
2019 12 96
2020 3 83
2021 13 98
2022 6 83
2023 10 93
SOURCE: Statcast

Adding Bader does wonders for a Mets outfield that finished 25th in overall defensive value in 2023. Brandon Nimmo, whose bat is the clear priority of the group, took a step backwards defensively in 2023, dropping from six OAA in 2022 to just one. It’s always best practice not to read too much into a single year of defensive data, and Nimmo can still handle center on the occasions when Bader’s not in the lineup. But when he is, Bader in center means Nimmo can take a corner outfield spot – which Stearns says he is on board to do – that might otherwise have had to go to Starling Marte (whose fate is unknown after an injury-doomed 2023) or DJ Stewart. Jeff McNeil, who’s been an option in the outfield in past seasons, is expected to handle the bulk of the work at second base with Ronny Mauricio out for the foreseeable future with an ACL tear, so Bader holding down center – and Taylor capable of slotting in anywhere – gives the outfield group some needed flexibility:

Mets 2023 Outfield Rankings
Metric Value Rank
Offense 39.9 6th
Defense -25.1 25th
Baserunning 8.4 8th

An outfield with Bader in center and Nimmo and Taylor in the corners would make for the best defensive option on any given day, but new manager Carlos Mendoza will have some flexibility to mix and match based on which bats he wants in the lineup – contingent of course on which of an injury-prone group of players is healthy at any given time. Nimmo and Stewart hit from the left side, and Taylor and Marte have relatively flat career splits, but it’s the right-handed Bader who has the highest career wRC+ against lefties at 121. Even in his rough 2023, Bader had a 153 wRC+ in 97 plate appearances against lefties:

Career wRC+ Splits
Player vs. RHP vs. LHP
Bader 82 121
Nimmo 138 119
Marte 118 111
Taylor 100 104
Stewart 114 73

It’s up in the air what Bader may be able to contribute with the bat if he can stay healthy. His offensive production has been inconsistent throughout his career, and he’s struggled at the plate since leaving St. Louis midseason in 2022, battling a host of injuries over that time. Bader is the type of player who can generate some value without hitting much, but if the bat gets going even just a bit, his value in the field and on the bases – the Mets just added to an already strong baserunning lineup – can turn him into a quite valuable part of their lineup. Thanks to his defensive and baserunning value, Bader was worth 4.1 WAR with just a 107 wRC+ in 138 games in 2017, and 3.2 with a 108 wRC+ in 103 games in 2021.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
The Value Proposition of Bader
Season G wRC+ BsR Def WAR
2017 32 71 1.6 0.8 0.2
2018 138 107 7.6 15.4 4.1
2019 128 82 0.7 14.0 1.8
2020 50 114 0.8 3.1 1.1
2021 103 108 2.5 11.9 3.2
2022 86 85 4.2 4.3 1.4
2023 98 70 4.4 6.9 1.0

So what does Bader need to do to right the ship offensively? Discipline would be a good place to start. Bader has become more aggressive at the plate over the last few years, swinging at more of everything — including pitches outside the zone. As a decent contact hitter, he’s been able to swing freely without ballooning his strikeout rates, but he’s also stopped walking much at all, which hasn’t served his offensive production very well. He’s never had outstanding plate discipline peripherals, but he’s been a much better hitter when he’s swinging at, say, 30% of pitches outside the zone instead of 37%:

It’s not exactly fair to just write off two tumultuous years that featured two midseason trades and five trips to the injured list, but it’s also reasonable to expect something in between 2023 Bader and 2021 Bader at the plate in 2024. One of the three strains that sidelined Bader in 2023 was in his left oblique, a difficult injury when it comes to rotating with enough strength to generate the type of bat speed available to a healthy player. Bader struggled immensely on pitches over the heart of the zone in 2023, generating -12.3 runs of value overall, including -6.8 runs of value on swings. That’s a pretty uncharacteristic data point for Bader, maybe suggesting the oblique was at least partly to blame. From 2017 to 2022, he was worth 2.3 runs per 100 pitches over the heart of the plate, never below zero for a season; in 2023, he was worth -3.0. To make matters worse, he was swinging more than ever:

Bader’s Value on Swings Over the Heart
Year Pitches Batter Run Value Batter RV / 100
2017 76 0.2 0.2
2018 343 10.7 3.1
2019 274 7.1 2.6
2020 81 2.0 2.4
2021 280 6.9 2.5
2022 192 2.1 1.1
2023 229 -6.8 -3.0
SOURCE: Statcast

With a healthy 2024 – which, to be fair, is no given – Bader could conceivably regain some of his rotational speed and be able to get the bat around on some of those middle-middle strikes like he had prior to the oblique strain. Bader was worth -7 runs overall at the plate in 2023 – had he been neutral on those swings over the heart of the plate, he would have been just about at zero runs above average overall. And a run-neutral Bader at the plate could provide enough defensive and baserunning value to make for a solid stopgap in what might amount to a bit of a rebuilding season in Queens in 2024. There will be a fair number of outfielders vying for playing time in Port St. Lucie this coming spring, but a healthy Bader should be their guy in center, at least unless and until top prospect Drew Gilbert comes knocking this summer.

I find myself succumbing to the kind of optimism that sometimes needs tempering when trying to analyze a baseball transaction. Bader is no savior to a Mets team that was profoundly underwhelming in 2023 – none of these measured one-year additions will be. The best bet is that at the end of the day, Bader ends up somewhere between a forgettable short-term Mets tenure and a pleasantly surprising role player, possibly dangled for a third straight midseason trade if the Mets are in position to sell. But $10.5 million is a modest investment for a player who meets a need with a shot at being a little more interesting still.





Chris is a data journalist and FanGraphs contributor. Prior to his career in journalism, he worked in baseball media relations for the Chicago Cubs and Boston Red Sox.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David Klein
2 years ago

With Bader’s injury history and Marte’s age and broken down body Taylor should get a lot of playing time and Stewart gets kicked to the dh spot for now where he’d platoon with Vientos or Trayce Thompson I guess. I would prefer the Mets bring in Turner or Martinez for the dh spot truthfully. Bader is a great fielder no question but his numbers vs righties are not good and they completely cratered last year. He does help vs lefties and the Mets very much struggled against them this past year.

Last edited 2 years ago by David Klein
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago

Okay, one-year deals don’t matter and this isn’t a lot of Cohenbucks to spend, but this signing doesn’t make any obvious sense to me on top of the Taylor pickup. Spend the money on pitching! I guess it has to be taken as a sign that the front office thinks Marte is 100% toast.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
2 years ago

Upgrading the OF defense helps the whole staff and is cheaper than consolidating all that money in one or two pitchers.

During Stearns competitive tenure in Milwaukee (2017-22) they ranked 4th at +189 DRS and 5th with a -0.14 gap between their ERA (3.91) and FIP (4.05).

Other teams with top defenses also predictably beat their FIPs by considerable margins over the same time frame…

HOU (+284 DRS | 3.57 ERA | 3.75 FIP)
LAD (+265 DRS | 3.19 ERA | 3.61 FIP)
STL (+230 DRS | 3.90 ERA | 4.14 FIP)
CHC (+178 DRS | 4.11 ERA | 4.34 FIP)
ARI (+172 DRS | 4.25 ERA | 4.31 FIP)
CLE (+171 DRS | 3.70 ERA | 3.84 FIP)
TBR (+158 DRS | 3.69 ERA | 3.83 FIP)

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

But Bader is only an obvious upgrade to the Mets’ outfield defense if you think both that (a) Marte is toast and (b) DJ Stewart is ever going to be allowed to set foot on the grass again. Otherwise, you’re looking at a regular group of Nimmo, Marte, Taylor, and occasionally McNeil, who are all fine or better at fielding their positions. Upgrading the glove of effectively the 5th OF doesn’t seem like a great use of resources, though they can obviously use the added depth. (ETA, I guess I’m talking myself into this purely on the grounds that they probably do need an insurance policy for Marte’s legs, and this is a cheap one.)

Last edited 2 years ago by Roger McDowell Hot Foot
jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago

Bader has been one of the absolute best defenders in CF since his debut- why would they not put him out there and see if his bat is viable? Why would you consider him a 5th OF?

slz
2 years ago

Marte has been horrific defensively since the Mets signed him and Nimmo is just hanging on in CF

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think that Marte is possibly toast and that this is a solid hedge against that, along with Taylor. They’re all getting hurt at some point anyway, I wouldn’t worry about playing time.

Dmjn53
2 years ago

Indirectly, this was money spent on pitching. At the end of the day. run prevention is run prevention

Last edited 2 years ago by Dmjn53
jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago

FWIW, Stearns had suggested McNeil would spend most of his time at 2B even before Mauricio’s injury.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think it’s a smart move. There’s been a lot of issues about defense and injuries in the outfield for the Mets since…forever? Nimmo is not a model of health and is stretched a little bit in CF anyway, so having an elite CF should allow him to spend more time in a corner slot. And if he’s hurt, then they just go back to whatever arrangement they had earlier, but I think this will save some wear and tear on Nimmo (the guy who matters).

docgooden85Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Moving Nimmo off CF is the only reason I will defend this. Bader doesn’t hit enough to be anything but a 4th OF on a properly constructed contending roster but makes a lights-out version of that guy for a team that can afford the salary and utter crap shoot on health. The chronic foot injuries would have turned me off, since to me it devalues his main carrying skill (defense).
Edit – when I say “chronic” I’m trying to be polite. What I really think is he’s as cooked as Kris Bryant (same injury) but at least Bryant can sort of fall back on power/launch angle.

Last edited 2 years ago by docgooden85
carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

Bryant hasn’t had much power for a while now. Middling at best. Projects at 100wrc and 19hrs.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

It depends on the year. Some years Bader has hit pretty well.

Plus, he’s always hit lefties, so he’s a short-side platoon player plus elite late-game defensive replacement or pinch-runner at worst.

Mike NMN
2 years ago

It’s not $10.5M but $10.5M plus CBT. The player himself is interesting. On a playoff team, he’d be a solid addition as the 4th OF who plays 120-130 games because the team wants to protect its big men, and as a late inning PR/defensive specialist. 120 games per year will also lessen wear and tear on him. Still, for the Mets (yes, they have money to burn) is $20M. Wouldn’t be surprised to see him dangled at the deadline, especially if the Mets aren’t in contention

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

Dunno but Mets and contention doing seem too likely for ’24.

Going by the deals and the roster *today* the Mets are still fourth in the Nl east, maybe third at best if the pitching gambles work out. The central is looking improved and the West is if nothing stronger, so a wildcard looks out of reach.

Barring a big FA push over the next month, the one year deals seem to point to a retrenchment and waiting for the farm. Which may actually be the best strategy for a team with so many questions.

Last edited 2 years ago by fjtorres
krusty
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

The Mets’ plan is for 2024 to be a “transition” year and the twin goals are to play, in Wilpon-era parlance, meaningful games in September while focusing on setting the team up for 2025 and beyond.

Their offseason was predicated on Ohtani and Yamamoto. If they’d somehow gotten Ohtani, then they’d have simply gone for it. If they’d gotten Yamamoto, then they’d have been somewhat more win-now. The Mets didn’t get either, and so the focus is on short-term and stopgap improvements to raise the team’s floor in the very short term without prejudicing its future ceiling.

As it stands right now, the Mets look to me to be a fringe contender. Lindor, Nimmo, and Alonso are in their primes and are safe bets for very good to better performance. McNeil, Alvarez, and Marte aren’t as sure bets (all for different reasons), but are reasonable bets as high upside plays nonetheless. McNeil in particular is a pretty good bet for 2ish+ WAR over a full season as a floor, and his ceiling is obviously higher pending hitting mechanics and BABIP. Bader raises the floor by directly addressing the needs for CF defense and speed, while Wendle is somehow an upgrade on Guillorme??? I guess? I dunno that one, man. 3B is a pretty big question mark as it stands, but that’s by design because the Mets’ want to see what they have in Baty and it’s worth burning PA on him to find out (Mauricio was also meant to figure into that). The farm should start producing by the second half, and the Mets will get a sense of what they have. Hence the “transition”.

The rotation is… not as pleasant. Senga is great, but once you get past him, it’s full of question marks. Severino is a really fun high upside play on a one year basis. Quintana seems a pretty good bet, provided he can fend off the pitfalls of age/stuff/etc. Neither Houser nor Megill inspire confidence, but hey, hope springs eternal.

The pen is a mess. Diaz is arguably the best closer in baseball, assuming he returns to full health and effectiveness, but his deal was made with the short term in mind and obviously, things haven’t worked out in a way to optimize that value. Still, he’s great to watch and root for so at least there’s that. The rest of the pen is a lesson in reliever volatility, as in the Mets are betting on lots of good years as it stands right now. If Raley keeps his form and Smith returns to his, then at least there’s something cooking.

That’s a huge word salad and hopefully not word vomit, but it’s a very longwinded way of saying this is a team that’s designed to contend if things break right and to yield good enough deadline returns if it doesn’t. My biggest concerns are that Lindor, Nimmo, McNeil, Alonso, and Diaz are all in their primes and could be on the wrong side of their aging curve (tho probably still productive) come 2025 and that the farm’s big pieces (Acuna, Gilbert, etc.) won’t make be ready to make meaningful contributions by then. But that’s a 2025 question and it’s part of what the Mets are spending 2024 sorting out.

jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago
Reply to  krusty

I’m not sold on the narrative that their offseason was predicated on Ohtani and Yamamoto. They didn’t seem to really even try much on Ohtani. Yamamoto seemed like a guy they were willing to go big on, but as a long-term piece; I never got the impression that signing YY would have led to them changing the rest of their plan for this offseason.

That said, I agree with your final assessment – I think that the team will ultimately be capable of winning 85 games and contending for a Wild Card spot. With the way the playoffs are set up now, I think it’s foolish to label any team as “not a contender” unless they are really and truly bad- the Mets are not that.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  jb1205

Even without the structure of the playoffs in mind, it’s foolish to dismiss any team in early January that is attempting to get better. A team like the Mets could make a few more decent moves, get lucky during the season itself, make the right moves at the trade deadline, and actually win 95+ games.

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  krusty

Basically you listed what I see: a lot of questions, a lot of maybes, an iffy rotation (Quintana is number 2?) and a *hope* for 85 wins.
85 is the *floor* for half the NL!

Now, they could go on a FA signing tear, add Bellinger and Snell and raise their chances for 90 a lot.

But I said *today*.
Today the Mets are pretenders.
Stearns still has work to do to line up with the D-backs, Cards, Reds, and Padres to name a few of the second tier WC contenders. To say notbing of the top tier of Atlanta,LAD, and Philly. Pitching is key.
They really really need Snell.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

No interest in Snell I think Snell and Bellinger are the two most likely to bust on long term deals. Oh and the Mets just signed Manaea and reportedly are done with rotation other than adding more depth guys.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Agreed. Although even with Snell (injury risk) and Bellinger (performance risk) I’m not sure they have a great chance at 90.

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  airforce21one

Last year they did 75.
Right now, factoring the losses and additions, is the pitching better? Is the offense better? The defense looks somewhat better but does it all add up to ten games better?

Last year the NL wild cards won 84 and are all looking a few games better. Plus the cards and Giants are looking significantly better.

The AL wild cards all did 90+. Something both SD and philly can aspire to.

It’s still early but the Mets look closer to the Cubs than the D-backs. Both have some shopping to do to be contenders.

Last edited 2 years ago by fjtorres
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Last year, the Mets sold at the deadline and still had a -12 run differential on the season.

They’re (correctly) not trying to be world-beaters this year, but they could absolutely be frisky.

Last edited 2 years ago by Cool Lester Smooth
Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I’d easily take the Mets over the Padres at this point. The teams were similar disappointments last year, and while the Mets are trying to get better or at least hold steady, the Padres are drastically cutting both payroll and talent.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lanidrac
Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I don’t know about the NL West being stronger than last year. The Dodgers and maybe the Diamondbacks, yes, but the Giants seem stuck in neutral, the Padres are definitely worse, and the Rockies are still the Rockies.

johndarc
2 years ago

Bader is a great defender and clubhouse guy, the issue seems to be that he can’t really hit and certainly can’t stay healthy.