Mike Trout and One-Man Teams
Mike Trout’s exploits are well known, but no matter how well Mike Trout plays, his team will not succeed without productive play from others in the lineup. Mike Trout is not the first great player with a less than stellar supporting cast. It is something he has gone through already in his brief career. In 2012 and 2014, the Angels had solid teams surrounding Trout that won nearly 90 games in 2012 and won the division in 2014, but in 2013, the rest of the Angels provided poor production and the team wasted a 10-win season. The Angels have gotten off to a slow start at 12-15 and they are certainly far from out of the race at this point, but based on the start of the season and the projections from here on out, the Angels could have trouble providing Trout with support and staying in the playoff hunt as the year goes on.
On offense this season, Mike Trout has been 11.6 runs above average, good for sixth in all of baseball while the rest of the position players have been 26.6 runs below average. Even with Mike Trout, the team has an 85 wRC+ in the early going, ranking 25th in Major League Baseball. Mike Trout is hitting .302/.404/.552. while the rest of the team is .218/.275/.323. Garrett Richards, C.J. Wilson, and Matt Shoemaker should perform well in the rotation, but the team projects to finish the season around .500. No matter how hard he tries, Mike Trout cannot end every game like this:
The rest of the season projections are not incredibly promising for position players not named Trout. The only position players projected for better than average production for the rest of the season are Kole Calhoun and Albert Pujols. Combining the team’s current production with their FanGraphs Depths Charts projections for the rest of the season looks like this:
| Name | WAR |
|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 9.0 |
| Kole Calhoun | 3.5 |
| Albert Pujols | 2.9 |
| Johnny Giavotella | 1.9 |
| Erick Aybar | 1.5 |
| David Freese | 1.1 |
| Chris Iannetta | 1.0 |
| Collin Cowgill | 0.7 |
| Josh Rutledge | 0.2 |
| Matt Joyce | 0.1 |
| Grant Green | 0.1 |
| Efren Navarro | 0.0 |
| Taylor Featherston | 0.0 |
| Drew Butera | 0.0 |
| C.J. Cron | -0.2 |
| TOTAL | 21.8 |
In the last fifty years, only 26 players have achieved nine-win seasons, and those players have accumulated 47 of those seasons. Mike Trout has two of those seasons, and if he were to have another one in 2015, he would join Barry Bonds (8), Alex Rodriguez (6), Joe Morgan (3), and Mike Schmidt (3) as the only players during that time to have at least three nine-win seasons. Cal Ripken, Jr., Ken Griffey, Jr., Rickey Henderson, and Carl Yastrzemski are the only other players with more than one nine-win season in the last fifty years.
Great players have had varying degrees of help during their magnificent seasons. Ken Griffey, Jr. and Alex Rodriguez are the only position player teammates in the last half-century to post nine-win seasons in the same year. The graph below shows the highest teammate WAR during the season where the player achieved nine wins.
The green bar is the updated projection for Kole Calhoun. While a nine-win season is hardly a guarantee for any player, even Mike Trout, if he meets his projections, he will have one of the worst second-best teammates in a great year in history. The A-Rod and Griffey, Jr. season is at the top, and here is the rest of the top ten, including the teammate and WAR.
| YEAR | TEAM | STAR | WAR | TEAMMATE | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Mariners | Alex Rodriguez | 9.2 | Ken Griffey, Jr. | 9.7 |
| 1996 | Mariners | Ken Griffey, Jr. | 9.7 | Alex Rodriguez | 9.2 |
| 1972 | Reds | Johnny Bench | 9.2 | Joe Morgan | 8.7 |
| 2004 | Cardinals | Scott Rolen | 9.0 | Jim Edmonds | 8.3 |
| 1997 | Astros | Craig Biggio | 9.3 | Jeff Bagwell | 8.0 |
| 2011 | Red Sox | Jacoby Ellsbury | 9.4 | Dustin Pedroia | 7.8 |
| 1976 | Reds | Joe Morgan | 9.5 | Pete Rose | 7.4 |
| 1973 | Reds | Joe Morgan | 9.5 | Pete Rose | 7.3 |
| 2001 | Giants | Barry Bonds | 12.5 | Rich Aurilia | 7.1 |
| 1980 | Royals | George Brett | 9.1 | Willie Wilson | 7.0 |
The Big Red Machine of the 70s had several great players, and that 2004 St. Louis Cardinals’ team also had Albert Pujols not too far behind. The list above shows some of the greatest single-season duos in history while the below list gets closer to the one-man teams. The great players below played without an upper-level caliber second banana out in the field, as with a cutoff of a five-win season.
| YEAR | TEAM | PLAYER | WAR | TEAMMATE | WAR | WINS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Cubs | Sammy Sosa | 9.9 | Ricky Gutierrez | 1.8 | 88 |
| 2013 | Angels | Mike Trout | 10.5 | Howie Kendrick | 2.6 | 78 |
| 1996 | Giants | Barry Bonds | 9.2 | Matt Williams | 2.6 | 68 |
| 2004 | Giants | Barry Bonds | 11.9 | Ray Durham | 3.1 | 91 |
| 1997 | Rockies | Larry Walker | 9.1 | Andres Galarraga | 3.1 | 83 |
| 2003 | Giants | Barry Bonds | 10.2 | Jose Cruz | 3.2 | 100 |
| 1980 | Phillies | Mike Schmidt | 9.0 | Manny Trillo | 3.3 | 91 |
| 2004 | Dodgers | Adrian Beltre | 9.7 | Cesar Izturis | 3.6 | 93 |
| 1967 | Red Sox | Carl Yastrzemski | 11.1 | George Scott | 4.4 | 92 |
| 1990 | Pirates | Barry Bonds | 9.9 | Andy Van Slyke | 4.4 | 95 |
| 2005 | Yankees | Alex Rodriguez | 9.1 | Derek Jeter | 4.4 | 95 |
| 1990 | Phillies | Lenny Dykstra | 9.0 | Darren Daulton | 4.4 | 77 |
| 1991 | Orioles | Cal Ripken | 10.6 | Mike Devereaux | 4.5 | 67 |
| 2002 | Rangers | Alex Rodriguez | 10.0 | Rafael Palmeiro | 4.5 | 72 |
| 1974 | Phillies | Mike Schmdit | 9.4 | Dave Cash | 4.6 | 80 |
| 1968 | Red Sox | Carl Yastrzemski | 9.3 | Ken Harrelson | 4.8 | 86 |
| 2003 | Rangers | Alex Rodriguez | 9.2 | Hank Blalock | 4.8 | 71 |
| 1977 | Phillies | Mike Schmidt | 9.2 | Greg Luzinski | 4.9 | 101 |
Mike Trout has already made this list once as Howie Kendrick was the second-best option in 2013 and had under three wins. The biggest gap on the list occurred in 2004, when Barry Bonds hit .362/.609/.812 for a wRC+ of 233, and four Ray Durhams would have been needed to surpass one Bonds. The worst-performing teammate above was Sammy Sosa’s teammate Ricky Gutierrez. Sosa hit 64 home runs while Gutierrez’s slightly below average bat and average defense at short gave him an average season.
Many of the teams above managed to win quite a few games, but knowing only the second-best position player on the team could mask decent depth behind the top two players. Taking the teams in the last chart above, and then looking at team WAR from position players without the best player helps show which players were playing on an island. The graph below shows rest of the team WAR for the 18 players listed above as well Mike Trout and the Angels’ projections for the rest of this season.
The 1977 Phillies were a great team with nine players with at least two wins. Bake McBride, Larry Bowa, and Garry Maddux all had very good seasons to support Schmidt and Luzinski barely played below the five-win threshold needed to qualify for this list. The 2005 New York Yankees team is an unusual one. The team won without any great pitching seasons as Randy Johnson’s 4.1 WAR was the highest on the staff and the only pitcher above three wins. Bernie Williams and Tony Womack each had seasons that were two wins below replacement level. The team trotted out A-Rod, Jeter, Giambi, Jorge Posada, Gary Sheffield, Hideki Matsui, and Robinson Cano and bludgeoned the opposing pitcher without regard for defense. Mariano Rivera closed down the games and the team won 95 games before losing a 3-2 series to the Angels in the first round.
Mike Trout is not all alone on the Angels. Kole Calhoun and Albert Pujols are solid players and the pitching staff should be adequate, but even another superlative season from Trout might not be enough to get them to the playoffs. Trout is in very good company in almost every conceivable statistic and when it comes to being a superstar without a solid surrounding cast, it is no different.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.



Mike Trout is clearly in a whole different stratosphere than every other current player. The only way he could have fair competition is to pit him against the only other individual to literally be a one-man team: Bugs Bunny.
Over the last 3 calendar years, Mike Trout has been worth 30.7 WAR.
This is 9.1 WAR more than the next best player (McCutchen). In other words, Trout has been worth about as much as McCutchen and J.J. Hardy combined in that time.
He’s also been worth these combinations of players (min 400 games playes in last 3 calendar years):
Miguel Cabrera (19.4) and Freddie Freeman (11.2)
Robinson Cano (18.1) and Evan Longoria (12.1)
Buster Posey (18.0) and Kyle Seager (12.4)
Josh Donaldson (17.2) and Joey Votto (13.4)
Adrian Beltre (16.6) and Jason Heyward (14.1)
Alex Gordon (16.2) and Chase Headley (14.3)
Carlos Gomez (16.0) and Adam Jones (15.1)
Ben Zobrist (15.5) and Paul Goldschmidt (15.1)
Trout has also been worth about:
3 x Howie Kendrick
4 x Jose Altuve
5 x Alejandro De Aza
6 x Starlin Castro
7 x David Freese
8 x Drew Stubbs
9 x Eric Hosmer
10 x James Loney
162 x Raul Ibanez,
and last, but certainly least
(negative 10) x Yuniesky Betancourt
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2015&month=12&season1=2015&ind=0&team=&rost=&age=0&filter=&players=
That’s great analysis and all, but you should have looked into Bugs Bunny…
#TroutGraphs
Thumbs down for incorrect use of “literally.” Bugs Bunny isn’t even a man!
Should of kept Hamilton
I hadn’t ever thought of it before, but Trout is Ken Griffey Jr., the best all-around player of our generation (depending on what you think of Bonds).
By the end of his age-23 season (this one), Trout could have the following career line: .300/.400/.500 with 130 HRs, 750 H, 500 R, 400 RBI, 350 BB, and 130 SB with a 165 wRC+ and somewhat above average CF defense for a total of 40ish WAR.
Griffey after his age-23 season (1993) was approximately .305/.380/.510 with 142 HRs, 832 H, 424 R, 453 RBI, 318 BB, and 77 SB with a 140ish wRC+ and good CF defense for a total of 28.1 WAR.
Griffey’s defense was likely better, but Trout’s baserunning was more valuable, and Trout plays in a much harder offensive era, hence the WAR discrepancy.
The question is, why doesn’t Trout have a nickname like “The Kid”? Maybe we can call him “The Adolescent” or “The Teen” or just “The Adult”?
We should actually select from the following names:
The Egg, The Fry, The Smolt, The Adult, The Spawning Adults
I like “The Spawn.”
Followed by: The Filet. Or perhaps the Fishwich.
He’s the Millville Meteor.
I really don’t know how you could call Jr. better than Bonds. Bonds was a better fielder, a better baserunner, and a better hitter and if you go by their career numbers, it’s not at all close in any category. Going by wRC+, there has never been even a single season in which Jr. was better than Bonds.
But to answer your question, it’s because Mike Trout already has an 80 grade
everythingbaseball name.Albert Pujols through Age 23 is up there as well with an OPS well over 1.000, 114 HR, 591 H, 367 R, 381 RBI, and 220 BB with a wRC+ of about 165 and good defense at multiple positions for a WAR of 31.6 (although I don’t trust those defensive ratings, which claim he had negative defensive value even when he won his 2 Gold Gloves), and he managed that in just 3 seasons.
Best players other than Mike Trout through age 23:
Ted Williams, .356/.481/.642, 127 HR, 541 R, 515 RBI, 36.4 WAR
Ty Cobb, .346/.395/.476, 254 SB, 471 R, 474 RBI, 36.2 WAR
Mel Ott, .321/.421/.564, 153 HR, 582 R, 602 RBI, 33.2 WAR
Mickey Mantle, .298/.400/.528, 121 HR, 510 R, 445 RBI, 29.5 RBI
The next dozen guys by WAR are all all-time greats, but all among the “peaked early and then faded quickly in their ’30’s” types, with a couple of exceptions — Ken Griffey Jr., Arky Vaughan, Joe Jackson, Eddie Mathews, Al Kaline, Jimmie Foxx, Rogers Hornsby, Alex Rodriguez, Stan Musial, Andruw Jones, Sherry Magee, Cesar Cedeno.
But looking at those names… yeah, there’s Williams and Cobb and Musial, but also… the following players put up a combined TWO 4-WAR seasons after their age 32 seasons: Mickey Mantle , Ken Griffey Jr., Arky Vaughan, Joe Jackson, Eddie Mathews, Al Kaline, Jimmie Foxx, Andruw Jones, Sherry Magee, and Cesar Cedeno. Mathews had 5.2 WAR as a 33 year old in 1965, was decent in 1966, and then was basically done. Foxx had 4.5 WAR as a 33 year old in 1941, and then hung on for a couple of years as a part time player. That’s it.
And even among the exceptions… Hornsby had a total of two 4 WAR seasons after age 32 (11.1 WAR for the Cubs as a 33 year old; 5.2 WAR for the Cubs as a 35 year old; only one other season above 0.5 WAR). Rodriguez has put up 15 total WAR after his 32 year old season; albeit with time left. Ott managed to put up some good numbers during the War because all of the other top players were off fighting, but he was finished the second they all came back (played a grand total of 36 games after his 37th birthday).
So, essentially, either Trout is going to flame out early… or you’re hoping he can be Williams, Cobb, or Musial. The closest comp I see for Trout is Mickey Mantle, so I’d go with the former.
Well, the next dozen after that include guys who put up a ton of 4+ WAR seasons after 32 including Frank RObinson, Hank Aaron, Tris SPeaker, Eddie Collins (not going to total it up). Even Rickey had 2 4+ WAR seasons after 32 – so your point is . . . .what exactly? That players tend to taper off after 32 and aren’t quite as good? Brilliant analysis.
Also, did you really use Joe Jackson to prove that Trout will really crash after 32? THinking Trout has a gambling problem that might shorten his career?
Nothing to see here…
Craig, what’s the point of excluding pitching from your analysis?
I felt it was more interesting to just compare the everyday players in the lineup given I was going with a one-man team concept and pitchers don’t make an impact every day. A two-man team, but only every five days, didn’t seem quite as compelling to me.
Makes sense, I guess… though a SP will face more hitters in a year than a batter will get PAs (doesn’t take into account fielding chances, I know…)
I guess the conclusions get a little wonky in some places where teams were led by pitching… 1980 PHI had Carlton at +10 WAR, for example
Looking at the top 6 pitcher seasons from the same time frame (all 10+ WAR seasons), 5 of them did not have another pitcher that did much better than average, ranging from 2.3 to 4.0 WAR for the second best. Curt Schilling had 7.8 WAR to help Randy Johnson and his 10.4 WAR in 2001.
TKDC: well, now you’re just comparing batters-to-batters and pitchers-to-pitchers… wasn’t the point of my question
I know. I looked for interesting comparisons there as well but didn’t find anything. There aren’t any top hitter/top pitcher seasons. I was thinking the same thing as you. I guess my comment should not have been a reply to yours.
I sense a missing gif in the article. Right after “Mike Trout cannot end every game like this”
Weird. It’s showing up for me.
It might be something with your browser. I can see the gif perfectly fine on my* machine.
*Company’s
Back to work, you slackard!
Eep!
Man, that 1996 Seattle Mariners was one strange team.
As the son of a man whose all-time favorite player is the Philadelphia Phillies Wall of Famer, #31, I feel obligated to point out two thirds of the world is covered by water, the other third is covered by Maddox (with an ‘o’ not a ‘u’).
Which they needed with The Bull patrolling(?) LF. I never understood why the Phils didn’t keep Luzinski at 1B – not only was playing LF a near-disaster for him but it couldn’t have helped his longevity roaming the outfield turf. A shame, because the guy could really hit the snot out of the ball.
Although I agree Trout has no peer on his team, he seems to have far better protection in his lineup than Goldschmidt has in Arizona.
Here are the only other teams ever where a player had 9.0 WAR and the second-best player had less WAR than Howie Kendrick in 2013:
1910 Cleveland Naps: Nap Lajoie, 9.3 WAR; Terry Turner, 2.4 WAR (Wait for it…)
1911 Clevaland Naps: Joe Jackson, 9.3 WAR; Nap Lajoie, 2.5 WAR (this is hilarious)
1925 St. Louis Cardinals: Rogers Hornsby, 10.6 WAR; Jack Smith, 2.5 WAR
1955 New York Giants: Willie Mays, 9.0 WAR; Hank Thompson, 2.5 WAR
Another thing I realized while looking through this: Hornsby had 9 WAR seasons with the Cardinals (6 of them), Giants, Braves, and Cubs. He’s one of my favorite players and I’d totally forgotten that he even played for the Braves. Anybody else ever done that for four different teams?
I don’t care. I love that one of your favorite players is Rogers Hornsby
Only 12 players have ever had four or more different 9 WAR seasons at all, and out of them Hornsby is the only one to have 9 WAR seasons with four different teams. ARod is runner-up with three different teams (M’s, Rangers, and Yankees), with Barry Bonds (Pirates/Giants) and Eddie Collins (A’s/White Sox) the only others to do it with more than one team.
As big as the gap is between Trout and no. 2 on his team, the gap is even larger if we consider $/WAR. In 2013, he was paid about $500,000 for about 10 WAR, or $50K/WAR. Pujols was paid something like $20 million for around 2 WAR (he missed much of the season), or $10 million/WAR. That is a difference of 200-fold. Without looking into history at all, I’m guessing that is the largest such difference between teammates in history.
Yikes, it’s even worse than that. Pujols only had 0.6 WAR in 2013. So the $/WAR difference between them was more than 600.
That 96 season with Arod and Griffey was pretty amazing. The 2004 Cardinals season is interesting because if you went to third highest WAR, it would be Pujols at 7.8 WAR. After that the next highest WAR was Tony Womack at 2.8 WAR. Chris Carpenter led pitchers with 3.1 WAR and pitchers as a whole contributed 16.6 WAR
The position players as a whole contributed 33.6 WAR, but 25.1 of that WAR came from Pujols/Rolen/Edmonds. So those 3 contributed 74% of position player WAR, and 50% of total team WAR. MV3 was a very fitting nickname for them. I wonder if there is any other set of 3 players who carried a contending team so much.