Mike Trout Is Impossible

I guess you could say that the Angels are sputtering. After sprinting out to an astonishing 13-3 record, the club has lost five out of six, getting swept by the Red Sox and then losing two of three to the Giants. It was a fairly unremarkable weekend for the most interesting player in baseball. Shohei Ohtani was in the lineup twice, and he even batted cleanup. Though he recorded three singles, he didn’t drive in any runs, nor did he score any himself. He struck out two times on Sunday.

Meanwhile, context be damned, it was a tremendous weekend for the best player in baseball. In the eighth inning on Friday, Mike Trout homered. In the third inning on Saturday, Mike Trout homered. And in the eighth inning on Sunday, Mike Trout homered. Trout leads baseball with nine home runs. Over the weekend, he homered to left field, to center, and to right.

There exists a recurring joke(?) that baseball statistics start to matter the day that Trout assumes the lead in WAR. Barring a DL stint, it always feels like an inevitability. As of this Monday morning, Trout leads all players in WAR according to FanGraphs. And Trout also leads all players in WAR according to Baseball Reference. Here we are, and, you know, we haven’t checked in with Trout in a while. He seems to…be…better?

Trout spent the weekend batting 6-for-11 with the three home runs, plus another two doubles. Even if you didn’t know anything about him before, the homers alone would make it tempting to conclude that Trout must be among the very best players. This is the pitch that Trout hit out to left-center:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

This is the pitch that Trout hit out up the middle:

This is the pitch that Trout hit out to right-center:

Fastball in on the hands? Check. Offspeed pitch dropping below the knees? Check. Fastball down and away? Check. Easy power, all-fields power, quick, compact swings. Trout showed exactly what makes him so dangerous. Looking at only three swings over the span of three days, you can tell that Trout must be one blessed individual.

When it comes to Trout improving, though — the way that Trout is getting better isn’t something that’s readily apparent. It would be easy to miss in a single game, or even in a single series. Trout is very good at the big and flashy things. He doesn’t make it very hard to put together a highlight reel. Here’s a home run. Here’s another home run. Here’s a triple, followed by a massive home run. That’s Mike Trout.

But we should talk about Trout setting himself up for success. More and more often, Trout is making it easier on himself. Easier on himself, and therefore more challenging for his opponent. What do you do when Mike Trout stops swinging at pitches out of the zone? Because that is the very direction he’s headed.

Trout has never been an overaggressive kind of hitter. If anything, he’s gone through bouts of being *too* patient. That’s something he’s tried to work to improve. But there’s patience, and there’s discipline. Hitters just about never benefit from chasing. How well does Mike Trout currently know his own strike zone? We can examine his entire career, looking at rolling 50-game averages.

There are fluctuations — there are always fluctuations — but Trout is chasing less and less often. As another way of looking at this, we can pull some data from Baseball Savant. Using their detailed-zones feature, we can look at how often Trout has swung at pitches (A) clearly in the zone, (B) around the edges, and (C) clearly out of the zone. In this plot, the numbers just go year-by-year, so forget about rolling averages for a moment.

What do we have? When it comes to swinging at would-be balls, Trout is at a career low. He’s been taking more of those pitches — especially down and in, and down and away. Around the edges, Trout hasn’t changed so much. Those are the 50/50 pitches. Sometimes you just have to protect. And when it comes to swinging at would-be strikes, Trout is at a career high. He’s been swinging at more of those pitches — he’s up seven percentage points from the previous two seasons. Those seasons were themselves up about five percentage points from Trout’s earlier norm.

Late last week, I wrote about the Red Sox’ increased level of selective aggression. This follows along some similar lines. Trout’s overall swing rate is somewhere close to where it’s always been. However, if you were to judge each individual swing, a greater rate of Trout’s 2018 swings would be considered good decisions. He’s laying off more pitches he couldn’t do very much with, and he’s attacking more pitches he thinks would be hittable. Focusing on the former — if you’re a pitcher, what can you do when a hitter doesn’t chase? If you want to have any chance, you have to throw strikes. Mike Trout is seeing strikes.

In a certain sense, Mike Trout has forced pitchers into the zone, because he won’t let them get away with pitches somewhere else. There’s always the option, I guess, of just issuing walk after walk. Pitchers haven’t gotten there yet. Maybe they will pretty soon. Because, of course, Trout is dangerous, and, what happens when, as a hitter, you don’t chase, and you force pitchers to throw strikes? Trout has been making more regular contact.

Last season and this season, Trout has ranked in the 97th percentile in terms of chase rate. That is very, very good. And, by contact, Trout used to rank around the 60th percentile. Last season, he ranked in the 78th. So far this season, he’s ranked in the 93rd. There’s never been a good way to pitch to Mike Trout — at least, not for very long. He’s been baseball’s best player year after year after year. Yet, right now, pitching to Trout is somehow extra impossible. This version is extra selective, and therefore extra dangerous. This version of Trout gets into even better counts, and this version of Trout is even more able to generate the loft he’s always looking for. You want to tie Trout up? Can’t really do it. You want to get him to overextend his arms? Can’t really do it. Trout is just about constantly under control. He knows what he wants to attack, and he knows precisely how to attack it.

According to Statcast, Mike Trout might’ve improved a little bit defensively. I don’t have anything on that, and that’s just a whole other matter. This is about only Trout in the box, and, in the box, Trout has found a way to inch closer to perfect. He appears less likely to chase a pitcher’s pitch. Pitchers can’t consistently repeat their quality pitches. More than ever, the Trout decision seems to be: put him on base, or give up hard contact. That was already sort of true before, but even the best of the best can improve. As terrifying as that is to consider.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

67 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
radiohead
8 years ago

I hope this guy stays healthy so he can end his career with extraordinary stats…

Mahoney
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

Here’s a WAR graph comparing Trout vs Aaron (who stayed healthy) and Mantle and Pujols (who didn’t):

https://www.fangraphs.com/graphsw.aspx?players=1000001,1008082,10155,1177

Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney
Mahoney
8 years ago

…(Rex drops mic.)

ScottyBMember since 2017
8 years ago

Very cool. The inclusion of 2018 makes some of the visuals odd, but that’s a very very small nit to pick

DougMember since 2019
8 years ago

…which points out what a MACHINE Aaron was. The consistency is just ridiculous.

rosen380
8 years ago

Trout, plus the other six position players with 40+ fWAR through age 25:
https://www.fangraphs.com/graphsw.aspx?players=10155,1002378,1008082,1004285,1006030,1009904,1274&wg=2

FrodoBeck
8 years ago

Seems he always finds a way to get a bit better. When he started selling out for more power in 2014 and his K% went up to 26%, he learned to keep the power while trimming the Ks, and also increasing walks at the same time. Now he’s basically the most selective hitter in the league. What is the next step to take? Only hitting dingers? Is he working on secret bullpen sessions and out of nowhere he’s the next shutdown closer?

bananas
8 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

The real reason ohtani chose LAA…

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
8 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

Moar triples. Just because.

smada
8 years ago

*gets to O-swing graph*

DEAR GOD

MoateMember since 2022
8 years ago
Reply to  smada

It’s scary to think that this might not even be his final form.

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  Moate

Imagine if he improved as much as Bonds, and I’m not even talking about the second version of Barry:

Bonds 21-26: wRC+ 136
Bonds 27-29: wRC+ 189

Trout will finish his age 26 season this year with a wRC+ of around 170.

rustydudeMember since 2021
8 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

If you look at his plate discipline stats that Jeff outlines, Trout is looking more and more like vintage Bonds. Which is unbelievable because Bonds was unbelievable.

insidb
8 years ago
Reply to  Moate

OPS…OVER 9000!?

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  smada

Trout reminds of that old joke about the pitcher who complained that his pitches to Hornsby weren’t being called for strikes. The umpire replied, “Mr. Hornsby will tell you when the pitch is a strike.”

southie
8 years ago

What a beast. A slugger with a 5.1% swinging strike, 46.3% hard contact, 50% FB and only 8 8% IFFB.

I’m giving him Bonds treatment for rest of season if I’m managing against him. Take my chances.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  southie

Taking nothing away from Trout, and this is just unreal, his numbers this year in this small sample still don’t hold a candle to second-prime Bonds.

v2miccaMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

No one claimed they do. Just opining that he would give him the same treatment Bonds often received if he were managing against him.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

To which my point is that would be overkill. The “Bonds treatment” as I believe it is commonly meant, is to always lean towards walking him rather than pitching to him (either through intentional walks or just not throwing strikes). Trout’s output is not at that level yet.

southie
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

No argument here. Bonds was certainly playing at an unreal dare I say…enhanced level…

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  southie

I would really be tempted to let 38 year old Mike Trout officially retire and then come back as Trike Mout with special permission to juice up. Just to see what happens.

Angelsjunky
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Consider this: Trout started slowly, hitting .184 through his first 9 games. Since then he’s hit .404/.500/.894 in the last 13 games.

It is conceivable that Trout ends the year with a .320/.450/.650 line. That’s not quite Bondsian, but not far from it.

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  Angelsjunky

Actually, that’s exactly Bonds in his first prime. From 1992-94, he was .321/.449/.651.

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

Also worth noting that over his last 162 games, Trout is .304/.440/.613.

JoserMember since 2021
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Right now he’s tracking Y2K, Age 35 Barry Bonds:
2000 Bonds: .456 wOBA, 19.3 BB%, 12.7 K%, .381 ISO
2018 Trout: .456 wOBA, 13.9 BB%, 18.8 K%, .376 ISO
Obviously the BB and K rates differ, but these are different pitching eras also.

I wouldn’t expect Trout to continue on the 21st Century Bonds progression, but then I wouldn’t have expected him to keep getting better the last few seasons either, so who knows. He is still just 26.

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

“Taking nothing away from Trout, and this is just unreal, his honest numbers this year in this small sample still don’t hold a candle to what can be done using illegal chemicals.”

Fixed that for you.

Bret
8 years ago
Reply to  Yanks123

Today I learned two things.
1. You can put images in fangraphs comments.
2. You should not put images in fangraphs comments.

Also that heatmap looks like a tide pod.

Angelsjunky
8 years ago

NSFW

JEdwardMember since 2016
8 years ago

You’d think I’d be tired of all the Trout articles by now, but nope, like his ABs, I just want to see more. He’s f’in ridiculous.

noeckerrMember since 2016
8 years ago

Who else noticed the high socks yesterday?

HughesMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  noeckerr

He’s giving fair warning that he’s going to steal more bases and chase down more fly balls.

Mahoney
8 years ago

Mike Trout has 56.7 career WAR at this moment. Taking the worst of the three ROS projections on this site, let’s assume he adds 7.1 WAR to end 2018. Between now and season’s end he will have passed Hall of Famers Wee Willie Keeler, Joe Tinker, Bill Dickey, Bill Terry, Jackie Robinson, Richie Ashburn, Ichiro, Tony Perez, Andre Dawson, Dave Winfield, Max Carey, Frank Baker, Billy Williams, Joe Gordon, Ryne Sandberg, Hank Greenberg, Pee Wee Reese, Bid McPhee, Willie Stargell, Zack Wheat, Ernie Banks, Duke Snider, Roberto Alomar, Mike Piazza, and Alan Trammell, and an equal number of non-HOF’ers, to crack the top 100 all-time (#93). He’ll also still be just 8 months older than Aaron Judge.

NOW assume that he’s gotten even better…..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

About a year ago, I tried to figure out if Mike Trout could pass Willie Mays as the “greatest player since integration” (sans steroids). The short version was that it was possible, but not likely. He has a really good shot of passing Mantle on the career fWAR list, and a decent shot of passing Hank Aaron, but that’s probably around where he ends up (the scenario wound up putting him around 130-135 fWAR).

It’s really something when the debate stops hinging on whether someone is going to be Hall of Famer but where on the all-time greats list he’s going to end up.

bjsguess
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The biggest challenges when comparing players of other eras is the defensive calcs. They are really nothing more than shots in the dark. For example, Babe Ruth at age 39 was worth more defensively than 3 of Mike Trout’s seasons so far. I’ve never seen the Babe on defense but I just have a hard time accepting this fact.

If you change assumptions on defense and focus on what we can really count effectively, offense, then Trout is absolutely on track to catch up to the greats. It’s not likely, but he has a shot. That’s something that we haven’t been able to say in a really, really long time.

LHPSU
8 years ago
Reply to  bjsguess

Defense is league-normalized, so that could work if Babe Ruth’s peers are much worse on defense compared to Babe Ruth than Mike Trout’s peers are compared to Mike Trout.

free-range turducken
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Last year, Al Kaline moved ahead of Albert Pujols to take sole possession of 26th place in all time WAR. He was still 689 months older than Aaron Judge..

crew87Member since 2026
8 years ago

What’s it like to be an Angels fan? I mean are the blogs/podcasts/whatever just like MIKE. TROUT. Everytime?

And now you get Shohei Ohtani? I basically watch as many Angels games as I can and I’m a Brewers fan. I honestly can’t fathom what it’s like to have this embarrassment of riches and entertainment.

Johan Santa
8 years ago
Reply to  crew87

You know it’s remarkable when you leave out Andrelton Simmons off your list of entertaining Angels.

Jetsy Extrano
8 years ago
Reply to  Johan Santa

I wish I had named my ballplaying son “Mike Tro”.

Angelsjunky
8 years ago
Reply to  crew87

Look at the first four decades of Angels history and you realize we deserve this.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Angelsjunky

And watch Angels in the Outfield.

redsoxmaniac
8 years ago
Reply to  Angelsjunky

And Jim Edmonds leaves the room in a huff! Garrett Anderson and Tim Salmon kindly asks you to rethink your team’s history though.

mike2017
8 years ago

mike trout is a great one, sure.
but overrated, in that he is not impossible nor ridiculous.

willie mays had 156 WAR.
his WAR between 1962 and 1965, 4 years straight he had WAR higher than 10.5 every year re baseball reference. much better than trout.

hank aaron had 143 WAR.

lets see if he could keep it going like them first.

bjsguess
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

I hope you are trying to be funny and just failing.

Willie Mays, Babe Ruth … those guys were impossible. It doesn’t diminish what they did to recognize that what Trout is doing is also impossible. He’s just so good. That’s not overrating him. It’s stating a fact.

But if you want some help, how about we compare each player through their age 25 season.

— Trout – 306/410/566 … 172 OPS+ … 54.2 bWAR … 54.9 fWAR … 201 HRs … 162 SB’s
— Mays – 306/382/584 … 153 OPS+ … 32.5 bWAR … 31.2 fWAR … 152 HRs … 83 SB’s
— Bonds – 265/358/479 … 133 OPS+ … 33.3 bWAR … 31 fWAR … 117 HRs … 169 SB’s
— Aaron – 323/372/559 … 151 OPS+ … 38.6 bWAR … 36.6 fWAR … 179 HRs … 20 SB’s

Now Mays loses a bit in the counting stats since he served in the war for a time. But since you bring up career stats it’s only fair to show where each player stacked up at this point in their careers. And if you need help reading the numbers let me help, Trout does just fine.

Each of those guys shared something in common that we don’t know about Trout – longevity. Playing into your 40’s and still being very productive is a rare feat. Odds are Trout won’t do it. But it’s hard to penalize the guy for something that hasn’t happened yet. And I also don’t make it a habit to bet against the guy.

What we know now is that Trout is playing this game as good as anyone who has come before him. To talk about his greatness is not overrating him.

frangipard
8 years ago
Reply to  bjsguess

“Odds are Trout won’t do it.”

I don’t see any reason to think that. He won’t be the Trout we’re used to, but Mays and Aaron weren’t in top form in their last years, either. When you’re starting from such ridiculous heights, you can be greatly diminished and still a productive contributor.

IMO, the question will be whether or not he’ll want to … Aaron and Mays and those guys had a financial incentive to keep on playing as long as they can; they weren’t making so much money that they’d be set for life when they were done playing ball. By the time he’s declining, Trout will have eleventy zillion dollars, and may decide hanging around as an 41 year old 1B/DH isn’t fun. One imagines if he’ll look back at late-career Albert Pujols in deciding whether or not he wants to end his career with several years as a mere mortal.

mike2017
8 years ago
Reply to  bjsguess

impossible carries a deep meaning.
it only applies to one player if any.
saying trout is impossible means trout is the best ever.
i dont think so.

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

You’ve obviously never heard of the marketing boast, “Six impossible things before breakfast.” Impossibility does not imply singularity.

WARrior
8 years ago

I hope you know the origin of that saying. It wasn’t thought up by anyone in marketing.

mike2017
8 years ago

no i am not a native english speaker.
but understand your point now.
however trout is still overrated among the readers here compared to the past greats i feel

awalnohaMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

Unique means “one of a kind” though now it is used to mean extremely rare or unusual.

Ukranian to Vietnamese to French is back
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

Mike Trout is great, of course.
But it’s not that it’s impossible or funny.

Mais has 156 wars.
The war from 1962 to 1965, four years in a row, had more than 10.5 years of war every year in baseball. Much better than salmon.

Hank Aaron has 143.

Let’s see if he can continue as he is.

WARrior
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

Well, here’s one way he could pass not only Mays and Aaron, but Bonds and Ruth:

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/getting-mike-trout-to-168-4-war/

awalnohaMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  mike2017

Mike Trout is incorrigible?

lmcgagin07
8 years ago

I wouldnt be shocked if he pulled out some reverse babe ruth and started throwing shutuots next year. also, its kinda scary that hes barely halfway into his prime and will have more career war after this year than ichiro and ernie banks

Shirtless George Brett
8 years ago

Its only marginally related to this article but the fact that Ted Williams took 3 whole seasons off (1943, 44, 45) when he was 24 and missed basically another two seasons due to injury (played only 43 combined games in 1952 and 53) and still finished with 130 fWAR is insane.

Jon L.Member since 2016
8 years ago

I’m pretty sure that was the Korean War, and not injury, in 1952 and 1953. Seems one of the finalists for Best Hitter Who Ever Lived was also on the short list for Best Fighter Pilot Who Ever Lived. Something about eyesight, reaction time, and hand-eye coordination, I suppose.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  Jon L.

He’s was pretty high up there as a fly fisherman, too.

Jon L.Member since 2016
8 years ago

” As the Korean War heated up, however, the Marines desperately needed pilots-and Williams was one of the best. He returned to active duty six games into the 1952 season. After hitting a home run in his last at bat, he hung up his spikes to don flying boots to patrol the skies of Korea instead of Fenway Park’s outfield.”

halidonhill
8 years ago

This is why I think Ted is in the argument for greatest player of all time, not just greatest hitter. He went for 11.6 fWAR in 1942 and 11.8 when he got back in 1946. Call it 11.6 per season and he’s at 165.2 career fWAR. He put up 2.3 fWAR in just 110 PA in 1953 when he got back from Korea. Call 1952 and 1953 7.5 fWAR seasons (probably low) and he’s at 180.2 career fWAR, 12 fWAR better than Ruth in a comparable amount of PAs.

halidonhill
8 years ago
Reply to  halidonhill

More on Williams:

Give him back his average stats (with conservative estimates) for those five seasons and he’s the career leader in just about every offensive category at the time of his retirement and some still today.

~2,430 RBIs – Passes Aaron easily and would still be the leader with no one likely to pass him

~2400 Runs – 100 more than Rickey Henderson and still the leader with no one likely to pass him

~692 Home Runs – Not hard to squint and see 24 homers over 5 prime seasons to pass Ruth though Aaron and Bonds would still pass both eventually.

~3,600 Hits -2nd All time at retirement behind Cobb, in about 4 seasons worth less PAs, and would still be 5th now

~2,750 Walks – Almost 200 more than Bonds, Think this is the most astounding

~ .348 AVG – Moves him into 4th all time for guys over 5,000 PAs and still the best modern era AVG by a good bit

Everyone talks about the video game numbers Bonds put up but Williams did it 50 years before and did it better.

Johnston
8 years ago

Trout: simply the best.

BenZobrist4MVP
8 years ago

Chuck Norris makes Mike Trout jokes.

Mike Green
8 years ago

Trout turns 27 in July. It’s a little early for him to have that perfect season, but that has been his career pattern anyway.

mnauj
8 years ago

Skimmed the comments and didn’t see this mentioned… I read some stats a year-ish ago about trout not swinging at the first pitch, and when he did he was batting under .100. Is there a place where we can graph just first pitch action O vs Z, from month to month or year to year?

matthayden4Member since 2024
8 years ago

As of today, career 162-game averages:

Trout: 36 HR, 100 RBI, .306/.410/.568/.978, 172 OPS+
Mantle: 36 HR, 102 RBI, .298/.421/.557/.977, 172 OPS+

Wicked ProphetMember since 2017
8 years ago

So I seem to remember articles discussing a rising Zone% for a batter being predictive of a slump or injury, as it implied the pitchers no longer feared pitching in the zone. Is Trout such an outlier that he’s the exception, and it would still be considered predictive? Or am I mis-remembering what stat was used (I searched but couldn’t find anything).

david k
8 years ago

I suppose that with more offensive threats in their lineup than they’ve had for a while, Trout can afford to be more patient and not feel like he has to do everything himself.

ebjerke
8 years ago

I hope some of you Fangraphs experts can answer some questions I have about Trout.

Just so you know, he is my favorite player, but I am not easily satisfied and I have constant complaints about Trout. I would love you guys with all the stats and measurements to put me in my place.

1. He seems to be an incredibly UN-CLUTCH player. Are not the vast majority of his HRs solo shots? I don’t know for sure because I don’t know where to find those numbers, but I would think he is much less dangerous with men on base than other top performers. But not just HRs with men on, but plain old hits with men on. I swear that among elite players he has to be one of the worst at delivering when it matters.

2. He seems to NEVER have HUGE headline-grabbing games. Compared to Harper and even less-than superstar players, he has way fewer multiple HR games. It is such a rarity for someone who is so good. I constantly see multiple HR games from players I have never heard of, but Trout? SO RARE. And not just multiple HR games, but I don’t think he has many multi-hit games either. Two hits is about his typical limit.

3. About this year: At this juncture, he is walking LESS frequently than in the past. In fact, after going something like 50 at bats in spring training without a strikeout, he seems to have been making up for lost time. As I write this, he has 20 Ks against only 17 BB. It used to be guaranteed that he walked once a game, but in spite of your swing rate stats, he is walking less frequently.

I think that is all the Mike Trout complaints I have that I can recall, but believe me when I tell you guys that I am constantly disappointed in him. Good thing he is not my son because I would be hell to live with. Maybe I am.

ebjerke
8 years ago
Reply to  ebjerke

What? Downvotes but no one to put me in my place? I WANT TO BE WRONG about some of this, but no one is playing.

insidb
8 years ago

Trout gives me genuine hope that players like Didi and Judge can evolve and sustain growth. Watching players improve is one of the most satisfying aspects of fandom, because stagnation is so frustrating. Trout boggles the mind every year, because he is literally raising the sport’s ceiling, not just approaching it.

This guy is so good.

awalnohaMember since 2017
8 years ago

Whoops wrong reply