Mike Trout Wants Your Curveballs Now

Mike Trout is, once again, the league leader in position-player WAR, and league leaders in position-player WAR tend to do some incredible things. Trout just did an incredible thing on Monday, and we should talk about it. With two strikes, against Collin McHugh:

No, you didn’t see that wrong. Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable, because memories are notoriously unreliable, but the thing about eyewitnesses is that they witness things once. You can witness this as many times as you want. Loop it over and over and over again. This pitch. It went for a dinger.

trout-low-2

I’m probably not going to get sick of posting screengrabs, but if you bear with me for a moment, let me try to get this out of my system. Here’s an image from the side:

trout-low

Pretty low. Here’s the Gameday Classic image:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

trout-homer-gameday

To be honest, this isn’t the sort of thing that requires a lot of research. The home run is self-evidently unusual, because we all know that was a pretty good location for a two-strike breaking ball. McHugh threw the pitch he wanted. Trout just stayed with it and applied the appropriate swing. From Baseball Savant, here are Trout’s career home runs, with yesterday’s indicated by the arrow:

trout-home-run

Lowest one yet! Trout has always been fond of the low pitch, but not really pitches that low. On the other side, here are McHugh’s career home runs allowed, with Trout’s obviously again indicated by the arrow:

mchugh-home-run

Lowest one yet. You see an elevated blob up there, but the homers in the lower areas are sparse. I looked up all of McHugh’s career two-strike curveballs thrown way down below the zone. Unsurprisingly, most of them were taken for balls. There were 35% swings. Of those swings, 68% missed. There have been four times as many whiffs as batted balls. In case it’s not clear, McHugh did what he wanted to. That pitch had nearly never failed. Then came the Mike Trout Override.

Daren Willman tweeted something after the fact. It’s since been picked up in a handful of articles. Willman noted that Trout’s homer was the lowest pitch hit out since Freddy Galvis drilled a lower pitch in April 2013. It’s true! It’s been more than three years since we’ve seen a lower pitch turned into a homer. Yet we can turn this into something even more impressive. Trout is a pretty big dude, right? Galvis, not so much. Galvis isn’t short, but it’s worth remembering that pitch heights are always relative. The pitch Galvis hit out was 7.7 inches below the lower boundary of his strike zone. The pitch Trout just hit out was 9.1 inches below the lower boundary of his strike zone. If I’ve done my analysis correctly, then in these terms, Trout’s homer came against the lowest pitch — relatively speaking — in the PITCHf/x era. It just narrowly edges out a homer by Delmon Young. All the measurements have margins of error, so we can’t pretend it’s all perfect, but Trout did something extraordinarily rare. It’s kind of his thing.

Stepping just a little back, Trout walloped a two-strike curveball. For that matter, it was a good two-strike curveball, and I noticed that, when Trout came up to bat the first time, McHugh didn’t show him a curve. The second time, McHugh didn’t show him a curve until the curve that flew away. Now, McHugh throws plenty of curveballs, and it’s not like Trout would’ve been taken by surprise by one, but still, this grabbed my attention. Trout was ready and waiting. And according to the numbers, he’s now feasting on curveballs more than ever.

I’ve written in the past about how Trout has acted passively against curves. This is his fifth full season in the majors, and he’s sitting on a career-high swing rate against curves. It’s the highest rate by a good margin. And this year, against curves, Trout has slugged .886. Last year, he slugged .261, and through last year, since debuting, Trout slugged .422. His contact rate against curves is up. It would appear that sometimes Trout is looking for curves, and he’s doing a fantastic job of staying back. That’s how you end up with a leaderboard like this. Here are the top hitters in baseball, sorted by run value at the plate against curveballs:

So Trout, this year, is at +10.3. Trout, for his entire career, is at +16.7. His career-best mark before was +3.9. Trout is still just 24 years old, and it makes sense that he continues to develop. His current wRC+ is right where it’s always been. Yet he has a career-low rate of strikeouts, having slashed five percentage points off last year’s mark. Mike Trout has gotten more prepared for each individual at-bat, and his success against curves shows that he’s still learning what to look for, and when. Now Trout’s approach is better, and more complete. He’s plugging holes that weren’t even that hole-y. Depending on your perspective, he’s either amazing or impossible.

Mike Trout has become a fan of hitting curveballs. Monday, he smashed a really good curveball, one thrown right where the pitcher wanted. It was one of the lowest pitches hit out of the park that we’ve seen in recent years. It was a signature moment for an iconic young player, the sort of achievement even the other team has to stop and admire. The Angels lost.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Youppi!
10 years ago

Damn straight he hit that bad ball out; he wears Vlad’s number #27.

ChippersJonesing
10 years ago
Reply to  Youppi!

Ha! I thought of Vladi too. It won’t be long until we see one of these from Trout: http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/6479266/v6106853/laabal-angels-take-advantage-of-guerreros-blooper

I mean, he probably shouldn’t try to do it, but he probably could.

Youppi!
10 years ago

that was beautiful. always great to watch. hopefully in 5 or 6 years we’ll get Vlad Jr: http://tinyurl.com/jhrqyz7

ChippersJonesing
10 years ago
Reply to  Youppi!

And he had to reach for that bomb! Damn, that’s some pop. Vladi Sr. was one of, if not the most, fun players to watch in the entire league, if Jr is half as fun, I’ll be a fan.

JDX
10 years ago

Interesting list… looks like 4 distinct types of hitters, as Trout, Votto, Cespedes/Davis, and Prado all sort of go about their business differently.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
10 years ago

Yeah, but the “Nasty Factor” on the pitch he hit out was only 12.

Lunch AngleMember since 2016
10 years ago

Speaking of crazy home runs hit yesterday, how about Arrieta going oppo with a pitch on the inside corner at the knees? http://atmlb.com/29lQktY

Matt
10 years ago
Reply to  Lunch Angle

That is what scouts would call a ‘metal bat swing’. Throwing the head out in front of the wrists will lead to a lot of oppo hits in general, but yeah, everything about that is weird.

Poor Mans Rick ReedMember since 2016
10 years ago

Oh no. Ohhhh no. I like that little #lolAngels thrown in at the end.

aaronsteindler
10 years ago

Fwiw, Tyler Naquin did the same thing against Joaquim Benoit. Just a couple days ago in Detroit, he hit a triple off a very low pitch, as well. I’m wondering if you guys could do an analysis on him. He’s been a very interesting player since he came up, and nobody really expected him to produce.

rustydudeMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  aaronsteindler

Here’s a good piece on Naquin from the Community Research pages.
http://www.fangraphs.com/community/tyler-naquins-blossoming-power/

JoserMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  aaronsteindler

He did something similar in Seattle, also, that was (somehow) a home run. I linked the video in the comments to Sullivan’s Indians piece last week. That’s another “metal bat swing” like the Arrieta one linked above — a mere 93.7 MPH off the bat, and a standard distance of 350 feet, which still managed to (barely) get out of Safeco.

CheeseballMember since 2016
10 years ago
LHPSU
10 years ago

Joey Votto pitch values:
FB: 3.3
SL: -1.9
CT: -2.8
CB: 10.3
CH: -2.9
SF: 0.2

His value against fastballs last year was 39.4.

SubmarineSailor
10 years ago

I watched the game last night. I saw this AB live, and all of the replays they showed on the broadcast, and on the highlights this morning before work, and just watched the clips above 6-7 times. I still don’t understand how he hit that pitch 400 feet.

dustin0224
10 years ago

I only tuned into this game on MLB.tv just see if Trout, Correa, or Altuve would do something crazy and when he hit that out I woke my wife up laughing and saying no way. I knew it would only be a matter of time before this analysis came out. What a fun time to be a baseball fan with young talent like this.

JHay all DayMember since 2026
10 years ago

Mike Trout is good at the game of baseball.