Mike Trout’s Inevitable Decline

Time is the ultimate badass. No matter how great you are, no matter how amazing you are at planning, time always wins in the end. And so it is in baseball as in other things. Mike Trout is, in many ways, the reigning king of baseball, that rare player who enters every season as the nearly-undisputed best in the game. Trout is no longer the young phenom and will turn 30 in just under 18 months, the threshold past which your baseball youth is symbolically gone. Young talent debuts every year while Trout inches closer and closer to retirement, and the day will come when he’s no longer baseball’s clear best.

Just being the best player projected coming into the season is practically enough to ensure your baseball immortality. I went back to the start of the modern era (1901) and collected the top WAR projection for every season, instructing ZiPS to calculate a Marcel-like method for the seasons prior to 2003, when the ZiPS projections did not exist. This is a quick way to demonstrate Trout’s dominance compared to other elite players in baseball history:

Top WAR Projection, 1901-2020
Season Name
1901 John McGraw
1902 Cy Young
1903 Cy Young
1904 Honus Wagner
1905 Honus Wagner
1906 Honus Wagner
1907 Honus Wagner
1908 Honus Wagner
1909 Honus Wagner
1910 Honus Wagner
1911 Ty Cobb
1912 Ty Cobb
1913 Ty Cobb
1914 Ty Cobb
1915 Tris Speaker
1916 Eddie Collins
1917 Walter Johnson
1918 Ty Cobb
1919 Ty Cobb
1920 Ty Cobb
1921 Babe Ruth
1922 Babe Ruth
1923 Rogers Hornsby
1924 Babe Ruth
1925 Babe Ruth
1926 Rogers Hornsby
1927 Babe Ruth
1928 Babe Ruth
1929 Babe Ruth
1930 Rogers Hornsby
1931 Babe Ruth
1932 Babe Ruth
1933 Babe Ruth
1934 Jimmie Foxx
1935 Jimmie Foxx
1936 Lou Gehrig
1937 Lou Gehrig
1938 Lou Gehrig
1939 Mel Ott
1940 Joe DiMaggio
1941 Joe DiMaggio
1942 Joe DiMaggio
1943 Ted Williams
1944 Charlie Keller
1945 Stan Musial
1946 Snuffy Stirnweiss
1947 Hal Newhouser
1948 Hal Newhouser
1949 Ted Williams
1950 Ted Williams
1951 Stan Musial
1952 Jackie Robinson
1953 Jackie Robinson
1954 Stan Musial
1955 Duke Snider
1956 Duke Snider
1957 Mickey Mantle
1958 Mickey Mantle
1959 Mickey Mantle
1960 Ernie Banks
1961 Willie Mays
1962 Mickey Mantle
1963 Willie Mays
1964 Willie Mays
1965 Willie Mays
1966 Willie Mays
1967 Willie Mays
1968 Ron Santo
1969 Carl Yastrzemski
1970 Carl Yastrzemski
1971 Bob Gibson
1972 Fergie Jenkins
1973 Johnny Bench
1974 Bert Blyleven
1975 Joe Morgan
1976 Joe Morgan
1977 Joe Morgan
1978 Mike Schmidt
1979 Mike Schmidt
1980 Mike Schmidt
1981 George Brett
1982 Mike Schmidt
1983 Mike Schmidt
1984 Mike Schmidt
1985 Cal Ripken
1986 Rickey Henderson
1987 Wade Boggs
1988 Wade Boggs
1989 Wade Boggs
1990 Wade Boggs
1991 Rickey Henderson
1992 Barry Bonds
1993 Barry Bonds
1994 Barry Bonds
1995 Barry Bonds
1996 Barry Bonds
1997 Barry Bonds
1998 Barry Bonds
1999 Barry Bonds
2000 Pedro Martinez
2001 Pedro Martinez
2002 Randy Johnson
2003 Barry Bonds
2004 Barry Bonds
2005 Barry Bonds
2006 Alex Rodriguez
2007 Albert Pujols
2008 Albert Pujols
2009 Albert Pujols
2010 Albert Pujols
2011 Albert Pujols
2012 Clayton Kershaw
2013 Mike Trout
2014 Mike Trout
2015 Mike Trout
2016 Mike Trout
2017 Mike Trout
2018 Mike Trout
2019 Mike Trout
2020 Mike Trout

There are a couple of oddities in there, mostly caused by the difficulty of projecting a player who missed seasons due to war service, but otherwise it’s a Who’s Who of the Hall’s inner circle. I’d wager that in 50 years, all but two of these players will be in the Hall of Fame, with Charlie Keller likely on the outside, and Snuffy Stirnweiss certainly so. (If I’m still around in 50 years to test this prediction, I also wager I’ll be a very shouty, curmudgeonly 91-year-old.)

In terms of the number of years at the top of the heap, Trout’s eight seasons already puts him in third place in modern baseball, behind only Babe Ruth and Barry Bonds. In terms of uninterrupted reigns, Trout’s eight consecutive seasons ties Bonds’ 1992-1999 stretch, meaning that if he has the top projection entering 2021, he’ll have earned his spot as the giocatore di tutti giocatori in baseball.

Top WAR Reigns, 1901-2020
Name Reigned Years
Barry Bonds 11 1992-1999, 2003-2005
Babe Ruth 10 1921-1922, 1924-1925, 1927-1929, 1931-1933
Mike Trout 8 2013-2020
Honus Wagner 7 1904-1910
Ty Cobb 7 1911-1914, 1918-1920
Mike Schmidt 6 1978-1980, 1982-1984
Willie Mays 6 1961, 1963-1967
Albert Pujols 5 2007-2011
Mickey Mantle 4 1957-1959, 1962
Wade Boggs 4 1987-1990
Joe DiMaggio 3 1940-1942
Joe Morgan 3 1975-1977
Lou Gehrig 3 1936-1938
Rogers Hornsby 3 1923, 1926, 1930
Stan Musial 3 1945, 1951, 1954
Ted Williams 3 1943, 1949-1950
Carl Yastrzemski 2 1969-1970
Cy Young 2 1902-1903
Duke Snider 2 1955-1956
Hal Newhouser 2 1947-1948
Jackie Robinson 2 1952-1953
Jimmie Foxx 2 1934-1935
Pedro Martinez 2 2000-2001
Rickey Henderson 2 1986, 1991

So, yeah, Mike Trout is really good. He’s essentially lapped the bus test at this point, meaning that if he was hit by a proverbial bus (why are we only hitting players with buses?), the 10-year eligibility requirement for Hall of Fame induction would be waived and he’d be easily ticketed to Cooperstown. He wouldn’t even just be barely limping across the threshold, either; if any player can ever make an inner-circle claim based on a decade, Trout is that guy.

Now, when will Trout finally be overthrown as the best player entering a season? Whether by injury, declining performance, or one of baseball’s newest young phenoms establishing their own cases for immortality, it will happen. In fantasy circles, you can argue that this may have already happened this year. Peruse some lists of average draft position and Ronald Acuña Jr. is going first in more drafts this season than Trout.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

For a more specific estimate, I unleashed ZiPS on this question. And what a meta question it is, since I’m projecting projections! I ran the projections for all the top players in baseballs’ projections to estimate the probability of the players entering the given season with the best projection in baseball. This paragraph may have set a record for the use of the word “projection.”

Top Projection…uh…Projections, 2021-2029
Year Top % 2nd % 3rd % 4th % 5th %
2021 Mike Trout 58.7% Francisco Lindor 9.7% Juan Soto 7.5% Mookie Betts 5.2% Cody Bellinger 4.1%
2022 Mike Trout 32.6% Francisco Lindor 11.7% Ronald Acuña Jr. 10.1% Mookie Betts 8.9% Juan Soto 8.0%
2023 Mike Trout 23.3% Ronald Acuña Jr. 16.4% Francisco Lindor 10.6% Juan Soto 9.1% Mookie Betts 8.0%
2024 Ronald Acuña Jr. 18.8% Mike Trout 16.1% Juan Soto 10.2% Francisco Lindor 9.0% Cody Bellinger 7.2%
2025 Ronald Acuña Jr. 13.9% Mike Trout 11.6% Juan Soto 9.1% Cody Bellinger 8.9% Francisco Lindor 8.6%
2026 Ronald Acuña Jr. 13.7% Juan Soto 10.5% Wander Franco 9.5% Cody Bellinger 9.1% Francisco Lindor 7.2%
2027 Ronald Acuña Jr. 14.3% Juan Soto 12.0% Cody Bellinger 9.4% Wander Franco 6.5% Gleyber Torres 6.4%
2028 Ronald Acuña Jr. 13.3% Juan Soto 12.8% Cody Bellinger 7.9% Wander Franco 7.1% Gleyber Torres 7.1%
2029 Ronald Acuña Jr. 12.2% Juan Soto 11.2% Wander Franco 7.0% Gleyber Torres 6.9% Cody Bellinger 6.5%

Quite obviously, these probabilities are only for players who are currently in professional baseball. ZiPS does not know if there’s some 12-year-old out there who’s going to go Soto on the league in 2028!

ZiPS projects Trout as the favorite to enter the season with the top projection in baseball for three more seasons, with only a single year in which he’s better than a coin flip. Yup, ZiPS likes Wander Franco as much as the scouts do. By the year 2029, Trout’s age-37 season (should he be bound by the constraints of spacetime like other humans), Trout’s only a one-in-100 shot to still have the best projection in baseball.

In one sense, Trout’s future has already been surpassed in the rest-of-career projections. Ronald Acuña Jr. and Juan Soto passed Trout in the 2019 projections, the first time anyone has beat him since 2012. Trout had typically lapped the field, with only a few players coming close at times: Carlos Correa, Bryce Harper, and then Francisco Lindor. As of this year’s projections, Trout now ranks sixth in rest-of-career wins, behind Acuña, Soto, Lindor, Cody Bellinger, and Gleyber Torres. And there are many other players within five wins of catching the Angels center fielder: Ozzie Albies, Bo Bichette, Vlad Guerrero Jr., Jack Flaherty, Alex Bregman, Gavin Lux, Wander Franco, and Walker Buehler.

So enjoy Mike Trout while he’s at the top of baseball because that day will pass and then never be again. His nearly casual excellence might sometimes feel a bit boring since it seems so effortless, but you’ll miss it when it’s gone. Valar morghulis.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

68 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TwinPeaks
6 years ago

If Trout is hit by a bus, that bus is going to need a lot of repairs. This chart does seem pretty reasonable to me. Trout’s got a really good shot of being the best player in baseball for a couple more years. After that, it’s gonna be dicey. But you never know; part of me thinks Trout’s still got another gear in there, and that we’re going to see a Godzilla-sized monster season from him in the next few years.

J.D. MartinMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  TwinPeaks

His wRC+/wOBA both went down but last year Trout posted his best xwOBA, xwOBACON, and Barrel% of his statcast career (2015 onwards). It might already be here.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

It’s crazy that Wander Franco doesn’t have a single game above A+ and he’s projected for the third most wins in 2026.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Thanks for the correction.

Also: That’s still utterly insane.

MichaelMember since 2017
6 years ago

Just glad to hear you’re not planning to change over the next 50 years 🙂

jgaryw
6 years ago

First of all, how dare you.

loubrockholt
6 years ago

I can read the letters on the screen but what they’re saying doesn’t compute for me…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

One thing I noticed today: The difference between ZiPs and Steamer is that ZiPs thinks that Trout is only going to get 600 PAs instead of 675. Both systems project nearly identical batting lines otherwise. Considering what an extreme case Trout is, that’s really surprising.

It also makes me wonder where, exactly, ZiPs projects a decline. And my guess here, based on the fact that Trout has actually improved his hitting line as he’s gotten older, is that what’s going to cause Trout to fall below the league line is injuries. He’s been kept out by nagging injuries that last couple of years, and ZiPs seems to recognize the playing time changes and Steamer doesn’t.

Travis LMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s no longer reasonable to expect Trout to continue to improve his batting line, due to his position on the aging curve.

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He’s suffered dings the last three years running.
And he’s turning 30.
He might still be projected best for 21 but his style of play makes him a risk down the road.
Maddon needs to start training him for 1B.

sbf21
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Well, he’s turning 30 – eventually. But first he has to turn 29.

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  sbf21

He’ll be 30 in 21 which is what is in qurstion.
Will he still be projectably the best after hitting 30? Maybe. But if 2020 dings him too and he can’t be counted for a full season…?

mattMember since 2023
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Trout lead the majors in WAR even while finishing 70th in PA’s last year, not only that his expected stats suggested he was unlucky, while the only guy close to him was very lucky. He’s going to have the best projection running for awhile even if he misses 25-30 games a year

WARrior
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

His baserunning value, one of the highest in the league, will decline, and probably fairly soon he will start the move from CF to LF to 1B to DH.

dl80Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Also maybe having to move to a corner outfield spot?

manormachine
6 years ago

That’s the most interesting thing about Trout: how long can he keep it up? Players of his talent level are so rare that prediction is difficult. Willie Mays ended up in a mets uniform. No one could have predicted Barry Bonds would be among the league’s best at 42, especially because the previous two seasons he barely played. When he broke the home run record, a few baseball writers were saying, “Well, at least A-Rod will break the record in a few years and it will be clean again.” How did that turn out? Pujols fell off a skill cliff but keeps compiling numbers.

MikeSMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

That question is the difference between “slam dunk hall of famer” and “can he catch Ruth?”

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

If not him, somebody, some day…
Records and standards are made to be broken.

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

Uh, Bonds has a wee bit of baggage.

iancalMember since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Yeah, if Trout starts hitting ‘the cream’ a few seasons before Bonds did he may just run the table until he retires…

ascheffMember since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

I’m all for putting Bonds in the Hall of Fame, but using his career arc as a reference for any modern player in the steroid testing era is extremely unfair. The Willie Mays career arc of being great into his mid 30s and then merely good after that is definitely in play for Trout though.

dl80Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

I’m rooting for Trout to have Aaron’s 30s (impossible, I know, but still).

sbf21
6 years ago
Reply to  manormachine

However, if Trout doesn’t grow his head 3 sizes he’s unlikely to be better than Ruth in his 40’s.

MuadDib
6 years ago

Sometimes within a Fangraphs I find a table that I know I’ll want to come back to again and again. And when I find one it’s like receiving a present that I’m absolutely giddy about, or finding a hidden treasure, and I know I need to save the link to the article or else I’ll never remember where it was buried.
This article has three of them.

Santos
6 years ago

Not today, Satan

gabriel
6 years ago

I’m not sure that I buy that Trout only has a 11% chance to be the best player in 2025, and a sub-7% chance to be projected as the best player in baseball in 2026. That, to be frank, does not seem to reflect the actual career paths of the very best players of all-time, which you acknowledge him to be.

As you note, he’s an inner-circle hall of fame player already, and in 2026 he’ll be going into his age-34 season. A lot of the guys on your list were projecting as the best players in the league at that age or older. Mike Schmidt, Rogers Hornsby and Jackie Robinson were all still the top projections for their age-34 years; Lou Gehrig (despite about to be stricken down with his eponymous fatal illness) was still the top projection for his age-35 season; Willie Mays and Honus Wagner were still the top at age-36; and Babe Ruth made it all the way to his age-38 season. I won’t mention what Bonds, aided by steroids, did.

Trout is already way off in the stratosphere of baseball royalty – and your own projection system suggests that kind of player often remains the best player in the game well into their thirties.

gabriel
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

There are eight position players with a higher WAR7 than Trout (65.4) – and six of those eight were the top projected player in their age-34 seasons.

When you have a comparison group who are 75% for the event you’re predicting at below 7%, I think we need to rethink whether the system operates well for extreme outliers.

PhilMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  gabriel

But that’s because it is projecting season to season – here you’re projecting years into the future based on now and there is a lot that can happen between now and then.

If Trout puts up a vintage Trout season in 2025, then of course his projection in 2026 is going to be great.

In 2009 or 2010 what would you have projected Albert Pujols WAR to be 5 years in the future?

gabriel
6 years ago
Reply to  Phil

I don’t see how season-to-season projections are making a difference here.

My comp group is players with a WAR7 of greater than 65 – Trout can improve within that group, but he cannot fall out of it. Of those, 3/4 were projected to be the best players in their league at age 34. I’m not saying Trout should be given a 75% chance, but given the historical performance of the very greatest players in baseball history in their thirties, I think 7% is unreasonably low.

The two most comparable players to Trout at his current age are probably Mantle and Mays. Mantle was an alcoholic, and good-but-not-great in his 30s. Mays was the best player in the league through age 35. As far as I know, Trout isn’t an alcoholic.

BubbaMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  gabriel

I think you’re missing the point of the season to season comment. Those other players were projected for greatness at 34 because they were incredible at 33.

Trout’s projection for 34 is based on what his projection is at 33, which is based on his projection for 32, which is based on his projection for 31, and so forth. The projection is regressed a little bit each time. There’s uncertainty each time.

gabriel
6 years ago
Reply to  Bubba

I don’t think Dan would have done it that way, because that would compress the projections along a regression line, and narrow the range of outcomes.

Hank G.Member since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  gabriel

I’ve said multiple times that Trout is Mantle without the alcoholism and major injuries.

Mantle has had the higher peak (so far), but Trout has the steadiness of an Aaron or a Murray, but at a higher level.

Mantle had two consecutive years with fWAR of 11.5 and 11.4. What could he achieved sober and with a good knee?

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  gabriel

“There are eight position players with a higher WAR7 than Trout (65.4) – and six of those eight were the top projected player in their age-34 seasons.”

Ummm…you biased your comparison group by only taking guys who were better than Trout.

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Also there were some pretty big differences in the number of teams and the quality of the competition. Simply a lot easier for some of the older players to be projected to lead the league in WAR than it is for modern players. Plus, Dan had to use a different method for the pre-ZiPS years and it’s unclear how that might have effected things.

gabriel
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

“Simply a lot easier for some of the older players to be projected to lead the league in WAR than it is for modern players.”

This would be the case for pre-integration baseball, where some of the best players would have been playing in the Negro Leagues. But a lower level of competition in general shouldn’t make a difference – your competition isn’t replacement level, it’s the other star players of the time.

gabriel
6 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

This is a reasonable criticism, but (a) those aren’t necessarily better players- they are players who had a higher WAR7 over their entire careers – and it is unknown where exactly Trout will slot into that group when he finally retires, and (b) Trout doesn’t have any equals in his career-to-date, with only Ty Cobb even within 5 WAR, so you have to find a comp group elsewhere.

So, creating an appropriate comp group is challenging, and even if you want to lower the WAR7 standard to 60, which doubles the size of the group, that still gives a 37.5% chance of being the projected best player at age 34, and a 50% chance at age 33 – far, far better than suggested above.

Hank G.Member since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Is there a table for “projected WAR for rest of career” published anywhere?

TerryMc
6 years ago
Reply to  gabriel

It’s amazing to have the best odds two years in a row. Griffey never once in his career was predicted to lead the league in WAR. An 11% chance five years from now is AMAZING, of course we’re talking about Trout and that word always seems to apply to him.

BubbaMember since 2016
6 years ago

This is such a cool idea, great job!

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago

It’s wild to me that fantasy weirdness, namely positional scarcity, doesn’t push outfielders lower than like Alex Bregman, but oh well.

D-WizMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Lots of leagues play 5 OFs (and additional 2B/SS and 1B/3B spots), so I suspect that largely negates that effect. But it would certainly be interesting to see some analysis around this!

aklangMember since 2016
6 years ago

Stay thy voice, heretic.

D-WizMember since 2019
6 years ago

Thanks for reminding us all of our mortality, Dan! On my birthday no less 🙁

FedericoMember since 2017
6 years ago

How dare you?! You are a horrible horrible person and I don’t want to read anything you wrote!!! Liar! Monster!! 😭

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago

Followup… what do Acuna or Soto have to do this year to overtake Trout in terms of 2022 projections?

fjtorres
6 years ago

Don’t neglect Lindor.
And don’t neglect the (horrible) possibility of an early injury taking Trout out of the running.
Stuff happens.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Or Lindor. Or Betts. Or Bregman.

I would love to know what kind of numbers those guys would need to put up this year, with Trout finishing the year healthy, for either of them to overtake Trout in the projections.

schwejk
6 years ago

Does this article indicate that the Angels have another Pujols contract?

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  schwejk

With Pujols, the Cards got his good years and the Angels got the bad ones.
With Trout the Angels are getting the good years and however many aren’t.
Not quite the same thing.

Green Mountain Boy
6 years ago

I would venture a guess that in drafts where Acuna Jr is going ahead of Trout, it’s because of a) his three position eligibility and b) his potential to go .300/.400/.650 with 120 R/40 HR/40 SB, which I absolutely believe he *will* achieve one of these years – just probably not quite yet.

And hey, if the baseball thing doesn’t work out for Mike Trout, I’m thinking he’d most likely have a pretty long run as the US Long Drive Champion. Heck, I’m sure if he set his mind to it he could be an All-Pro WR in the NFL. What doesn’t he do well? Can he skate? Bowl? Ski? Swim? NASCAR driver? Olympic decathalon? Chess? Dude can probably kick 99.9% of the populations a** at all of those right now!

Seriously, if he played in NY or BOS or CHI, he’d be making $50m a year and be worth every penny.

SimmonsforPres2020Member since 2020
6 years ago

Get some pitching and get this guy in the playoffs Angels!

pilldomMember since 2024
6 years ago

I’m curious why the 2021-2029 projections have Soto jumping around so much. He’s projected in 2021 to be higher than Betts, but than Betts is back on top for 2022, before falling behind Soto again.

sbf21
6 years ago

No Fernando Tatis, Jr.?

runningfrog
6 years ago

The biggest challenge for Trout, if in fact Trout is challenged at all, ever… is staying healthy. He may have to rein in his athleticism in the field to be at the plate for more games.

He missed 16 games total in four seasons from 2013-2016. In the three seasons that have followed, he’s missed 98 games. A Trout that misses 4 games a season is a lot more valuable than a Trout that misses 32 games a season. And he probably recognizes that as great as 130-game-Trout may be, his team could really use 154-game-Trout.

Dreamin
6 years ago

A wild takeaway for me from that first table is that Alex Rodriguez only projected to lead the league once thanks to how oppressive Barry’s 2001-2004 was. The early 2000s were an insane time, largely due to, um, *reasons*.

TKDCMember since 2016
6 years ago

I know this wasn’t the point, but as a Braves fan this excited my loins.

Mahoney
6 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Good thing Dan didn’t do a projection of future Trade Value leaders 😉 Mssrs. Acuna and Franco would have stiff competition from that kid who’s getting $44m over the next 8 years, which should work out to about $1m per win over that period. And 40-50 WAR is truly a best estimate range (ZiPS has Albies averaging about 5 wins over the next 3 years)…but I can’t rule out a Mookie-level upside for Albies either.

Spin
6 years ago

Fun read. I think Trout will up his game now that he’s finally getting a team around him.

Max Power
6 years ago
Reply to  Spin

Right, because everyone knows the knock on Trout is that he’s usually lazy/unmotivated

zoinky
6 years ago

that is the best first sentence of any article i have ever read

mattMember since 2023
6 years ago

The ZIPS projections for wander must be insane if he hasn’t even reached AA yet and has that kind of a projection given how conservative zips usually is. I’m not saying i disagree with it by any means just find it interesting

Shattenjager
6 years ago

I think ZiPS is making the mistake of thinking that Mike Trout is human.

mph
6 years ago

By “projecting a player who missed seasons due to war service,” I assume you’re referring to Ted Williams? It does seem a little odd that he’d only be projected #1 three times. Other than that, gotta say: daaayum, that’s an impressive lists of GOATs.

Chris KMember since 2020
6 years ago

Blasphemy. Ponyboy will stay golden.

TapeyBeerconeMember since 2016
6 years ago

“Top WAR Projection, 1901-2020” that might be the coolest table I’ve ever seen on Fangraphs!