Milestone Tweeners

As every baseball fan not living under a rock knows, Ken Griffey Jr. hit his 600th home run last night, putting him in a category with just Barry Bonds, Hank Aaron, Babe Ruth, Willie Mays, and Sammy Sosa. Griffey is currently being managed by Dusty Baker, who previously managed Bonds and Sosa and played alongside Aaron, which is eerily interesting in its own right.

Griffey did not play in much of the Reds/Phillies four game series last week, while stuck on 599, but between 599 and 600 he remained pretty productive, posting the following milestone tweener numbers:

Griffey Between: 6-14, 3 2B, 9 BB, .429/.652/.643, 1.295 OPS

With that in mind I decided to take a look at how the 600 Club sans-Ruth performed in between certain milestones.

Willie Mays: 599 on 9/15/69, 600 on 9/22/69
Between: 7-21, 2B, 2 RBI, .333/.391/.381

Sammy Sosa: 599 on 6/15/07, 600 on 6/20/07
Between: 0-13, 5 K

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Barry Bonds: 599 on 8/6/02, 600 on 8/9/02
Between: 3-8, 2B, 5 BB, .375/.700/.500

Barry Bonds: 659 on 4/5/04, 660 on 4/12/04
Between: 4-17, 2B, RBI, 7 BB, .235/.458/.235

Barry Bonds: 699 on 9/12/04, 700 on 9/17/04
Between: 3-9, 2B, RBI, .333/.571/.444

Barry Bonds: 713 on 5/7/06, 714 on 5/20/06
Between: 4-29, 2B, 2 RBI, .138/.400/.172

Barry Bonds: 754 on 7/27/07, 755 on 8/4/07
Between: 2-18, 10 BB, .111/.444/.111

Barry Bonds: 755 on 8/4/07, 756 on 8/7/07
Between: 2-5, 2B, .400/.571/.600

Griffey’s milestone tweener plate appearances produced the highest OPS of this group. Granted, Babe Ruth’s gamelogs are not easily available, and he may have out-OPSd Griffey between some of his milestones but, as a devout baseball fan, regardless of these numbers, I cannot help but wish some of what Dave discussed this morning actually came true.





Eric is an accountant and statistical analyst from Philadelphia. He also covers the Phillies at Phillies Nation and can be found here on Twitter.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Librocrat
18 years ago

It’s not worth bringing up very often, due to Griffey’s ~normal BABIP this year, but Griffey has been somewhat unlucky in his own right. Felix Pie robbed him of a clear home run earlier this year, and I’m fairly certain he was robbed of another within two weeks of that grab. Since I can’t find the other clip, it is somewhat worth nothing that the one single home run that he didn’t get would have put Griffey’s line (not including today’s game) at .264/.369/.433, good enough for an .802 OPS.

This means nothing, clearly, as I’m sure that many other people have been robbed of home runs this year. But it does illustrate that while his fielding may be abysmal, he still has the potential to make a good DH, especially if his HR/FB rises, which I personally believe it will because the robbed homerun(s) affect the ratio and I don’t believe his power is gone.

Dave CameronMember since 2018
18 years ago

An .802 OPS in Cincinnati from a guy who can’t run or field is not the qualifications for a good anything. There are a handful of better players than Griffey in Triple-A who are more qualified to DH for an AL team than Junior is.

Librocrat
18 years ago

…Okay.

“his fielding may be abysmal”

“…especially if his HR/FB rises, which I personally believe it will because the robbed homerun(s) affect the ratio and I don’t believe his power is gone.”

I did not make any blasphemous statements here, I’m not sure why your comment needed to be so terse, especially since you seemed to ignore the above two quotes. You are not moderating 250 comments here, there is no reason to be rude, especially since you could easily not comment at all.

Librocrat
18 years ago

And to respond to your comment:

I’m clearly not saying he can field or run, so I will ignore that part of your post since it is irrelevant. What I’m saying is that an .802 OPS is not awful, and if he had an .802 OPS so far this year, the idea that a HR/FB increase (that I personally think can still happen) would make him a valuable hitter is still possible. Since I think there is a chance that the perception of a loss of power, which is tied into both the robbed home runs and the low OPS, may be incorrect. So if he can bump his HR/FB% to what it was last year, which is still much lower than it used to be, his OPS has the potential to raise to .850+, possibly more, making him a useful DH.

Will it? Probably not. But there are at least a few signs of hope that his days as a useful hitter (~.875 OPS) are not over, even though his days as a useful player – especially in the NL due to his terrible defense and running ability – are long gone.

Sal Paradise
18 years ago

With the injury risk, the not-so-splendid personality (allegedly) and the rather high price tag, why?

Wayne Ball
17 years ago

hi
yv5pla61hakocq0l
good luck