Milton Bradley: The Man an Army Couldn’t Save
You know what statheads love to do? Find pet players who’ve been overlooked by teams, and lobby for them to find a real home. Often, we focus on players with strong minor league track records who’ve never gotten a shot because of perceived weaknesses, only to see those perceived weaknesses regurgitated by the big club as their numbers grow gaudier and gaudier. Ten years ago, we wanted to Free Erubiel Durazo. Now, we want to Free Brandon Allen.
We’ll also, on occasion, back a player with supposed attitude problems. Whether or not those problems are real or harmful, we will (sometimes) argue that consistent performance should outweigh a jerky demeanor. If the A’s of the 70s could put up a mini-dynasty with 25 men and 25 cabs, how much harm can one rouser of rabble cause? That was Milton Bradley, and that was us.
Bradley got dumped for the first time in 2001, by the same Montreal Expos organization that raised him. Though he’d had a few dust-ups in the minors, Bradley hadn’t yet run into the kind of high-profile blow-up that would later define his career. Maybe then-Expos GM Jim Beattie had an inkling that the talented young outfielder would run into trouble, and that’s why he flipped Bradley for forgettable right-hander Zach Day. Or maybe this was just the same guy who also once gave Graeme Lloyd a three-year, $9 million contract, and traded three prospects (including Jake Westbrook and Ted Lilly) for Hideki Freaking Irabu.
Bradley started slowly with the Indians, then took off in 2003, hitting .321/.421/.501 with strong defense and a career-high 17 steals. But that year saw Bradley grapple with another defect that would plague his career: a severe lack of durability. He would spend 65 days or more on the disabled list in four of five seasons spanning 2003 through 2007 (hat tip to Corey Dawkins at Baseball Prospectus). Though he played just 101 games in ’03, Bradley 4.6-WAR season would prove to be the high point of his career (matched by his huge 2008 campaign).
Though injuries were becoming a concern, teams don’t trade five-tool outfielders coming off big seasons at age 25 unless there’s a really good reason. But that’s exactly what the Indians did, sending Bradley to the Dodgers after his run-in with Cleveland skipper Eric Wedge during spring training. Bradley lasted two years in L.A. before getting sent to Oakland; more injuries, service time, and the Dodgers liking Andre Ethier (good call there!) played a big role in the decision. But Bradley’s temper did too. In a June 2004 game, Bradley became so frustrated with a third strike call that, upon returning to the dugout, he fired dozens of balls onto the field. Near the end of the season, a fan tossed a plastic bottle onto the field in Bradley’s direction, after Bradley made a big error. Bradley picked up the bottle, started yelling up at the fans, then chucked the bottle into the stands.
He showed flashes of greatness in Oakland, becoming the third player to hit home runs from both sides of the plate in a playoff game. By the next summer, he was designated for assignment, having again succumbed to injuries and managing just 61 games that entire season. He hit a solid .292/.373/.446 with the A’s, though, leaving one to wonder if a well-mannered player with that profile (Nick Johnson?) could have been retained as an ace pinch-hitter instead of getting thrown overboard. Late that season, in a key game against the Padres, Bradley got into it with first-base umpire Mike Winters. San Diego first base coach Bobby Meacham claims Winters was swearing at and baiting Bradley, possibly knowing his reputation and that such actions might set him off. They sure did: Bradley got so incensed that when he lunged at Winters while manager Bud Black tried to restrain him, he tore his ACL, a big blow that contributed to the Padres blowing their late-season lead and missing the playoffs.
There was more: He tried to go after Royals TV announcer Ryan Lefebvre for what Bradley claimed were unfair comments about him. The next year, he got suspended for bumping an ump. Bradley threw a fit after flying out during a game, prompting manager Lou Piniella to order him to go home. That led to a clubhouse altercation, and later that year, a season-ending suspension by the club. Bradley may not have been wrong when he said, “you understand why they [Cubs] haven’t won in 100 years here.” But suspending him for being impossible to deal with wasn’t high on the list of reasons why. Last season, Bradley left the Mariners for two weeks, for undisclosed personal reasons. As Shannon Drayer expertly chronicled in her farewell post on Bradley, the Mariners bent over backwards to accommodate him before finally cutting him loose, probably well after other teams would have given up.
Through it all, Bradley’s supporters frequently backed him as the victim of a bum rap (somewhat true, if you read Drayer’s post and consider that he may have simply been an incredibly competitive player who struggled with his emotions). We wondered if he could flourish in the right environment (probably not true, since the injuries happened many times in many different cities, as did the blow-ups). And we felt his talent was being short-changed (very often true).
When the Mariners traded Carlos Silva for Bradley in December 2009, many of us were ready to throw a ticker-tape parade in honor of Jack Zduriencik. After all, the Mariners GM had converted an apparently useless pitcher into a hitter just a year removed from a monster season who at worst could be a really good part-time bat. Never mind that Silva became a solid, 2-win pitcher last year as a part-time starter, while Bradley languished below replacement level, then did the same early this season.
By the time Bradley ended last year looking like a hollow version of his former self, even the biggest believers were ready to cut the cord. A January felony arrest stemming from a domestic violence allegation ended with no charges being filed. But the mere idea of Bradley’s outbursts turning more serious off the field torpedoed the last of his supporters, and made his release an imminent inevitability.
I was one of those last supporters. Like Vladimir Guerrero, Larry Walker, and other Expos minor league phenoms, I remember Bradley the teenage Vermont Expo, starting to put his game together even as whispers began that he was right on the cusp between competitive and too competitive. I rooted for him to make it in Montreal, then backed him every subsequent step of the way. But eventually, I just felt bad for the guy. It stinks that it had to end this way for him, as a washed-up 33-year-old who’s not even good enough to crack one of baseball’s worst offenses. Worse, as a malcontent whose powder keg personality made people forget the player he once was, and could have been.
I rooted for him as long as I could. Whatever he does now, I hope he finds inner peace. As Drayer said: “Hopefully in the future it doesn’t have to be hard to be Milton Bradley.”
Jonah Keri is the author of The Extra 2%: How Wall Street Strategies Took a Major League Baseball Team from Worst to First -- now a National Bestseller! Follow Jonah on Twitter @JonahKeri, and check out his awesome podcast.
Thank you for pointing out that all of the know-it-alls at Fan Graphs don’t actually know everything.
Character, commitment to the team, and a dedication to something bigger than yourself is important – not just OPS, VORP, and WAR.
I imagine this post could have been modified slightly to compliment the article without insulting everyone who reads it.
I was going to say that Bradley is a classic outlier which Fangraphs readers should be able to understand. There are lots of guys who are jerks or very emotionally labile but it’s not so bad that it affects their performance. Bradley is the outlier who has such big problems it has affected his career. It’s easy to look past it for a while and see big stats and talent, especially when he is playing in a city you don’t live in so you don’t see him making an idiot of himself on a daily basis. Most guys can compensate adequately enough that they will get another chance but some are to far out on the tail of the bell curve.
Of course, if Bradley had even a slightly positive WAR, he’d probably still be employed today. But by all means, keep believing it’s all about character, team-first attitude and, I dunno, grit or something.
Um, if he were hitting .300/.400/.500 every year and playing in 150 games, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Would the Mariners have kept him if he was nicer than Eckstein but hit like he did? Not likely.
Why not? Eckstein could bat 5th in that lineup.
Strawman.
What do Initech and the 2009 Cubs season have in common? Both went up in flames because of a disgruntled employee named Milton.
Milton was not the only (or even the primary) reason the Cubs crashed and burned.
But if it makes Cubs fans feel better to blame it all on one guy, hey, go for it.
Since I’m not a Cubs fan and was just trying to make a joke, I’ll simply suggest that Paul B lighten the hell up.
Actually, it was all Steve Bartman’s fault
Great reference.
I think Bradley probably lost his stapler long ago.
Milton Bradley = Game Over
Well all that money should help make things “not too hard” now.
Typically snarky responses from d-bags like noseeum and Random Guy.
No one is saying that WAR isn’t a valuable tool – just that isn’t the beginning and end of an inquiry into a player’s value.
People on this site think it is – people who work within the game of baseball know better.
“People on this site think it is – people who work within the game of baseball know better.”
That’s a giant generalization. We’re not all stat automatons, and people in baseball aren’t all great judges of character.
If Bradley was still producing, he’d still have a home. Besides, I like Milton Bradley’s character. He’s colorful; too colorful for teammates during a full season of baseball, maybe, sure, but having watched him for a decade now, he’s colorful enough for me, as a fan. He’s a guy I’ll remember when comparable players of his caliber are long forgotten, and it has nothing to do with his stats.
I hope he gets another shot and makes good on it.
You’s trollin’. But let’s go along with your argument.
Can you at least agree that, for many years, a productive but ill-tempered Bradley remained employed — and now, in 2010, an unproductive Bradley is unemployed? Forget about these hifalutin statistics that you disdain so much; the guy is hitting .218 with two home runs and is said to be a terrible fielder. He’s an aging player with visibly declining skills on a team that’s trying to get younger. In any era, with any front office, that puts you on thin ice.
And I don’t think commitment and dedication are part of the problem with Bradley. If anything, he’s too passionate. Hence all the ejections.
Nobody’s saying his personality had nothing to do with it. It’s just one factor. When Bradley was playing well, teams wanted him. Now they don’t. And it’s not because his personality has gotten even worse than before.
Saying “if anything, he’s too passionate” is serious spin to try to make a virtue out of a vice. He has impulse control problems and probably needs psychological help. Even when he was hitting you never knew if he might go off and slug an umpire. I hope he gets his shit together for his own sake but even when he was a productive player he went through 8 teams in 10 years – desperate teams wanted him, then rather quickly wanted him gone.
I think Elijah Dukes still had a chance to be productive but no one wants to find out anymore. His issues seemed to run even deeper than Milton’s.
don – I wasn’t trying to make a “virtue out of a vice.” I was responding to a comment that Bradley lacked “commitment to the team, and a dedication to something bigger than (him)self.” The point is that it’s not a lack of caring or commitment that undid Bradley.
Not trying to be “that guy” – but doesn’t it seem like we rarely/never hear about these sorts of character issues with white players? It seems only black players are singled out for the “unstable jerk” treatment.
cf. Bonds, Bradley, Dukes, Milledge, Everett, etc.
AJS, I don’t think people have to qualify comment in threads like these with a reference to Brett Myers, Brian Giles and Bobby Cox hitting thier wife/girlfriend, whatever, Ty Cobb being a virulent racist, etc.
Anorher ‘purist’ lying in the weeds, just waiting for the moment when he can stick it to those stuffy know it alls on fangraphs. Mwahahah!
I’m going to forget how faulty your premise is and let you enjoy this one. Though, these other guys may not be so accomadating…
Breadley has supporters?
Yep, I’m a Bradley supporter. An A’s fan in 2006, I attended the only playoff game of my life and saw Miltie hit one home run from each side of the plate against the Tigers. I sat out in right field and watched him get super fired up about his success. That was, by far, the highlight of the game. So many MLB players exude nonchalance, and though his presence on the opposite pole may be pathological, as some have suggested, for me, that day, it was wonderful. Do I want to hang out with him and have a beer? Probably not. But I’d buy him one any day.
I heart Milton Bradley.
Temo, the point is that I think most of the people who read this site are indeed stat automatons – they really believe human beings are robots.
You claim to believe that most of the Fangraphs readers believe human beings are robots.
I find that very implauible. It’s not just implausible that most Fangraphs believe that human beings are robots. I find it implausible that you believe that to be true. Have you read anyone in the comments who seriously espouses that view, let alone a majority?
In other words, I believe you are just saying ridiculous things to generate a reaction. You are trolling.
Dwight, I didn’t want to spend too much time here because you are either ignorant, grumpy, or enjoy being a douche, but if it’s ignorance, let me explain how stats work. When it comes to baseball, a player’s skill level can be shown through statistics. Tracking how well a player is hitting the ball and how often good contact is made are all indicators of a talent level of a human being and can indicate possible increased levels of productivity. Since you are probably unemployed and have attitude issues like Bradley, let me explain that this description actually resembles a real business. Personal relationships and attitudes are alternate methods of evaluation, but are secondary to production unless too inflamatory.
If we were keeping stats on your posts, they would all have a low grade and indicate that we should expect nothing from you except pointless comments that have no useful information at all.
“Since you are probably unemployed and have attitude issues like Bradley”
Wow. You’re a classy guy SKob. That’s for setting it straight for you unproductive lessers.
Skob, you’re points are valid, but the unemployed comment is high quality, grade-A, premium troll food. You’re giving him exactly what he wants. Someone who starts his comment with a belligerent and inflammatory sentence like “Thank you for pointing out that all of the know-it-alls at Fan Graphs don’t actually know everything” is best ignored.
Dwight,
That is the most clueless thing I have ever read on this site ever!
I wonder if guys like are you were not superstar athletes pass along in life because of your athletic skills, and now you fear knowledge that goes coubter to what some of your coaches told you.
Dwight, the problem isn’t that were stat based automatons its that we don’t have the appropriate statistic to account for the effects of personality. I propose we use this case to develop a personality adjusted WAR etc. Then we won’t have to deal with these fuzzy emotional human concerns.
So what’s the LF situation in SEA look like now? Are either of these callups any good?
Not really. They’re very similar players actually, both very large men with some power and big strikeout tendencies. Wilson is an aging prospect who has kicked around the system forever and kind of looks like the second coming of Wladimir Balentien. Peguero is younger and might have a future, but probably isn’t ready yet and might be over his head. There’s some chance it turns into an okay platoon since Wilson bats righty and Peguero bats lefty, but I wouldn’t count on it. I think they still like Michael Saunders better, even though he hasn’t produced at the major league level, and would expect Saunders to be given a shot in left field when Gutierrez comes back. Peguero probably goes back down at that point, and maybe Wilson makes a career for himself as a fourth outfielder/power bat off the bench.
Thanks
Because I have no way to tell about any given player’s personality except the perception given out on MLB.com and ESPN, I look at the known quantities to judge player’s skills. I want to believe that Evan Longoria, Paul Konerko, Andrew McCutchen, Troy Tulowitzki, and Chase Headley are all chill dudes, but I haven’t met them nor shared a beer with ’em. To the contrary, I want to believe Andre Ethier, Albert Pujols, Alfonso Soriano, Derek Jeter, and Felix Hernandez are d-bags, but I also haven’t met them nor shared a beer with ’em. It’d be foolish to judge in either situation.
I know a girl who worked for the Rays a couple summers ago. Said Longoria was a douche who constantly hit on her. BJ Upton, on the other hand, was very nice and they still keep in touch. She also Jeter was very polite and funny.
Anecdotal “evidence”, I know.
Exactly my point, I can’t know who these guys are because I’ve never met them. I’m more likely to trust your evidence than my perception based on what they “seem” like.
Also whether it matters or not, flirting with a women or hitting on her, doesn’t make a man a douche.
Might be the “constantly” part.
There’s ways to flirt and hit on women that don’t make you a douche. There are ways to flirt and hit on women that very much do make you a douche. I find it very likely a certainty that some MLB players do the former and others do the latter.
Constantly is relative to an individual, so I threw out that part and only read the “hitting on her” part. It’s okay if he is a d-bag, btw.
Any time I’ve heard of a woman meeting Jeter he’s a great guy, but most every time I’ve heard from a guy…not so much. I think Jeter is charming to the ladies and is a douche to male fans. Anecdotal evidence AND second or third-hand.
What My echo and bunnymen says makes sense, but you can’t ignore the facts – I think it’s clear that certain guys are cancerous like Milton.
So was Bonds, but he produced.
So was Jeff Kent, but he produced.
Hey, wait – are there two people posting under the same name in this thread?
The odd thing is there are quite a few instances of Milton being incredibly nice to fans. Just goes to show that not everything (or everybody) is painted in shades of black and white.
*is painted in black and white.
Don’t bring up black and white, that’s a WHOLE nuther can of worms.
I prefer to rememeber Milton Bradley at the 2008 all-star game, or rather, during the home run derby (he was 0-2 witha walk in the 15 inning game itself).
Hamilton was putting on his show, blasting home run after home run on the pitching of his former BP coach from Cary, North Carolina, Clay Council. Council was 71, from the pre-Civil Rights era south.
After home run upon home run it was getting comical. Bradley was cracking up, and came out to the mound to give Council a mock rubdown for his arm. Bradley and Council were both laughing and it was just a nice moment, the black player with the anger issues and the old cracker (that’s of course unfair to Council, for all I know he sat in at the Woolworth’s counter in Greensboro solidarity) sharing a moment. Bradley seemed to be having a great time and enjoying his teammate’s ridiculously awesome BP power display and sharing Council’s 15 minute moment.
He had a great year that year, but more than anything I saw that I thought to myself this guy isn’t all that bad despite all of the other issues. Yeah, and I know, Hitler liked little children and dogs, but aside from the dropped charges this off-season it doesn’t seem like Bradley’s issues involve him hurting others, more himself. I hope he finds peace. He certainly has made enough money and hopefully has plenty of it socked away.
Leaving the A’s, there were two reasons why he was traded so quickly to San Diego. One was the aforementioned injuries, the other, however, was that he blew up in the clubhouse, threw chairs everywhere, and called A’s GM Billy Beane a racist.
Hello, has anyone else realized this guy has put up a 100 wRC+ this season? He was average. Not bad; average. His only problems on the field were with the glove, in small sample size.
He IS fine as a bench player.
Interestingly, although doucheness may not be generally known in the statistical realm, it is not technically unknowable. In fact, one might say doucheness is an unexplored area of baseball analysis.
Each player comes in contact with hundreds of other players, coaches, managers, ballboys, equipment managers, PR directors, umpires and more over the course of a career, for that matter, over the course of one year. Sample size would not be an issue – although any single person would be prone to making a flawed judgment, what is the likelihood that hundreds of people would all misunderstand a player? And like any other stat, one would imagine doucheness can fluctuate.
Maybe we’re against makeup as an analyis because it’s believed to be a judgment of too few. Using well developed observational information, it’s not entirely unfathomable that personality could someday be incorporated into WARP, if someone had the determination.
This is true, but I have no desire to give out a Miss Congeniality award in baseball.
Baseball’s version of the Lady Byng trophy…I kind of like that idea.
We could call it the Steve Lyons award.
Find pet players who’ve been overlooked by teams, and lobby for them to find a real home.
I love this game. Josh Phelps, Brad Fullmer, Dallas McPherson, Nick Johnson, Ben Petrick, Austin Kerns, Elijah Dukes, Bobby Crosby, Brandon Wood, Ian Stewart, Daric Barton. One thing I love about Ron Shelton is his annual expressions of humility.
Roberto Petagine was my favorite.
Ron Roenicke, Randy Ready
Mark my words: once the NFL and NFLPA work things out, Bradley lands with the Ravens. They’ve got the locker room leadership to keep him in line.
All things considered as a Mariner fan, I’m not happy with the boat anchor contract Bradley left, but I’d prefer the Mariners version of Bradley over the Mariners version of Carlos Silva.
Milton Bradley’s problem was Milton Bradley. Carlos Silva’s problem was with everyone not named Carlos Silva. Bradley couldn’t hit anymore and fielded like crap, but in the last two years his issues were personal (and with umps). Silva, though, criticized everyone but himself for his atrocious performance.
Silva did provide 1.3 fWAR to Bradley’s -0.4. But man, they call Milton Bradley a cancer? Silva spread to the lymph nodes. At least Bradley was contained to a small, easily excised part of the Mariners.
Frankly, I am not so sure bradley can’t hit lefties anymore. I think he can. Off the bench or as a platoon mate vs left handers he could still help most teams.
But, I am still not completely off the Bradley is not all that bad bandwagon yet, so I am biased.
Did anyone read the interview with his mother after he left the Cubs? According to his mother, Milton’s young son was enrolled in a Chicago pre-school, where the teachers, the students, and the students’ parents all called Milton’s son the N-word.
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/news/story?id=4496640
Not trying to be flippant, but it’s pretty clear that mental illness and persecution complexes run in the family
Is there really a place left in the United States where teachers can call a kid an “N-word” and still not be immediately fired? Or at least suspended while the incident is looked in to? Bizarre.
With Bradley out the Mariners need to do something about their offense Jack Cust and his 610 OPS at DH is not getting it done.
The Mariners should trade for Willy Mo Pena, he is tearing up the PCL ( I know it’s a hitters league but he has 13 HR, and a 1200+ OPS).
Only sort of amazing that Mariners fans are not expressing their relief en masse. If you are incapable of seeing that your team is clearly better off today than it was three days ago, I feel sorry for you.
I feel even more sorry for the expert chronicler who feel like we “just never knew him.” Really? That statement clearly insinuates that you give credibility to Milton’s claims that all his problems have been because of racism. First, ask yourself how this notion can ever be proven wrong when you have no standard of proof. Are we now to the point where a person claiming racism is the same as the workplace standard for harassment, that what controls is how the “victim” feels, not what actually occurred? I don’t have a problem with that legal standard, but don’t you have to acknowledge that once in a while a person who is mentally ill or just a liar and manipulator, will make these claims as excuses?
Milton Bradley was given many opportunities to make an outrageous fortune playing a child’s game, while millions of African-American men in this country aren’t given the time of day. Milton is a flawed human being who brought most of his woes on himself. Sticking up for him does not make you race-conscious or empathetic, it just makes you gullible.
Keri, you are lucky you don’t have a little Bradley hanging around your real life. Can you imagine being his friend?
Paul at 11:28 am already stated this case, in another word.
Rest in peace, Milton. You are not missed.
Mental issues are still a misunderstood part of human “being”. Doesn’t excuse any of his behavior, naturally, but I do feel bad for him. Here’s a guy who came out and asked for help last year– admitted his problem, at least to himself– tried to save the end of his career, and heal his legacy, and yet he STILL couldn’t get away from his own head. He was trying so hard earlier this season, with the earplugs, shaking his head but walking away silently when umps made questionable calls, asking the umpires to intervene when he had issues with fans (instead of engaging them himself), and he was obviously NOT talking to the media as a rule of thumb (keeping his own mouth shut). None of these were natural behaviors/inclinations for the guy. It had to take a lot of effort.
When he was able to hold it together, he led the M’s in batting the first few weeks of the season. Stole some bases. Could be seen laughing and enjoying his teammates. Then it seems he ran out of stamina to deal with his own issues, and his depression/anxiety (whatever it may be) took over again, and his batting turned awful, he took out the earplugs, he started barking at the umps again, and within two weeks was OUT of baseball.
It seems as if he decided for himself “I’m done.” He got suspended. He started obviously not going all out after balls to left field. And he looked miserable in the dugout.
And now he’s gone.
I don’t suppose it’s a happy place to be, being Milton Bradley right now. He’s a sad footnote in the annals of modern baseball.