MLB In-Market Streaming a Small Step

If you were glancing at baseball news around the internet recently, you might have come across some announcements from MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred. A Forbes‘ article features a headline, for example, that reads “Manfred Announces 3-Year Deal With FOX To Have MLB Games Streamed In-Market“. At MLB’s own website one finds “Streaming deal a huge leap forward for MLB, fans“. Viewing the headlines alone, we might conclude, or at least be hopeful, that this is a really big deal — that MLB is finally getting rid of its blackout policy on MLB.tv, allowing fans to watch their local team without subscribing to an expensive cable television package. Unfortunately, that’s not what’s happening. In-market streaming is a small step towards making baseball more accessible to fans, but does not deal with the principal blackout problems that prevent getting MLB games any way you want them.

In-market streaming, in the iteration announced yesterday, is helpful to fans provided they already pay for a cable service broadcasting their team’s local games. As the Forbes article indicates, the deal is with FOX-owned cable affiliates. Half of the league is broadcast on a cable network owned by FOX, with the other half spread out between other owners like Comcast, Time Warner and DirecTV. While the other networks could reach a deal with MLB, Manfred’s announcement relates exclusively to the FOX-owned properties. In the chart below, the column on the left features the teams whose broadcasts are affected as a result of this agreement, while the column on the right shows teams whose rights are not managed by FOX and are therefore not part of this announcement.

15 Teams With In-Market Streaming for 2016
With In-Market Streaming Without In-Market Streaming
Atlanta Braves New York Mets
Cincinnati Reds Philadelphia Phillies
Cleveland Indians Chicago Cubs
Texas Rangers Chicago White Sox
Detroit Tigers Pittsburgh Pirates
Kansas City Royals Houston Astros
Los Angeles Angels Los Angeles Dodgers
Miami Marlins Seattle Mariners
Milwaukee Brewers San Francisco Giants
Minnesota Twins Oaland Athletics
New York Yankees Washington Nationals
Arizona Diamondbacks Baltimore Orioles
San Diego Padres Colorado Rockies
St. Louis Cardinals Boston Red Sox
Tampa Bay Rays Toronto Blue Jays
SOURCE: MLB.com

Depending on the cable provider, one might be able to stream games through portable devices if also signed into a home wifi that has also been purchased from the same provider, for example. For the fifteen teams part of this agreement, cable subscribers should have significantly more viewing options. Prior to this agreement, a fan, even if he or she were a cable subscriber and even if he or she paid for MLB.tv, would still be unable to watch games on a cell phone or tablet while located in the home market — nor could could one watch games at the doctor’s office, friend’s home, or while commuting on the train or bus. MLB.tv blacked out the games on own its platform, nor was the local cable provider was providing its own options.

Under this agreement, the local regional sports networks, after authenticating that the viewer is a cable subscriber, will allow fans to watch games on their chosen portable devices while on the go. Likely, fans will be directed to use the FOX Sports Go app that already broadcasts many events under the FOX umbrella. MLB has fiercely guarded the digital rights to broadcasts, and this deal, while a small step for the end consumer suddenly used to having access to sports everywhere, was likely a big decision for MLB. They are ceding some control over how fans access baseball outside of the television screen. In exchange for this concession, MLB will be receiving 4% of the team’s cut of the local television deal, per Maury Brown of Forbes.

Smaller deals like this have been a precursor to major changes. A few years ago, HBO unveiled HBO Go to cable subscribers of the channel, allowing those who already paid for HBO to access programming on portable devices or through set-top boxes hooked up to their televisions. Since that time, HBO has followed up with HBO Now, a service that allows customers to completely bypass cable if they so choose and simply pay a monthly fee directly to HBO for its services.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

An HBO-like service is not likely to soon be offered due to the cable bundling system in which regional sports networks are involved. At HBO, the price subscribers pay for HBO through their cable provider is roughly the same as buying the digital package driectly from HBO. Unlike HBO, regional sports networks that air baseball games are not specifically chosen for purchase by the consumer. They are bundled by the cable providers into one large package, and the fee that networks charge (usually $3-$5 per month per subscriber) is passed along to the consumer by the cable provider. This practice is the lifeblood of regional sports networks. If they can get all cable consumers to pay for their channel, they can charge a relatively low amount. If cable networks went purely to a subscriptions service or even to some hybrid, they would need to charge significantly more for the digital subscription to make up for the lost consumers. This is why the MLB’s blackout policy, which is similar to the NHL’s, exists — although is entirely different from the NFL’s old blackout rule.

The NHL, now in partnership with MLBAM, has a package similar to MLB.tv that costs a bit over $150 per year, and after a lawsuit, they actually made available a one-team package for around $100 per season. However, even this one-team package is subject to local blackout policies. Like in baseball, the only way to watch your local team at home within the the conifnes of the law is to purchase a cable package.

The NFL got rid of its blackout policy before the season, but the NFL’s policy stemmed from worries that people would not attend games if they could watch the game at home. MLB.tv has a local blackout policy due to worries that if people could access local games through an MLB.tv subscription, then they would not subscribe to cable or would otherwise lessen the demand for the regional sports network as part of a cable package. As that cable package is currently fueling the high local rights deals for MLB teams, the blackouts that regional sports networks demand will remain absent a significant shift in the cable model. Cordcutting is happening, but the drop in cable subscribers would have to be massive to necessitate a change from the current model and that is not likely to happen in the very near future.

In-market streaming is a small victory for those who already subscribe to cable and have a local team broadcasted by a FOX-owned cable channel. They will have expanded options to view games, and the games will be much more accessible outside of the home. The move could be a precursor to a direct subscription model, combining the best of HBO Now and MLB.tv, but due to the current cable model, this move is more of a small step than a drastic change for baseball fans.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
2014 National Champions
10 years ago

I recently moved from Nashville to Wyoming and was pretty stoked to see the only team I’ve blacked out from watching on MLB.tv = the Rockies. Life in Nashville was tough when you wanted to watch the Reds/Braves but didn’t have access to a TV. It’ll be so nice to be able to watch just about any game I want to now.

DNA+
10 years ago

It sounds a bit silly, but I have an easier time watching baseball living outside the US than I did living in the US. International MLB.tv works for all feeds at all times. It is wonderful. ….now if I could only do something about the time zones problem.

pft
10 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

You can watch the games after they have been archived at your convenience, or watch the condensed games after the game is over.

DNA+
10 years ago
Reply to  pft

..its just not the same as watching games live though. I’ve just adapted to sleeping during the offseason.

mike sixel
10 years ago

Since I can listen on the radio for free…..it would be a nice step if I could stream the radio broadcast on my phone…..but for some (many?), we have also gotten rid of our radio tuners……and yet I can’t listen to the Twins on my phone for some reason, even if I want to stream the radio broadcast.

Lucas
10 years ago
Reply to  mike sixel

One thing MLB does do well for the consumers, for $20/season you can subscribe to the AtBat app which includes streaming audio for every game.

Erix
10 years ago

Just a heads up that the Blue Jays do have in-market streaming through a similar mechanism with Rogers who owns both the network and the team

Torgen
10 years ago
Reply to  Erix

Is that only if Rogers is your mobile provider, or can you get it if you have a Bell phone and Bell TV with Sportsnet in your TV package?

Rustybob
10 years ago
Reply to  Torgen

I streamed no problem with Mobilicity, both through the At Bat app and video streaming.

And the postseason was supposed to have been blacked out in Canada, but I always just clicked on the link saying I was an international subscriber, and it worked every time

obviousguy
10 years ago
Reply to  Erix

Correct, jays fans have had in market streaming for 2 years. Doesn’t matter which service provider.

Bryan
10 years ago

At least this alleviates a little of the strain for those of us who live in Hawaii, where MLB blacks out SD, SF, LAD, LAA, OAK, and SEA. If those teams aren’t playing each other, we lose 40% of the available games on any given day.

L. Ron Hoyabembe
10 years ago
Reply to  Bryan

Tell me more about this “strain” of living in Hawaii.

Steven
10 years ago

Any idea if this allows streaming the local broadcast while traveling? For instance, could a Milwaukee cable subscribing Milwaukee Brewers fan watch the FS Wisconsin broadcast while not in Wisconsin?

steve
10 years ago

So in Northern NJ where Comcast just dropped the Yes network, this won’t help me to stream Yankee games? My cable provider will not provide Yankee games (they do have Fox Sports channels, but not Yes).

regyptian
10 years ago

I live in British Columbia, have never been blacked out of a Blue Jays game or a Mariners game on MLB.tv

Jeff in T.O.
10 years ago
Reply to  regyptian

Shhhhhhh……

Westside guy
10 years ago

I would gladly pay the carriage fee on top of my At Bat Premium subscription to watch my local team, even though it’s the Mariners. But what I will not do is increase my Comcast bill by $65/month for the same privilege.

So what I do is pay for At Bat Premium, then install Protect My Privacy on my jailbroken iOS device. Works like a charm. The only thing I have to be careful about is backing up older versions of At Bat, since occasionally MLB figures out how to get around location spoofing. But as of the end of last season, this worked quite well with the latest At Bat.

Andy O'Hara
10 years ago

I’m in Kansas City and routinely watch Royals games on my iPad on my Time Warner Cable app (apparently my wife thinks there are other things worth watching in the summer). I won’t be a cord-cutter anytime soon, so this has worked for me, but I have to be on my home wifi, which it appears this new announcement might solve. However, for me, I love access to the interactive box scores, highlights, game summaries, etc. that I can get on AtBat but can’t get on TWC. If they integrate it through FS GO, hopefully the MLBAM folks share some of that code with the FS Go developers.

John Thacker
10 years ago

So as I read it, no change if you subscribe to a cable operator but your package does not include the particular FOX RSN, including if your cable operator does not have any package that would allow you to subscribe, such as Time Warner Cable in the eastern half of NC and Fox Sports Atlanta for the Braves (the Orioles and Nationals fans are even more out of luck since MASN is not FOX owned). The problem of “the team considers it territory, the cable operator does not” remains.

While it’s true that the revenue model is bundling, it seems like FOX (and other RSNs) could offer a higher payment direct subscription for people in the claimed area, through FOX Sports GO or the like. While grumbling, I know people who would pay $10 or even $20 / month for just Fox Sports Atlanta for the Braves (and it would be easier than using methods to evade MLBAM’s location detection.)