MLB Teams With the Most Dead Money in 2018

As this offseason confirms, the way in which clubs spend their money has changed perceptibly over the last decade or so. Where it used to be commonplace for an organization to pay a player for what he had already done, teams have increasingly begun to compensate players for what they’re likely to do in the future. We see the emergence of this trend most clearly in long-term extensions for younger players, a development that has led to missing free-agent classes.

Of course, that doesn’t mean clubs have stopped signing free agents altogether or stopped exposing themselves to risk of any kind. Teams still need to address weaknesses, and one means to do that is by way of the open market. In some cases, the performances they expect fail to materialize. In some of those cases, teams decide they’re better off paying someone else to take care of the problem. This is how teams end up with dead money on their payroll.

Dead money is generally any money a team is paying out to a player who no longer appears on their 40-man roster. There are three types of dead money:

  1. Money paid to players who have been released. Those players are free to sign with other teams, but the team releasing the player still owes the money remaining on the contract.
  2. Money paid to other teams as compensation for players who have been traded. Generally, we see teams cover a portion of a contract to receive a better return in trade.
  3. Money paid to players who are still in the organization, but who have been removed from the 40-man roster. Any team could have claimed these players if they were willing to take on the contract, and the player probably could have elected fee agency, but then he would forfeit his right to the guaranteed money.

Last season, nearly $300 million of MLB payroll was of the deceased variety, a sum that was double the amount of the prior campaign. Over the past year, we’ve seen the contracts of Carl Crawford, Josh Hamilton, Jose Reyes, and Alex Rodriguez all come off the books. The result is a $100 million decrease in the amount of dead money from last year. The graph below shows the teams who are paying the most money this season to pay players not on their roster.

Boston takes the top spot this year thanks entirely to Rusney Castillo and Pablo Sandoval. The Los Angeles Dodgers’ dead money, meanwhile, is spread out over seven players. Because of their original trade with the Padres that removed Matt Kemp from their roster, they are actually paying an amount higher than his current salary after having reacquired him. And the Dodgers would actually place higher on this list if they had released Adrian Gonzalez instead of taking on Matt Kemp’s contract when their former first baseman was dealt to the Braves and then released. The team could also still increase its total if the front office decides Kemp is not a fit for the current roster.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Breaking the money down by type, the table below shows players who were traded with payments from their former teams.

Players Traded Along With Cash
Name Old Team New Team Money Owed
James Shields Padres White Sox $11.0 M
Justin Verlander Tigers Astros $8.0 M
Prince Fielder Tigers Rangers $6.0 M
Travis Wood Royals Padres $6.0 M
Mike Leake Cardinals Mariners $6.0 M
Brian McCann Yankees Astros $5.5 M
Hector Olivera Dodgers Braves $4.7 M
Adrian Gonzalez Dodgers Braves $4.5 M
Evan Longoria Rays Giants $3.5 M
Matt Kemp Dodgers Padres $3.5 M
Brandon Moss Royals A’s $3.25 M
Cole Hamels Phillies Rangers $2.5 M
Andrew McCutchen Pirates Giants $2.5 M
Jedd Gyorko Padres Cardinals $2.5 M
Luis Avilan Dodgers White Sox $2.0 M
Joakim Soria Royals White Sox $1.0 M
Daniel Hudson Pirates Rays $1.0 M
Chase Headley Yankees Padres $0.5 M

As the table here indicates, the Padres are responsible for the largest subsidy in the league right now. They’re also probably more than happy to pay it, in light of their return: San Diego agreed to pay part of James Shields’ future salary and received Fernando Tatis Jr., the fifth-best prospect in all of baseball.

Many of the deals above feature relatively small amounts to help offset payments for quality players like Hamels, Leake, Longoria, McCann, McCutchen, and Verlander. In no case was the money likely central to a deal, but it helped sweeten things enough to move both sides to an agreement. Luis Avilan might not technically belong on this list. He was moved from Los Angeles to the White Sox along with some cash so that the Dodgers would receive reliever Scott Alexander from the Royals. The real money in the deal came from the Dodgers and Royals to the White Sox to help pay for Joakim Soria, but because Avilan started with the Dodgers, the $2 million technically goes with him.

The traded players above account for around $70 million, and the group of released players below account for roughly that same amount, as well.

Players Released With Money Owed
Name Old Team Current Team Money Owed
Pablo Sandoval Red Sox Giants $18.45 M
Adrian Gonzalez Braves Mets $17.5 M
Edinson Volquez Marlins Rangers $13.0 M
Prince Fielder Tigers Injured/Retired $9.0 M
Hector Olivera Padres FA $6.5 M
Brandon Moss A’s FA $4.0 M
Dian Toscano Dodgers FA $1.8 M
Anibal Sanchez Twins FA $0.4 M
Ezequiel Carrera Blue Jays Braves $0.3 M

The Dodgers paid some money to the Braves in the big contract swap this winter, but even after that payment, Gonzalez was still owed a hefty sum. The amount owed to Prince Fielder accounts for money the Rangers are receiving from insurance following Fielder’s forced retirement from the game due to injuries. Brandon Moss is still looking for work, while the small figures for Anibal Sanchez and Ezequiel Carrera were due to their release during spring training.

The final group of players is composed of guys still in a team’s system, but not good enough for a spot on the team’s 40-man roster.

Players Still in the Organization
Name Team Money Owed
Rusney Castillo Red Sox $11.7 M
Erisbel Arruebarrena Dodgers $6.5 M
Yaisel Sierra Dodgers $4.5 M
Jon Singleton Astros $2.0 M

Of the four players here, three were signed to big contracts out of Cuba. Of particular note with regard to those three players is that, because they don’t appear on their respective clubs’ 40-man rosters, their salaries are not counted towards the competitive balance tax. The Dodgers are likely to stay under the tax amount this season in part because their payments to Arrabarruena and Sierra do not count. The Red Sox were able to get under the tax threshold last season because the salaries of Castillo and Allen Craig did not count. The Red Sox’ liability will be lessened this season so long as Castillo is not added to the 40-man roster. As for Singleton, he will not be paid $2 million this year as he is serving a 100-game suspension without pay for a drug of abuse. The Astros are nowhere near the tax threshold for payroll, but if Singleton were on the 40-man roster, he likely wouldn’t have been suspended, as Major League Baseball does not test for marijuana.

While the Dodgers and Red Sox have the most dead money on their payroll, they do not have the highest percentage of their payroll on the same. For the second consecutive season that honor goes to the Padres, as the table below indicates.

Percent of Payroll Going to Dead Money
Team Net Dead Money (M) 2018 Payroll (M) % Dead of Payroll
Padres $20.0 $90.7 22.1%
Braves $17.5 $116.2 15.1%
Dodgers $27.5 $185.7 14.8%
Marlins $13.0 $89.9 14.5%
Red Sox $30.2 $230.8 13.1%
Tigers $14.0 $125.9 11.1%
Royals $10.3 $119.9 8.6%
Athletics $4.0 $64.6 6.2%
Rangers $5.5 $130.5 4.2%
Pirates $3.5 $85.6 4.1%
Yankees $6.0 $165.0 3.6%
Rays $2.5 $77.1 3.2%
Phillies $2.5 $93.0 2.7%
Cardinals $3.5 $145.2 2.4%
Twins $0.4 $126.6 0.3%
Blue Jays $0.3 $158.8 0.2%

For a vast majority of teams, dead money isn’t too much of an issue this season. The Padres’ number should decrease a bit more next season, and the Dodgers will lose a couple salaries from their books, but the Red Sox will be paying Castillo and Sandoval for a few more years. If teams continue to find creative ways to trade payroll like the Braves and Dodgers did this winter or Padres Chase Headley plus prospect deal from the Yankees, we might see this effect lessened a bit in the future.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
8 years ago

in before first mention of Bobby Bonilla

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago

Forget Bonilla, the Braves are still paying Bruce Sutter from his contract in 1985. That still has a few more years to go with a $9.1M lump sum payment at the end.

bkgeneralMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Is this real? They still owe Bruce Sutter?????? If true, it puts Bonilla to shame.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  bkgeneral

Oh yeah, in a move that was way ahead of its time, the Braves signed him for 6/$4.5M and then $1.15M per year for the next 30 years with a $9.1M lump sum at the end. Theoretically they were going to put the $9.1M in an annuity and interest rates at the time were like 12.3% (we’ve gotten used to low interest rates the last 10 years or so but they were crazy in the 80’s – mortgage rates were 12 to 13% in 1985). More than likely they didn’t and have simply been paying out of pocket ever since with the $9.1M kicker coming up in 2022.

You can find all sorts of links for it but here’s one: https://tomahawktake.com/2015/07/04/atlanta-braves-morning-chop-a-bad-contract-still-being-paid/

Luy
8 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Ha!
The Mets aren’t even the best at handing out absurd contracts!

Hank G.Member since 2016
8 years ago

So, if I buy an annuity from an insurance company, the money they are paying me is dead money? They do get the use of the money that used to be mine, before I bought the annuity and became a leech.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
8 years ago

I am excited for the next CBA negotiation, where the MLBPA bargains for some sort of payroll floor. Then we will get to see dead money contracts traded to teams hoping to avoid floor penalties as if they had actual value. It will be glorious! *

* It will NOT be glorious

GoNYGoNYGoGo
8 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

The CBA has a floor. 25 player roster required, minimum salary is $500K. Floor is $12.5 million.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  GoNYGoNYGoGo

Hmm… I can’t find anything that says you must have 25 players; only that you can’t have more. Are you listening, Derek?

Dave TMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

A team isn’t required to have 25 players on the roster, but it is required to have at least 24. See page 67 of the CBA – http://www.mlbplayers.com/pdf9/5450407.pdf

The floor for a team’s spending on the MLB roster per the CBA is 24 players at the minimum salary (~$13 million) plus each team’s share of player benefits (~$15 million), so a total of ~$28 million.

Momus
8 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Can’t wait for the first baseball version of that last Chris Pronger trade – he will one day retire as a Phoenix Coyote, a team he was traded to about 3 years after his career was ended by injury.

Or the equally amusing Nathan Horton trade by the Maple Leafs: They literally traded a high-priced player off their active roster for the *even more* expensive Horton, who they knew would never play again, just because his salary wouldn’t against the cap.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  Momus

Equally as good, the Keith Van Horn trade in 2008. He had stopped playing 2 years earlier (but never officially retired which was a big key to the deal). NBA trade rules require matching salaries. So when the Mavs needed some salary to complete the Jason Kidd trade, they signed Van Horn to a contract for the rest of the year and traded him to the Nets.

I kind of wonder if the biggest beneficiary of this wouldn’t be lower-level pitchers undergoing TJ surgery. As of now, they literally can’t sign for anything (or best-case, 2 year deals for very little in the current year, a la Eovaldi and Pineda). With a floor and a need for salary, teams could offer them anything and they would sign. Teams could then bury them on the DL where they don’t take up a 40 man roster spot.

Paul-SF
8 years ago

MLB reaction to …

$300 million to pay players not to play: “Cost of doing business.”
$30 million to provide minor-league players a living wage: “CALL CONGRESS. IT MUST BE STOPPED!”

Gavin
8 years ago

Can you explain Matt Kemp? Are they currently paying the Padres $3.5M? I checked Cots and couldn’t find any evidence of this…

It seems like you’re suggesting that the Padres are collecting $3.5M per remaining year of Kemp’s deal, while paying Kemp nothing. This would also mean that Kemp’s deal is $3.5M more expensive per year than what was signed, just by virtue of his being traded.

It makes more sense that the Dodgers are just paying Kemp’s full salary and the Padres are neither receiving or paying any money for, nor paying any money to Kemp.

mike sixelMember since 2016
8 years ago

Just imagine the number’s size if players that contribute negative WAR were counted as dead money…..since they are replacalbish with 500K a year players, theoretically.

Only glove, no love
8 years ago
Reply to  mike sixel

This raises what I consider the overlooked aspect.

The good systems and/or richest franchises face the problem of there only being 9 spots on the diamond. They have to cram as much talent as possible in each spot. This lends itself to creating dead money as a good thing. Sending bad players home or away frees up a spot on the diamond which is really valuable. And if a team is relatively rich and wants to win, maybe they should embrace dead money and send the broke down and bad players home.

The bad and/or poor systems have the opposite problem, they have to fill 9 whole positions with mlb talent or a reasonable facsimile thereof. They can’t afford to have non active money. Unless they embrace the tank.

Of course, the new and terrible in my opinion salary tax will play in as well by limiting the utility of huge dead money accumulations.

But in the past I always wondered why relatively rich teams didn’t just send the bad players home instead of hurting their team by playing them in the field.

dl80Member since 2026
8 years ago

Because most of the owners don’t understand “sunk cost.” Example A: Pujols.

OddBall Herrera
8 years ago

Talk about a sweet deal, Anibal Sanchez was paid more money to hang out with the Twins for a couple weeks of spring training than most of us do over 5-10 years of work.

Paul22
8 years ago

So 2-3% of revenue goes for dead contracts. Not too bad.

Teams have always paid for what they think a player will do. The best measure of that has always been what they did in the past. Now, for whatever reason they all seem to have be using a similar steep age decline curve. However, we know such curves have wide error bars and are accurate only for the group and not necessarily for the individual

Teams also in the past recognized the pact was to get surplus value from young players and then pay these surplus value achievers back in their later years, at least the few who avoid injuries and early declines. They seem to be going back on their agreement. Time for MLBPA to take back some of their concessions. Prepare for no baseball in 2022.

Only glove, no love
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

The like/unlike system is terrible. This does not deserve downvotes. Everything he said is true. A small minority of spiritual hall monitor tone policemen get way too much power with this system.

Luy
8 years ago

What does “tone policing” have to do with the above comment. You seem to be bringing some (a lot of) baggage to reading of the comment.

Sort of like you’re doing the exact thing you’re whining about…

And you’re DEFINITELY doing the thing you’re whining about when you tell people they can’t be dismissive of arguments you disagree with. Because you’re being dismissive of downvotes you disagree with.

Only glove, no love
8 years ago
Reply to  Luy

Stop. I am not tone policing. I am advocating a greater latitude in tone. And that isn’t policing by any but the most tendentious definition. What I am saying is that the like/unlike system was instituted to stop trolling and bring the tone and content of comments more in line with editorial preference. This is done by allowing the tiny minority of people who bother to vote an overweighted say in policing the comments (because the editors believe their preferences are shared by this tiny minority). And the downvotes to that relevant and factually supported post show that this minority is just as if not more unrepresentative of the general reading public than the trolls. At least some of them were amusing. This minority has taken things too far. But that is inevitable when you allow the type of person who frequently votes on comments an overweighted say. Sacrificing arguments that are relevant and factually based because of tone is a bad thing on a site like this.

dl80Member since 2026
8 years ago

The upvotes and downvotes literally don’t matter at all. It’s not as if a comment gets hidden if there are a certain number of downvotes (which would be a good system) or moved up to the top with a certain number of upvotes (also possibly a good system). I would bet that not one reader on this site ignores a comment because it has a lot of downvotes.
The flags, on the other hand, are a good thing.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Hello, Boston Red Sox!

It’s amazing that given how good the Red Sox were at almost everything back in the day, how horrifically bad they were when it came to giving out big free agent contracts.

Luke I am your Father
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Back in the day? Too early to comment on JD, but that David Price contract was only 2 years ago.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Yeah, that one isn’t going to be good. But Carl Crawford and Pablo Sandoval were epic disasters (I guess Price has a chance to still be worse than Hanley).

dl80Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Don’t forget Daisuke ($103 million for 7.5 WAR over 6 years).

kevinthecomic
8 years ago

This is the first time I have ever heard the name Dian Toscano.

Jason BMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  kevinthecomic

I always thought Sam would get with her eventually…the show really went downhill after Kirstie Alley came on board.

Hank G.Member since 2016
8 years ago

It doesn’t meet your criteria, but I don’t think any money is deader than the Albert Pujols contract. That alone would put them near the top. I think paying a guy to stink up the joint is worse than paying a player to not be on the roster.

radivel
8 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

Miguel Cabrera will take over this spot at some point. He’s signed for another 6 years!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

So dead it takes up a roster spot too.

AndyMember since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think the reason Phillies fans are so tolerant with ownership and rosters over the past few years is we’ve known that the Howard contract (walking dead money) was part of the price paid for the 2007-2012 run.
Fortunately, that delivered a title.

dl80Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  Andy

If we’re being really charitable, perhaps having Pujols helped convince Trout to resign in March 2014. His WAR in 2013 was not good, but he was above average with the bat (112 wRC+). I’m grasping for straws here.

RockiesRoom101
8 years ago

Out of interest how does this affect players tax? Assuming Player A gets traded from LAD to MIA with a bunch of dead money left in LA…Does he pay high income tax on the California rate for the dead money or does it become the tax-free Florida rate?

Dag Gummit
8 years ago
Reply to  RockiesRoom101

I believe players’ taxes are pro-rated by time in each state. A player who plays half their games in a tax-free state will have half of their salaries tax-free. If 40 of their games are in CA, then ~25% of their salaries are by the CA income tax.

I don’t really know, but I think I’ve heard that it’s along those lines.

NewfyMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  Dag Gummit

The allocation is relevant if the player is still active. In this case, the OP is asking what happens if he’s not playing. In which case it’s similar to the above response – it depends on where he spends his days, and whether he’s required to follow the team around, or meet with a trainer or doctor as a requirement of his contract. If the answer is “stay at home and get paid”, then hopefully he’s retired to a state with no income tax, and the income will be allocated there. Will not matter what state he is paid from, in the great majority of situations.

alashieve
8 years ago

The MLB needs their contracts to be NFL style this would end the problem.

Gavin
8 years ago
Reply to  alashieve

Are you being facetious?

Abomb1018
8 years ago

It says a lot about the state of payroll disparity in the MLB when two teams can eat a top tier contract and still be in the top handful of teams in the league. This kind of dead money would set back a small market team for the better part of a decade.

Gavin
8 years ago
Reply to  Abomb1018

This is no different in any other major league sport.

The Toronto Maple Leafs have a ton of dead money on their books; they have even TRADED for dead money in order to skirt the NHL salary cap and get out of a bad deal.

Nice to be able to print money, and isn’t changing any time soon.

Abomb1018
8 years ago
Reply to  Gavin

Hockey has a dynasty in a rust belt city and the top 5 teams this year include Tampa, Nashville, and Winnipeg.

I don’t know NHL salary cap rules, but something is allowing small market teams to be more competitive than they are in the MLB.

Baseball’s likely division winners are all in the country’s biggest markets except for Cleveland. This is because (among other things) the major markets can take on a busted contract like Sandoval and cover up the mistake with more spending.