Monitoring Salvador Perez’s Workload

For better or worse, the Kansas City Royals have garnered a fair amount of attention to start the season. On the better side of the ledger, the team now sits at 10-3, with the second best record in the American League behind only the 11-2 Detroit Tigers. Even finishing a game over .500 the rest of the way would give the team a solid 85-win season, and the Playoff Odds here at Fangraphs give the Royals a better than one in three chance at making the playoffs. While those might not seem like great chances, they are sixth in a league where five teams make the playoffs and they are already ahead of preseason darling Cleveland Indians.

The ugliness that consumed the weekend for Kansas City certainly is not drawing the type of attention a team should hope to receive, but perhaps lost amid the beanings and the yelling and the pointing, there was a significant and rare day for the Royals as Salvador Perez did not start on Sunday. Erik Kratz took his place, although Perez did not receive the day off as he entered the game in the seventh inning and caught the final two innings behind the plate.

This early in the season, a catcher making most if not all a team’s starts is not overly unusual. Perez started the first 11 games, but off days early on meant that he received two days of rest during that time. While his games and plate appearances are near the top of the catcher Leaderboard and his 107 innings behind the plate are second in baseball to Derek Norris’ 111 thus far, it is too early to get alarmed about his workload thus far. It is the upcoming workload that should be concerning.

Perez has gotten off to a great start at the plate so far, hitting .380/.385/.620. The updated ZiPS has Perez hitting .283/.312/.433 for a wRC+ of 108. Combined with his hot start, the updated ZiPS have his final projected line at .292/.319/.450 and a 115 wRC+. Those numbers would represent a career year for Perez and close to a five-win season, great numbers as the Royals try to return to the playoffs. Based on past usage from Ned Yost, the 24-year old Perez will receive as many plate appearances as possible to achieve that career year and become potentially a breakout star. For Perez, that could be a positive, but playing the most grueling position in the game could make that a negative as well.

Searching “Salvador Perez workload” yields the following results:

Screenshot+2015-04-21+at+7 (1)

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

An interesting juxtaposition to be sure. For the Royals part, they seem to understand that Perez might have been overworked last season, playing in 150 games, catching in 146 games, and starting 143 of those games behind the plate. Last season Perez had a solid 116 wRC+ for the first half followed by a terrible 61 wRC+ in the second half. We do not know for sure that his workload played a role. he actually had a better second half offensively in 2013, but we do know that catching is difficult and nobody has been asked to shoulder the load quite like Salvador Perez.

His 1248 2/3 innings behind the plate were the most in the majors last season by more than 60 innings over second place Jonathan Lucroy. Yadier Molina’s career high for innings caught in a season is 1176 ? having never broken 1200 innings in the regular season. Only five players were within 200 innings of Perez behind the plate in 2014, and adding in 15 games and another 140 innings or so and Perez was working nearly 50% more than most of the catchers in baseball. Hence articles wondering if the Royals broke Salvador Perez or if the Royals were Killing Salvador Perez. Coming into Spring Training, the problem was acknowledged, and a plan was at least discussed, although how much those discussions matter is up for debate once it is time to write a player’s name in the lineup.

Ned Yost at the Winter Meetings in December:

“I can’t catch Sal 150 games again,” Yost said. “I’ll kill the kid.”

Then Yost in February at the start of Spring Training:

‘How do I resist the temptation to write Salvador’s name in the lineup 150 times? I don’t know yet,” Yost said. ”It is hard to take him out. It’s hard to do. We’ve got to find ways and I don’t know how we’re going to do it yet.”

”It will be one of the hardest things that we try to figure out all year,” Yost said. ”How we keep balance there.”

”The easiest way to do it is just assign a starter (to a backup catcher) and that way Sal’s getting a break every five days,” Yost said. ”But there are other ways, too, where we just make it a mandatory off day. If we have a day game the next day (after a night game), give him that day off.”

At least they were thinking about it. Then in March:

Now it is April. The Royals have already had four day games following night games, and in the first three of those games, Salvador Perez received the start in both the night game and the day game that followed it before finally getting the first six and a half innings off on Sunday. The real adventure begins now as the cushy early April schedule disappears and Yost will have to actually figure out if he is interested preserving Perez for the whole season.

Beginning last Wednesday, the Royals embarked on a schedule where they will play 32 games in 33 days including six days after night games not counting the two they have already played in that stretch. A win early in the season is worth just as much as one at the end, and it is difficult to take a player out of the lineup before the grind of the season has worn him down. Perez is young and last season he showed that he could perform well playing in a lot of games, but the odds that he can continue down the same course year after year get smaller. If Yost is serious about getting Perez some days off and preserving him over the course of the season, the next month will go a long way in determining whether the offseason chatter was anything more than words.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Joe
11 years ago

Hey craig if it was your job to make the call what would you do? start him 140 games or????

James Hogg
11 years ago
Reply to  Craig Edwards

Also get him in against LHP where possible e.g. rest him vs a RHP the night before a day game vs a LHP (then also he gets extra time to recoup after the day game)

Shirtless George Brett
11 years ago

I never really bought the idea that Sal’s decline in the second half was due to his workload. If you watched Royals games frequently it seemed to have a lot more to do with the fact that his approach at the plate went to hell. And he wasn’t exactly disciplined to begin with.

His K% went from 11.2% to 17.8% in the second half and his BB% went from 5.5% to 1.2%. I’m not sure you can attribute that all to workload.

joser
11 years ago

I don’t know, my approach to a lot of things goes to hell when I’m fatigued. Loss of focus, declining discipline, trying to “wing it” instead of sticking to a plan — these are all things that can happen when you’re getting burned out.

Jake Taylor
11 years ago
Reply to  joser

Yep, totally agree.

Shirtless George Brett
11 years ago
Reply to  joser

He caught only 133 more innings in 2014 than he did in 2013. Thats an increase of 11% or about 14-15 games in total. And not only did he not collapse in the second half of 2013, he was actually much better then he was in the first. (121 wRC+ compared to 91 in the first half and his BB% and K% both improved as well). So essentially the workload narrative is saying that catching 14 extra games caused him to be about half as good offensively as he was the year before during the same time. That seems pretty extreme.
 
And its not like it was a slow decline in 2014 that would indicate his drop off was due to him wearing down. Perez posted wRC+’s of 100 or better in April, May and June, (he had a 162 wRC+ in June 2014) then suddenly cratered to a 54 wRC+ in July 2014 and basically stayed there for the rest of the year. If we are going believe the workload narrative then we have to believe it started to affect him before he even caught 100 games because that’s when his decline began.
 
So either the margin for turning an above average offensive catcher into a terrible offensive catcher is as narrow as 14 extra games (which seems unlikely) and/or Perez was worn out after less then 90 games (seems equally unlikely) or there was something else at play in 2015 that caused him to have a terrible second half.
 
“Workload = decline” seems like an easy narrative to peddle but doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense when you actually look at the numbers.  

cs3
11 years ago

14-15 games difference is huge. You think 2 extra weeks off doesn’t make a difference? C’mon.

Shirtless George Brett
11 years ago

You think 2 extra weeks off spread over the course of ~6 months is enough to turn a above avg offensive catcher into a downright terrible offesive catcher?

And that doesn’t even begin to address the fact that his decline started in july. Before he had even caught 90 games.

But “c’mon” is a very compelling argument.

Catoblepas
11 years ago

Notably, he also played in the Japan All-Star Series, which was true of numerous MLB players, but none with the same workload and related concerns.
http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/just-a-bit-outside/baseball-joe/blog/trio-royals-salvador-perez-alcides-escobar-jeremy-guthrie-extend-season-world-series-japan-111214

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago

Over 10 years (2000 – 2009), Jason Kendall averaged 142 games caught / 1228 innings caught. In 2008, he started 149 games at catcher and caught 1328.3 innings. He did not die.

Explanation: Jason Kendall is a cyborg?

Eric
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Although he did not die, his bat did.

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

And, in case anyone else was interested in the single-season record:

In 1968, Randy Hundley caught 160 games for the Cubs (156 starts). 1385 innings behind the plate. He only missed the last two games of the season because he couldn’t get out of the wheelchair*.

(*I am assuming this sentence to be true, but I have made no attempts to confirm)

Jake Taylor
11 years ago

As a former catcher, I can tell you that a heavy workload does make a big difference. When you’re very young you can handle it, but at some point your body is just not going to recover in time for the next game. The biggest problem is inflammation. You can get yourself to the point where you can play, but it’s really hard to be a consistent hitter when your legs (or shoulder) feel completely different from one day to the next. Sure, it’s possible, but it’s not easy.

The second problem is mental fatigue. Catchers do not get to space out, so you have to track the ball 150 times a game in addition the 20 pitches you’ll see as a hitter. Again, some nights that’s OK. Some days you just can’t maintain your focus, you can’t pick up release points or wrist pops or spin or whatever.

Finally I wonder if there’s something like football’s Curse of 370 (in which running backs who have extreme workloads in excess of 370 carries in a single year tend to be permanently broken down).

Joey
11 years ago

Check out this stats site:

http://twonumbertwos.com/

Andy
11 years ago

Salvy is also fairly big for a catcher at 6’3, 245. I would assume his size would make it even more taxing on him to crouch behind the plate on a daily basis. Salvy should have two days off each week to keep him fresh and limit injuries.