Nationals Acquire Elite Reliever for Relative Bargain

The Washington Nationals started with their sights on Aroldis Chapman. They’d deemed their bullpen to be in need of an upgrade, and Chapman was the most obvious candidate. Obviously, that didn’t happen. And not only did it not happen, but the return for Chapman was so high that clubs still interested in Andrew Miller could be seen as effectively priced out. From Washington, the Yankees reportedly asked for top prospect Lucas Giolito in exchange for Miller, and no matter what the tweets say, that was never going to happen.

So the Nationals had to lower their sights a bit. But they didn’t have to lower them far, because after Chapman and Miller, they might have gone out and gotten the next-best thing:

It’s a trade that makes sense for both teams, as they all should. The Pirates may not be strong current contenders, but they remain future contenders, if that makes sense. We’ve got their playoff odds at 16%, which is still very much in the race, but makes them a longshot. What the Pirates have beyond this year, though, is a strong core coupled with a handful of promising, near-ready prospects that ought to keep the club’s contention window open for years to come. They’re not going away anytime soon, but they’ve been largely done in this season by uncharacteristically poor starting pitching.

So they moved an expiring piece. Mark Melancon’s been a fixture of Pittsburgh’s recent revival, but he’s gotten expensive, and he’ll be a free agent at year’s end. Teams like the Pirates typically don’t retain relievers like Melancon when they hit the market, so they got what they could. That means Felipe Rivero, a lefty reliever who touches the high-90’s in the majors right now, and that means Taylor Hearn, a lefty (future) reliever who stands 6-foot-5 and touches the high-90’s in the minors right now. They’ve got Rivero for five more years. They’ve got complete control of Hearns. The Pirates sold, but not really. They made this year’s team slightly worse in going from Melancon from Rivero, but they’ve made future year’s teams better by adding Rivero (and Hearns) for a player who was set to be gone anyway. It’s the perfect kind of retooling move for a small-market team operating within a window of contention.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

And yet, it’s hard not to view this return as relatively light, at least up against what the Yankees just received for Chapman. The Yankees got a top-25 prospect in Gleyber Torres, a fringe-100 prospect in Billy McKinney, a pitcher capable of starting with major league success under his belt in Adam Warren, and then some. Speculation around a Melancon-to-Washington trade invoked names like right-handed starter Erick Fedde, who ranked 61st in Baseball America’s midseason update. The actual return featured a pair of lefty relievers. Exciting lefty relievers, but lefty relievers nonetheless; one of whom has already had his clock started, the other of whom didn’t crack top-10 prospect lists in the Nationals’ system at the start of the season.

Of course, Chapman throws 105 and because of that, is Aroldis Chapman. Melancon isn’t that. But he’s closer than one might think! Like, for instance, since joining the Pirates in 2013, Melancon’s 1.80 ERA is the lowest among all 255 pitchers with at least 200 innings thrown. He’s been better at preventing runs than literally everyone over the last three-plus years. And while he might not do it with the sort of eye-popping stuff to which we’re accustomed from seeing of the game’s top relievers, there’s no arguing with the results:

Most Valuable Relievers, 2013-Present
Name IP K% BB% K-BB% GB% HR/9 ERA FIP WAR RA9-WAR tWAR
Aroldis Chapman 218 44.2% 10.9% 33.3% 37.8% 0.54 2.03 1.81 8.5 8.2 8.4
Dellin Betances 229 40.7% 9.0% 31.7% 48.2% 0.55 1.88 1.89 8.0 8.5 8.3
Kenley Jansen 240 37.8% 5.6% 32.2% 35.2% 0.71 2.13 1.95 8.4 8.1 8.3
Mark Melancon 260 23.8% 4.2% 19.7% 56.8% 0.31 1.80 2.27 6.9 8.7 7.8
Wade Davis 183 32.2% 8.8% 23.4% 45.3% 0.15 1.08 1.97 6.0 9.3 7.7
tWAR: 50/50 split of RA9-WAR and FIP-WAR

Again, the style is a bit different, but when we’ve talked about the Chapman’s and Jansen’s and Davis’ of the world, Melancon’s been right there all along. Here’s another way to view things, if you’re not as keen on using WAR to evaluate relievers:

Win Probability Added, all relievers, 2013-Present

  1. Mark Melancon, +11.74
  2. Tony Watson, +10.63
  3. Zach Britton, +10.55
  4. Wade Davis, +10.42
  5. Dellin Betances, +10.07

By WPA, no reliever’s been more valuable than Melancon during his time in Pittsburgh. By WAR, it’s only Chapman, Betances, and Jansen. You see the second name there on the WPA leaderboard also plays for the Pirates, so it’s not like they’re suddenly hurting for high-leverage relief options, and Watson will still be there next year, too. But the Nationals just added one of the game’s elite to an already great bullpen.

Not that there aren’t flags with Melancon. I’m hesitant to call them red flags, but they’re orange or maroon, maybe. His walk rate is still great, but it’s also the highest it’s been during his Pittsburgh tenure. The curveball’s being spotted less often at the bottom edge of the zone, and is more often winding up in the dirt, and batters are laying off:

Brooksbaseball-Chart

Fewer swings against the curve explains the slight uptick in walks, and it explains the downtick in ground balls — the curve has always been Melancon’s big ground ball pitch. Melancon doesn’t possess top-shelf raw stuff, so he’s thrived by limiting walks and homers. Limiting walks and homers are predicated on elite command, and there’s some evidence that the command could be starting to slip. For now, though, the command still looks great. And those maroon flags can be the next team’s concern, anyway; the Nationals only care about the next three months.

Funny thing about the Nationals bullpen is, before the Melancon trade, they were projected for 1.8 rest-of-season WAR, and after  they’re Melancon trade, they’re projected for… 1.8 rest-of-season WAR. But what they’ve done is shift their leverage, the sort of thing that a WAR projection might struggle to grasp. Melancon is now clearly the best option in Washington’s bullpen, and he’ll receive the most important innings. Less important innings are to follow for Jonathon Papelbon, as should be the case. Shawn Kelley remains elite. It’s the kind of 1-2-3 punch we’ve become accustomed to seeing in the late innings of playoff games.

And while I’ve referred to the cost as a bargain within this post, it’s really only a bargain relative to Chapman. Really, it’s the kind of return we should expect for three-plus months of an elite reliever. The kind of return we might’ve expected, say, a week ago. The Chapman move was just an outlier, for whatever reason. Take that how you will. The Pirates retooled, as they should have. The Nationals improved their high-leverage innings for the stretch run by acquiring one of the game’s best run preventers. It looks like a win for both clubs, and yet somehow it also feels like something of a steal by Washington, based on what we’ve recently seen. Maybe the Pirates could have done better for Melancon. Or maybe the Cubs just gave up a ton for Chapman.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
jdbolickMember since 2016
10 years ago

I agree that this looks like one of those “good for both teams” deals. While the Pirates’ return might be light on upside, it has a strong likelihood of being useful at the major league level.

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

While Torres is nominally a top prospect, everything I’ve read about him says that he’s likely an average defensive shortstop who hits well and has moderate power – a solid regular, but not a star.

There’s a great deal of difference between a top-10 prospect and someone in the 25-30 range, and I feel that the high ranking for Torres has more to do with his relatively low risk profile than the upside. It also doesn’t change the fact that he’s still in High-A.

I don’t think the difference between the return in the two trades is much different than the difference between Chapman and Melancon.

GoldenSpikes
10 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I have to disagree with you JD, I don’t think this is light on upside, it just doesn’t have much floor. Rivero could end up a closer, or continue to be a random middle innings guy if he remains inconsistent. I like Hearn more than anyone, I had him #9 on my Nationals mid season list. He has huge upside, but as much as I like him anytime a kid has a screw in his elbow you have to be very worried about his ability to hold up long term. The upside is there, they could get a big return, or it could all disappear in a hurry.

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  GoldenSpikes

Farnsworth, is that you?

O'KieboomerMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  GoldenSpikes

Rivero is a LOOGY, not a closer. He can’t get righties out.

GoldenSpikes
10 years ago
Reply to  O'Kieboomer

Righties are hitting .182/.238/.306 this season, career.189/.246/.322. He’s also 25, he can still improve, he could easily become a closer if he can become more consistent.

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  O'Kieboomer

Would it have killed you to look up Rivero’s splits before calling him a LOOGY? It’s actually lefties that he has problems getting out this season, and I’m going to bet that he won’t allow .339/.438/.475 to lefties going forward.

Member since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  GoldenSpikes

This year’s ERA aside, the numbers say Rivero is already more than a random middle reliever.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to 

Eh, a hard-throwing lefty in his mid-20s with worse results than his good-not-great peripherals is pretty close to the platonic ideal of a random middle reliever.

LHPSU
10 years ago

A lefty who touches 99 while keeping his BB/9 below 3 certainly has the potential to be more.

Member since 2016
10 years ago

Well, I’m a Pirates fan, so when I see “random middle reliever”, I think of guys like Jared Highes and Arquimedes Caminero, and Rivero is clearly better than they are. Maybe most other teams have bullpens full of guys as good as Rivero, though, I don’t know.

jdbolickMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  GoldenSpikes

Whether or not the Pirates eventually use Rivero in the ninth doesn’t change his actual performance. He’s a good reliever who is unlikely to ever become a dominant one, while there aren’t many who believe that Hearn will be a major league starter. Two relievers, even good ones, lack upside. Two good relievers do have a lot of value to a major league team, though. The only significant upside would be if you believe that Hearn will remain a starting pitcher.

Spa City
10 years ago

“Top Prospect” lists and name recognition aside, I see no reason to assume Torres and McKinney are likely to have better major league careers (combined) than Rivero and Hearn.

GoldenSpikes
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

the reason to assume Torres and McKinney will be better is that they are hitters. Torres should at least be a below average regular, a Starlin Castro kind of player. McKinney is probably an up and down 4th/5th OF type. Rivero is very inconsistent and may never be more than a generic reliever. And while Hearn has a huge arm it has already been injured and could explode at any time.

jorgesca
10 years ago
Reply to  GoldenSpikes

When has Starlin Castro been below average?

Buo
10 years ago
Reply to  jorgesca

He’s been well below average very frequently, in 2013, 2015 and this year specifically. In fact, he’s probably done being above average forever, as he’s no longer a good defender and hasn’t been a sustainably good hitter since 2013, when his K% jumped pretty enormously and he stopped stealing bases.

gnomezMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  jorgesca

He’s averaged 1.7 WAR/150 G over his career, and has put up less than 1 fWAR in three of the last four years. That is by definition below average.

jdbolickMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

Torres is a very good prospect. McKinney is probably nothing, but if everything works out for Torres then he’s a poor man’s Correa while if it doesn’t work out then I agree with GoldenSpikes about him being a below average regular. There’s no guarantee that the Cubs’ haul produces more major league value than the Pirates’ haul, but even disregarding the prospect rankings, surely you would prefer the shortstop with impressive hitting talent over two relievers.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
10 years ago

11 years of control of what seem like above average relief pitchers versus 2 months of an elite but declining pitcher seems like a pretty damn good trade for the Pirates by any measure, including surplus value and War. The real winner is melancon losing the QO threat. Hope baker can figure out how to use his pen in the playoffs.

Matt
10 years ago

Sure it seems light but realistically, the Pirates had no leverage so *anything* of value they get for Melancon is good for them. That they managed to get solid, albeit unspectacular, value for him is just a bonus.

With the qualifying offer rate about to jump to almost $17M, it is guaranteed that Melancon would accept a qualifying offer from the Pirates and the Pirates certainly have no interest in paying a 31 year old reliever nearly $17M. They had to trade him in order to get any value from him and it isn’t like they have a huge drop off from Melancon to Watson/Feliz even if they wanted to make a run at the wild card.

The Yankees actually had leverage, as they knew they held the single most valuable reliever(s) available at the deadline *and* they knew they could fall back on keeping Chapman and offer him a QO which Chapman, and only Chapman, would be in a position to decline giving the Yankees a comp pick.

I think the price paid for each reliever was both fair and in line with the bargaining power each trading team held.

John WickMember since 2018
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt

There are plenty of teams that could have used melancon. That’s all the leverage the Pirates needed.

Matt
10 years ago
Reply to  John Wick

Melancon is a great reliever, plenty of teams *could* use him, but that doesn’t mean they are going to pay an artificially inflated value. Melancon doesn’t tip the scales in the way a Chapman or Miller does, he won’t even be the best reliever in the Nationals bullpen.

Remember, as players like Chapman come off the board, supply/demand shifts from seller to buyer. There is no doubt the Pirates shopped Melancon around and quickly realized that this was his value. The other 29 teams in the league are not going to bid up on the services for a guy they know damn well the selling team has no incentive to keep and all the incentive in the world to trade for anything of value.

swingofthings
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt

No leverage? The Pirates are in contention – it was smart to move Melancon but would have been fine to keep him for the stretch run. That’s leverage; teams had to pry away a valuable piece of a contending team. And Melacon would surely turn down a QO too.

BMac
10 years ago
Reply to  swingofthings

I’m not so sure Melancon would turn down $17 Mil. Except for Chapman, I don’t think clubs are willing to pay that much for a reliever, even a closer.

Astute clubs can pull a veteran off the waiver wire for far less and have quite acceptable outcomes from their closer, like Oh or Madsen, or convert a young starter whose innings you need to control, like Osuna or Matt Barnes, or even washed up starters, like Gomes or Wade Davis.

Dave Robertson is only making $46 mil/ 4 yrs, and seems like a cautionary tale right now, yet that is only $11.5 Mil / yr.

Melancon might take the QO. Who wants to give up 1st rounder for a 31yr old reliever plus $17 Mil?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  BMac

Not to mention Melancon’s track record outside of Pittsburgh, where his home park suppresses HRs and his OF consists of three CFs.

Fair or not, the Nats almost certainly brought it up.

Matt
10 years ago
Reply to  swingofthings

The ~$16.7M Melancon would receive via the QO would be at least twice what he’d receive next year via free agency, plus he still gets to go to free agency the year after.

For reference, Andrew Miller signed a contract for 4 years at $9M/year for his age 30 season. Melancon will be entering his age 32 season. Never mind the fact that Miller is leaps and bounds better than Melancon is, it isn’t even close.

Melancon will likely get something in the range of 3/$25M with some incentives based on games finished this winter. He absolutely, without even a shadow of doubt, would accept the QO the Pirates offered him. He’d make as much in that one year than he would in the first two years of any free agent contract he signed and he could still go to free agency.

With the QO cost going up again this year, there are only a handful of relievers in baseball who have the talent and negotiating power to choose free agency over a QO and all of them but Chapman are already under contract. The Yankees, and the Yankees alone, had the leverage to say “we will keep this guy if you don’t meet our price.”

The Pirates had no such leverage and no incentive to keep Melancon. They don’t even get significantly worse by trading him IF they plan to compete (which I don’t believe they can, as their playoff odds have dipped below 15%). Pirates did well with what they had to work with. It’s a pretty well run club.

johansantana17Member since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt

I generally agree with you but I think you are slightly undervaluing Melancon’s performance. If you read the above article, it would be clear that Melancon has been better at run prevention than Andrew Miller has over the past three seasons.

johansantana17Member since 2026
10 years ago

The Cubs just gave up an insane amount of value for Chapman. This is the normal price for a closer, not what the Cubs gave.