Nationals Settle for Daniel Murphy’s Adequacy

One of the many reasons why it’s challenging to evaluate a front office is that it’s hard to know what to do with intent. All the stuff we actually see is results-based observation. This offseason, the Nationals wanted to sign Darren O’Day, but he went somewhere else for similar money. They wanted to sign Jason Heyward, but he went somewhere else for similar money. They wanted to sign Ben Zobrist, but he went somewhere else for similar money. They couldn’t even finish a deal for Brandon Phillips after Phillips wanted too much to waive his no-trade clause. The Nationals have had several plans, but the big thing they’ve actually done is sign Daniel Murphy, pending a physical. According to reports, it’s to be a three-year contract, worth $37.5 million.

You remember Murphy for his whirlwind October. For sure, it was a hell of a story, tracking the rise and fall of an unexpected superstar. If there was a mistake made, it was linking Murphy’s performance to his upcoming free-agent negotiations. When Murphy was white-hot, I remember reading speculation he could land a five-year contract. When he came undone in the World Series, many wondered how much money Murphy had cost himself. The playoffs were never going to be that important, relative to Murphy’s track record. He’s now signing the contract he was pretty much always going to get.

Murphy turns 31 on the first of April. He’s historically been a solid player, but he’s never been a great one for more than a week or two at a time. He’s a middle infielder with heart but objectively mediocre defense, which is to say, he tries his damnedest, but he doesn’t look smooth. The Mets put a qualifying offer on Murphy, meaning he’ll cost the Nationals a mid-round draft pick, and those get evaluated around $10 – 15 million or so. Put it together and the Nationals are paying Murphy to be worth more or less six wins. And that’s basically how he projects. I know this reads like an oversimplification, because every player is unique and every situation is different, but this is what’s at the very core of the agreement. In terms of just money, the Nationals are probably getting a bit of a deal, compared to other free agents. That’s balanced out by the loss of the draft pick.

The Nationals needed a second baseman, because they like Trea Turner as a shortstop, and Danny Espinosa as supportive utility. The Nationals also wanted a left-handed hitter, which is one of the reasons why Yunel Escobar went away. Murphy checks off the boxes, even if the front office might’ve preferred Phillips. On the one hand, Murphy is happening only after the Phillips deal collapsed; on the other hand, Phillips is a righty, so it’s not like Murphy doesn’t have his advantages. The Nationals were already good enough to make it to the playoffs, and now this should make them a little bit stronger.

Because of the Murphy arc, it’s only natural to want to know what to do with his playoffs. It wouldn’t make good sense to suggest that Murphy just suddenly figured something out and reached a new level. He’s not to be considered one of the best power hitters in baseball. By the same token, it would be stupid to pretend like the playoffs just never happened. Murphy deserves credit for all the good he did, in particular because he homered against the likes of Clayton Kershaw, Jon Lester, Zack Greinke, and Jake Arrieta. I think the right thing to do is to just combine Murphy’s overall 2015 performance into one. Here’s what happens — you see Murphy’s regular-season numbers, then his combined numbers below those.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Daniel Murphy, 2015
2015 Season BA OBP SLG wOBA wRC+
Regular 0.281 0.322 0.449 0.325 110
Combined 0.285 0.329 0.478 0.340 120

It’s a minor boost in average, a minor boost in OBP, and a big boost in power. That shows up as a 10-point leap in wRC+, which is not insubstantial. At 110, Murphy would’ve been tied with Dexter Fowler. At 120, he would’ve been tied with Justin Upton. Murphy gets credit for a .193 isolated power, which would be by far the highest mark of his career. The talk a few months ago was about how Kevin Long got Murphy bringing more of his lower body into his swing. Regardless of whether the changes are easily observable, here are hints in the output.

But it’s not just about the power. See, Murphy has always been hard to strike out, but last year he made a leap. A couple years back, Murphy whiffed once per 7.5 trips to the plate. Last year, he whiffed once per 14.2 trips to the plate, and his strikeout rate was the second-lowest in baseball among regulars and semi-regulars. The only player who struck out at a lower rate than Murphy was Nori Aoki, and Aoki didn’t show Murphy’s pop.

Murphy made an unusual transition: he started making more contact while also pulling the ball more. Typically, those are more inversely related, as you can see with, say, Xander Bogaerts or Matt Carpenter. But while Murphy shaved six percentage points off his strikeout rate, he added seven percentage points to his pull rate. The most similar player in that regard: one Bryce Harper, who did the same thing. Less encouragingly, there were A.J. Pierzynski and Ichiro. In general, it feels like it should be a good thing to be able to hit for more power while also hitting for more contact. It’s just a question of how it’ll sustain.

You can see how Murphy concentrated more on one part of the field. His results by location:

Daniel Murphy, wRC+
Season(s) Pull Center Opposite
2012 – 2014 120 126 136
2015 178 82 64

Instead of being an all-fields hitter, Murphy last year was a pull hitter. These numbers don’t include the playoffs, but the bulk of his playoff damage was done to right and right-center. Murphy’s power has always been to the pull side, but he could at least get hits elsewhere. Last year he lost a few of those singles, and this could just be a consequence of the transition. As the power goes up, the BABIP goes down. It’s not like every indicator can be good.

So here’s where we are: the Nationals are getting a contact hitter, fresh off a career-best contact rate. That’s good. The Nationals are also getting a secondary power hitter, fresh off a career-best power rate. That’s good. Because of the contact, and because of the power, the hitter doesn’t walk too much, and he doesn’t spray the ball around. You can accept that, as long as the power is there. The defense is a weak point, but it’s playable. Maybe you end up in a situation where both Murphy and Ryan Zimmerman need to play first base down the road, but that point isn’t here yet. That’s a future issue, not a contend-in-2016-and-then-see-what-happens issue. Murphy’s defense is mediocre, but it’s not embarrassing.

I don’t think it’s a challenge to see how the Nationals could end up quite pleased with this. If Murphy keeps up his blend of contact and power, he’ll be a helpful player for almost all situations. He could look like a first baseman playing second. On the downside, he could look like a first baseman playing second. And he could lose some ground at the plate, since he’s strong, but not notably so. When you have just enough power, it doesn’t take too much of a slip for those long flies to become outs. Murphy found a good balance in 2015. He helped get the Mets to the World Series. Yet as he ages, he might find the power and contact can’t remain so closely linked.

There are questions, as there are with everyone. The Nationals have their own. It’s not like this was their Plan A. But I think just about every question is offset by a selling point. When that’s the case, I feel like you’re looking at a fair deal. Murphy was never going to get $70 million, and he never cost himself half that money with a lousy final series. Murphy was destined to get this kind of deal. Destiny just didn’t know who would be giving it.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
francis_soyer
10 years ago

Murphy is completely underrated and will be a pleasant surprise for the Nats.

jpgMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

I love it when people make declarative statements like this. Why is he “completely underrated”? Because you said so? The last three years he’s posted a wRC+ between 107-110. He’s post WAR totals between 2.5 and 3.1 in the same time frame. He is what he is, a solidly average to slightly above second baseman.

My Zombie Dust Clone
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

What will the surprise be? At this point in his career, I think it’s pretty clear what type of player he is.

francis_soyer
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

OK. I’ll say he’ll have at least 2 years with a wRC+ above 120, and at least 2 years over a 3 WAR. And one all-star appearance.

Would that qualify as a surprise ?

Jeez.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

No.

wobatusMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Tough crowd. Slightly more than expected.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago

I’ll say this for Rizzo; he doesn’t let desperation push him much if at all. If it did, he would have matched the offers that other teams made to O’Day (the extra year) or Heyward (the higher AAV, two opt outs), or paid Phillips the passage fee out of Cincinnati. He didn’t do it. Nor did he make an offer Zobrist couldn’t refuse. Instead he paid a reasonable rate for a solid, not spectacular ballplayer.

One interesting note that I’m not sure what to make of: where most players hit better at home. Murphy hits better on the road:

Murphy’s H/R OPS:

2015:
H: .707 A: .832
2014:
H: .652 A: .805
2013:
H: .679 A: .785

In 2012 he hit better at home, but in 2011 he was (again) much better on the road; 2012 is the obvious outlier.

hebrewMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

don’t forget that his home had been Citi Field, one of the worst hitters parks in baseball.

Hank G.
10 years ago
Reply to  JCCfromDC

I’ll say this for Rizzo; he doesn’t let desperation push him much if at all. If it did, he would have matched the offers that other teams made to O’Day (the extra year) or Heyward (the higher AAV, two opt outs), or paid Phillips the passage fee out of Cincinnati. He didn’t do it. Nor did he make an offer Zobrist couldn’t refuse.

Another viewpoint is that ownership is cheap. They also made an offer to Bud Black, their first choice for manager, that he considered insultingly low, and wound up with Dusty Baker instead.

They’ve also made it pretty clear that they are not likely to be competitive bidders for Bryce Harper once he reaches free agency.

wildcard09
10 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

When Bud Black and Dusty Baker are your 2 managerial choices, don’t you just lose anyways?

Hank G.
10 years ago
Reply to  wildcard09

That could be, but of the two, I’d prefer Black. Baker is 66 and has already had health problems. He is not noted for being sabermetrically inclined and has the reputation for overworking pitchers. Then again, it’s Strasburg’s last year with the Nats, so what the heck (I’m kidding, of course). .

At best, he is going to be an interim solution, like Davey Johnson, and in a couple or three years they are going to be searching for another manager.

His one saving grace (IMO) is that he has the reputation for promoting harmonious clubhouses, which the Nationals are really going to need, especially if they keep Papelbon.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  wildcard09

You lose more games than you should.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Hank G.

Sigh. The “LERNERZ R CHEEP” mantra just won’t die, no matter how high their payroll goes (despite being the only team in MLB that doesn’t control their own local broadcast rights), how many Werth/Scherzer contracts they write, it’s still “CHEEP!” If the reports are correct, the Nats offered Black, a manager whose next playoff game will be his first, a higher annual salary than most managers are making. How much is he making now?

Dusty Baker’s teams routinely outperform their “pythagorean” record – often by a several games. Fans rail about Baker’s lineups, when analysts who break down the “optimal” lineup simultaneously concede that their impact is minimal. And those same analysts also concede that that there is no. reliable. metric. for truly evaluating managers (Dave Cameron posted eloquently about this when he had a MoY vote last year).

tomjefMember since 2014
10 years ago

Murphy can hit, and field most of the time, but he is a deficit in the field in crucial situations. Hopefully he will make up for his gaffes with his hitting, and he usually does, unless his gaffes are late in the game. I think the Mets will be shooting the ball to him when the game is on the line. Waiting to watch that.

Natsochist
10 years ago
Reply to  tomjef

In this case, that’s where Espinosa becomes so valuable. In a late and close situation, it becomes eminently reasonable to switch out Murphy, move Spinner to second, and plug in Turner at SS (or just straight swap Espinosa, if Turner is already in the game). Espinosa has superior defense just about anywhere, and particularly at the keystone. He also has just enough pop to make pitchers think about all that wind power they’re helping to generate while they strike him out at the plate.

Trotter76Member since 2018
10 years ago
Reply to  Natsochist

Murphy proved himself capable of playing 3B when Wright was hurt last year, and Rendon has played 2B a lot in the majors, so it’s very conceivable that they use that alignment, which would put less pressure on Murph’s glove.

francis_soyer
10 years ago
Reply to  tomjef

“I think the Mets will be shooting the ball to him when the game is on the line.”

Uhh … they can’t even put the ball in play when the game is on the line. The only guy who was basically a lock not to strike out was Murphy.

LongTimeFan
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

Mets still strikeout prone, but have definitely improved defensively and on the basepaths.

That puts more pressure on the opposition.

francis_soyer
10 years ago
Reply to  LongTimeFan

I don’t se how they have improved defensively. Neil Walker and Asdrubal Cabrera are below average defenders, and Cespedes is better than Conforto.

apbadogsMember since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  tomjef

It isn’t slow pitch softball where you can hit the ball anywhere you want…they just can’t “shoot the ball” at Murphy.

GameofRedemption
10 years ago

I find it a bit odd that Murphy was the Plan B to acquiring Brandon Phillips. I understand there’s some advantage to having only 2 years obligated to BP rather than 3 to Murphy, but Murphy certainly has a better chance of breaking out than Phillips does of repeating last year’s performance. Phillips is older and clearly wasn’t very optimistic about playing in DC. Murphy could potentially put up decent power numbers with the Nats, and maybe he learns to play better defense. Seems like a pretty solid move for a team that needed to do something solid. I liked this piece Jeff, and the only thing I disagree with is the statement:

“The Nationals were already good enough to make it to the playoffs, and now this should make them a little bit stronger.”

If the Nationals were good enough to make it to the playoffs, they would have.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
10 years ago

The team, as currently constituted, is rated #4 in MLB in projected WAR. They are certainly good enough, with a reasonable amount of luck, skill and health, to make it to the playoffs. This was also true last year, but obviously they didn’t. Baseball.

francis_soyer
10 years ago

Phillips was a trade, Murphy cost dollars. Perhaps they had budgeted their dollars towards other Free Agents, so it’s not a straight player vs. player comparison.

Careless
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

They make about the same money

francis_soyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Careless

True, if Cincy wasn’t going to eat part of BP’s salary.

Gfuzz
10 years ago

Unmentioned in this article is what Murph did post April. Not about to crunch the #’s, but he definitely hit over .300 and slugged over .500 from May 1 onward.

Steve Perry
10 years ago
Reply to  Gfuzz

~”Not about to crunch the #’s, but he definitely hit over .300 and slugged over .500 from May 1 onward.”~

Daniel Murphy, from May 1 onward in 2015:

.297/.334/.469

francis_soyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Steve Perry

Perhaps he included the offseason ?

Steve Perry
10 years ago
Reply to  francis_soyer

~”Perhaps he included the offseason ?”~

Daniel Murphy, from May 1 onward until 15 minutes ago:

.300/.341/.492

LongTimeFan
10 years ago

Despite the flaws, Murphy’s an asset as player and person on the field and off.

Classy, self-reflective, humble, authentic, passionate, thoughtful, very intelligent, a student of the game, religion and life, fine mentor, family man.

If he avoids his yearly slumps, he’ll be .300 hitter. And as always, clutch hitter, a tough out despite the low OBP.

While I don’t agree with some of his off field views, I still respect him.

As a Mets fan, it’s sad to lose him, the player and person – the package, good and bad – especially knowing how much he yearned to return but front office wanted to move on.

Rooting against him when we play the Nats will be weird, but it’s the way it will be.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  LongTimeFan
apbadogsMember since 2026
10 years ago

@Antonio…not everyone agrees with the gay lifestyle.

majnun
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

Some people are bigots

aprahl7
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

You understand how ignorant this sounds, right?

I have blue eyes – do you disagree with them? I’m married with 3 kids – do you disagree with that?

Hank G.
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

What the hell is the gay lifestyle?

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

Some people are Christians who cannot accept “the gay lifestyle.” (I’m not one of them, btw.)

Show a little respect for the religious beliefs of others. Diversity means the acceptance of opposing viewpoints as legitimate ones. You practice your lifestyle without their approval and they can practice theirs without yours. Not everyone has to approve of your lifestyle, just like some intolerant people disapprove of good Christians practicing their religion and slander them as “bigots.”

Shirtless Johan Santa
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

What Johnston just said. Not every Christian is a Westboro Baptist type hater. From the evidence of his comments about and discussions with Billy Bean, I don’t see Murphy as a hateful bigot.

Dave from DCMember since 2018
10 years ago
Reply to  apbadogs

@Johnston:

That’s a frequently repeated argument–“Show a little respect for the religious beliefs of others. Diversity means the acceptance of opposing viewpoints as legitimate ones.”–implying, I take it, that to condemn people for intolerance stemming from their religious beliefs is hypocritical. The problem is that argument is utter rubbish. I don’t condemn all religious people, only those who use religion to justify bigotry, whereas people who don’t “believe in the gay lifestyle” are condemning all gay people. That’s an important distinction–why am I under any obligation to respect the views of people who categorically dismiss, if not outright discriminate against, certain groups? Why should I extend them greater understanding than they extend to others? It’s nonsensical. Recall that at one point in time all sorts of things were considered defensible political or social positions and opinions–slavery, the disenfranchisement of women, minorities or immigrants, etc. I don’t have to respect any view that I see in that tradition, and homophobia certainly qualifies. And that’s without even touching the question of whether one gets to ‘choose’ his or her sexual orientation, which I won’t pursue because it gets people riled up.

wildcard09
10 years ago
Reply to  LongTimeFan

Are you Daniel Murphy’s dad or something?

NATS FanMember since 2018
10 years ago

I do not get the love for this deal. Murphy is 30 years old so he has little to no upside granted he may not decline. Espinosa is 28 so he has some potential upside left. Murphy entered the league at the age of 23 and through the age of 27 he has been worth 8.8 fWAR for his career. Espinosa has been worth 9.1 fWAR over those exact same ages. Last season, Murphy was worth 2.5 fWAR over 130 games. Whereas, Espinosa was worth 2.3 fWAR in only 118 games. Espinosa’s best season he was worth 3.5 fWar in 160 games. Whereas Murphy’s best has only been 3.1 FWAR in 161 games. In every sense, Espinosa has been a bit better all round player over his career than Murphy was over the same time period. Murphy is older and much more likely to regress or not improve and makes much more money than Espinosa. Why the love? If I were the Rays or As I would be calling the NATS to see if I could get the super cheap and still young asset called Espinosa! This trade did little to improve the team overall.