Nelson Cruz Wasn’t Out by a Mile

The Dominican Republic hadn’t lost a game in the World Baseball Classic since 2009. They’ve been a juggernaut, an unstoppable force barreling through immovable objects. That ended last night when Puerto Rico beat them 3-1 in a game that was much wilder than its score would indicate. One of the more dazzling plays was Javier Baez putting a no-look tag on Nelson Cruz on an ill-advised steal attempt.

When we say ill-advised, we really mean it. For one, Yadier Molina was behind the plate, and Yadi has been of the best in the business at throwing out baserunners. Cruz can only really be called a baserunner because of the fact that he does, in fact, technically run between the bases, even if “lumbering” may be a better verb for this scenario. Cruz is a large, 36-year-old adult human being. He hasn’t recorded a positive baserunning figure since 2010. Whatever speed he once possessed (24 steals in Triple-A in 2008!) is almost entirely gone.

There’s also the factor of Baez, who has revealed to the surprise of many that tagging is a real skill. So, yeah, we’re not sure why Cruz was running here, especially with two outs and an 0-0 count on Adrian Beltre. But run he did, and well, this happened.

Baez didn’t even look at Cruz. He was pointing to Molina and grinning like a kid on Christmas before he even caught the ball. You silly, silly man, he’s probably thinking to himself. Thanks for the free out. Cruz is out by a mile, and Peurto Rico gallops off to the dugout. Goddamn, Javy Baez. Goddamn, Yadi. Jeez, Nelson Cruz.

But hold on a second, here. Slow-motion video affords us the chance to take a closer look at plays like this. It also affords us the chance to make complete and utter fools of ourselves, as I may be about to do here. But I’ve been writing here long enough for all of you to get used to that by now, so hang with me here for a second. Let’s roll the film again.

Molina’s throw beats Cruz to Baez. The ball is in Javy’s glove right as Cruz is starting to slide. Nine times out of ten that’s game over, man. But was it? It initially looked like Baez got the tag down on Cruz’s knee, and Cruz was dead on arrival at second base.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

This isn’t an episode of CSI, so I can’t tell the lab tech to enhance the video and clean up the pixels. I can, however, tell you that the umpire was on the shortstop side of second base, and that his view of Baez’s glove was obstructed by Cruz’s legs and tookus. And here’s a warning, because this is about to turn into a bad knock-off episode of CSI.

The law of inertia tells us that an object will remain at rest or on its current trajectory unless acted upon by an outside force. An outside force could be the wind, gravity, or a sliding Nelson Cruz. Baez’s arm shoots straight down as soon as he receives the ball, and hangs there for Cruz to run into. It’s absolutely possible that he grazed Cruz’s knee, and that this is all a lot of hot air. I look forward to you telling me I’m wrong in the comments, because I’m almost definitely wrong. Playing umpire from home is a bad idea.

Where were we? Not Australia, but inertia. Baez’s arm remains in the position he put it in until Cruz slides into it. If we watch the slow motion angles of the video, we see that his arm doesn’t start recoiling until it comes into contact with the area around Cruz’s belt, and not with his knee. Now, because Baez is a very strong man, it’s possible that his arm wouldn’t react much to his glove being grazed by Cruz’s knee, and would only move perceptibly when that same glove made contact with Cruz’s torso. But look at where Cruz’s foot is when Baez’s arm starts to recoil.

He’s on second base. Is Baez pulling his arm back himself, and not letting it be pushed back initially by the force of Cruz colliding with his glove? I don’t know. We’d have to ask Baez that, and I wasn’t in San Diego last night. I can’t stress enough that this is all probably wrong, and that I’m probably making a fool of myself. I’m not a trained replay official in the umpire’s room at MLBAM headquarters. This is one of those plays that could wind up as inconclusive, and the play would stand.

Every time I watch this replay, though, I’m more and more convinced that Cruz really might be safe. I’m being influenced by my own biases. If you could see me right now, you’d probably notice a faint resemblance to the crazed mad scientist from a bad movie version of Frankenstein. But man, Javy Baez made this a lot closer than it had to be. This isn’t to criticize Baez for being jubilant and celebrating. Baseball is better when players showboat and make the game entertaining. The unwritten rules largely stink. Baez’s showboating may have given Cruz a stolen base, though. Thankfully for Baez, the umpire didn’t see it that way.

There’s no way of knowing for sure whether Cruz was safe. More likely than not, he was out. But this play really wasn’t the one-sided slaughter it appeared to be, and Cruz really might have been safe.

But I’m also probably wrong.





Nick is a columnist at FanGraphs, and has written previously for Baseball Prospectus and Beyond the Box Score. Yes, he hates your favorite team, just like Joe Buck. You can follow him on Twitter at @StelliniTweets, and can contact him at stellinin1 at gmail.

86 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
dtpollittMember since 2016
9 years ago

Javier Baez loves playing baseball and I love watching him love playing baseball.

Vic Romano
9 years ago
Reply to  dtpollitt

I’m not a religious man….but Amen to that.

Daniel KingMember since 2016
9 years ago

I’m all for celebrating, but you should make sure you get the out before celebrating! Otherwise it’s like dropping the football on the one yard line.

Dewey24
9 years ago
Reply to  Daniel King

Gotta agree here. Youthful exuberance is great, but the beauty of the game is in excellent execution. The exuberance would have been embarrassing if he’d blown the tag (which he maybe almost did) and wasted Molina’s awesome throw. Respect the game.

Brians Sticky Sock
9 years ago
Reply to  Dewey24

I get what you’re saying, but that exuberance is also why he makes some of the amazing plays that he does. The Cubs want him to execute as well as he can, but are trying to make sure they don’t coach the joy out of his game. (this has been a topic of discussion in Chicago… Theo, Maddon, etc have talked about it)

Dewey24
9 years ago

Absolutely agreed. That is a good phrase, “don’t coach the joy out of his game” and it is a fine line for a coach to walk. Maddon has also said he wants the kid to “make the routine plays routinely” without emphasizing the flash.

res
9 years ago
Reply to  Daniel King

Thanks for your 2 cents Goose.

Jordioteque
9 years ago

This post is inane. Find something marginally important to write about.

Pizzabox
9 years ago
Reply to  Jordioteque

Yeah! It really sucks that we are forced to read this free content that the writers of Fangraphs pump out day after day all year round about every aspect of the game we all love. I hate reading about baseball too!

Alice Cooper
9 years ago
Reply to  Pizzabox

“Free content”

Someone is paying for it. Advertisers likely. Don’t act like these guys sit at home and do this out of the goodness of their hearts. My traffic to the website pays their bills.

Joeys Bat FlipMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

How generous of you to do them the favour of reading their content so that someone else will pay them to advertise on their site. Jordioteque is complaining, even though to him this isn’t something he pays for. It may not be something that the FG writers put out without compensation, but (a) I suspect that no one is getting rich behind this website, and (b) it is nevertheless content that readers enjoy at no cost, or for free.

Stevil
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

That wasn’t very Alice Cooper-esque. Gotta have humor.

10Q
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

Haha! No don’t you know that every writer here is a starving artist? They sacrificed their potential earnings to provide free content on the web. My mom did something similar! She could’ve made lots of money, but instead she chose to be a school teacher, and provide “free education” even to those who didn’t have the income base to pay in taxes for those educational services! Argh. She was miserable!!!

Oh wait. She’s actually really happy. My bad…

Pizzabox
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

No, someone is profiting off of it, but no one is required to pay to read this content, nor are you affording yourself an opportunity cost to read this article.

Arjon
9 years ago
Reply to  Jordioteque

This reply isn’t inane and says something at least marginally important?

CheeseballMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Jordioteque

Because.. Fangraphs is the last place you’d go if you wanted to read someone’s fun thoughts on a super fun baseball play?

strosfanMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Jordioteque

Hey I pay for my membership and I really liked this article. Entertaining and informative. While watching I was sure he was out! But maybe….

JUICEMANE
9 years ago
Reply to  strosfan

anyone who paid for a “membership” is a sucker haha

this site isn’t members only! LOLOLOL

alpha309
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

paying for something does not make someone a sucker. It makes you honest

By not paying for content, you are asking people to work for you for free. Would you ask your mechanic to fix your car for free, or a plumber to repair your sink for free? No you wouldn’t because it isn’t fair. Yet, we want to be entertained for free, how is that fair?

And for full honesty, I am not a paying member here. I don’t use ad blocks, and am happy with the ads paying for my portion of the income this site needs to pay the employees it has. In fact, I think there are too few ads here most of the time. As long as they are not the ones that automatically make noise, or the ones that automatically make the screen center on it, I am happy to have them on the site.

The FoilsMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  alpha309

Eh, not sure it’s an honesty issue. I like this site and have disposable income, so I pay. It’s not really a moral stance. I just tend to regard the tragedy of the commons as more of a dark comedy, and conduct my affairs accordingly.

JUICEMANE
9 years ago
Reply to  alpha309

says the guy who isn’t a member! you can’t make this stuff up. he tried to play the “holier-than-thou” card! LOLOLOL OMG my stomach hurts.

alpha309
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

I am not playing the “holier-than-thou” card. I am stating facts. I expect nothing free. In fact working in entertainment I actually understand how this site is able to stay open through ads, though I don’t know the exact internet model, as I deal with television. I gladly watch ads and click through on some of them, so the site can collect money. If Fangraphs were implement a strict membership policy with paid content and free content, I wouldn’t complain, nor call people who chose to pay for the paid portion.

In the end, you can’t expect anything for free, which I am doing my part to generate revenue for this site with ad views, as well as clicks to make sure that some of my time at least goes to try to get these hard working people paid.

I am even arguing for the fact that since no money is directly coming out of my pocket, Fangraphs should be making the experience MORE inconvenient for me to utilize. I know that is probably against what most people would want, but it is only fair to the site.

JUICEMANE
9 years ago
Reply to  alpha309

ok good point…seriously I mean that…on a lighter note: I am doing my part by pissing people off so they create fake accounts to give me extra down votes.

GO FANGRAPHS!

Psychic... Powerless...
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

Google “Delusions of grandeur”

JUICEMANE
9 years ago

Only if you Google “on a lighter note” first!

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  alpha309

Alpha the problem here is that you are not paying for content, you are paying to remove ads, something that can be done for free. I have said many times that I have no issue with FG becoming a pay for content site, but I’m not giving them a dime for nothing essentially.

10Q
9 years ago
Reply to  alpha309

As a non-paying member, I totally agree that people who pay for memberships here are honest and I encourage such honesty!

Paul G.Member since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

Being a member helps keep this site going. I would like to keep this site going. The membership fee very affordable for me. It made it a very easy decision.

strosfanMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

I can’t handle the ads. It is money well spent, just in time loading pages.

Mark Davidson
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

I hope this is a bad joke. How much value do these writers bring to your life? Def 25 bucks a year or whatever we’re paying for the membership. These people all have lives and bills and pour themselves into this.
If you want to not pay, that’s fine; that’s an option, after all.
But don’t be an ass.

JUICEMANE
9 years ago
Reply to  Mark Davidson

“and pour themselves into this” LOLOLOL

Half of these guys work from home and are obese.

they pour themselves into sweat pants…LOLOLOL

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  JUICEMANE

This needs more down votes

10Q
9 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Obliged. Downvoted you.

JUICEMANE
9 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Fake accounts awaiting…

GO FANGRAPHS!

Maggie25
9 years ago
Reply to  Jordioteque

Nice to see someone enforcing the unwritten rules of baseball writing. No fun. Ask yourself, would Murray Chass write about this? Be professional. Come on.

CheeseballMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Maggie25

Don’t feed the trolls.

CheeseballMember since 2016
9 years ago

Great article! It’s possible reckless base-running is the only thing more fun to watch than jubilance. Nelson Cruz and Javy Baez are both heroes!

But it looks to me like Baez gets him on the knee with the outside of the glove. Even if he misses there, I think the glove gets him in the groin before that foot touches the base. The arm doesn’t start to move until after contact, and it looks to me like the arm moves just before Cruz reaches base.

jwr235
9 years ago
Reply to  Cheeseball

I agree with you. If you zoom in on the last gif, I’m pretty sure you can see the pants on Cruz move when Baez brings the glove down. The color of the pants definitely change, whether that’s movement or a shadow I can’t decipher, but I agree also that if Baez missed there then he definitely got him in the groin before Cruz got to the bag.

Great article though, a lot of valid points.

Spudchukar
9 years ago
Reply to  Cheeseball

That’s the way I see it too!

bdon91Member since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  Cheeseball

I see it the same way. Cruz is out, but Baez made it very close because he didn’t look to see where he was tagging. If Cruz had any sliding avoidance talent (adjustment in sliding when you know you’ve been beaten) he probably could have avoided this tag, especially because Baez wasn’t watching where he tagged. I like Baez’s enthusiasm, I hate the fact that Baez can’t just do the job without feeling like he has to celebrate before the job is done.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
9 years ago

It’s not totally clear when Cruz touches the base. I honestly think he’s not quite there when he starts to pop up, but he gets there at some point before the end of the GIF. I also think that Baez probably grazes him on the leg at some point. I’d really think that if he were looking at Cruz instead of Molina.

Also, there is a bit of showmanship in this that might work to Baez’ favor. The thing in baseball it is closest to in my opinion is the first baseman coming off first to catch the ball, but then acting like he’s just stretching out and not trying to re-engage the bag. Trying to get back on the bag is admitting you were off the bag.

Going to other sports, I’m amazed sometimes when I see a defensive back in football totally and obviously interfere on a pass, and then jump up and do the “incomplete pass” sign emphatically and then of course get hit with a penalty anyway.

MetsoxMember since 2016
9 years ago

He was out by a mile…

res
9 years ago
Reply to  Metsox

Yep not even close. Pure click bait.

maumanntsMember since 2022
9 years ago

If it ever gets to the point where someone in a video booth has to use one frame to justify overturning a call that’s 100-times-out-of-100-chances correct, baseball is screwed.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  maumannts

You missed the playoffs last year, eh? Spoiler alert – the Cubs won!

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

This was actually my best comment of all time. Unfortunate to see that it got lost in the shuffle.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  maumannts

We are already there with the microsecond loss of contact with 2B reviews.

Pirates HurdlesMember since 2020
9 years ago

What is more annoying is that the FG personalities won’t even reply to questions regarding pay for content models.

Joe Joe
9 years ago

Sure looks like tip of glove starts to bend just as passing knee as well as pants momentarily fluttering as if hit (pants thing could just be video on phone though). Not conclusive, but much more likely a tag on knee than not.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago

Very happy to see this article! I immediately thought he missed the tag in the live broadcast.

Absolutely hilarious to hear the broadcast crew talk about how great of a job he did, when in reality it was a sloppy tag at best. Perhaps showboating isn’t a marker of great skill. The rest of the league just simply makes the tag. It was not a close play but he made it into one.

res
9 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

“Get off my lawn, that’s not how they did it in my day”.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  res

Excellent point! Please enlighten me with your insightful analysis. I am looking forward to learning about how much the game has changed, because I clearly don’t understand how “tagging a runner” works. It is all so new and hard to understand, I am not sure if I am even saying it right. In my day it was all so different…

One day you will realize how foolish it is to mock experience and knowledge, but until that day continue to do so!

Oleg
9 years ago

Love how the announcers were all about Baez flair. Of course, if he’d missed the tag or something, it would have been criticism of latin flair.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Oleg

Not sure about the “latin” criticism part. Baez is a showboat, I think it would have been about that.

Rob
9 years ago

If only this were an episode of CSI: San Diego; the vehicle that’s parked conveniently on the opposite side of 2nd base and Cruz would show a reflection in the paint of the tag. We can tell the lab tech to enhance the video and clean up the pixels. I think our answer would be very clear. Do not laugh, this is how CSI solves crimes (actually seen in an episode!?).

johnsnot20
9 years ago

throw beat him, he’s out.

DDMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  johnsnot20

#tagsmatter

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  johnsnot20

As much as I am on here criticizing Baez, I agree with this. It was a poor decision by Cruz. This is a lot of chatter and analysis of bad baseball. The only guy who did a great job was Molina who is not getting much mention.

Johnston
9 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

That is only because we all know that Molina is a great catcher.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

We all know that Baez is a great tagger… so that logic doesn’t really hold up.

misterjohnnyMember since 2016
9 years ago

why doesn’t the hitter swing to protect the runner? Molina got a great throw off because he basically jumped the pitch. If the batter swings, Cruz is safe or you get Catcher’s Interference.

ceddy
9 years ago
Reply to  misterjohnny

I wouldn’t be surprised if Cruz decided to steal that bag on his own without a steal sign given to him. Pretty hard to decide you’re gonna try a hit and run with 2 outs on a 0-0 count in a second or two.

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  misterjohnny

Because it was not a hit and run.

MDMember since 2017
9 years ago

This was my first thought last night. The announcers were saying “Wow! Look how good he is that he doesn’t even have to look at the tag!” And I’m thinking “Wow! What a bone headed miscue to not look at the tag and assume the out. I think Cruz might have gotten in under it.”

RonnieDobbs
9 years ago
Reply to  MD

Imagine how much he would have missed the tag by if he slid to the inside of the bag! Something head-first would have left Baez looking like a real fool.

TheGoodDoctor81
9 years ago

You spelled Puerto Rico wrong in the fourth graf.

SnerdMember since 2020
9 years ago

says the guy that can’t even spell “graph” right, despite the fact that exact word is plastered all over this site

TheGoodDoctor81
9 years ago
Reply to  Snerd

https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-a-graf-2316031

Next time don’t be a snarky d-ckhead.

SnerdMember since 2020
9 years ago

Fair play, never heard “paragraph” shortened to that. I’ll admit to snark biting me in the ass on this one.

10Q
9 years ago
Reply to  Snerd

Attack with snark and steel, defend with paper and pacifism. Passive-aggressive much?

Brandon WarneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Cruz ran because he wasn’t being held on. They baited him.

That really has to be a ding to your pride, being still hosed when they aren’t holding you on.

But it worked.

Chill
9 years ago

Baez is fun to watch! Molina too!
Fun article and comments section to read!
The only bonehead involved was Nellie. Running with two outs in the 8th, down two runs with Beltre at bat?!? Replay Schmeplay. Cruz was out the minute he broke for second! Respect the game!

Alice Cooper
9 years ago

“Baseball is better when players showboat and make the game entertaining”

Respectfully disagree. No problem with a guy celebrating a bit, but full blown showboating? Leave it for the clubhouse. It comes down to respecting your opponent, being humble. Once it crosses that line, I’ve had enough of it. Not to say what Baez did was bad. It wasn’t. Just speaking in general.

res
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

Let me guess, you’re a mortician.

Johnston
9 years ago
Reply to  Alice Cooper

Could not agree more. Keep the showboating off the diamond.

Wu-Bacca
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

If you enjoy baseball without showboating, then that’s certainly your taste and I can’t argue with it. But I have a very hard time wrapping my head around this line of thinking. Baseball is entertainment. Showboating is entertaining. Even excessive showboating (like when, say, someone flips his bat on a warning-track flyout) can be fun b/c it gives you something to root AGAINST. I say more showboating, more expressiveness, more exuberance. Otherwise baseball seems very mechanical and dour. That’s not to say I don’t also admire guys who “keep their heads down” and “respect the game” – the Cal Ripken approach – but dear god if I had to watch a whole ballfield of Cal Ripkens I think I’d shoot myself.

Jetsy Extrano
9 years ago

Watch his elbow. Looks to me like it moves away (toward RF) first, then towards 2B. I think that’s contact with the outer side of the leg, and then contact with torso.

bgunckel
9 years ago

I have no idea if Baez catches the knee or not, but you can definitely see (on a 27″ monitor anyway) that the tag catches Cruz’s right foot before he gets to the base. Whether he’s out by a mile or not, he certainly is out. I do like the hot-dog tag here, but only in this annual event. In the big leagues Baez had better be paying attention; in which case Cruz would have been out by a mile.

toosanetek
9 years ago

There sure was resitance when Baez tagged Cruz on his left knee before reaching the base. Good post though.

WerthlessMember since 2020
9 years ago

Javier Baez = DeSean Jackson

Spudchukar
9 years ago

Please share whatever you are smoking!

res
9 years ago

Leave it to fangraphs to try and ruin a completely joyous play, with over analysis.

John Autin
9 years ago

What’s entertaining is a matter of personal taste. I do find Baez’s general joyous tone quite entertaining and welcome. But I don’t enjoy this play. Any kind of showboating that risks losing an easy out is selfish and stupid. Cheer that if you want, but when showboating blows a big game for your team, remember that you helped it happen.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

No Mets fan can forget the cost of stupid showboating: Game 1 of the 2000 World Series, Timo Perez on first base with two out, prematurely celebrating what he thought was a homer by Todd Zeile, instead of running hard right away. The ball hit the top of the wall and stayed in play, Jeter’s relay nailed Perez at home, and the Mets lost in extra innings. It’s all fun & games, until someone blows a WS win.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
9 years ago

Thank you for the Bill Paxton reference.