NERD Game Scores for September 11, 2016

Devised originally in response to a challenge issued by sabermetric nobleman Rob Neyer, and expanded at the request of nobody, NERD scores represent an attempt to summarize in one number (and on a scale of 0-10) the likely aesthetic appeal or watchability, for the learned fan, of a player or team or game. Read more about the components of and formulae for NERD scores here.

***

Most Highly Rated Game
Boston at Toronto | 13:07 ET
Buchholz (117.1 IP, 122 xFIP-) vs. Sanchez (169.1 IP, 85 xFIP-)
The implications of this game, like the two before it in the series, are clear: a victory improves the winner’s probability of claiming the division by a not insubstantial amount. How not insubstantial? Regard the following table. It documents Boston and Toronto’s odds of winning the division (Div%) before the beginning of the series, after the Red Sox’ game-one victory, and after the Blue Jays’ win last night.

Playoff Implications, Red Sox and Blue Jays
Event BOS Div% TOR Div% Change for BOS Change for TOR
Before Series 56.3% 32.5%
BOS Wins Game 1 67.4% 23.8% +11.1% -8.7%
TOR Wins Game 2 57.2% 31.6% -10.2% +7.8%

The figures in the two rightmost columns document the change in probability for each club following the relevant event. Because the two clubs are differently situated with regard to wild-card qualification (or complete absence from the postseason altogether), the differences in their divisional probabilities haven’t been entirely reciprocal. Regardless, each game has been worth approximately 10 points. This remains the case for tonight, as well, naturally.

Readers’ Preferred Broadcast: Toronto Radio.

Two Other Brief Notes
Today’s Free Game
Today’s free game features New York NL at Atlanta, starts at 13:35 ET, and can be accessed by means of this hyperlinked text.

On NERD’s Playoff Adjustment, the Cubs, and the Rangers
As the season wears on, the algorithm for game NERD scores weights team scores progressively more heavily and pitcher scores less heavily — to account for the greater influence of a team’s posteason chances on the watchability of their games. Also as the season progresses, the algorithm for those team NERD scores weights various performance factors (weighted batting, adjusted home-run rate) less heavily and playoff odds more heavily.

The idea of the postseason adjustment is to assess higher NERD scores to clubs which feature less certainty regarding the postseason. To accomplish this, the author begins with the divisional odds and wild-card odds and finds the absolute value of each number minus 0.5 (or, 50%). I then add the results together divide by two. Then I subtract the result of that figure from 0.5 and multiply the resulting number by 20. Finally, I normalize all the scores to create a league average of 5.0.

Here’s all of that using the Chicago Cubs as an example. The Cubs have divisional and wild-card odds of 100.0% and 0.0%, respectively, using the site’s “coin flip” methodology (which seems to best represent how the human mind conceives of postseason odds).

  • [ |1.000 – 0.5| + |0.000 – 0.5| ] / 2 = 0.500
  • (0.5 – 0.500) * 20 = 0.0

That 0.0 number is the postseason adjustment just before it’s normalized to create a league average of 5.0. The raw league average right now is 1.60. So, to find the Cubs’ score we subtract that figure from 5.0 and add the difference to the Cubs’ raw score.

So:

  • 0.0 + (5.0 – 1.60) = 3.4

That 3.4 represents Chicago’s current playoff adjustment — a figure to which the team’s NERD score will gravitate continuously as the season continues. It’s also the lowest possible score a club can receive at the moment, one shared mostly by very poor clubs that have been effectively (or literally) eliminated from postseason contention. Because, like those clubs, the Cubs aren’t playing games of any great consequence at the moment. Playing in a division where it appears as though 86 wins would be sufficient to claim that division, the Cubs have already recorded 90 wins. Which, that means they could lose every game for the rest of the season and still probably win the Central. A similar principle applies to the Texas Rangers, as well: they’ve already won 85 games, while second-place Houston is projected for just 86 wins.

Complete Schedule
Here’s the complete and very sortable table for all of today’s games. Pitching probables and game times aggregated from MLB.com and also the rest of the internet. Note that calculations both for team and game NERD scores feature adjustment for postseason odds that increases as season progresses. Read more about those adjustments here and here.

NERD Scores for September 11, 2016
Away SP TM GM TM SP Home Time
Matt Andriese TB 7 4 6 7 8 NYA Luis Cessa 13:05
Clay Buchholz BOS 2 10 8 10 8 TOR Aaron Sanchez 13:07
Chris Tillman BAL 3 8 6 6 7 DET Justin Verlander 13:10
Kenta Maeda LAN 6 6 5 4 5 MIA Jose Urena 13:10
Brandon Finnegan CIN 3 4 4 4 2 PIT Ryan Vogelsong 13:35
Seth Lugo NYN 4 8 5 3 4 ATL Williams Perez 13:35
Adam Morgan PHI 6 3 4 4 6 WAS Gio Gonzalez 13:35
Corey Kluber CLE 8 5 5 4 5 MIN Jose Berrios 14:10
Ian Kennedy KC 4 4 4 3 8 CHA Chris Sale 14:10
Zach Davies MIL 6 4 6 7 10 STL Luke Weaver 14:15
Colby Lewis TEX 4 4 3 3 1 LAA Jered Weaver 15:35
James Paxton SEA 10 4 5 3 6 OAK Raul Alcantara* 16:05
Matt Moore SF 4 8 6 4 6 AZ Zack Greinke 16:10
Chad Bettis COL 5 4 4 4 1 SD Edwin Jackson 16:40
Jake Arrieta CHN 6 4 5 5 4 HOU Mike Fiers 20:05
SP denotes pitcher NERD score.
TM denotes team score.
GM denotes overall game score.
Highlighted portion denotes game of the day.

* = Fewer than 10 IP, NERD at discretion of clueless author.





Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Kasińskimember
7 years ago

The Blue Jays won yesterday in the day, not last night (not that it changes the point of the article).