Now Available: Full 2013 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheet

by
February 19, 2013

Note: if Google spreadsheet below isn’t working, click here for one the author has uploaded himself after having modified only slightly from Szymborski’s original.

With the release last Thursday of the ZiPS projections for the Cleveland Indians, now all 30 major-league teams have been caressed tenderly by proprietor Dan Szymborski’s math computer.

While we wait — as if sitting atop some combination of pins and needles — for ZiPS to be added to the projection leaderboard area here at the site, Szymborski has released a spreadsheet including all the ZiPS projections for 2013.

Click this hyperlinked text to visit the full spreadsheet for the 2013 ZiPS projections.

In the meantime, some observations:

• Highest Projected WAR (Field Players): Mike Trout, 8.0

• Most Defensive Runs Saved: Craig Gentry, +15

• Highest Projected WAR (Pitchers): Justin Verlander, 6.4

• Lowest ERA: Craig Kimbrel, 1.57

• Yankees Prospect Corban Joseph: 579 PA, .242/.313/.389, 87 OPS+, 1.0 WAR





 

Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ben
11 years ago

Why are they not on the leaderboards yet?

-35
JLeddy
11 years ago
Reply to  Ben

A “thanks” would have been probably the more socially acceptable response.

34
David
11 years ago
Reply to  JLeddy

Thanks! This would be even more awesome if it were in the leaderboards section instead of blowing out the bandwidth limit imposed by Google Docs 😉

2
Ben
11 years ago
Reply to  JLeddy

Mate, this isn’t the rotary club. It was a simple question. Love having the Fangraphs Comment Police around though.

-25
philosofoolmember
11 years ago
Reply to  Ben

Right, it isn’t the rotary club, it’s just a bunch of people who provide stuff that you really want FOR FREE. The least you can do is be polite.

8
Train
11 years ago
Reply to  Ben

That was s simple question? You were really just interested in the reason behind the fact that they are not yet on the leaderboards? Apologies then, to me it seemed to be snide commentary.

1
Ben
11 years ago
Reply to  Ben

It was literally a question with no ulterior meaning! I was asking what the process happening right now is. I was not at all trying to say that Fangraphs had somehow shirked a responsibility to me or anyone else.

0