Oakland Athletics Top 32 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Oakland Athletics. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the fourth year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but we use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mason Miller | 25.7 | MLB | SIRP | 2024 | 50 |
| 2 | Jacob Wilson | 22.1 | AA | SS | 2026 | 50 |
| 3 | Luis Morales | 21.6 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 50 |
| 4 | Joe Boyle | 24.7 | MLB | SIRP | 2024 | 45 |
| 5 | Royber Salinas | 23.1 | AA | SP | 2024 | 45 |
| 6 | Steven Echavarria | 18.8 | A | SP | 2028 | 45 |
| 7 | Darell Hernaiz | 22.8 | MLB | SS | 2024 | 40+ |
| 8 | Max Muncy | 21.7 | AAA | SS | 2025 | 40+ |
| 9 | Grant Holman | 23.9 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 40+ |
| 10 | Denzel Clarke | 24.0 | AA | CF | 2025 | 40+ |
| 11 | Carlos Pacheco | 19.5 | R | CF | 2028 | 40+ |
| 12 | Mitch Spence | 26.0 | MLB | MIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 13 | Brady Basso | 26.6 | AA | SP | 2025 | 40 |
| 14 | Joey Estes | 22.6 | MLB | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 15 | J.T. Ginn | 25.0 | AA | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 16 | Freddy Tarnok | 25.5 | MLB | MIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 17 | Daniel Susac | 23.0 | AA | C | 2027 | 40 |
| 18 | Ryan Lasko | 21.9 | A | CF | 2026 | 40 |
| 19 | Jose Ramos | 17.6 | R | CF | 2030 | 40 |
| 20 | Cole Miller | 19.0 | R | SP | 2028 | 40 |
| 21 | Myles Naylor | 19.1 | A | 3B | 2028 | 40 |
| 22 | Brett Harris | 25.9 | MLB | 3B | 2024 | 40 |
| 23 | Edgar Montero | 17.5 | R | 3B | 2030 | 40 |
| 24 | Alex Speas | 26.2 | MLB | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 25 | Richard Fernandez | 21.6 | R | SIRP | 2027 | 40 |
| 26 | Stevie Emanuels | 25.3 | AAA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 27 | Kyle McCann | 26.4 | MLB | 1B | 2024 | 35+ |
| 28 | Will Simpson | 22.7 | A+ | 1B | 2027 | 35+ |
| 29 | Erick Matos | 17.3 | R | SP | 2030 | 35+ |
| 30 | Ryan Cusick | 24.5 | AAA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 31 | Jackson Finley | 23.6 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 32 | Will Johnston | 23.4 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Enormous Pitchers
Pedro Santos, RHP
Eduardo Rivera, LHP
Franck De La Rosa, RHP
Yunior Tur, RHP
Santos, 24, is a 6-foot-4 Cuban righty who sits 95-98 but struggles to find the zone. He’s closing at Midland right now. Rivera, 20, is a 6-foot-7 Puerto Rican lefty with average arm strength but a shot to develop three good pitches. De La Rosa, 23, is a 6-foot-8 Dominican righty who sits 95-97 and is off to a better strike-throwing start than at any other time in his career, albeit at Low-A. Tur, 24, is a 6-foot-6 Cuban righty whose low-90s fastball routinely has 20 inches of induced vertical break; the rest of his repertoire is suspect.
Other Hard Throwers
Shohei Tomioka, RHP
Danis Correa, RHP
Jack Perkins, RHP
Jacob Watters, RHP
Felix Castro, RHP
Tomioka, 28, played ball at Toyo University and then in the Industrial League in Japan while he held down a job packing medical supplies. He responded to an A’s tryout call and touched 95 there. He’s been up to 96 this year, and has a cutter and a slow, 3,000 rpm curveball. Correa was a longtime “bottom of the list” prospect with the Cubs. There have been stretches when he has shown cutting upper-90s heat and a plus changeup, but he’s never been able to throw strikes or stay healthy for very long. At times, Perkins and Watters have looked like fastball/slider middle relief guys, but Perkins has been hurt frequently and Watters’ results have been unspectacular. Castro is an ACL arm to watch, a reliever-y righty with 93-95 mph fastballs, a promising cutter and a changeup.
Pitchability Depth
Gunnar Hoglund, RHP
Blake Beers, RHP
Chen Zhong-Ao Zhuang, RHP
Hoglund, a former first round pick and mid-rotation starter prospect, hasn’t quite had a velocity rebound since his Tommy John. He’s having more success so far this year at Double-A Midland, where he’s sitting 92 with below-average secondary stuff. A 2021 19th rounder out of Michigan, Beers is a Double-A kitchen sink righty with starter-quality control, though he lacks a swing-and-miss weapon. Zhuang is a 23-year-old Taiwanese righty who sits 92 with ride and run. He has a decent mid-70s curveball and busts out a splitter and cutter against lefties. His 2024 is off to a great start.
Tough Profiles
Henry Bolte, RF
Clark Elliott, LF
Brayan Buelvas, CF
Colby Thomas, LF
Brennan Milone, 1B/3B
Bolte, 20, is a former second round pick who I have tended to be lower on than consensus. He is currently striking out nearly 40% of the time and struggling on defense. I have long been apprehensive about his hit tool, which that has been prescient so far. Elliott is currently on the IL. He lacks the well-rounded offensive game to profile in left field, his best defensive fit. To get to power, he has to swing with a ton of effort. Buelvas is a classic tweener upper-level depth guy. He could still become Jose Azocar or something like that, I suppose. Thomas is an older, physical outfielder at Double-A Midland. He has above-average bat speed but doesn’t track pitches especially well, and it’s going to be a tough left field profile with a 40 hit tool and 50 power. Milone is a pretty well-rounded hitter who has trended from 3B/2B to 1B/3B, where his power is a bit short.
Pet Projects
Max Schuemann, UTIL
Yeniel Laboy, 3B
Tom Reisinger, RHP
Schuemann is a super versatile defender in the Andrew Velazquez mold. Laboy is a well-built 19-year-old infielder (1B/2B/3B) with above average bat speed and a sweet lefty swing. Reisinger is a small school (East Stroudsburg, PA) prospect with a naturally cutting upper-80s fastball and plus breaking ball.
System Overview
This system is in rough shape, with below-average depth and slightly below-average impact up top. Oakland’s recent rebuild trades haven’t gone especially well. Of all the players they acquired, only Shea Langeliers has really established himself a long-term build-around player. JJ Bleday (who came back from Miami for A.J. Puk) is having a fair start to his 2024 and JP Sears looks like the inning-eating backend starter he was projected to be, but the system lacks high-end impact in general, and considering how much talent was traded away in 2021-2023, that’s disappointing. The Sean Murphy trade, which the Brewers somehow stuck their nose in, only to escape with by far the best departing Brave, is probably the worst deal of the lot.
I did film study on Tyler Soderstrom while I was working on this list and I still believe he’ll eventually be a middle-of-the-order big league thumper. He’d be first on this list were he still eligible. He’s slowly improving behind the plate (the A’s have plenty of time to let him keep developing back there), but mostly, he just has ridiculous lefty bat speed and a body built to last. He is going to have so much power that he’ll be an impact hitter despite elevated chase and strikeouts. He was up enough last year to lose rookie status, but he’s effectively still a prospect.
The A’s are still playing catch-up in the realm of technology implementation and use. Just a couple weeks ago on their backfields in Mesa, a TrackMan unit was installed on a second of their four fields, with several domed cameras that provide video feeds of the action on that field from a variety of angles also freshly installed. These are the sorts of things that most other teams have had in place for a while (some other teams’ camera set-ups and usage is way more advanced than this), but John Fischer’s budgetary shortcomings extend beyond the team’s payroll to other aspects of the club’s infrastructure. It’s as if the baseball ops crew has to fight with one hand behind their back and several fingers cut off of the other. This has no doubt contributed to the A’s struggles across the entire org, from scouting to player dev, but it isn’t the sole reason they’ve had difficulty doing either of those things well for the last five years.
As a guy who came to care about the Arizona Coyotes during my decade of living in Phoenix and is bummed that the young players I’ve grown to like will now enjoy their prime years in Salt Lake City, I can’t imagine what it’s like to lose a team that has been part of your city and culture for more than half a century. (The ghost of my dead grandfather, who had the A’s ripped away from him when they moved from Philly to Kansas City in the 1950s, might find it darkly funny that this is somehow happening yet again.) It’s odd writing about prospects who are more likely to be Sacramento and Las Vegas A’s than they are Oakland A’s, and it’s unfortunate that A’s fans who have suffered through rebuilding and tanking won’t reap the benefits of it on the back end.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
This system is bleak.
They have to take advantage of the “hot” start and move some of the older players who have started well for system depth if they can.
It’s bad at least partly because the A’s insisted on getting pitching back for their previous deals, but nobody wants to trade good pitching prospects anymore.
Between the guys who flamed out last year and this list here, I see a lot of future relievers and only one starter (Sears).
It doesn’t work to trade for pitching if the pitching is bad. If they haven’t learned that, then trading Stripling and Blackburn won’t solve much.
Iriarte, Thorpe, and Roby are 3 Top-100 pitching prospects that were traded in the last year. Is that an indication that “nobody wants to trade good pitching prospects anymore?” Were there a lot more of the top-100 traded in the past?
I am pretty sure the answer to this is “yes”, teams used to be more willing to trade starting pitching.
If we go back to the 2017 board, Anderson Espinoza, Michael Kopech, Tyler Glasnow (who was basically still a prospect), Reynaldo Lopez, Lucas Giolito, James Kaprelian, Jose De Leon, Jeff Hoffman, German Marquez, Sandy Alcantara, Luis F. Ortiz, Josh Hader, Max Fried, Luiz Gohara, Justin Dunn, Anthony Banda, and Justus Sheffield were all Top 100 prospects who got traded around the time they were highly regarded prospects. Not all in one offseason, but that’s 17 names from a single list who were traded when they were still highly regarded prospects in that general time frame. Franklin Perez and Luke Weaver and Frankie Montas were also given FV50 grades and were traded in that general time frame (Montas twice, I think). So you could easily extend this to 20.
There are fewer pitchers on the 2024 list, but even so it’s a totally different story here. The only ones on the list who got traded when they were Top 100 prospects are Iriarte, Thorpe, and Roby. River Ryan got traded, but he was a nobody when he was dealt. If you want to stretch it back to 2023 to account for fewer pitchers, the only names we would add are Jake Eder and Ken Waldichuk and Hayden Wesneski (technically Waldichuk was at 101 and Wesneski at 120, but if we are going to all FV50 prospects then we should include them).
So I would say: Yes, the fact that over two years of lists (with a lot of overlap, to be fair) we less than half as many FV50 prospects who got traded as those in 2017 I think is an indication that people don’t want to trade pitchers anymore. Although it works if you even just take it as an absolute asymmetry (“teams don’t want to trade pitchers, they want to trade position players. but teams want to trade for pitchers”)
Maybe not technically a prospect but Cole Ragans was also traded in 2023
In addition to Iriarte, Thorpe, and Roby; the Royals just got Cole Ragans for a rental reliever. I don’t think we should make sweeping proclamations about the trade market for pitching prospects just because the A’s suck at acquiring good players in trades (and at that, bad at acquiring hitters too).
The Lord, the Lord Jehovah has given unto you these fifteen…!
Oy. Ten! Ten commandments for all to obey!
Did Jacob Wilson just get an Erick Aybar comp because he can play a credible shortstop? He’s entering the Erick Aybar Zone.
I am definitely a fan of using Erick Aybar as a comp in this way. I think it works. Jacob Wilson, to me, looks a lot like the answer to the question “what if David Fletcher could play an average-to-plus shortstop?” When he hits enough to be about league average there he’ll be weirdly valuable because shortstops are in short supply. I just don’t think it’s going to last that long.
The Jose Caballero special
Caballero is a perfect comp. He’s good until he slips off the tightrope he’s walking and then he’s useless.
The way he played against the Mets all weekend suggests that Caballero is a future hall of famer.
Saw Boyle pitch against Detroit earlier this year & I’d say this is spot on.
You could tell he had filthy stuff, but, he was very wild. Had more balls than strikes. Detroit ended up letting him off the hook by being too aggressive/not hitting with RISP, so Boyle ended up with a good line superficially…but, you could see that it isn’t going to work long-term until he tightens up his command.
Fujinami was like that.
I first want to say thank you for the very detailed prospect lists. I know the level of detail takes time to get these out and that is fine. But is there a list of what order the remaining teams will have their lists released? Tentative dates aren’t required, but it would be nice to see what teams will come next.
“doesn’t seem to be executing any kind of plan or competent sequencing” does a pretty good job of explaining the Athletics franchise as a whole
I don’t see that changing at all with Fisher as the owner. They will move to Vegas and get some initial draw from the new team and stadium, and then attendance will plummet again. I’m not sure what Fisher will say as the excuse for being a poverty franchise then will be.
This is the dumb part of all of this. He’s using the Raiders and Golden Knights as examples of what the Athletics could be in Vegas while completely ignoring that the Knights have literally been one of the most competitive teams in their sport since their inception (basically being the Astros, by getting to at least the conference finals 4 of the 6 years) and the NFL is the NFL and will attract anyone regardless of the team.
I don’t think this is necessarily true. A’s have been contending more often than not in the Fisher era, and were well over .500 through 2021. I’m not sure about now. The Fisher era has been about the same as the Finley and Haas eras in terms of W-L record. He’s a terrible owner but he leaves Beane and Forst alone for the most part….well until the past 2 years.
The thing is, even if some city or state is dumb enough to gift him a stadium, all those other shortcomings will remain.
I was kinda hoping San Jose would gift them a stadium, and the city seemed ready to do it. I don’t think it would have necessarily been a bad deal. It might have, or might not have.
It should also be noted that Denzel Clarke is a cousin of the Naylors who are both in MLB.
Sigh.
This recovering A’s fan is not surprised to this system so bleak.
I broke up with them early this year. Are you still with them?
The way they’ve handled Soderstrom is confusing. There was no reason to promote him in a lost season, he wasn’t ready to catch, and it seemed pretty clear he wasn’t ready to face MLB pitching. The AA and AAA affiliates of the Athletics are extremely hitter-friendly, and the surface level stats were an illusion.
Now he’s back in AAA and he’s hitting a little better and working on his catcher defense, which is good because there’s a pretty good chance he’s not going to work out at all unless he can play a position other than first base. So if things go normally and he’s going to catch again then it will have worked out. But doing this also meant they had to have him on the 40-man roster, shortening his developmental timeline. So if they don’t work out and he needs to learn to play another position and/or he gets hurt and needs time to recover, this could come back to bite them.
In any case, I’m not at all convinced he’s going to stick at catcher and would like to see him at third base, where I think his arm strength will play better than behind the plate. But I don’t think he’s going to get the chance.
He’ll be at catcher in 2025 when they trade Langeliers post-breakout. The power will play; even translating from AAA to MLB, his near-.300 ISO is something like a .220-.225 IIRC, and he’s still only 22.
But you have me intrigued at the thought of him at 3B. I always assumed he was RF-only if he moved off the plate.
I don’t think he has the speed for the OF, honestly.
Might have a chance at 3B if he’s twitchier than his blocking or pop-time suggest, though.
Soderstrom’s definitely one of the more obvious “Looks good in shorts” guys from the last few years.
Bat-only *and* largely unproductive is a sub-optimal combo.
He has performed better this year, enough that if he sticks at catcher I think he won’t bust. There’s a lot of ways for this to go wrong, though.
For me it’s a thing where I completely understand the appeal of “CJ Cron at catcher” (love Sal Perez!) but the kid seems rather more likely to end up as “Frenchy at 1B.”
And now he’s back in the majors, so I guess he’s fixed?
Hard to fathom the A’s getting less out of trading Chapman, Olson, Murphy in their controllable primes.
The Murphy trade never made sense. How does Contreras change hands and go to the BREWERS in that deal? Esteury Ruiz looks a little frisky noaways after really struggling last year, and Kyle Muller will be a serviceable bullpen arm but that’s all they’ve got here.
And the Chapman trade… blech.
I do like the Olson deal a little more in that I still really like Langeliers. His breakout will come in the 2nd half of this season, and I don’t think he’ll look back. But he’s the 3rd best catcher in deals the A’s made that year behind Murphy and Contreras. And they’re not going to pay him in three years, and the cycle will repeat itself. Still, I think he’s the best player they got in the three deals, and Olson was the least controllable of the three players traded.
All three of these deals felt like “fantasy baseball manager has a couple beers and someone sends him a ridiculous trade offer and he ok’s it without checking on value with the rest of the league or really knowing who the prospects are.” Which is how you get value in exchange for Cristian Pache.
It’s as though someone dared them to make a bad trade, and then make a worse one, and then an even worse one.
They ought to trade Miller. He’s the most valuable piece they have, as a cost controlled high leverage reliever who’s elite. He’s also the riskiest player they have given that his arm could explode any minute. They’ve been lucky enough to start hot, but that’s not going to last due to the actual talent level of this team. They don’t have a use for a closer, so they should think about trading him while his value is as high as it’ll ever be.
This is correct which is why it won’t happen.
They absolutely should be fielding offers on him, RIGHT NOW, do not delay. But man, it’s sure hard to trust them to get value at this point.
Problem is that trade value asymptotes. Miller has 6 years of control, I believe. You can get an FV55 for him, but you could get that if he has 2 years of control, so you might as well keep him for 4 years and then trade him.
Same “problem” that Cleveland has with trading Clase. (Cleveland handily winning the AL Central doesn’t make it a big problem to have a great closer.) And neither Cleveland nor Oakland has an albatross like Robinson Cano to pair with him to make parting with so many years of control palatable.
But he’s a reliever so while you know you can get value for him now, waiting and especially waiting four years is a huge gamble.
The premise that Miller is worth the same amount now that he will be four years from now seems very wrong.
Valuing Clase is difficult for this reason, where teams will pay a premium for 2 years of team control vs 1, but less for 3 years vs 2, and so on and so forth.
Valuing Miller is difficult because on top of that, he is at extreme injury risk based on his past injury history and how hard he throws. I would probably value him at 2 years of team control–the rest of this year and an unspecified future year. Holding on to him any longer runs the risk that the injury happens now and they get nothing.
I’d value him as someone with 1.5 years controllable years. That can be pretty good as Hader to the Padres was for the Brewers. I don’t think Chapman to the Yankees is realistic unless it’s to the Orioles for Hjerstad or something.
The problem with hanging onto him for another 4 seasons is that he may end up sucking for a year, or his elbow finally gives out and he goes under the knife, unable to even throw a baseball for over a year let alone pitch. Also, given how Fisher runs his A’s, there’s probably no end in sight for this tank period for as long as they’re floating around northern California. They really ought to get as much value as they can out of trades now, and then maybe in 3-4 years when they’re finally in Vegas they might have some up-and-coming young players to be excited about.
They probably will, but it will be for three fringe guys.
But other teams know he’s a reliever too, right? Do you really think teams are gonna fork over a 55 for a flame throwing reliever with six years of control? Or more than that? Probably not.
For bad teams, I’m mostly on board with the trading of relievers. But the half decade of control makes the value a little sticky.
Well there you go, when your #1 prospect is a reliever…
I mean, he’s really good, I’ll give him that.