OMG! Iglesias Keys Mets to 8-4 Victory Over Brewers

I’ve heard the phrase “track meet” more this year than at any point since I ran track in high school. Some of that is Olympics-related – great track meet! – but most of it is because analysts like me can’t resist referencing track and field when we bring up the Milwaukee Brewers. “They turn games into track meets.” “They have gamebreaking speed.” You’ve no doubt read those two sentences (and many variations on them) as people explain the team’s success this year.
Those comparisons aren’t wrong. The Brewers can flat out fly. Brice Turang, the first batter of today’s Wild Card game against the New York Mets, slapped a grounder past Mark Vientos and turned on the afterburners en route to a double. He did it again in the third. Garrett Mitchell went first to third beautifully. Sal Frelick had a hustle double of his own. Turang and Jackson Chourio advanced adroitly in a two-run fourth. If there are 90 feet lying around for the taking, the Brewers will grab them. You have to be alert whenever there’s an open bag and a Milwaukee player on base, and they’ll take away hits with their defense to boot.
The Mets, in comparison, are station-to-station mashers. They hit 30 more homers than the Brewers this year and stole 111 fewer bases. The average Mets hitter is 30 years old; the average Brewers hitter is 26.4. If this were a track meet, the Mets would not be favored. They wouldn’t have a prayer of winning, if I’m being honest; the Brewers outfield is three-quarters of a 4×100 relay team, and fourth outfielder Blake Perkins completes the squad. If you could actually turn a game into a race, the Brewers would be 100% likely to win this series (I’m not sure how good anyone on these teams is at high jump or hammer throw, so we’ll leave the “field” part aside).
No one hit a home run in today’s game. In some senses, then, this was the ideal “track meet” game. As I mentioned, the Brewers tore up the basepaths whenever they had a chance. The Mets were relatively restrained. They took the odd base on a defensive miscue – Jesse Winker tripled home two runs after a bobble, and Tyrone Taylor doubled when Chourio took a bad route to a smashed line drive – but that’s not really their game. They struck out more frequently than the Brewers. Surely, this is the best-case scenario folks are describing when they talk about this year’s Milwaukee squad.
Naturally, then, the Mets won 8-4. By pretty much every speed-related statistic, they got outplayed. But as it turns out, even when you keep the ball in the yard, most of baseball isn’t about sprinting really fast in a straight line. The Mets did a ton of little things well, and they added up to eight runs against a quality opponent.
First, they waited Freddy Peralta out. He came out throwing mainly fastballs and changeups, putting his slider in his back pocket. The Mets didn’t walk a ton against him, but they had a plan: work counts and try to swing at fastballs. Six of their nine balls in play came on heaters. Peralta averaged 4.5 pitches per batter and only lasted four innings. It cost them on the strikeout front – five in those four innings – but Winker’s timely triple meant they racked up three runs anyway.
Then came the critical inning, and the Mets actually did turn the game into a track meet, only on their terms. With runners on first and second and two outs, Jose Iglesias slapped a grounder that first baseman Rhys Hoskins fielded deep in the hole. He gathered himself, turned, and tossed to reliever Joel Payamps. Just one problem: Payamps lost the race to the bag. Iglesias, who at age 34 can still motor, turned on the turbo boosters about halfway down the line and beat Payamps to first with a perfect headfirst slide. Taylor, the runner on second, never stopped; he scored to tie the game at four. An actual footrace – Payamps against Iglesias, with the Brewers getting a massive head start – and the old dudes pulled it out:
The most “Jose Iglesias” game-tying, RBI single ever. Crazy to imagine where this team would be without him. pic.twitter.com/x6EAklkFzA
— Steve Gelbs (@SteveGelbs) October 1, 2024
I’m not sure whether the Brewers were flustered by that play, or whether it simply wasn’t their day, but things unraveled quickly from there. Brandon Nimmo reached on an infield single that Willy Adames had a chance at – he would’ve needed to make a spectacular play, but he couldn’t get a grip on the ball in his do-or-die attempt, and that was that. Vientos crushed a dead-red fastball for a two-run single. J.D. Martinez pinch-hit in a big spot against a lefty and smashed a grounder through the defense to the opposite field for another two runs. Vientos and Martinez are slow, and they didn’t hit home runs, but there are other ways to win baseball games.
The Brewers didn’t get the breaks on Tuesday, and they weren’t able to manufacture their own luck. They came out after that disastrous five-run fifth and went pop out-strikeout-pop out in the bottom half of the inning. They hit exactly one ball 95 mph or harder the rest of the day, and it was pounded directly into the dirt in front of home plate. Heck, they only had four hard-hit balls all game, and three were grounders. The Mets, for their part, recorded 11 of them, eight of which were in the air. The Brewers popped out six times and grounded into a double play; the Mets popped out three times with no double plays.
By game’s end, this one didn’t feel particularly close. The Mets used José Buttó for two innings and then Ryne Stanek to close things out. They didn’t allow so much as a single baserunner. There was no last-second turnaround, no late-inning drama. The Mets didn’t have to use their closer or extend their starter for a risky number of innings. They didn’t get into the weak part of the bullpen. They just scored eight runs and cruised to the finish line (to be fair, scoring eight runs usually lets you do that).
You should never read too much into a single baseball game. For as much as I made it sound like the Brewers never stood a chance, they out-hit the Mets. They out-slugged them, too. Their bullpen has been better all year. A five-run inning keyed by a defensive misplay and two infield singles, one of which involved a headfirst dive into first base, was the difference between victory and defeat. If Payamps had gotten to the bag half a step earlier, maybe I’d be talking about how the track meet plan paid off for Milwaukee today.
But broadly speaking, you should be skeptical of these simple narratives. The Brewers don’t make every game about their speed and only their speed, because that’s not how baseball works. Speed is a part of the game, but it’s nowhere near the whole thing. It’s mostly a game of batter against pitcher, and the team that hits the ball harder tends to do better. The team that walks more tends to do better, too, and New York racked up five free passes to Milwaukee’s two.
When the two teams play tomorrow, no one’s going to get in a three-point stance waiting for the starter’s gun (though after today, I’d pay to see a race between Payamps and Iglesias). They’re going to play baseball, not run track. The Brewers might win – they’ll be favored to win, in fact. And they could win while out-homering the Mets and making a bunch of defensive misplays, just as easily as they could win because their speed is undeniable. Today’s game was about hitting the ball hard and posting a big inning, though no one knew that in advance, just like no one knows what tomorrow’s game will be about. That’s part of the joy of playoff baseball – or the pain, if you’re a Brewers fan tonight.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Really tired of watching the Brewers lose. Just win a game. Once.
Interesting to view this as a matchup of David Stearns’ old team vs his new one. The old team has mostly owned his new one to date, running all over them as both their pitchers and their primary catcher are not equipped to face that type of lineup and the legacy sluggers haven’t been able to outpower their speed
But then you see some aspects of, maybe, “my stuff doesnt work in the playoffs” – to quote a different former Boy Wonder.
Peralta, a Stearns acquisition, was seemingly outpitching Severino and had started to cruise. Milwaukee’s computers say to pull him after 4 so they do, and their pen gets lit up. Tyrone Taylor, taken to New York by Stearns, gets things going and then Iglesias, a new Stearns-type of acquisition for the Mets, hits the ball to Rhys Hoskins, a new non-Stearns addition in Milwaukee. The Mets left Severino in a couple more innings with the lead and then Stearns’ pieced together bullpen closed things out
Is this the perfect marriage of Stearns and non-Stearns for Milwaukee or are they still a year away? Did David get there in one just one season with New York? Or will either fall to LA next round anyway?
The winner of this series plays the Phillies, who will be hugely favored no matter who moves forward. Can’t believe they pulled Peralta that early, and it’s fascinating that Tyrone Taylor has played such a huge role in the last two Met wins as the key former Brewer Stearns has acquired (and Winker had a huge hit, too).
Lost in the shuffle is the fact that presumptive NL manager of the year Pat Murphy took out his ace pitcher after only 68 pitches, when he had just retired 9 straight Mets. He now has to deal with a bullpen that is seemingly less rested than the Mets who had to play a double-header the day before.
I’ve been pretty critical of Mendoza using Diaz and Maton as magic bullets down the stretch, overusing them to the point that they no longer perform as elite relievers (Maton is particularly ineffective on back-to-back days, let alone 3 straight days). With that in mind, none of that is any where near as egregious as pulling your ace on 68 pitches when he had just set down 9 straight.
Pat Murphy can scream that he didn’t think Peralta had his best stuff til the cows come home. It doesn’t change the fact that he made a truly baffling decision that completely blew up in his face, and put the Brewers in a serious hole.
Check the statcast-Peralta was getting hit hard, even on his outs. His peformance in the 2nd half of the season was a consistent decline-2nd half K-BB% of 13. Payamps came in and had been dominant in September-27 K-BB%, with 12 consecutive scoreless outings. Peralta was coming up on Lindor for the 3rd time. We may disagree on whether he should have come out, but it’s not a baffling decision. I think it was the right one.
I checked his statcast and it wasn’t bad? Of the 9 straight outs he recorded, the very first one was the most dangerous, the Starling Marte sac fly. There was a Lindor line drive with a middling 380 xBA and an Iglesias grounder at 350. Otherwise it was all strikeouts, weak grounders and a pop-up. All that statcast showed is he probably “deserved” to only retire 8 out of 9 instead of 9 in a row.
I won’t speak to his second half performance, but looking at his statcast just reinforced that he deserved to stay in the game.
OK Ben, you ran track in high school? What events did you compete in?
110 hurdles and high jump
None of the replays show the two events together, but I would be curious to know exactly where Igelsias and Payamps were at the moment Taylor rounded third. It appears Payamps did not take notice of Taylor at all, but what if he had? Could Payamps, running virtually full speed away from home plate, have stopped, turned, and gotten the ball to Contreras in time to catch Taylor, even if he had started that process as soon as he received the ball from Hoskins?
I don’t think so. Taylor is running full speed on contact, with a secondary lead off of second base. Even having to slow himself and deviate from a straght line, in order initiate his turn as he approaches third, Taylor, with a 25-foot head start on Iglesias, has to have been around third and starting on his dash home as Payamps was receiving the ball. I don’t see how Payamps arrests his momentum fast enough, or gets enough on the throw, to get Taylor, even if Taylor were the first thing on his mind. Heck, he might have been better off tossing the ball back to Hoskins, who at least was stationary and facing in the right direction to throw home, though that of course would have taken too long, as well.
All that said, the real hero of that sequence — with due respect to the celerity and hustle of both Iglesias and Taylor — might have been Mets third base coach Mike Sarbaugh. The reply shows him vigorously windmilling Taylor home as Taylor is approaching third, which means he was doing so when the result at first was still entirely uncertain and without having any reason to expect that the Brewers would just forget about Taylor. It appears he read the play and saw an excellent risk-reward ratio. Or maybe he always does that when there are two outs, a speedy runner on second, and the pitcher has to cover first. Someone should ask him.
Sarby is willing to wave speedy guys around third towards home frequently; it’s something he developed as Cleveland’s 3B coach. I’d imagine he took into account the risk-reward calculation and weighed it against the Brewers running an incredible bullpen, and made the snap decision to be aggressive in a tight spot, trying to give his team the best possible edge at winning vs. a team they tend to struggle with. He was probably also preparing for that exact play before Payamps started pitching to Iglesias, knowing Taylor’s speed and Iglesias’ tendency to hit oppo grounders.
EDIT: I misspelled Payamps’ name. Which is something I do often.
Taylor is a superhero. In the 1st game of the doubleheader against the Braves, he was the only Met not playing afraid for the first 7 1/3 innings. And his run last night was huge.
As I wrote above, Stearns got Taylor from the Brewers, and he’s now the most Brewer-like Met (though Iglesias isn’t far off).
I read this, not because I needed to, but because I want to revel in every second of it.
Payamps hesitated and did not immediately run to the bag. Should have been a routine play and the end of a scoreless inning. Can’t have brain farts in the playoffs.
Iglesias had a season with a 160wrc and a season with a 137 wrc. Things I didn’t know yesterday.
Nailed that one.