On Pursuing the Self-Actualization of Henry Davis

When the Pittsburgh Pirates took Henry Davis first overall in 2021, they knew they were making a compromise. No matter what happened, even if he blew away everyone’s expectations, he was destined to only be the second-best hitter in big league history with the first name Henry and a last name that’s also a first name.
More than that, the Pirates took him knowing he probably wasn’t the best player in the draft. Davis received a signing bonus of just $6.5 million, only the fifth-highest number in the top six picks. Going way under slot allowed the Pirates to overpay for highly touted high schoolers with their next three picks, and I guess Bryan Bullington and Tony Sanchez no longer count as “in recent memory.”
Nevertheless, having the first pick is a rare gift, and you don’t want to blow it.
Even accounting for the fact that the Pirates got the top pick again two years later, along with Termarr Johnson and a number of other exciting young prospects, they need Davis to pan out. Because it’s not good for you if you biff the no. 1 overall pick:
| Year | Team | Player | Career WAR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Phillies | Mickey Moniak | 0.7 |
| 2014 | Astros | Brady Aiken | 0.0 |
| 2013 | Astros | Mark Appel | 0.1 |
| 2008 | Rays | Tim Beckham | 2.8 |
| 2006 | Royals | Luke Hochevar | 9.0 |
| 2004 | Padres | Matt Bush | 1.4 |
| 2003 | Devil Rays | Delmon Young | -1.3 |
| 2002 | Pirates | Bryan Bullington | -0.2 |
Moniak did nothing in a Phillies uniform, and Philadelphia’s recent success has come after 1) the passage of many, many years and 2) the expenditure of many hundreds of millions of dollars in free agency, to say nothing of hitting on fellow lottery picks Aaron Nola, Alec Bohm, and Bryson Stott.
The Astros got away with missing with the no. 1 overall pick two years in a row, yes. But they already had Carlos Correa and George Springer in the system, and the compensation pick they got for not signing Aiken turned into Alex Bregman. This is the draft equivalent of falling off your balcony and landing in the bed of a truck transporting marshmallows.
Beckham was actually the best player the Rays drafted between the 2007 class of David Price and Matt Moore, and the miraculous 31st-round selection of Kevin Kiermaier in 2010. Every bit of success Tampa Bay has had in the past 15 years has been the result of savvy scouting and development, and when that pipeline dried up for a couple seasons, it coincided with a five-season fallow period that just so happens to overlap substantially with Beckham’s career.
The Royals were customarily terrible during most of Hochevar’s career, but he stuck around long enough to throw some middle relief innings for the World Series-winning iteration of the team in 2015. The Padres won 80 games four straight years after drafting Bush, who as a high school shortstop was expected to take time to develop. Bush’s lamentable actions off the field delayed his path to the majors until he’d changed teams and positions, and without the no. 1 pick, the Padres missed the playoffs in 13 straight seasons from 2007 to 2019.
Further back in franchise history, the Rays got away with a dud at no. 1 overall in Young, because around that time they were also spending high picks on Rocco Baldelli, B.J. Upton, Evan Longoria, Carl Crawford, and Price. Sort a proto-Astros situation, in which quantity has a quality all its own.
Which brings us back to the Pirates, who were terrible when they drafted Bullington and remained so for about a decade afterward.
Other no. 1 overall picks during this time period — Joe Mauer, Price, Stephen Strasburg, Bryce Harper, Correa — were franchise players. In order to survive not getting one of these with the first overall pick, a team either needs to hit on most of its adjacent early picks, or be able to buy off somebody else’s franchise player. Or in the Astros’ case (and sorry to bring up the Gerrit Cole trade in a post about the Pirates), both.
Davis has played all of 62 games in the major leagues, and even after a full college career and a couple seasons in the minors, he only just turned 24. I’m not writing him off by any stretch of the imagination; I’m merely emphasizing how important it is for the Pirates to get a meaningful player out of this draft pick. Ideally an All-Star, or at least a first-division regular.
But the early returns left something to be desired. Davis hit .213/.302/.351 in 255 plate appearances, with a 9.8% walk rate and a 27.1% strikeout rate. That would be pretty bad even if he’d played catcher, but the Pirates shunted him out to the outfield; Pittsburgh’s would-be franchise catcher has spent just two innings behind the plate in the major leagues. (Davis also graded out terribly as an outfielder, but in so few innings I’m inclined to view those numbers with extreme skepticism.)
Those positions are at opposite ends of the defensive spectrum. The league-average wRC+ for catchers last year was 90; for right fielders, it was 105. The most encouraging news about Davis since the offseason started was Ben Cherington’s announcement that the former Louisville star will enter next season as a catcher.
Nevertheless, this is not a Patrick Bailey or Mike Zunino type, where the glove is the carrying tool and any additional pop is a bonus. Wherever he plays, Davis needs to hit.
Last year’s results don’t look like some BABIP-y fluke. Davis posted a wOBA of .287 and an xwOBA of .288. And it could’ve been worse; Davis was one of the most extreme pull hitters in the league in 2023, and yet hardly ever got shifted (insofar as that’s possible under the new rules). Davis also hit the ball on the ground a lot, at least more than you’d want from a player with his raw power. He could’ve hit into a lot more hard outs than he did.
Now, can a hitter with his directional hitting tendencies put up big numbers? Absolutely. Consider another current National League catcher who went to college in the Ohio Valley: Sean Murphy.
| Name | GB/FB | Pull% | Cent% | Oppo% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean Murphy | 1.07 | 50.2% | 32.2% | 17.6% |
| Henry Davis | 1.21 | 49.0% | 33.1% | 17.8% |
So they’re hitting a lot of the same types of ball, when they make contact, but let’s see what’s on the next page.
| Name | BB% | K% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | IFFB% | HR/FB | HardHit% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean Murphy | 11.2% | 22.4% | 27.5% | 71.0% | 3.8% | 20.0% | 45.8% |
| Henry Davis | 9.8% | 27.1% | 31.8% | 64.2% | 13.8% | 12.1% | 41.4% |
This is where Davis needs to improve. Murphy has a slightly higher swing rate overall, but Davis is more aggressive outside the zone and less aggressive in it. As a result, he strikes out more, walks less, and hits four times as many pop-ups. Murphy and Davis have similar groundball-to-fly ball ratios, yes, but Murphy homers once out of every five fly balls, while Davis hits one out a little less than once per eight fly balls.
A lot of the flaws in Davis’ game — the relatively high strikeout rate, the pull-happy tendency, the balls on the ground — you could live with, if he made better decisions about what to swing at and what to take. Out of 362 players with at least 200 plate appearances last year, Davis was 314th in Z-Swing% and 129th in O-Swing%. Selective aggression is in the zeitgeist after Corey Seager went busalooey during the playoffs, and at the risk of making an insultingly obvious observation, Davis needs to be more aggressive on pitches he can hit.
It’s something to work on this offseason, but it’s something a no. 1 overall pick needs to figure out sooner rather than later.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
It made little sense to not get Hank reps behind the plate last year. Was he going to hit “worse” if he had to catch, too?
I wish you’d looked into his MiL numbers. He hit like crazy before promotion (wRC+ 170 in AA, 186 in AAA), but now I wonder if it was an illusion, or if he just needs more adjustment time.
FWIW, his minors BB% was much better in ’23, and his K% was significantly better in ’22 and ’23. So there’s hope that he was just doing the typical rookie thing of “you don’t walk off the island.”
Curious if he hit well in the minors vs actual high end pitching prospects.
I really don’t like what they’ve been doing with his position. Do they still really think he’s a viable defensive catcher or are they moving him back because they don’t think the bat is good enough for the corner?
If they have always felt he’s a viable catcher then why rush him up to play half a season as an outfielder only? You could have just played him at catcher in the majors and let Endy continue to work in AAA if that’s the case because he wasn’t crushing there.
If it’s because they have soured on his bat, then did they believe it was good enough for the corner when they called him up? If so, it’s an awfully quick decision to pull the plug.
I’m hopeful for him. He had a bad stretch at AA at one point and bounced back. Bad job, front office thus far, though.
I think they believed the bat was genuinely ready and weren’t that worried about his fielding. And it’s not like he was taking innings away from any true OFs.
If both he and Endy make it to the bigs and stick at catcher, they’ll both be playing in the field on off days, so it’s not as if putting him in the OF was a random choice. They’re vastly more valuable if the two of them don’t monopolize the DH slot, and they’re both athletic enough to be viable fielders so that’s the correct way to develop them IMO. Might not work, of course, but better than DH (or bench) as Plan A.
I think you’re right they weren’t worried about his outfield defense and he didn’t take time from anyone who is part of the long term plan. My issue with that, if that was the plan, is you stalled his catching development because he ONLY played the outfield when he came up (he appeared at catcher twice but didn’t start a single game). I don’t love stopping his work as a catcher for half a season early in his career if you plan for him to catch long term.
Yep, by trying to both-ways this they shorted him on both fronts defensively. While I understand his injury last year prevented them from getting more intel on whether he actually can catch, this all feels incredibly rushed.
I would much rather they stick him at Altoona/Indy through July to see how he did behind the plate. If he still looks like Ryan Doumit, transition him to the OF in August, maybe get him a call up this past September. Why they didn’t seem to have a plan is beyond me.
I do agree that it’s weird not to give him a single start, although that may have come down to the thumb injury—catcher is not exactly the spot for guys with hand injuries to get comfortable.
I also wonder if his struggles at the plate affected things as well—don’t add more to his load when he hasn’t mastered the main thing.
I guess my feeling is that it wasn’t inherently flawed. Nobody expected his bat to struggle so much (his approach in AAA was excellent), and that’s what drives the second-guessing. I understand wanting a more conservative approach, but that’s been this team for at least 15 years, and god knows it hasn’t worked.
They’ve grossly mishandled him. Hey, kid, we know you’ve only caught, but we don’t think you can do it. Tell you what, we’ll have you catch a dozen games at Indy and now you’re in the show. Oh yeah there’s a big wall out there that’s hard to play. Good luck!
He was rushed to the show, plain and simple.
Surprising no mention of his thumb injury that tanked his August and led to a eventual IL stint after trying to play through it. He was better prior to that. It wasnt an ideal debut, but I think some context is useful.
Yeah he went on the IL August 21st and in the report it said he had been dealing with an injury to his right hand and trying to play through it for a few weeks. From July 26th to August 20th he was one of the worst hitters in the majors 125/220/194 for a 11 WRC+ to go along with 24 Ks in 82 PAs.
He wasn’t exactly great afterwards, either, though: .214/.283/.405 with a 45% K rate and a .368 BABIP. I mean, it was loads better, but still not wonderful.
If you look at his rolling wOBA there’s a very clear “before” and “after”. And he raked in the minors in large part due to his plate approach. He’ll need to make an adjustment like almost all rookies do, but I don’t see any reason to be overly concerned just yet.
I’m not sure it’s accurate to say they took him knowing he wasn’t the best player in the draft. There was no consensus top pick that year, and it was a bit if a weak top crop overall. I think Mayer tended to top the pre-draft rankings, but it was hardly unanimous, and Davis was definitely in the top group. I think Law had him #1. Looks like fangraphs had 7 guys with a 50 FV that year (highlighting again that there was parity among a not very elite top), with Davis ranked second overall behind Mayer, and separated by just two spots in the top 100 rankings—functionally a dead heat.
They got a steep discount on him because of the parity and the fact that he was a college guy unlike Lawlar or Mayer and didn’t have huge demands like Leiter, but it’s entirely possible they also believed he was the best player. In general, there was widespread praise for how they executed that draft.
Yeah, thanks for saying this. Very much not a Sanchez or Bullington (or Moskos) pick.
Yep. Although given how they spread the money around, they certainly could have gotten Mayer or Lawlar and one of Chandler/Solometo/White.
I didn’t have a problem with Hank, but their handling of him is so poor.
I can assure you that he was every bit as bad in RF as the metrics indicated. He’s athletic enough and has a good arm but he was just plain bad at judging fly balls. Hopefully he can either improve at that or at catcher, but none of that matters if he doesn’t figure out how to hit major league pitching. Personally, I would start him in AAA next year to give him time to work on some of this stuff. It’s a lot to take in and the Pirates are going to be bad again so why not.
To defend the Phillies’ Moniak pick, the whole first 2016 round was a disaster area. The only first-round pick to get more than 10 bbWAR* so far was Will Smith at 32nd overall. The second-most bbWAR was Cal Quantrill (8th) with 6.7 and he just got DFAed. There’s a few more guys with a chance to put up decent value in the future but not as many as you want. The second round that year has almost as much total WAR as the first with eight fewer picks, many of whom haven’t made the majors. (Bo Bichette, Pete Alonso, and Bryan Reynolds being the top performers, all of them out-WARring even Smith.)
*Using this because BBRef has nice sortable draft charts
1000%! as a Philly guy I’m shocked Michael missed this. The first round had several guyS who hit legit prospect status (Whitley, senzel, Puk, lux, manning, kirillof) while matriculating but little has come of them. It would be something if moniak became (continued to be?) a career platoon masher.
Davis is less of a first name, and more of a last name that one could use as a first name and no one would stop you.
I looked up other prominent players named Henry, and Henry McHenry would agree with you.
Davis Love III comes to mind quickly, but after that I’m drawing a blank.
Davis Nothereman is another.
New Blue Jays cult hero Davis Schneider was the easy one for me
How many had the first name of Davis when Henry Aaron played?