One Double Play, Examined
Wednesday night, the Marlins defeated the Brewers by a comfortable 6-2 margin. Though the game wasn’t close, it could have been slightly closer: the Marlins saved a run with a clutch sacrifice fly double play in the bottom of the sixth. That’s a standard play; every level from youth tee ball on up has catch-and-throw double plays. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t impressive. In fact, the moment-to-moment action of the play shows how impressive baseball players are even on plays we think of as de rigueur.
Here, watch it in real time:
Let’s start with the pitch: Sandy Alcantara couldn’t have done much better. He dotted the bottom of the zone with a 99 mph sinker, the perfect location to induce an inning-ending ground ball. Seriously, it’s hard to draw it up any better than this:

That’s a perfect location for a grounder-inducing pitch. When he’s located that pitch on the bottom edge of the zone, good things have happened: he’s saved roughly four runs relative to average per 100 sinkers he’s located there. That’s roughly in line with the best overall pitches in baseball. When he spots it, in other words, the Marlins are right where they want to be.
Travis Shaw begged to differ. Well-spotted pitch, plus velocity: he hit the smithereens out of it. The ball came off his bat at 101.7 mph, a veritable laser beam. Combined with its flat 12 degree launch angle, that ball is a hit the vast majority of the time; it carried a .910 expected batting average per Statcast, though that ignores the horizontal angle (or spray angle), and Shaw happened to hit it right at a defender.
So far, this play had been a chain of each team outdoing its opponent’s previous move. Alcantara placed a fastball perfectly. Shaw hit the snot out of it. Lewis Brinson had it shaded perfectly — and to be fair, he didn’t have to do much to make the catch given where Shaw hit it.
From there, however, every split second was of the utmost importance. Shaw hit that ball so hard that even without much loft, it carried 287 feet. That’s plenty deep; there have been 485 sacrifice fly situations in the last two years where the ball was hit 285 feet or farther and caught in the air, and 97% of them scored the runner on third.
Of course, “the runner on third” isn’t an abstract concept. In this case, it was Daniel Vogelbach, and he’s nearly the worst position player the Brewers could have asked for in this particular situation. He’s a lovable Large Adult Son, but he’s not fleet of foot by major league standards. In 2020, he averaged 4.52 seconds on his 90-foot running splits, 357th out of 362 qualifying runners.
That’s still reasonably fast in regular human terms, but it made a play at least possible. If teammate Kolten Wong had been on third instead, his 3.99 second split would give Brinson a half-second less to get the ball home; that’s a huge difference on a play where everything needs to go perfectly to succeed. Even then, though, it’s only a half second; the difference between bad and good runners just isn’t that much. Say the word “spaghetti” out loud — that was more time than the difference between Wong and Vogelbach’s third-to-home times.
As it transpired, Vogelbach beat his average. He clocked in at roughly 4.35 seconds, a number I reached with a stopwatch and a ton of repetitions. That’s exactly the max-effort run you’d expect on a borderline sacrifice fly opportunity; it was clear the play would be a close call, and Vogelbach rose to the occasion.
Also rising to the occasion? Brinson. The math is rough on Brinson here; per research from Tom Tango, I used an estimate of 1.2 seconds for Brinson’s transfer and catcher Chad Wallach’s catch and tag. That leaves 3.15 seconds to get the ball from deep left field to the plate, with the added requirement that it be in Wallach’s catch radius.
From that same excellent Tango article, I used his average outfielder arm estimate and converted that to time from throw to the plate. As it turns out, throwing the ball at 85 mph from 287 feet gets the ball to home plate in 3.15 seconds — exactly how much time he had to make the play. Assuming an average arm and perfect accuracy, Vogelbach’s extra bit of speed turned this play from a likely out to a coin flip.
An average arm is a poor assumption to make when it comes to Brinson, though. While his accuracy remains an open question, scouts have consistently given him high marks for his arm strength, and he can air it out with the best of them. On this play, he also had a running start due to deep positioning, which gave him a further tailwind. From release until the ball reached Wallach, I clocked his throw at roughly 2.8 seconds, which equates to 96 mph (!!) out of his hand. That’s an absolute cannon of a throw, and while some skepticism is merited given the way I calculated it, Statcast clocked it at 95.5 mph. Brinson just played it perfectly:
While his throw was an absolute missile, the crow hop that Brinson used to power up cost him some of those precious fractions of a second he gained with the throw. The ball hit Wallach in the chest 3.85 seconds after Brinson caught it, which gave the catcher half a second to kill the ball’s momentum, gather himself, and apply a tag. Again, say “spaghetti” out loud — that’s how much time he had for this multi-stage maneuver. This isn’t an easy place to start your catch:

Vogelbach is out of frame, but only barely. By the time Wallach got both hands on it, time was running short. Here’s another angle of it (sorry about the umpire):

Okay. Large man bearing down on you at great speed, laser beam of a baseball catching you high in the chest — it’s time for the instincts to kick in. Wallach did what came naturally; he stabbed with his glove at the front of the plate, the point Vogelbach was most likely to cross through on his path to safety. He just managed it. As best as I can tell, here’s the moment his glove hit Vogelbach’s leg:

Figuring out distance on a broadcast is difficult, but that’s a matter of inches, not feet. The slightest bobble by Wallach, any miscue by Brinson, and Vogelbach would have scored. A better slide might have done it, but he’s hardly renowned for his sliding, and he had already done his part to ensure his safety by booking it down the line. He was caught in between on his slide, and if he’d managed to stick his foot out slightly differently, who knows:
This wasn’t a tremendously consequential play. If the run had scored, the Brewers would have trialed by three, and they managed a whopping two hits the rest of the way, so they were hardly tearing the cover off the ball. It would be easy to gloss over it, to think “good outfielder got slow runner” and move on with your life.
That’s not what happened, or at least it’s an insufficient description. Everyone did their job at a high level. Alcantara executed his pitch. Shaw tattooed it. Brinson was positioned perfectly, then unleashed a hellacious and accurate throw. He had to, because Vogelbach booked it down the line. Wallach made a split-second gather look easy and applied a tag with inches to spare. The only hiccup the whole way was Vogelbach’s slide, and that one tiny blemish was the difference between safe and out.
Regular baseball plays, the kind that don’t even make highlight reels unless they change the outcome of a game, aren’t routine. They’re routine in the major leagues, sure. That’s only the case because these players are absurdly good. The pitchers are nasty, the hitters crush baseballs. The outfielders throw 280 feet and hit their target in the chest. The catchers have split-second reflexes. Even the big men fly down the line when they need to. Baseball is beautiful, and even an out in a lopsided game can show how.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
That was a hell of an article. Ben Clemens did his job at a high level here.
Regular articles, the kind that don’t even make end-of-year best-of lists unless they change the success of a website, aren’t routine. They’re routine in Fangraphs, sure. That’s only the case because these writers are absurdly good. The metaphors are clean, the rhetoric spotless. The analysis is mathematically precise and the assumptions crystal-clear. The prose has split-second cadence. Even the quantitative analysts can turn a phrase when they need to. Baseball writing is beautiful, and even an article about an out in a lopsided game can show how.
It seems like Wallach’s positioning behind home makes that play a bit harder than it needed to be. If he positions himself in front of home, he catches it on the fly and can make a sweep tag to get Vogelbach.
Makes his quick gather and tag from behind home even more impressive!
1) If he caught the ball on the fly, his momentum would be going forward, then he would need to reach back to tag Vogelbach. Considering where the ball bounced, he’d likely have to lunge at Vogelbach to get the tag down. Plus, I don’t think catchers want to stray that far from home plate on a close play unless it’s absolutely necessary.
2) He moved back to make the hop easier to field. Any movement forward (without catching on the fly) turns it into a short-hop and those aren’t always easy to catch.
Watching the play it looks like Wallach had to make a decision on a tweener bounce and chose the safer route (i.e. less likely to allow the runner on first to advance).
1) If Wallach moved forward he would have had to lunge back at Vogey for the tag, he instead moved backward and had to lunge forward. He definitely lost ‘more’ time by moving backward and lunging forward than if he had moved forward and lunged backwards.
2) The way he caught that ball is definitely no easier to field cleanly than playing it on a short hop. That said, it was a much safer play because at worst he blocks the ball so the other runner doesn’t advance.
I think getting the out was the icing on the cake, made possible by a pretty terrible slide and slow runner.
He also risks putting himself in a position where he gets called for blocking the plate
Wait… did we not notice how much he slowed down in order to setup I’m the slide??? Like he had just run straight through (ideally not hitting the catcher)) I think her would have been safe.
Good catch, plus I wonder how much he was affected by his foot bouncing off the dirt and away from home plate as he slid. I think part of it may have been to avoid the tag, but it sure also looked like he had a chance of getting in under the tag if his foot went directly to the corner of the plate.
for sure. sliding is a natural break on momentum, I would imagine. That much friction with the ground without any additional propelling force from running would slow you down. There’s a reason you slide into second and third but not first: you can overrun first base, whereas you have to stop on a dime at the bags.
I guess aside from general runner/catcher safety, the reasons to slide at home are:
1) if you slide well, you may be able to avoid the tag easier
2) if the ball is caught at a significant height above the dirt, say at the chest, head, or above the head, the catcher has to spend some time and effort bringing that ball an extra 2 to 4 feet down to the ground. It’s maybe easier to tag someone running upright than it is to tag someone slip-and-sliding at velocity?
3) it can be hard to time your feet when you’re in a dead sprint, and you have to step on that plate, which isn’t a nice big pillow like first base. even in the majors you do see the occasional running error where players miss the plate at home. So you likely have to lose some momentum to get that timing right. It’s certainly a lot easier to get some bit of your body to touch the plate just by virtue of sliding over it than it is to time your foot mid-running-flight. Plus, if you don’t have dirt in your eyes, you can see the plate up close and can reach out and touch it with your hands.
So yeah, I’d expect it to be slower, but there are other reasons why it’s commonplace.
Unclear to me if it would have made a difference here. Maybe if he had slid straight into the plate rather than around it he would have made it. But I can’t speak for that hitter and how much effort it would be to contort that much mass at that velocity into an inch-precise location. haha. Certainly not the best baserunner.
This is a great piece. It should be said that I also like the fact the catcher didn’t end up with a concussion.
As a dad with 2 kids in coach pitch and 1 in t ball right I can attest….what major leaguers do is far from routine
in high school JV, it was legitimately hard for our catchers to get even the super high pop ups behind the plate. Even as an outfielder with a big glove, balls moving “backwards” really got me dizzy, even while I was good at timing flyballs hit at me. Working those catchers mitts ain’t easy!
Just any high pop ups would be tough and we practiced them all the time. And they weren’t mile high infield pops like they hit them in the majors.
Id love to see a trackman (or whatever we use now) visualization of this play. The ball traveled over 650 total feet in ~6 seconds in 3 different directions. Must look like a pinball.
“sorry about the umpire”
I feel like this is a phrase we don’t hear nearly often enough.
A Sullivanesque way to break down a simple play and show how great andinteresting baseball can be
Whoops, just said the exact same thing before reading all the comments lol
Ben has definitely taken over for Jeff as the guy writing “here’s a deep dive into something you didn’t know you cared about” articles. Which have always been my favorite articles on FG, so I dread the day Ben gets hired by a MLB team.
Ten years ago, Wallach ends up in intensive care.
Thinking the same thing, before Posey got his ankle broken to change the rules, Vogelbach and his 270 lbs of “muscle” would have slammed right through Wallach’s midsection at full speed.
These plays with slides and tags are so much more pleasing than the old home-plate collisions. I like watching baseball players doing skilled baseball things, not smashing into each other!
Im glad someone else is watching these Marlins games.
It really sucks that Brinson looks like he’ll just never figure it out at the plate. He’s loaded with all the right physical skills (many of which are demonstrated in this play) and it’s a shame we won’t get to see a fully realized version of his potential. Great article though – everything on display in this play is what makes baseball so great.
I can think of no higher compliment than to say that this post was Sullivan-esque.
Great, now every time there’s a close play I’ll be saying “Spaghetti” out loud.
and jeez in modern baseball there’s not enough spaghetti plays but too many cans of corn! and it irks me that you’re not allowed to bean anyone anymore.
Does this work if we say “pasketti?”
Best article I’ve read on here in a while. Just a celebration of the game. Beautiful.
Awesome. More of this!
In short: baseball is cool.
Awesome throw – could do without the double crow hop.
Five star article.
This is why you get my money!
Cool article, thanks!
Just wondering about this line: “That’s plenty deep; there have been 485 sacrifice fly situations in the last two years where the ball was hit 285 feet or farther and caught in the air, and 97% of them scored the runner on third.”
Not sure this is the best way to evaluate the risk on a ball hit 287 feet, since almost all of the balls hit farther than 285 feet will have been hit farther than 287 feet. The throwout rate on balls hit *less* than 287 feet would give some upper limit to the risk on this play (before adjusting for lumberlegs on third).
Great article. The gather and tag at the plate was really impressive for a 96 MPH ball. And I honestly don’t blame Vogelbach for sliding the way he did. It may have been self-preservation. When you see the catcher go up in the air like that, a lot of times he lands on the runner. Men tend to pull their legs up for protection lol.
Great analysis all around, really enjoyed the dissection.
Regulars on this site probably know that I have been an avid fan of this beautiful game for well over 70 years and this play, so wonderfully described by Ben, is simply another example of why I am screaming so loudly for a return of balance between hitting and pitching. When there are runners on base and the ball is put in play the game comes alive!!! Even in 1968 when the batting average for the season was .237, and the ball wasn’t juiced, there were only 5.9K’s/9 and 6,567 more hits than K’s. This year the average sits at .232, K’s average 9.3/9 and the most astonishing number of all, K’s exceed hits by 1,092 after just 1/6th of the season has been played. Assuming no improvement in contact rates that will bring the season total of K’s more than hits to over 6,000. The previous high for a full season in 2019 was just 784. The more K’s there are, the fewer exciting plays like this there are and the game is far the worse for it. I fervently hope that MLB will do something to raise contact rates before it is too late.
Excellent and full of love for the planets best sport! Thank you!
Best post of real baseball action this season!