Orioles Do Something, Land Suk-min Yoon

For the Orioles it’s been an offseason of mostly quiet contemplation, interrupted only by brief attempted dalliances with Grant Balfour and Tyler Colvin. At last, though, they are stirring again, reaching a three-year agreement with Korean righty Suk-min Yoon worth a reported $5.75 million. The contract, like the others were, is pending a physical, so perhaps it would’ve been wiser to hold off on writing this for another few days, but let’s just assume this is going to be official. Let’s assume the Orioles know what they’re getting into.

Yoon’s a risky sort with limited upside, and there are real questions here that’ll be discussed later on. There’s a reasonable chance Yoon never throws quality innings in the bigs, and there are reasons why he’s signed for less than the market rate of one single win. But let’s just get something clear: this is hardly any money, especially given the three-year guarantee. More money this offseason was thrown at Garrett Jones. A similar amount of money was guaranteed to Willie Bloomquist. Michael Morse got more money. Chad Qualls got more money. Edward Mujica got a lot more money, despite ending up last year with shoulder fatigue. It should be recognized that this is a small commitment, with upside more in terms of potential value than potential ability on the pitcher’s part.

The good: Yoon’s 27, and he’s been able to get his fastball into the 90s, and a few years ago he was Korean Baseball’s most valuable player. He has a full arsenal, and while people like his slider and changeup the most, he’s also been said to throw a curveball and a forkball.

The bad: Yoon’s come down from his MVP season. He split last year between the rotation and the bullpen, due in large part to a recurring shoulder issue that some have characterized as serious. Yoon isn’t thought to be on the same level as Hyun-jin Ryu, and there’s not even a consensus on whether he’s a future starter or reliever. It should be noted again that Yoon signed for considerably less money than Garrett Jones did.

Here’s one video of Yoon pitching:

Here’s another video of Yoon pitching. Below, some .gifs, selective for better pitches since nobody wants pitcher .gifs of mediocre pitches:

Yoon5.gif.opt

Yoon4.gif.opt

Yoon3.gif.opt

Yoon2.gif.opt

Yoon1.gif.opt

Something Yoon doesn’t have is pinpoint command. He also seems to have a tendency to leave pitches up, so he’s probably not going to match Ryu’s 51% groundball rate. For the Orioles, right away, he’s going to compete for a rotation slot, but it might be that he needs some time to adjust to living here and playing here, and the organization has at least three years to get value out of his arm. Yoon doesn’t necessarily need to pay off right away.

In Ryu’s last season in Korea, he struck out more than ten batters per nine innings. In Yoon’s best season in Korea, he struck out nine batters per nine innings, and then his strikeout rate fell for two consecutive years. The dropping strikeouts are a concern, and the shoulder problem is a concern, and Yoon’s never going to get by by overpowering his opposition. He doesn’t have Ryu’s skillset, but then in his debut big-league season, Ryu was a 3- or 4-win starting pitcher. Yoon can be his own kind of good, and there’s value in being even just all right.

Hisashi Iwakuma was posted, and when he couldn’t reach an agreement with the A’s, he returned to Japan. That season he injured his shoulder and he later wound up signing with the Mariners at a bargain contract. Now Iwakuma looks like one of the better starters in baseball, despite a pedestrian fastball and an assortment of health questions. This would be the best possible way for Yoon to work out.

But then, the Orioles don’t have to look that far for reasons to be optimistic. They’ve squeezed 300 adequate innings out of minor-league acquisition Miguel Gonzalez. More pertinently, they’ve had a positive experience so far with Wei-Yin Chen. Chen signed out of Japan for three years and a little over $11 million. He had and has a repertoire much like Yoon’s, and in Chen’s last two years in Japan, his strikeout rate collapsed from 20% to 14%. He didn’t have a shoulder problem that I know of, but there were reasons to stay away from Chen, and yet what the Orioles have gotten is 4.3 WAR over 330 innings. Or 4.7 WAR, depending on your preference. Chen’s been an average starting pitcher, and while there’s nothing particularly exciting about that, there’s something more exciting about having an average starting pitcher at a fraction of what you’d expect to pay for that. That’s how a team like the Orioles can boost its effective payroll.

Yoon isn’t Chen; Yoon isn’t anyone but himself. He’ll have his own professional experience, and it will either work out or it won’t. He throws fine pitches, yes. He has some issues, yes. But over a three-year period, the Orioles are paying him the free-agent rate of almost one whole win. People disagree on how to calculate that rate, but pretty much all the current estimates are north of Yoon’s $5.75-million guarantee. So that sets for Yoon a very low bar. Even if you figure the Orioles need to be a little more efficient than the market average, Yoon just doesn’t have to do much for the Orioles to come away with this having been worth their while. And if he can be an average starter for, say, the equivalent of two seasons, that’s several millions of dollars of surplus value. Even Yoon as a reliever could be more than worth the salary.

If he’s busted, he’s busted, and shoulder problems are some of the worst problems to have. But as recently as a year or two ago, Yoon would’ve been a pretty high-profile potential acquisition, and he’s still well shy of 30 years old. So this is a relatively inexpensive roll of the dice, with a distinctly unsexy sort of upside. Yoon might turn himself into a perfectly fine big-league pitcher. And for the cost, the Orioles would be ecstatic. Value’s value, however you get it.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Lutz
10 years ago

Maybe value is value, but this is not what the Orioles truly NEED.
They need to find one flamethrower with nasty stuff. They desperately need an ace, someone they can count on. Not adding to the plethora of mediocre pitching they already have. You wasted the career year of Chris Davis last year, do you really want to do it again?

bdhudsonmember
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric Lutz

You wanna find them a hundred million lying around somewhere? Or a reliable ace that’s waiting for a team?

attgig
10 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

Just look in Angelos’ mattress. he’s getting an extra 25 mil per year from mlb, but not changing payroll. he’s also fleecing the nats on the tv deal, and payroll… yup, still the same.

bdhudsonmember
10 years ago
Reply to  attgig

Ask Moreno how throwing money around works out

GiveEmTheBird
10 years ago
Reply to  attgig

I hate this line of thought. If YOU had $100mm lying around would you use it to buy the Orioles a pitcher (or would you rather use it for yourself)? Angelos is no different. He is doing what needs to be down to preserve his business’s revenue stream, keep the fans that have come coming, keep the media content value, and so forth. The rest is his money and no one else’s. if you want to start up a collection bucket or want to stop giving your money to him go ahead – just stop complaining about what is not yours. Angelo’s doesn’t tell you how to spend your money.

Justin
10 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

Angelos has alot of money. Just the money from MASN alone could be put to good use. You’d think someone of his age would like to see a championship in Baltimore but he holds true to his Scrooge McDuck mentality as he probably plans to be buried with his millions of dollars. I believe the highest paid Orioles pitcher all time is Kevin Millwood

Dean Travers
10 years ago
Reply to  Justin

It’s not Angelos’ money to spend–it’s Baltimore taxpayer money; the net annual cost of Camden Yards to Baltimore’s taxpayers is 11 mil.

Eric Lutz
10 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

then you pocket money if there is no one, spend it more wisely later. But if they were going to go out and spend the money anyway on someone that is completely marginal, like this Korean guy, then AJ Burnett would have been way way better than Yoon as an option (since he has a whole career in MLB to justify your purchase), and would not have cost $100 million on a one or two year deal, not even close.

Catoblepas
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric Lutz

I can’t stand this line of thought. Enough mediocre absolutely equals great, and stars-and-scrubs does not lead to guaranteed success (see: Angels, 2013). Especially saying that they need a specific position filled by a superstar, or a specific type of player at that specific position, strikes me as ridiculous. Focus on value. The Yankees could’ve added Jimenez, Santana, and a decent infielder for what they paid for Tanaka. They would be without an ace, but they would have a team way more likely to make the playoffs.

Jay29
10 years ago
Reply to  Catoblepas

Jimenez, Santana, and Infante on 3-5 year deals each also means the Yankees couldn’t improve at those positions. With Tanaka, Kelly Johnson, and Brian Roberts, they can add a quality infielder or two in July or December and be the better team for the next few years because of it.

You have to remember two things: (1) the Yankees don’t really care how much they pay as long as they get the players they want, and (2) they want to win every year. Having two below-average players isn’t great in February, but it’s also an opportunity to improve, which means their ceiling for 2014 (and 2015) is higher with Tanaka than with Ubaldo et al.

Catoblepas
10 years ago
Reply to  Jay29

I don’t see how you can seriously make the argument that adding 5-6 WAR at one position and not adding anything at another, with a potential to scrape some rent-an-infielder away from another team at the trade deadline at significant cost to an already-limping farm system, is better than adding 8 WAR spread across three positions. You say they don’t care how much they spend, but why didn’t they sign Tanaka AND Jimenez AND every other free agent? Obviously their tolerance is higher than other teams, but it isn’t nonexistent. Saying “it lets them improve later” is the craziest justification for holding onto bad players and not improving now I’ve ever heard.

Cliff
10 years ago
Reply to  Jay29

Jimenez, Infante and Santana combined wouldn’t come close to adding 8 WAR. They are each 2-2.5 WAR players and the players they would replace are 1.5-2 WAR(Johnson/Dean Anna, Phelps/Pineda/Nuno). Or close enough. It’s possible they wouldn’t add any WAR at all. Tanaka as a 4 WAR projected starter easily adds 2-2.5 WAR. The reason they didn’t follow your plan is because they are not idiots.

bdhudsonmember
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric Lutz

A flamethrower with nasty stuff….like Gausman?

Oh, Beepy
10 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

Dylan Bundy isn’t dead, you guys.

bdhudsonmember
10 years ago
Reply to  Oh, Beepy

Him too

Jonathan
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric Lutz

This is a ridiculous line of thought. I’m a Red Sox fan and people were throwing this garbage around at this time last year.

For one, aces aren’t just lying around and money will almost never actually get you one (And in the rare instance that it would, you’re not going to outbid the large market teams for one), and even if you did, you’d be paying way above market value for maybe two or three years of actual ace performance.

Second, and more importantly, a deep pitching rotation is infinitely more effective than having one bonafide ace. It certainly doesn’t hurt to have one, but the Red Sox didn’t have one last year (Look, I like Lester, but it’s hard to call him an ace overall considering his relatively uneven season) and they did pretty okay.

Any team is better off trying to develop their own solid pitching rotation (See Cardinals, Rays) and using their finances to fill in the blanks.