Orioles Send Mullins to Mets and Morton to Tigers, and Get a Gaggle of Pitchers in Return

Though many predicted heading into the 2025 season that the Orioles’ weak starting rotation and general inactivity over the offseason would come back to haunt them, even Baltimore’s biggest skeptics weren’t prognosticating that the team would sit well under .500 and 7.5 games out of playoff position at the end of July. Such as it is, the Orioles spent this year’s trade deadline turning over roughly a third of their roster. Over the last week or so, the O’s have traded relievers Gregory Soto, Seranthony Domínguez, and Andrew Kittredge, along with infielders Ryan O’Hearn and Ramón Urías. Then on Thursday afternoon, Anthony DiComo reported that Cedric Mullins was on his way to the Mets; a few hours later, Jeff Passan broke the news that Charlie Morton would be joining the Tigers. The only healthy pending free agent who wasn’t traded out of Baltimore is Tomoyuki Sugano, and with Zach Eflin hitting the IL mere hours before the deadline, Sugano is now a load-bearing member of the rotation.
Mullins was drafted by Baltimore in the 13th round of the 2015 draft. He debuted with the club in 2018 and has been a full-time starter with the O’s since 2021. Over the last few years, Mullins has hovered right around league average at the plate, but he arrives at his full season numbers riding high peaks and low valleys:

This season Mullins started strong, slumped through much of May and June, and then bounced back in July. Whether he can sustain July’s success into August and beyond remains an open question, but perhaps more uncertain is whether or not Mullins will sustain his newfound reverse platoon splits. For his career, Mullins has posted splits typical of a lefty hitter, logging an 84 wRC+ against left-handed pitching and a 115 wRC+ against right-handed pitching. But this season, Mullins owns a 143 wRC+ against lefties and an 89 wRC+ against righties. Mullins has made some adjustments to his stance that could be the source of the sudden reversal. He’s positioning himself slightly further back in the box and slightly closer to the plate. His feet are closer together, but his stance is more open, which might make it easier for him to track pitches thrown from the left side. His current set up in the box is similar to his stance from 2023, the only season in his career to see Mullins post neutral platoon splits.
His platoon splits will likely have a large influence on how and when Mullins is deployed for the Mets, but not because of the situation in center field specifically. In recent weeks, Jeff McNeil and Tyrone Taylor have split time in center for New York, but the timeshare isn’t based on starting pitcher handedness. Instead, Mets manager Carlos Mendoza is making a daily choice between McNeil’s bat and Taylor’s glove. McNeil has posted a 126 wRC+ while playing all over the diamond this year, but his limited range means he’s a slightly negative contributor in the outfield by FRV. Taylor, on the other hand, has a wRC+ of 58, but ranks seventh in FRV among center fielders despite having accrued less playing time than several of his peers. Mullins essentially splits the difference between the two, posting a 104 wRC+ with much better range than McNeil in the outfield, but a notably weaker arm compared to Taylor.
So Mullins doesn’t just address the Mets’ need for a more complete center fielder; he also addresses their need for better hitting against left-handed pitching, at least potentially. As a team, the Mets have posted a 114 wRC+ against right-handers, fifth best in the majors. But against lefties, the Mets rank 18th, with a wRC+ of 90. If Mullins’ 2025 platoon splits are the new normal, then it makes sense to give him the nod in center against left-handed starters and let McNeil move back to the infield, where he can spell either Brett Baty at second or Ronny Mauricio at third, since both struggle against southpaws. Against righties, Mendoza will have the flexibility to gear his lineup toward more specific matchup considerations and distribute rest days as needed.
Mullins joins relievers Gregory Soto, Ryan Helsley, and Tyler Rogers as the deadline additions for New York. As it stands, the Mets own a half-game divisional lead over the Phillies, who currently hold the second NL Wild Card and made similar moves in recent days to reinforce their bullpen and outfield options. Though adding Mullins might feel like the Mets are making finicky adjustments to an already strong roster, in a tight race against a competitor also working to get better, they’re right to seek whatever marginal gains a player like Mullins offers.
As a result, the Mets sent a trio of relievers back to the Orioles, who seemed to realize they might need to restock after trading away four members of their bullpen who have combined to throw almost 150 innings so far this season. (That’s not actually the reason, as only one of these pitchers is anywhere near cracking the majors, but I like the image of Mike Elias stopping at Royal Farms on his way into work and then, just as he’s strolling into his office, smacking his forehead because he forgot to pick up a couple relievers while he was at the store.) The three-pitcher package includes Anthony Nunez, Chandler Marsh, and Raimon Gomez.
Nunez was originally drafted out of high school as a shortstop, later converted to pitching, and over the span of two seasons and 50 innings pitched, quickly worked his way up to Double-A. According to his most recent prospect report,courtesy of Eric Longenhagen, his showpiece is an impressive slider that he commands well enough to survive in high-leverage situations at the big league level. The report continues, “Nunez doesn’t throw all that hard, but he has a good cutter that keeps hitters off of his fastball, and he’ll turn over the occasional sinking changeup. He’s been utterly dominant all year and is a virtual lock to be put on a 40-man roster this offseason.” Based on that evaluation, there’s a decent chance he joins Baltimore’s bullpen next season.
The other two pitchers fall more into the high upside flamethrowers category. Per his report, Marsh, an undrafted free agent out of Georgia, is “thriving as a reliever at Brooklyn thanks to his vertical slider and a 94-97 mph fastball that plays down due to a lack of control.” Likewise, Gomez struggles to command a high velocity fastball. His heater sits 97-103 mph. Quoting from his report, “His arm speed breaks the sound barrier and when his delivery is synched up, Gomez approaches the upper boundary of what is possible for humans to do with a baseball. [But] he has zero idea where it’s going and throws a ton of non-competitive pitches, especially when he throws his low-90s slider, which he lands for a strike less than 60% of the time.” The report further states that Gomez is unlikely to ever be as effective as, say, Aroldis Chapman, but (and this is me editorializing now) with that kind of velocity, he’ll almost certainly be given ample opportunity to try.
The Orioles closed out their deadline dealings by sending Morton to the Tigers. Morton signed with Baltimore on a one-year, $15 million deal back in January. After showing very few signs of aging in recent years, the 41 year-old took a step back this season and even agreed to pitch out of the bullpen for a spell in May. The break from starting seemed to do Morton some good, and he was able to bounce back after an atrocious April and log some productive innings in May and June, but his July has regressed back to his April. For the Tigers to get productive innings from Morton, they’ll need to help him tweak his curveball. The pitch has picked up several additional inches of glove-side movement, impacting his command and his ability to generate groundballs. As a result, hitters are slugging .398 against the curve this year, compared to .309 in 2024.
The Tigers likely view Morton as an insurance policy, a pitcher who can alternate between spot starting and providing long relief innings out of the bullpen. Morton joins Sawyer Gipson-Long, Alex Cobb, and rookie Troy Melton in the mix for the fifth starter spot. Both Gipson-Long and Cobb are working their way back from injuries on uncertain timelines. Melton has made just two starts in the majors, giving up six runs over five innings against the Pirates, then throwing seven scoreless against the Diamondbacks. Though Melton is highly regarded, ranking 70th on our most recent Top 100 Prospects list and fifth within Detroit’s system, it’s reasonable for the Tigers to avoid putting too much pressure on a guy with 12 innings in the big leagues.
But Morton wasn’t Detroit’s only addition to the pitching staff. After Reese Olson went down with a season-ending shoulder surgery a few days ago, the Tigers traded for Chris Paddack, though the Tigers clearly feel that more is better when it comes to pitching. With Morton and Paddack in the fold, Detroit also fortified its bullpen at the deadline, adding relievers Luke Jackson, Codi Heuer, Kyle Finnegan, Paul Sewald, and Rafael Montero.
In exchange for Morton, Detroit sent 6-foot-7 left-handed reliever Micah Ashman to Baltimore. Ashman was drafted in the 11th round of the 2024 draft after setting the all-time saves record at Utah. He threw 39 1/3 innings at High-A before a promotion last week to Double-A, where he logged an additional three scoreless innings. Ashman hasn’t allowed a home run all year, and he’s striking out batters at a 30% clip in pro ball and while walking fewer than 6%. He throws a low-90s fastball, a low-80s slider, and a split-finger changeup. Both the slider and changeup generate a ton of swing-and-miss. He creates deception by combining his height with a funky over the top delivery. When I asked Eric for the deets on Ashman’s arsenal and future profile, he pegged him as a middle-inning reliever.
Following fairly quiet offseasons, both the Orioles and Tigers navigated the deadline as volume shooters, acquiring as many players as possible in the hope that a few will work out, be it now or in the future. Meanwhile, a very active offseason for the Mets preceded a deadline where they were able to make more targeted moves to improve on the margins. But as we all know, procrastination doesn’t preclude success — though it may have caused a delay for the Orioles — and preparation doesn’t guarantee victory.
Kiri lives in the PNW while contributing part-time to FanGraphs and working full-time as a data scientist. She spent 5 years working as an analyst for multiple MLB organizations. You can find her on Bluesky @kirio.bsky.social.
I would suspect that McNeil plays most days at second as he’s the teams fifth best position player and one of their top hitters. Mendy will then likely mix and match Mauricio and Baty at third and use Vientos vs lefties at third and use him as the DH vs most righties. I know the defensive runs saved metrics says Mullins shouldn’t play CFer, but statcast has him at +2 at the position. Stearns mentioned in his press availability with the media yesterday that Mullins had a hammy issue early in the season and that the Mets felt he looked a lot better in CF the last two months. Nunez is a great story and I hope he makes it to the show but I think the Mets made out well in this trade.
man my comment got blocked. if it gets unblocked you can read it, but if it doesn’t, it was about how Elias only has one trick for acquiring pitchers and I don’t think it has worked.
Seriously, I would love to know what in that comment the filter found so objectionable that it got referred to moderation. Is the algorithm monitoring these things Mike Elias’s mother?
If it included a link it was probably that.
Lots of things to criticize about Elias and pitching development, but it seems he’s done a pretty good job of acquiring pitchers from other organizations. Bradish, Povich, McDermott, Cano, a whole host of waiver claims. None of those came in deals for material Major League value, and none was a highly rated prospect.
Plus Burnes and Eflin. We seem to be a popular punching bag for whatever reason, as people make lots of lazy digs at Elias and the Orioles that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
Does “we” mean the Orioles or people being criticized for making pro-Orioles comments?
It seems to me that Elias’s happy place, his comfort zone, is acquiring and drafting prospects, but he hasn’t distinguished himself in being able to sign his current core to long term deals (that could be an agent – IOW, Scott Boras – issue, to be fair) or to acquire stars with more than a year of control (Burnes, Saguano signing, all good, but 1-year deals only – to be fair, no one is especially strong at this right now unless they have unlimited budgets like the Dodgers, Mets, & Yankees).
In contrast, getting O’Hearn and, I think, Cano, were genius moves as was Santander in the Rule 5 (though, was not resigned, OTOH, hasn’t played well at all for Toronto)
On balance, I’d say the jury is still out on Elias’ overall abilities as a GM. He’s built a strong team on the backs of fantastic 1st round draft picks and is poised to have the Orioles compete for a World Series title for at least the next 3-4 seasons. But he must add to the fabulous core, especially starting pitching – a lot of talent is coming back from injuries and Rogers is great, but it’s not enough.
It’s unfair to judge him on this season’s Murphy’s Law year, but this offseason may go a long way to determining if the Baltimore Orioles are fringe competitors or a dominant team from 2026-2030, or more.
The unknown – how much money does ownership allow him to spend to add via free agency. Yes, yes, I know the Orioles added more payroll than any other team this season, BUT – that was due to stars reaching arbitration years, not adding people to assist those stars. That can’t be the case this offseason.
This is completely wrong. The O’s increased payroll by $67.8 million and only $17.8 million of that total came from arbitration eligible increases.
Here’s the thing: The Orioles rotation has been bad for (IIRC) the entirety of the Elias era except 2024. And it looks like it is going to be terrible in 2026 too. It is hard to predict what will happen in the future but whatever the Orioles are doing does not seem to be working.
Many of the things Elias has done are good, but there is no way to build a strong rotation entirely out of trades for unheralded prospects and 7th round draft picks. It’s a very good part of a larger strategy and not good as the entire strategy. It just isn’t enough.
Aside from Bradish (who was legitimately turning into an ace before his arm exploded) I can’t think of another guy who looks like he can anchor a rotation that the Orioles found during the current FO’s tenure. Not Povich, not McDermott.
I am pretty sure there was a second one after Bradish I mentioned in my comment that got eaten, so it’s almost certainly two. Maybe Boston Bateman? Although he is a long way away, and I do like Watts-Brown even if “anchor” is probably too strong of a descriptor.
It is amazing that Elias and his team was able to find players that could be improved this much. It’s just not enough. At some point you need to find a way to get a higher grade of prospect (or veteran, which was what happened in 2024).
The plus side of this is that the Orioles are going to have a fantastic reliever corps at some point soon. Virtually every pitcher they got this deadline are pitching as relievers in the minors right now. But that rotation is going to be a leaky boat for a long time.
Here’s the thing: The Orioles’ rotation ranked 12th out of 30 teams in fWAR during the 2023 season, so no, they weren’t bad for the entirety of the Elias era except 2024.
Keep in mind that nearly every comment you have made about the Orioles over the last several years has been wrong, such as the argument we had this preseason when you insisted that Elias hadn’t traded enough prospects and that Heston Kjerstad was somehow “blocked.” You don’t know much about this team, which would be fine if you didn’t keep trying to argue with people who do know a lot about this team.
There are many things about the O’s future that I don’t know either. We don’t know how Kyle Bradish will be after his return. We don’t know how Grayson Rodriguez will be when he eventually returns. We don’t know if Brandon Young or Chayce McDermott will ever be effective major league starters. We don’t know if Trevor Rogers will keep up his current success (I’m confident that he won’t). We don’t know if Elias will re-sign Eflin or if he will get Framber Valdez in free agency.
All of those are legitimate questions regarding the future of the rotation, but you’re beginning from a false premise by insisting that 2024 was the only year that the rotation wasn’t bad, which isn’t true as I proved above. When Bradish and Rodriguez were both healthy, the rotation was above average. Elias has assembled an above average rotation before and he can do it again. Remember, Elias had the highest offer to Burnes until Burnes asked Boras to contact Arizona, and the Diamondbacks’ offer was only $13 million larger in total present value than what Elias offered while being for six years instead of four.
It’s fine to question the direction of the franchise, but you keep making criticisms of Elias that aren’t actually true because you keep getting basic facts wrong. You’re one of the people who “make lots of lazy digs at Elias and the Orioles that don’t hold up under scrutiny.“
I’m fine with the trade for the Mets and think Mullins will be a marginal upgrade down the stretch, but I don’t know what happened to Tyrone Taylor that he couldn’t be the same guy. It feels like the Mets are losing their bets on some of these bargain hole-filler guys and perhaps sticking with them longer than they should. But then I guess Siri was meant to be the insurance plan before his freak injury (or Taylor was Siri’s insurance).
RoFo reference!
I’m disappointed to see a column on FanGraphs beginning with a narrative that clearly wasn’t fact-checked. Back in February, Ben Clemens wrote an article noting that the Orioles increased payroll by more than any other team in the majors except the Dodgers. There’s no question that Baltimore’s season has been a huge disappointment, but saying that the team had “general inactivity over the offseason” is blatantly false. The complete opposite is true, as they were one of the most active teams over the offseason.
I don’t think you can ding the Orioles for “lack of activity.” They signed like eight pitchers this offseason and just traded for probably 15 minor league pitchers? What people mean by that is lack of high-end activity. But that’s not the same thing as activity.
The payroll increases were mainly for arbitration years of their players – they were not one of THE most active – that is also false – they added to the edges but didn’t bring in the high impact pitcher(s) they needed, but were available. But it is also false to say they were inactive as well. Probably. more true to say not high impact activity.
The Orioles had eleven players in arbitration years and all of those increases combined added up to $17,760,600.
The difference between Baltimore’s Opening Day payroll in 2024 and Baltimore’s Opening Day payroll in 2025 was $67,793,878.
That means 26.2% of the Orioles’ payroll increase was due to arbitration years of their players, so no, that wasn’t even remotely close to being “mainly” responsible.
They literally were one of the most active, having not only increased payroll by more than all but the Dodgers, but also signing one of the highest numbers of free agents. You’re free to dislike some of those signings, as I was opposed to Elias signing Morton, but please check your facts before trying to “correct” someone else who wasn’t wrong.