Pre-Deadline Top 100 Prospects Update

Kevin McGonigle Photo: Junfu Han/USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

With the draft behind us and the trade deadline looming, I’ve made a number of updates to The Board. The signing deadline for drafted players has passed, and the 2025 class has now been ported over to the pro side of The Board. You can now see where your favorite team’s new draftees line up in their farm system, and I may yet add a few more of the very late round and/or undrafted players who signed for way over slot (looking at you, Brewers). I’ve also peeled away from the lists those players who have exceeded the rookie eligibility threshold; they’ve been moved onto the Graduates tab on The Board. This means that the farm system values have shifted, and will continue to in real time as trades are made this week.

Most importantly, however, I’ve made a sweeping update to the Top 100 Prospects list. As I noted in the spring with our last Top 100 update, there are a couple of things to keep in mind as you read, especially if you’re new to FanGraphs prospect stuff. First, the “Top 100” title is arbitrary SEO nonsense; I rank players as deep as I have them graded as 50 FV prospects or better, and as of this update, that’s 99 guys. Second, remember that Future Value is a value grade. The tools and ultimate potential upside of a player matter a lot, as does the length and consistency of a player’s performance track record and their proximity to the majors. There are players who have talent upside better than their FV grade, but if they’re risky for whatever reason, or if they’re in the low minors, I want to reflect that risk/time element in their grade.

Finally, remember that an actualized “50” is an average everyday player at a given position. Not “average” in the sense that I’m averaging every big leaguer who played that position to create a performance baseline. Rather, “average” here means that the player would fall toward the middle of the pack when we’re talking about the top 30 or so players at their position across a multi-year window. That’s a high bar. Really excellent, tenured players tend to occupy their spot on a big league roster for long periods of time. It’s hard for prospects to crack into that All-Star-caliber group, and even harder to sustain some measure of production for six-plus years of team control. Forty- and 45-grade players are good big leaguers, too, and there are many more of them across the pro baseball talent distribution than there are players who are 50s and above.

This list overwhelmingly reflects my individual evaluations and grades, with sourced opinions from scouts and executives contributing to select players where I needed to fill a gap in my viewing, or to cross-check my thinking. The in-person looks I’ve gotten at the majority of this group, plus data and video, have contributed to my conclusions here.

Below you’ll find the updated list, followed by a rundown of the clusters of players that formed around similar profiles throughout the rankings. I provide some commentary on the clusters, with a focus on players whose grades have changed on this update. If you want more information, please head over to The Board, where you can find tool grades, pitch repertoires, full scouting reports, and more. I’ll be updating the hard-hit rates (as of 7/22) of the position player prospects throughout the rest of this week, so check back to see how those have changed compared to last year.

Updated Top 100 Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
1 60 Kevin McGonigle 2B 20.9 DET
2 60 Jesús Made SS 18.2 MIL
3 60 Samuel Basallo C 21.0 BAL
4 60 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.4 TEX
5 60 Konnor Griffin SS 19.3 PIT
6 60 Chase Burns SP 22.6 CIN
7 60 Bubba Chandler SP 22.9 PIT
8 60 Andrew Painter SP 22.3 PHI
9 60 Max Clark CF 20.6 DET
10 55 Jordan Lawlar SS 23.0 ARI
11 55 Bryce Eldridge 1B 20.8 SFG
12 55 Josue De Paula RF 20.2 LAD
13 55 Liam Doyle SP 21.2 STL 🆕
14 55 Carson Williams SS 22.1 TBR
15 55 Aidan Miller SS 21.1 PHI
16 55 Alfredo Duno C 19.6 CIN
17 55 Noah Schultz SP 22.0 CHW
18 55 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.4 COL 🆕
19 55 Jarlin Susana SP 21.4 WSN
20 55 Ethan Salas C 19.2 SDP
21 50 Leo De Vries SS 18.8 SDP
22 50 Angel Genao SS 21.2 CLE
23 50 JJ Wetherholt 2B 22.9 STL
24 50 Travis Bazzana 2B 22.9 CLE
25 50 Colt Emerson SS 20.0 SEA
26 50 Franklin Arias SS 19.7 BOS
27 50 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 17.8 SFG
28 50 Walker Jenkins LF 20.4 MIN
29 50 Chase DeLauter RF 23.8 CLE
30 50 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.4 MIN
31 50 Brandon Sproat SP 24.9 NYM
32 50 Josue Briceño C 20.9 DET
33 50 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.0 CHC
34 50 Thayron Liranzo C 22.1 DET
35 50 Zyhir Hope RF 20.5 LAD
36 50 Jackson Ferris SP 21.5 LAD
37 50 Thomas White SP 20.8 MIA
38 50 Kade Anderson SP 21.1 SEA 🆕
39 50 Alex Freeland SS 23.9 LAD
40 50 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.3 CHC
41 50 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.2 NYY
42 50 Arjun Nimmala SS 19.8 TOR
43 50 Aiva Arquette SS 21.8 MIA 🆕
44 50 Eli Willits SS 17.6 WSN 🆕
45 50 Luis Peña SS 18.7 MIL
46 50 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.6 STL
47 50 Braden Montgomery RF 22.3 CHW
48 50 Cam Schlittler SP 24.5 NYY
49 50 Parker Messick SP 24.8 CLE
50 50 Rhett Lowder SP 23.4 CIN
51 50 Jonah Tong SP 22.1 NYM
52 50 Chase Petty SP 22.3 CIN
53 50 Nolan McLean SP 24.0 NYM
54 50 Cooper Pratt SS 20.9 MIL
55 50 Cooper Ingle C 23.4 CLE
56 50 Luke Keaschall 2B 23.0 MIN
57 50 Carson Benge CF 22.5 NYM
58 50 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.7 SEA
59 50 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.4 NYM
60 50 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.2 SEA
61 50 Trey Yesavage SP 22.0 TOR
62 50 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.0 BOS 🆕
63 50 Jett Williams CF 21.7 NYM
64 50 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.1 ARI 🆕
65 50 Joe Mack C 22.6 MIA
66 50 Carter Jensen C 22.1 KCR
67 50 Harry Ford C 22.4 SEA
68 50 Tyler Bremner SP 21.3 LAA 🆕
69 50 Didier Fuentes SP 20.1 ATL
70 50 Troy Melton SP 24.7 DET
71 50 Payton Tolle SP 22.7 BOS
72 50 Gage Jump SP 22.3 ATH
73 50 Jonny Farmelo CF 20.9 SEA
74 50 Xavier Isaac 1B 21.6 TBR
75 50 Felnin Celesten SS 19.9 SEA
76 50 Quinn Mathews SP 24.8 STL
77 50 Hagen Smith SP 21.9 CHW
78 50 Caden Dana SP 21.6 LAA
79 50 Logan Henderson SP 23.4 MIL
80 50 Khal Stephen SP 22.6 TOR
81 50 Jimmy Crooks C 24.0 STL
82 50 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.0 TBR
83 50 Starlyn Caba SS 19.6 MIA
84 50 Brody Hopkins SP 23.5 TBR
85 50 Jaxon Wiggins SP 23.8 CHC
86 50 Connor Prielipp SP 24.6 MIN
87 50 George Klassen SP 23.5 LAA
88 50 Carson Whisenhunt SP 24.8 SFG
89 50 Tink Hence SP 23.0 STL
90 50 Brandon Clarke SP 22.3 BOS
91 50 Luis Mey SIRP 24.1 CIN
92 50 Edgardo Henriquez SIRP 23.1 LAD
93 50 Jeferson Quero C 22.8 MIL
94 50 Ricky Tiedemann SP 22.9 TOR
95 50 River Ryan SP 27.0 LAD
96 50 Jake Bloss SP 24.1 TOR
97 50 Travis Sykora SP 21.3 WSN
98 50 Alejandro Rosario SP 23.6 TEX
99 50 Moisés Chace SP 22.1 PHI

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
60 FV Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
1 60 Kevin McGonigle 2B 20.9 DET
2 60 Jesús Made SS 18.2 MIL
3 60 Samuel Basallo C 21.0 BAL
4 60 Sebastian Walcott SS 19.4 TEX
5 60 Konnor Griffin SS 19.3 PIT
6 60 Chase Burns SP 22.6 CIN
7 60 Bubba Chandler SP 22.9 PIT
8 60 Andrew Painter SP 22.3 PHI
9 60 Max Clark CF 20.6 DET

McGonigle’s BP at the Futures Game was opinion-altering. He has real juice in his hands, and he’s going to get to his power in games not only because he’s a skillful hitter, but because his swing is geared for launch. His arm isn’t a fit at shortstop. You could argue he should be the lone 65 FV prospect given the state of second base at the big league level right now, which aside from Ketel Marte and Jazz Chisholm Jr., is really light on power hitters. Basallo would have ranked first if not for his lack of plate discipline. He’s not a good catcher right now, though at his size, age, and relative inexperience due to injury, you can project he’ll stay behind the dish. But he might chase himself into a disappointing outcome. Made’s shortstop defense is getting better and might be really great at peak. He’s one of the best pure athletes in the minors, and has ridiculous range and body control. You could argue for any of Made, Griffin, and Walcott to be no. 1. Griffin has the most present power of that group (his swing looks like a righty version of Roman Anthony’s), but his length causes him to push a lot of contact the opposite way. Walcott is more often on time to pull, but he’s a lower launch guy. Neither of them has fully actualized their power yet; when they do, it’s going to be a lot of fun. Made is pretty easily the best pure hitter of the three.

55 FV Prospects
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
10 55 Jordan Lawlar SS 23.0 ARI
11 55 Bryce Eldridge 1B 20.8 SFG
12 55 Josue De Paula RF 20.2 LAD
13 55 Liam Doyle SP 21.2 STL 🆕
14 55 Carson Williams SS 22.1 TBR
15 55 Aidan Miller SS 21.1 PHI
16 55 Alfredo Duno C 19.6 CIN
17 55 Noah Schultz SP 22.0 CHW
18 55 Ethan Holliday 3B 18.4 COL 🆕
19 55 Jarlin Susana SP 21.4 WSN
20 55 Ethan Salas C 19.2 SDP

How Lawlar fills in for Eugenio Suárez at third base will be fascinating. His ability to dive or slide and then recover to throw is remarkable, but he’s also a tightly wound guy who looks uncomfortable in on the grass. He’s graded in a vacuum here, basically where he’d be were he going to play shortstop. De Paula is starting to actualize his power and is doing so without sacrificing contact. He has roughly average raw power right now and should still grow into at least one more grade as he ages into his mid-20s. Miller and Williams are having tough seasons on paper, but I’m trying not to overreact to either’s struggles. Miller still looks great both to the eye and when you look under the hood at his TrackMan data. I’ve written about Williams’ strikeout risk in the past, but even I’m surprised by how much his performance has swooned this year. He’s such a great defender that he should be a really good player anyway.

Buildaround Middle Infielders
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
21 50 Leo De Vries SS 18.8 SDP
22 50 Angel Genao SS 21.2 CLE
23 50 JJ Wetherholt 2B 22.9 STL
24 50 Travis Bazzana 2B 22.9 CLE
25 50 Colt Emerson SS 20.0 SEA
26 50 Franklin Arias SS 19.7 BOS
27 50 Josuar De Jesus Gonzalez SS 17.8 SFG
40 50 Jefferson Rojas SS 20.3 CHC

Arias moved into this group during this year’s list cycle and Gonzalez enters on this update, but the others have been here since February. Gonzalez looks incredible down in the DSL. His numbers (90% zone contact, 37% hard-hit rate, 104 mph EV90 as a 17-year-old) aren’t as bonkers as Jesús Made’s were at this time last year, but they’re approaching that. I’m not quite ready to stuff De Vries way up in the Top 10 because whether or not he’s a shortstop is still a question for me, and he doesn’t quite have the same bat speed as the 60 FV hitters. He’s more of a 50-hit/55-power combo with a swing actualized to get to it in games. He’s also the second youngest fella here, and I might be underrating his power projection. If you think so, then imagine him right behind Lawlar; I think that’s justifiable.

Oft-Injured Impact Bats
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
28 50 Walker Jenkins LF 20.4 MIN
29 50 Chase DeLauter RF 23.8 CLE
30 50 Emmanuel Rodriguez CF 22.4 MIN

This group is pretty self-explanatory, though I’ll add that Jenkins’ raw power has not developed as hoped, and he slid out of the 55 FV tier due more to that than to injury. DeLauter (broken hamate) and Rodriguez (oblique) both got hurt again recently.

Big League-Ready Mid-Rotation Starters with Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
31 50 Brandon Sproat SP 24.9 NYM
36 50 Jackson Ferris SP 21.5 LAD
37 50 Thomas White SP 20.8 MIA
38 50 Kade Anderson SP 21.1 SEA 🆕

This contingent includes the 50 FV pitchers whose long-term ceiling could be bigger than that grade. All of these guys could move into the 55 FV tier during the next few months if they continue to throw strikes. Obviously, Anderson’s timeline for a move into the 55s is more April/May of next year, as it’s unlikely he’ll pitch again in 2025.

Catchers
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
32 50 Josue Briceño C 20.9 DET
34 50 Thayron Liranzo C 22.1 DET
65 50 Joe Mack C 22.6 MIA
66 50 Carter Jensen C 22.1 KCR
67 50 Harry Ford C 22.4 SEA

Briceño is the best pure hitter of this group and also the youngest, but the others have better chance to be a good defensive catchers. Liranzo’s freaky switch-hitting pop creates some distance from the rest of this group, and if you wanted to argue that Macks’ defense is special enough to pull him up into that range I think you could, he’s just going to strike out a ton. Ford might be a trade candidate due to the presence of Cal Raleigh ahead of him. Jensen is again on here while Blake Mitchell is not (yet), because Jensen has better plate discipline and is a level closer to the majors than Mitchell is.

Power Bats with Hit Tool Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
33 50 Kevin Alcántara CF 23.0 CHC
35 50 Zyhir Hope RF 20.5 LAD
39 50 Alex Freeland SS 23.9 LAD
41 50 George Lombard Jr. SS 20.2 NYY
42 50 Arjun Nimmala SS 19.8 TOR
43 50 Aiva Arquette SS 21.8 MIA 🆕
47 50 Braden Montgomery RF 22.3 CHW
73 50 Jonny Farmelo CF 20.9 SEA
74 50 Xavier Isaac 1B 21.6 TBR

This group is structured prioritizing proximity and positional value. Alcántara is a prime trade candidate because he’s running out of option years and needs to be given a prolonged big league opportunity soon. His size and length mean he’s going to need a longer runway to adjust, and the Cubs’ timeline doesn’t really align with that. Hope’s contact rate is in the mid-60s this year, which is a bit of a concern. You could pull Lazaro Montes up from the 45+ FV tier and into this group if you wish. Mid-season swoons by Lombard and Nimmala kept them from the group headed by De Vries above. Isaac has some of the best raw power in all of pro baseball, but he was striking out at a 30% clip again when he was shut down with injury last month. Farmelo (rib stress fracture) has also dealt with yet another injury this season. You could slide those two all the way to the back with the injured pitchers if you like, and if they don’t play again this summer, that’s what I’ll end up doing in the offseason.

High-Floored No. 3/4 Starters
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
48 50 Cam Schlittler SP 24.5 NYY
49 50 Parker Messick SP 24.8 CLE
50 50 Rhett Lowder SP 23.4 CIN
51 50 Jonah Tong SP 22.1 NYM
52 50 Chase Petty SP 22.3 CIN
53 50 Nolan McLean SP 24.0 NYM
62 50 Kyson Witherspoon SP 21.0 BOS 🆕
68 50 Tyler Bremner SP 21.3 LAA 🆕
79 50 Logan Henderson SP 23.4 MIL
80 50 Khal Stephen SP 22.6 TOR

Schlittler was a 45 FV prospect during the offseason, but his velocity kept climbing this year and it’s rare to find guys his size who also throw strikes in the upper-90s. Note the gap between most of these names and the Witherspoon/Bremner duo, which is due entirely to proximity rather than talent. Though, because Bremner is an Angel, he’ll probably close that gap pretty quickly. Stephen is now in his second consecutive year of working nearly 100 (or more) innings and has shown special command. All three of his pitches are playing like above-average weapons. It was only a couple of years ago when he was struggling at Purdue; now he’s on the doorstep of the majors.

Dudes Who Rake
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
44 50 Eli Willits SS 17.6 WSN 🆕
45 50 Luis Peña SS 18.7 MIL
46 50 Rainiel Rodriguez C 18.6 STL
54 50 Cooper Pratt SS 20.9 MIL
55 50 Cooper Ingle C 23.4 CLE
56 50 Luke Keaschall 2B 23.0 MIN
57 50 Carson Benge CF 22.5 NYM
58 50 Michael Arroyo 2B 20.7 SEA
59 50 Jacob Reimer 3B 21.4 NYM
75 50 Felnin Celesten SS 19.9 SEA

Players in this cluster either have great feel for contact but only fair power (Willits for now, Pratt, Ingle, Keaschall, Benge), or are more balanced hitters with issues on defense (Arroyo, Reimer, also Keaschall). Peña’s underlying hit data is exceptional, but his defense has regressed compared to his spring look. I had been skeptical of Arroyo due to his swing path, which leaves him vulnerable to elevated fastballs, but he’s gotten better and better at laying off the pitches he can’t handle, and his ability to do damage to all fields against basically every other pitch type has held up even as he’s been exposed to Double-A pitching. He’s still a bad defender, but I buy that he’ll hit enough to be good anyway. Celesten’s risk is less about excessive strikeouts and more about whether or not he can polish his swings to the point where he can access his power in games.

Mold Breakers
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
60 50 Jurrangelo Cijntje SP 22.2 SEA
61 50 Trey Yesavage SP 22.0 TOR
63 50 Jett Williams CF 21.7 NYM
64 50 Kayson Cunningham 2B 19.1 ARI 🆕

Each of these players brings something unique to the table. Yesavage has three plus pitches, but his delivery requires a ton of effort; there really isn’t anyone else in the game whose mechanics look like this, certainly not among the starting pitchers. Williams and Cunningham lack the size of most successful everyday big leaguers.

Monster Fastballs
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
69 50 Didier Fuentes SP 20.1 ATL
70 50 Troy Melton SP 24.7 DET
71 50 Payton Tolle SP 22.7 BOS
72 50 Gage Jump SP 22.3 ATH

All of these pitchers command mid-90s fastballs that also feature nasty uphill angle, which hitters struggle to match. They also tend to have shallow, inconsistent secondary pitches that are difficult to control. Jump moves into this area after struggling to throw strikes for basically his entire lifetime as a prospect until his draft spring at LSU. He’s now had two consecutive seasons with walk rates under 8% and he’s sustaining mid-90s velocity this year even though he’s on pace to double his previous high in innings. The Athletics’ pitching development, overall, seems to have taken a step forward.

Having A Rough Year
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
76 50 Quinn Mathews SP 24.8 STL
77 50 Hagen Smith SP 21.9 CHW
78 50 Caden Dana SP 21.6 LAA

Some combination of injury and wildness has plagued this trio all year. Matthews is walking 8 per 9 IP as of this update; Smith has 29 walks in 40.2 innings but has also struck out 62 guys. Part of Dana’s appeal as a prospect entering the 2025 season was his size/control combo, which theoretically should allow him to eat a ton of innings. Instead, he has struggled to pitch enough in the bigs to graduate.

Glove-First Profiles
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
81 50 Jimmy Crooks C 24.0 STL
82 50 Tre’ Morgan 1B 23.0 TBR
83 50 Starlyn Caba SS 19.6 MIA

All three of these hitters have lower-impact offensive ability, but all three are premium, top-of-the-scale defenders who do enough at the plate to be considered an everyday player in the aggregate.

Relief Risk
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
84 50 Brody Hopkins SP 23.5 TBR
85 50 Jaxon Wiggins SP 23.8 CHC
86 50 Connor Prielipp SP 24.6 MIN
87 50 George Klassen SP 23.5 LAA
88 50 Carson Whisenhunt SP 24.8 SFG
89 50 Tink Hence SP 23.0 STL
90 50 Brandon Clarke SP 22.3 BOS
91 50 Luis Mey SIRP 24.1 CIN
92 50 Edgardo Henriquez SIRP 23.1 LAD

The Cubs have shockingly helped Wiggins throw strikes with basically his entire repertoire, and his arm action looks much more fluid and natural now than it did when he was in college. He and Hopkins (who, remember, was mostly a hitter in college and is still developing as a pitcher) are the two from this group most likely to remain starters long-term.

Injured
Rank FV Name Pos Age Team Trend
93 50 Jeferson Quero C 22.8 MIL
94 50 Ricky Tiedemann SP 22.9 TOR
95 50 River Ryan SP 27.0 LAD
96 50 Jake Bloss SP 24.1 TOR
97 50 Travis Sykora SP 21.3 WSN
98 50 Alejandro Rosario SP 23.6 TEX
99 50 Moisés Chace SP 22.1 PHI

Quero is dealing with more shoulder trouble after missing last year recovering from labrum surgery. Sykora’s TJ was announced yesterday and the timing of it will likely cost him all of next year, too.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

101 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric MartellMember since 2026
11 months ago

Okay, I have to ask – no Owen Caissie or Moises Ballesteros surprised me, given their placement on other lists. Just missed or overvalued by others?

tdmocMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  Eric Martell

They show up as 45s in the December report, so still good players, just not average (or better) every day regulars. From a quick skim it looks like Ballesteros isn’t a good enough defender and Caissie seems to lack the hit tool (or rather he lacks the compensating power).

Obviously, that report is now 8 months old, so it’s worth asking him in his next chat what he considers their lumps to be. But he never comments on other publications for obvious reasons.

Eric MartellMember since 2026
11 months ago
Reply to  tdmoc

Thanks!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Eric Martell

I think he explained pretty well his concerns with Ballestreros on the list, but I think Caissie’s raw power is back up? It’s possible that he hasn’t seen that yet, or that he has but whatever he is doing in his swing to get it he thinks will be exploited a lot in MLB.

Ryan TuresMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Maybe I’m just a rube, but maybe I didn’t read the methodology, but how are two guys that are both in the top 60 in both MLB pipeline and baseball America not even in the top 100 on this one??

I believe Caissie is in the 30s on MLB pipeline and Ballesteros

Last edited 11 months ago by Ryan Tures
Ryan TuresMember since 2017
11 months ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

I believe Caissie is in the 30s on MLB pipeline and Ballesteros is in the 30s on baseball America

bubblesMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

Different evaluators have different opinions. Eric is a lot more critical of prospects and there are flaws to both of those guys in his eyes. What makes Eric the best in my eyes in his willingness to form his own thoughts on players rather than just parroting what MLB Pipeline and BA have.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  bubbles

I don’t know that Eric is better than Baseball America / MLB Pipeline / whoever at predicting prospect outcomes, but I do know that Eric is far better at avoiding groupthink. And that he explains why far, far better than those other places do.

Last edited 11 months ago by sadtrombone
anthonydwMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That’s really well put. I’ll be honest I don’t find Eric’s reports more valuable than others. Pretty sure the consensus is more often correct than he is. That said, Eric clearly puts in the work and, even if I generally ignore his precise rankings (per this example, I completely disagree on Caissie and Ballesteros), I still respect his views and take his written comments very seriously. Always well grounded and a great counter-weight to take into account along with consensus rankings.

In short: Really glad he avoids that groupthink even if, overall, group consensus is probably more often correct — “wisdom of the masses” and other such cliches.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

You can read the same thing I did if you like. But I promise you I don’t have access to anything you don’t have, just some experience reading Eric’s scouting reports.

For Ballestreros, Eric thinks there’s a good chance he is not a catcher, in which case he is almost certainly a DH. And a roughly league average hitter as a DH is not really rosterable, even as a league-average catcher with fringy defense is in all-star consideration.

His receiving has improved to a place of viability, but his ball-blocking, especially to his left, mostly has not. Though this problem was much more pronounced during the 2024 Arizona Fall League than it was during the regular season, it’s an issue that might prevent him from catching pitchers whose stuff is apt to expose his issues, and in his particular case that means guys whose stuff tends to finish in the dirt.

Eric has been pessimistic about defense in the past that hasn’t panned out, and others don’t seem to be bothered by it.

For Caissie, he strikes out a lot, which Eric was willing to overlook as long as his peak exit velocities were absurd, but then last season they backed up. I think Kiley said his exit velocity is back up though, in which case he will likely return to being an FV50 as a Joey Gallo-ish right fielder. So either Eric doesn’t have that information yet, or Caissie is doing something with his swing that is going to leave him super exposed to good pitching in MLB that he hasn’t told us about yet. Ask him about it in the chat.

Caissie’s power output exploded in 2023 and held firm in 2024 even though his underlying power data backed up quite a bit. He still generated plus raw pop, but Caissie’s peak exit velocities were below the elite numbers he posted in 2023. It’s important for Caissie to get to big power because he has other limitations as a hitter. For instance, he is very vulnerable to fastballs located at the top of the zone. His contact rates are near the bottom of what is usually acceptable from a good big league corner outfielder. With elite power, that’s okay. With plus power, Caissie looks more like a platoon option that an everyday cleanup hitter.

Last edited 11 months ago by sadtrombone
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m still higher on Caissie than that – being from a small school in Canada, plus COVID, earns him plenty of slack in my eyes when it comes to present skills.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago

I think this is probably who he is? Maybe he gets better when he is facing down MLB pitching and he decides he needs to reevaluate how he is doing things but he’s been running K rates between 28% and 32% every year, walking a ton, and hitting an enormous number of homers. This TTO thing seems to be working out for him very well in the minors and either he can’t change or he / his coaches don’t think he needs to. It might play against MLB pitching too, especially in a platoon role, but I don’t think his profile is going to change at all while he is in the minors.

But if the raw power is back, he’s a 50 purely on the “never give up on 80 raw power” and the track record.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oh, I just expect him to maintain that High 20s K% in the majors rather than seeing it skyrocket, as he continues to adjust and get better.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  Ryan Tures

Caissie also didn’t make Keith Law’s updated list. Some prospects are polarizing, and it’s interesting to know why.

ironfireman
11 months ago
Reply to  Eric Martell

At a glance Caissie’s numbers are almost identical to last year except for SLG. He’s 90+pts higher this year – 20 HR in 80 games 25 Doubles – 940 OPS – I think he started a little slower this year and got hot over the last month… maybe it’s just a case of evaluating a few hundred players – all the new draft guys and Caissie was looked at a month ago. He’s 34-67 from MLB, BA, Fish, Law with an average rank in upper 50s.
One weird stat is 0 GIDP.

LenFuegoMember since 2025
11 months ago

The organization into various categories is very helpful for getting your head around these guys. Thanks!

isaacprinceMember since 2023
11 months ago

Interesting not seeing Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz here considering the season he’s had and your comments on him preseason. Carlos Lagrange as well. Also, very surprised to not see A.J. Ewing here at all.

ScoreboardMember since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  isaacprince

Agreed on ERC and Lagrange. If they were pitching for a less conservative organization, they’d likely be pitching in AAA by end of year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  isaacprince

I think Elmer Rodriguez-Cruz could easily be a 50 by the end of the year, he’s close enough now that I wouldn’t be surprised if someone had an FV50 on him.

Lagrange still looks kind of like a reliever, but potentially a really good one. I think he’s a 45, and let’s see if he can throw strikes reliably.

CC AFCMember since 2016
11 months ago
Reply to  isaacprince

Eric hates the city of NY, obviously

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago

The gap between FV60 and FV55 has never seemed so large.

Virtually everyone in the FV60 tier looks like a franchise altering talent, and then basically everyone in the FV55 looks to have serious flaws.

IMO I would probably skip the FV55 tier entirely except for Eldridge, Duno, Doyle, and Shultz, and it would be easier to convince me to move all four of the guys I like down to FV50 than to convince four more of the current FV55 guys to stay where they are at.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I took another look at the Top 9.

I think if McGonigle and Clark keep performing at AA the way they have been in their brief tenure there I think they’re definitely FV65 by the end of the year.

And I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Made, Basallo, Walcott, and Griffin were FV65 by this time next year.

Basallo would be an FV65 and the #1 prospect for me already if he were a lock to stick at catcher, and Walcott’s performance at AA as a nineteen year old is just a touch low for FV65, but I think he’s going to get there. I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see either of them or Griffin surpass McGonigle and Clark even by the end of this year, and both of them are pretty amazing.

If you have the tools and you’ve solved AA at age 20, then I think it’s okay to put that big grade on them. This is an extremely robust group of FV60 position players. Huge tools, huge performance at young ages. They look like future all-stars.

bubblesMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

May I ask where you would have Wetherholt? Wetherholt was by far my favorite prospect in last year’s draft. Since then, he has done hit everywhere he has been and it feels like his grade should be going up. Even as a 2B, he looks like a 55 and close to 60 for me. I am higher on the hit tool than Eric and think it is more of a 65 with 70 grade plate discipline and 60 grade bat control. I see 55 power upside as well, but maybe 50 more realistic.

I would have Wetherholt in the 10-12 range. Compared to someone like Jordan Lawler (highest 55) I feel a lot better about Wetherholt producing at an above average starter to All Star level.

Last edited 11 months ago by bubbles
sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  bubbles

The question about Wetherholt has always been if he can stay healthy enough.

If he’s healthy he’s probably a 3-win second baseman, with some upside for a bit more. Looks Brendan Donovan-ish to me, but it is possible I’m under selling the power or the defense.

You can take that a bunch of different ways with the “as long as he stays healthy” caveat.

So maybe I would stick him as a 55? I would take him over most of the players in that 55 tier, but it seems like the only thing that can derail him from that is health. And there may be some more upside.

anthonydwMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I find the health concerns on Wetherholt way exaggerated. it’s true that health is a skill. Some guys have a propensity to break bones, twist muscles, etc. That said, Wetherholt had hammy issues last year….those can be nagging in the short term, but basically once you’re over them you’re okay. But for some reason that’s become a major hit on his record in a way that seems quite over the top.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

A few other notes on guys who are IMO better than the average FV50 prospect but maybe only on the border of 50 / 55.

As noted below I could get behind Wetherholt as a 55. I don’t know that I trust him and the Cardinals training staff to keep him healthy though.

I understand why De Paula is a 55 but when you’re locked in an outfield corner at best, with 1B and DH a real possibility, I would like to see a little more now power. But Eric seems very convinced he will grow into big raw power.

I think Briceno is a cut above the other catchers in his group. I don’t really think he’s in the same category as Duno so a 50 is also fine, but he looks like he could hit enough to profile at first base. If he’s a 45 catcher that should be more than enough in the age of robot umpires. I think he is probably quite a bit better of a prospect than Melton, Liranzo, or Rainer and they are all good prospects.

I like the Dudes Who Rake and the Monster Fastballs group a lot and think they’re mostly pretty special. If you can hit they’ll find a place for you, and a lot of those guys are shortstops too. And pitchers throw a lot of fastballs so if you have a monster fastball everything else is easier. I have an especially soft spot for Tolle, Fuentes, Pena, Benge, and Willits. Fuentes’s major league challenges don’t bother me at all, and Pena has been moved around so much I wouldn’t worry too much about defense. He will probably find a home at second or third base and be more than fine.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think Briceno is a first baseman, but will hit enough to be a good one. If he can actually catch, I think he’s on the Basallo trajectory.

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago

The sproat and ferris obsession remains odd. We can go over the salas/lawlar thing but that’s been discussed often. Also having relievers only in a 50 fv tier makes zero sense to me

tdmocMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  matt

Reasonable minds can disagree on reliever grades, but they do have a rationale to it (emphasis mine):

Relievers are punished in any WAR-based measure because they throw fewer innings. The best relievers on the planet typically yield about 3 WAR, while really excellent relievers are 1.5-2.0 WAR players. Some clubs do consider elite relievers to be 80s and think WAR-only analysis of relievers ignores too much of the leverage component of their jobs. This is probably true, but we also think relief usage is about to change in a way that both accentuates that component but also changes the volume of innings they throw. For now, single-inning middle-relief types get a 40 FV from us, we slap 45 FVs on arms we think will be dominant bullpen pieces […], and anything more than that means we think they’re elite, but most elite relievers were starters as prospects.

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  tdmoc

The issue is it is near impossible to project the best relievers, at least with someone like Barco they can “fail” and still be a backend arm. No one cares about the .5 war reliever tho. And most top relievers will be failed starters.

slz
11 months ago
Reply to  matt

Sproat’s at least pitched a little better the last month after being the worst pitcher in AAA for the entire year

Andrew Painter is still a Top 10 prospect based on his scouting report from when he was 19

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

…maybe check out AAA run environments?

Like, you can scroll right down and see Painter’s ERA-.

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago

You mean the environment that shows Painter has only been average to slightly below in AAA? That’s not top 10 prospect level

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  matt

Leaving aside the 2 year layoff and the TJ…I’ll start worrying about his AAA box scores when he passes 200 MiLB IP.

The stuff coming back is the main concern at this point in the recovery…and all reports on that front are positive.

slz
11 months ago

Thank you for admitting it’s based on scouting reports from when he was 19, as I stated

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Maybe try reading it again, lad?

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

I agree that painter is too high too.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  matt

I don’t get the love for Jackson Ferris. He’s fine, but he’s probably a reliever.

Sproat went from one of the very top pitching prospects in baseball to looking like a non-prospect, so I think it’s okay to not move off of him entirely and wait a bit to see if he rebounds. Pitchers are weird, sometimes they go through phases where they look awful for no obvious reason from the outside.

juliusMember since 2021
11 months ago

Lol at the Pirates with two top 10 guys and then no one else in the top 100. Their list goes straight from FV60 to FV45. Real boom or bust stuff in that org right now. Sheesh.

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  julius

Not optomistic about the Pirates but I think Florentino belongs in top 75 and Barco in top 100. I’d take both over guys on list.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  matt

I’ll take Barco as an FV50 for sure. I thought he should have been an FV50 to start the year.

But I am very skeptical of any 1B-only guy being a Top 100 guy in A-ball.

whaiiiMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Florentino is playing mostly center in A ball right now and has a good amount of steals. He’s probably a better athlete than his current report.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  whaiii

He’s probably not a center fielder but that does give me a lot more optimism that he might not be locked into 1B for sure. Being able to play the corner outfield would help him a lot.

I still would prefer to see him do this at a higher level before giving him an FV50 but it’s much more plausible than him being locked in at first base.

TheBabboMember since 2019
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

If that’s a Florentino reference FWIW 18 of his 28 A-ball starts have been in CF, with six at DH, three at 1B and one in RF.

mattMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Florentino has average to above average exit velos with elite launch angle+elite pull air ability already. He is going to hit. This to go along with + plate discipline and + hit. I agree he’ll end up in a corner (tho cof isn’t out of the question) but the bat is rare

chrisl215Member since 2024
11 months ago

Happy to see Aidan MIller’s underlying numbers still look good. Trying to keep from being overly concerned unless he repeats the level next year and similarly struggles. Surprised at the lack of Eduardo Tait (unless Eric doesn’t see him as a C long term) and Escobar.

Wasn’t expecting Chace to remain at the back of this list but I guess if you view the big velo dip/struggles early as completely injury related then you could talk yourself into him coming back looking more like late 2024 Chace.

Last edited 11 months ago by chrisl215
MRDXolMember since 2021
11 months ago

Would love to hear if scouting opinion has budged at all on C. Montgomery. Been a very down-and-up year for him.

WhatLeylandNoooo
11 months ago

*extremely Simpsons voice*

McGONigle…

David GreenMember since 2021
11 months ago

I am surprised that Jamie Arnold did not make the list.

caedusMember since 2025
11 months ago

Certainly no surprise that Spencer Jones was not coming back to the Fangraphs top 100 list given his serious red flag contact numbers even in the midst of an insane hot streak. That said, wondering if there was any thought to putting him back to 50 FV? He’s made his way back onto a bunch of other top prospect lists this summer, although I am skeptical it was for the right reasons.

scotth855Member since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  caedus

If Eric thought he was a 50 FV, then he would be on the top 100. I believe all 50 or better FV prospects are on this list.

Last edited 11 months ago by scotth855
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  scotth855

Eric also LOVES Jones, haha – he’d definitely be on, if Eric thought it was a coinflip.

nathanjMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  scotth855

Unlikely. Pre-update had 122 at 50 FV or higher.

bada87bingMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  caedus

From Eric’s chat last week:

12:29 Eric A Longenhagen: When I hop off chat this is first on my to-do list for update.
12:29 Eric A Longenhagen: lemme glance at some stuff real quick, though.
12:31 Eric A Longenhagen: sub 60% contact rate is terrifying, no matter how much power
12:31 Eric A Longenhagen: He has a 58% contact rate
mercyMember since 2017
11 months ago

No Love for Spencer Jones in the “Power Bats with Hit Tool Risk”?

ShauncoreMember since 2019
11 months ago
Reply to  mercy

No disrespect to the guy, but there is hit tool risk, then there is “we built our city on top of a volcano that sits on a fault line next to a nuclear reactor and our town constantly gets invaded by aliens”.

Alcantara is a 30/35
Hope is a 30/40
Freeland is a 30/35
Lombard Jr is a 30/40
Nimmala is a 20/45
Arquette is a 30/45
Montgomery is a 30/40
Farmelo is a 30/40

Jones is a 20/30, where his future hit tool is about where all these other guys are at now, save for Nimmala who is 19.8yo vs Jones at 24.2.

Isaac is also a 20/30 but he’s several years younger and Eric just has him as a 50 FV. It’s not like he hates Jones relative to these others, Eric has him as a 45+.

But Jones is one of the oldest prospects on The Board and he’s a current 20 hit tool without much growth there.

isaacprinceMember since 2023
11 months ago
Reply to  Shauncore

There are clear signs of growth in his AAA numbers. His contact rate and k% have greatly improved.

EltnegMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  isaacprince

Yeah his contact rate and K% are much better at AAA so far, but it’s only been 19 games and his improved contact rate is 67%, which is still scary low.

You can be an elite hitter with a 67% contact rate if you absolutely crush the ball, but the guys who do that in the majors were putting up 75% contact rates against AAA pitching.

slz
11 months ago
Reply to  Shauncore

I mean, there’s a fair chance Spencer Jones isnt even a major leaguer. There’s another fair chance he’s one of those meme players like Joey Gallo

But if he HITS he’s going to HIT. And I think I’d rather have that than most of the back half of the Top 100. Like, George Lombard Jr probably sucks and he has an upside of probably sucks but stands at SS for a few years and his fangraphs page says he has 3 WAR for doing it

I’d rather roll the dice on Jones

GB
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Love this comment. While i have no doubt in Eric or any other prospect’s guru to evaluate players, I would be interested in seeing someone akin to a trader try to evaluate player risk/reward payoffs

ejfaganMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Yeah I think we’re overthinking things by not ranking Jones. His 2025 wRC+ is the highest ever in the Fangraphs minor league search. He might be risky, but the upside is literal Aaron Judge. I’d take him over a much higher floor guy who might make an All Star team as a replacement one year.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  ejfagan

Eric agrees with you philosophically, loves Jones, and doesn’t have Jones on the list.

Texas Gallo is a pie-in-the-sky outcome – Gallo had better contact and less chase as a 24 year old in the majors than Jones has in the minors during this insane season.

Last edited 11 months ago by Cool Lester Smooth
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

When Jones was Lombard’s age, he had a lower wOBA with a metal bat in the SEC than Lombard has right now.

When Joey Gallo was Jones’ age, he was an above average MLB starter.

Further to the point…comment section really don’t seem to understand how badly contraction has fucked up the minor leagues, when it comes to scouting statlines.

Lombard’s the same age as Colt Emerson – he just happened to turn 20 in June rather than July…but A-ball’s turned into an insane no-man’s-land between 19 year old recent draftees and 24 year old SEC guys.

GB
11 months ago

Not sure I understand the emerson vs lombard point but in regards to Jones I think the difference lies in the tail of the distribution. Jones has “fat” tails. There is a really good chance he is a 0 but there is a better chance that he is elite than a solid but unspectacular shortstop prospect. The question is: who should be ranked higher and who do teams value more?

The low variance option or the high variance option.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  GB

The point is that if Lombard were born five weeks later, folks in this thread would be excited about his “upside” because he was a “teenaged shortstop holding his own in AA.”

Which is the danger of only looking at statlines – he has been putting up MLB EVs at the age of 19, but folks here don’t read the top of the player page.

Anyway, I’ll reiterate that the “tails” of Jones’ curve look like Joey Gallo, who leads OFs with a K%>30 over the last 30 years, with 13.2 WAR…it’s looking like he won’t catch Rob Deer’s 14.8 at this point.

Drew Stubbs is next with 11.9, then O’Neill’s with 11.5.

Do you know a big-bodied CF who smoked AA and AAA, when he was 24?

Steven Souza.

Meanwhile a 105 wRC+ shortstop with average defense is also a 105 wRC+ 2B or 3B with plus defense.

Lombard’s got the breathing room to be Dozier or Lowrie or Headley or Blake if he’s not Asdrubal or Yunel.

slz
11 months ago

There’s an opportunity cost to playing guys. I dont actually care if Spencer Jones ends up in Korea if he strikes out in 60% of the 100 PAs I give him if I’m the Yankees because I have the resources to get someone else to play there. If he bombs out spectacularly I at least know I dont have to waste anymore time on him

Meanwhile I already have a multi-year shortstop running wrc+s in the 80s

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Yeah…this really does boil down to not even knowing how to “scout” a player page properly, much less understanding current MiLB context when it comes to ARL.

It was part of a fairly long comment, though – I guess I should have broken it up!

Jesus, though…Lombard and Volpe are at opposite ends of the Prep SS spectrum – Lombard’s still lanky, and already putting up higher EVs than Volpe does now.

Lupica overdose for sure.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Joey Gallo was a 50. He put up several 2+ win seasons despite being hurt a lot, and had one monster half year that propelled him to a 4+ win season and convinced the Yankees to trade for him (whoops).

The problem isn’t that Jones might be like Joey Gallo, it’s that it’s very likely he is like late career Joey Gallo. Jones’s contact rates are extremely bad.

slz
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean yeah, we all know this

Francisco Alvarez was running tragic contact rates when he went down on his recent AAA stint but he hit a home run every other day so it didnt matter

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  slz

Yeah…Alvarez’s contact rates were significantly better than Jones’.

And Alvarez’s 2025 MLB contact rate is currently better than Jones’ has been during his AAA surge.

And Alvarez is a good defensive catcher.

And Alvarez is younger than Jones.

frankMember since 2025
11 months ago
Reply to  Shauncore

“there is “we built our city on top of a volcano that sits on a fault line next to a nuclear reactor and our town constantly gets invaded by aliens”.” LOL

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Spencer Jones is that unfortunate city, but Bryce Eldridge’s city was built on Rock and Roll.

PC1970Member since 2024
11 months ago

Holy McGonigle!

No Bryce Rainer? Is it the injury? He certainly played well enough before he got hurt.

Last edited 11 months ago by PC1970
bada87bingMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  PC1970

The professor

kneel1749Member since 2026
11 months ago
Reply to  bada87bing

That’s Jason Parks

sauer
11 months ago

Why did Rainer fall off? Is it just because the injury?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  sauer

He was never on it. He’ll probably be on it in the offseason, or if not, by midseason next year.

nategreat
11 months ago

No Caminiti?

stkahlaMember since 2019
11 months ago

Have you been able to find out what’s going on with Alejandro Rosario??? Everything I’ve seen is cryptic to say the least.
Edited: Spelling

Last edited 11 months ago by stkahla
scotth855Member since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  stkahla

I asked him about it during his chat last week and here is what he said

12:06 Eric A Longenhagen: This is a Chris Young quote from Kennedi Landry’s reporting in February: “..it’s likely UCL, I don’t want to officially say, but yeah, it’s elbow and will probably require Tommy John. … He’s going to require surgery. As with all these things, we want to check the boxes and make sure we get multiple opinions. We don’t want to sit on this and not announce it when we know he’s going to be out, but we’re still figuring out the next steps.” I

12:06 Eric A Longenhagen: Here’s an Evan Grant tweet that Scooter is referring to…

12:06 Eric A Longenhagen: (1) Evan Grant on X: “@fantasyaceball @RealJRAnderson He’s not had surgery. It is a process. Rangers and Rosario working through some unrelated issues.”

12:07 Eric A Longenhagen: sorry to link to the hell site

12:07 Eric A Longenhagen: I have no insight on this, I’ll ask around myself and call Pablo Torre’s hotline to see if he’ll take the case.

12:07 Eric A Longenhagen: IDK what “unrelated issues” could be, but it reads like discontent to me

irulz23Member since 2018
11 months ago

Theo Gillen is having one of the better age adjusted seasons offensively. I’m surprised that hasn’t shaded up from the 45+ in February.

Last edited 11 months ago by irulz23
SaltyChipsMember since 2021
11 months ago
Reply to  irulz23

Seems a bit old for low-A if he’s to be considered a top 100 prospect. Production is good though and his contact numbers are improving a lot. If he was a better defender I’m guessing he might’ve cracked the list. Or if he was doing this split time between A and A+. Low A as a nearly 20 year old just loses a bit of that impressive prospect juice in my opinion

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
11 months ago

Ahh, more tasty prospect juice. Thanks!

OddBall Herrera
11 months ago

This feels light on Wetherholt. I just don’t believe there is quite as much daylight between him and McGonigle as these rankings suggest. What are you getting with Wetherholt? A second baseman who is an OBP machine and gets you 20+ HR and non zero steals. That sounds like McGonigle, just two years older.

jdbolickMember since 2024
11 months ago

Wetherholt’s maximum exit velocity so far is 106.7. McGonigle’s is 112.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  jdbolick

The hard hit rate is pretty similar on The Board, although McGonigle is also ahead there and younger (and that may be out of date).

I think Wetherholt has some chance to be a 20 homer guy because he seems to do okay tapping into his power but 106.7 as max EV is very bad! That’s like Jarrod Dyson, Nick Allen, Jacob Young level raw power. So either he has more raw than he is showing or the current power he’s showing in the minors is entirely due to small stadiums. It’s probably both, the question is how much.

Tim L.Member since 2025
11 months ago

Is he considering Misiorowski graduated? He’s probably a 60.

Last edited 11 months ago by Tim L.
Thatguy47
11 months ago

“Williams and Cunningham lack the size of most successful everyday big leaguers.”

In that case they sound more like mold-fit-insiders than moldbreakers, as they’re much smaller than the mold.

msl216Member since 2020
11 months ago

Did Kristian Campbell graduate? Also, as a Sox fan, very exciting to see four names on here given the young talent already in the bigs.

David HinkleMember since 2018
11 months ago

I know he’s injured, but I’m shocked Rainer isn’t in there.

Kinsm
11 months ago

I’m a Reds fan and I see little reason for Luis Mey to be on this list. I’d probably take a half dozen or more Reds prospects not on this list over him, as I see his FV more like a 40. He’s at best a setup man, and that’s if he ever fixes his control problems. As of now, he’s going to struggle to make their pen next year and that’s with the losses of Rogers, Barlow, and Pagan. Quite frankly, I don’t see how any relievers can be on a top 100 prospect list, especially ones who have never been closers in the minors or college.

RedsManRickMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Kinsm

Yeah, I don’t get it either. I get dreaming on stuff for a 20-year-old in A ball. But for Mey? Sure, he throws real hard. But he’s not young (already 24), the strikeout rates aren’t elite (sub 10 since A Ball) and the walks are prohibitively, career-endingly bad. A K-BB% south of 10 like he’s put in the minors, if he could manage that (which he hasn’t in 15 IP so far) would be replacement-level territory. I don’t see how you can put him above Sal Stewart, Cam Collier, Edwin Arroyo, Tyson Lewis, Hector Rodriguez to name a few — probably another half dozen guys easy.

I guess it’s just a quirk of the FV rating system and how far an 80 FV fastball carries you. On the flip side, the hitter crew above all lack the elite raw FV skills that get them into that the 50 FV tier — actual performance be damned. Maybe time to update that 35/45 hit tool on Stewart in particular.

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
11 months ago

Love the update! McGonicle getting his Max EV to 112 as a 20 year old is insane with those K numbers.

A few questions on The Board
– What’s the difference between Oppo/Pull and PoleToPole?
– What’s Versa? Is that their fall-back position or likely MLB role?
– The draft board has a column for Max EV. Is this something that could be added to the prospect rankings?

ehaltMember since 2016
11 months ago

How rare is it that the top prospect is merely a 60 FV?

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  ehalt

It’s an odd system that goes up to 80 but almost everyone on top prospect lists are between 50-60. It would be nice to have more separation.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

It would also be nice if Manfred and ownership hadn’t gutted the MiLB with a machete.

Sasaki was a 65 heading into the season.

Holliday was a 70 last season, with four 65s below him.

Henderson and Carrol were 65s in 2023.

Adley was a 70 with two 65s behind him in 2022.

Franco was an 80 with Adley a 65 in 2021.

Prospects are being ground through a food mill rather than developed these days, because there’s not enough space before the next crop arrives.

At least the savings are negligible!

krusherkovalev55Member since 2026
11 months ago

Iirc Gavin lux was a 70 at one point

jdbolickMember since 2024
11 months ago

Holliday never should have been a 70 given his contact issues and defensive shortcomings. It always felt weird to me being an Orioles fan but telling everyone that Jackson was overrated.

While I do lament minor league contraction and its negative effect on prospect development, I don’t think that is why the current list tops out at 60. The 2023 draft guys who would be 70s are already in the majors, while the 2024 draft lacked top end talent.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
11 months ago
Reply to  ehalt

It’s hard to be a 65 unless you have to have the tools and the loud performance at AA at a relatively young age.

These guys are good, but McGonigle and Clark just got promoted to AA, Walcott has been good but not elite there, Made is still in A-ball…

But a lot of these guys will never make it to 65 even if they deserve it, because they will light AA on fire and get promoted to the majors before there is a shot to update it. Teams are far more aggressive about promoting top prospects now.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
11 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

AAA doesn’t help by being a generally poor place to develop. On top of the lack of minor league talent to challenge players, you have a ton of parks at high elevations.

RedsManRickMember since 2020
11 months ago

Not enough of a ceiling for Sal Stewart? Defensive concerns?