Outfielders by wRAA/UZR

One graph is not enough for today, so, here’s another. This one is 2008 major league outfielders with defense on the horizontal axis and offense on the vertical axis. I adjusted the UZR for all the centerfielders up 10 runs (except Ichiro and Ellsbury, who got lesser adjustments for less than full seasons as a CF), since the average CF is about 10 runs better defensively than the average corner OF. I also adjusted all the wRAA numbers down by 8.5 runs to account for the fact that outfielders are better than average hitters. This puts all the outfielders on the same scale, where we’re comparing them all evenly to each other.

ofs4

The upper left quadrant would be the the good bat/bad glove, group, consisting of guys like Brad Hawpe, Adam Dunn, and Bobby Abreu. This could also be referred to as the reality check group, as they just had their contract demands violently re-adjusted. These guys have been, for the most part, viewed as star level players, but are generally less valuable than perceived due to their lack of defensive ability.

The lowet left quadrant would be, essentially, replacement level players. A below average bat and a below average glove is not a good combination. Here you see guys like Jeff Francoeur, Delmon Young, and Jose Guillen. They didn’t help their teams last year.

The lower right quadrant are the bad bat/good glove guys – the ones who don’t hit all that well but offer their value in the field. These players are the antithesis of the sluggers, and in general, have been undervalued for the last few years. Carlos Gomez is a great example, as his bat was bad but his glove more than made up for it, making him a positive contributor to the Twins.

But then there’s the upper right quadrant. These guys are the ones that everyone likes. They hit, they run, they throw – they are five tool superstars and among the best players in the game. You’ll find guys like Carlos Beltran, Grady Sizemore, and Nick Markakis hanging out over here.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Bearskin Rugburn
17 years ago

Is that Manny up at the top of the wRAA axis? I’m a bit surprised his defense was so good last year.

Trenchtown
17 years ago

My guess would be Berkman. Manny is probably one of the two unmarked dots above Abreu

Jonathan Reimer
17 years ago

This is absolutely excellent stuff. Is it possible to see a live graph? I’d like to see what players are represented by the diamonds, but whose names are not shown here.

Thanks Dave,
Jonathan

Erich
17 years ago

That would be nice, but you can find out who each point is with very little work using the leaderboards.

Joey Brick
17 years ago

Shouldn’t a +2.5 adjustment for centerfielders and -7.5 for corner outfielders be used instead? The relative values would remained unchanged but the y-axis would be shifted 7.5 runs to the right to more accurately reflect fielding value. Outfielders on average get a -4.2 adjustment per 150 games but the graph makes them look like +3.3 defenders relative to all fielders.

Or, alternatively, since you’ve already done the work, you can just draw an imaginary line with your mind’s eye through 7.5 on the x-axis, which is what I’m doing right now.

Good work all the same. Sexy, even. I know I’m a bit aroused.

richieabernathy
17 years ago

+1, Joey.

Telemachus
17 years ago

Is that Ryan Braun as the top hitter and slightly below on defense?

Joey Brick
17 years ago
Reply to  Telemachus

Manny. Yes, he only came out as -2 in the field this year.

Braun’s most likely the square directly below the number 20 on the y-axis, smack dab between the 2 and the 0.

Steve
17 years ago

It would be nice to have a thin red line bisecting the break even point (y=-x).

wanderingpawn
17 years ago

Love the graph, but not leaving some of notation of who is at which dot is cruel!

Blackadder
17 years ago

If you include Barry Bonds from 2001 to 2004 on this graph, (well, I guess you don’t have his UZR for 2001), his dots would be at the level of the heading of the article.

Mat
17 years ago

I must say, this is an excellent graph, very telling of a player’s value, or lack there of…cough, Francoeur, cough…

Brian
17 years ago

Hey I see on this site that Jeff Francouer has a great outfield arm. Nonetheless, you show him as being bad defensively. Are you counting his arm, or just his range?

Alireza
17 years ago

Sizemore is a 4 tool, not 5 tool player. As good as he is defensively, his arm isn’t much better than that of Juan Pierre.