Padres, Twins Crash Opening Day With Layered Exchange

© Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

With the 2021-22 offseason in the books, it’s clear we’ll remember it, at least in part, for how the Twins of all teams took the reins and strengthened their roster. They flipped Mitch Garver for Isiah Kiner-Falefa, who then went to the Yankees along with Josh Donaldson in exchange for Gio Urshela and Gary Sánchez. It wasn’t much of a downgrade, and the move gave Minnesota the opportunity to sign Carlos Correa, the biggest free agent of the offseason.

And now, here’s the cherry on top. In an attempt to address the fragility of their rotation, the Twins had already traded for Sonny Gray. But one good pitcher can’t lift an entire staff, so they went ahead and acquired another starter. And as we’ll discuss later, there were several other intriguing players involved in the deal. A fairly complex trade on the morning of Opening Day? Don’t mind if I do. Here’s the basic breakdown:

Padres Get

Twins Get

This started off as a discussion about the Twins, but let’s actually begin with the Padres’ return. Now, the bullpen down in San Diego was never projected to be an issue. If anything, it’s one of the league’s better ones, as evidenced by an 11th-place spot on this year’s positional power rankings. But it did lack a clear ninth inning stalwart after the departure of Mark Melancon, a problem made more obvious by last week’s Opening Day fiasco. With Rogers not yet with the team, Craig Stammen allowed a walk-off three-run bomb to Seth Beer (on National Beer Day, no less).

Luckily, Rogers is the man for the job. That’s partially because he has a hearty number of saves under his belt, making him no stranger to late-inning situations. But it’s also because he’s fantastic, to the point where some may not realize how great Rogers has been – or rather, become. In the early days of his career, he spent time as a thoroughly average member of the Twins’ relief corps. He wielded a solid sinker but paired it with an inconsistent curveball. From 2016 to ‘17, Rogers posted a 3.82 FIP across 117 innings.

It all changed in 2018, when he abandoned his curve in favor of a sweeping slider that better complemented his fastball. Since then, Rogers has continued to strike out an increasing rate of batters while trimming his rate of free passes. Since that revelatory year, here’s how Rogers compares to other relievers in key metrics:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
Taylor Rogers, 2018-21
Metric Rogers Rank
K-BB% 26.3% 7th
FIP 2.52 4th
xFIP 2.77 5th
WAR 6.1 5th
Among 97 relievers with min. 150 IP

You can see why the Padres are probably elated to have him close; as of this writing, Rogers has already collected two saves. It’s rare for a relief pitcher with the trifecta of stuff, command, and track record to be available in trade, but here he is. There’s a place for Rogers in a discussion of today’s best relievers. He’ll immediately bolster San Diego’s late-inning capabilities as the team looks to leave last season’s collapse behind and make the playoffs.

Meanwhile, Rooker, an outfield prospect who played in 59 games for the Twins last season, might not end up impacting his new team at all. That 2021 stint went poorly, as he showed glimpses of plus power but struggled to make consistent contact en route to a 89 wRC+. There are things to like about his profile, though. For one, Rooker has excelled at every minor league level he’s passed through, hitting balls with authority. The .245/.367/.594 line he posted in Triple-A last season seems indicative of Rooker’s big league ceiling.

In addition, the batted ball data looks promising, and if things went more his way, he very well could have finished last season as an above-average hitter. But reality is harsh: Rooker has little feel for contact, and because he’s so one-dimensional, almost all of his future value hinges on whether he can tap into a significant amount of power. There’s really no defensive position to hide in; for now, our Depth Charts have him towards the bottom of the left field totem pole. The Padres are mainly glad to have Rogers, but Rooker is a nice lottery ticket.

After this trade, Paddack is now the Twins’ problem to solve. One of the more confounding pitchers of late, dozens of articles have dealt with why he isn’t better. Usually, they boil down to two reasons. First, Paddack’s fastball isn’t terribly good. It’s only decently speedy by 2022 standards, and what’s more damaging is the movement it generates. Last season, Paddack’s heater sat in the dead zone of middling vertical and horizontal break when ideally, you should emphasize one direction over the other. Making matters worse, he chose to rely on it over 60% of the time. The fastball just isn’t good enough to warrant such usage, and leaning on it has the added effect of deemphasizing Paddack’s plus changeup.

Second, his big, loopy curveball has been an insufficient third pitch. To Paddack’s credit, he did address this issue by adding velocity without sacrificing movement, which can be a tricky task. And voilá – the whiffs picked up. But as Eno Sarris suggested, doing so may have led to the loss in fastball ride. Pitching doesn’t occur in a vacuum, and one change can always lead to unintended consequences. There’s been one step forward, but also about a step-and-a-half back. This is what has made Paddack such a tantalizing player.

But look, even if he doesn’t manage to pull off both tasks at once, the sheriff is hardly a train wreck. That 2021 ERA is ugly, but underneath the hood, his peripherals resembled that of his respectable rookie season. We’d love to see him pick up the whiffs, but Paddack’s overall control hasn’t wavered, which means he’s a good bet to last decently long in starts for the pitching-starved Twins. Can Paddack have his cake and eat it, too? If he can restore the movement on his fastball while maintaining a gain in curveball stuff, definitely.

Pagán is now also the Twins’ problem to solve. (I’m sensing a theme here.) As is common with the Rays, Pagán broke out in 2019 for them, taking advantage of an elite fastball by commanding it up in the zone. The Padres traded for him that offseason, but Pagán lost his magic as soon as he arrived in San Diego. We can chalk up his disappointing 2020 season to a small sample and the strangeness of that season. The problem is that the sharp decline in strikeouts (and subsequent increase in hard contact) persisted the following year. What’s wrong with Pagán, and can the Twins fix him?

To be honest, I don’t have a sure answer for either question. The dearth in whiffs is related to the fastball, but it’s lost less than a tick of velocity since Pagán’s breakout year. That alone isn’t enough to account for the degradation in fastball performance. It’s not as if his command has worsened, either – his walk rate has trended upward, but in terms of optimal locations, the fastballs are going where they’re supposed to. Through a process of elimination, we’re left with the most likely culprit (courtesy of Brooks Baseball):

Over the years, Pagán has been throwing from a lower and lower arm slot. Perhaps related to that, he’s lost a bit of ride on his fastball. It’s not a big difference, mind you – the pitch is still world-class by such a measure – but often, that extra inch or two is what helps miss the bat. Pagán is a two-pitch reliever, leaving him little room for error if one goes awry. If a change in release height is indeed what’s causing the fastball to misbehave, that’s an easy fix. Of course, there’s a chance that none of what’s been brought up is a potential answer. But if Pagán can rebound, the Twins might not have much trouble filling a Taylor Rogers-sized hole.

At first, I thought the Twins had themselves a great deal. For the price of one reliever, albeit a stellar one, and a decent prospect, they gained two pitchers with potential to metamorphose into something greater. The issues plaguing Paddack don’t seem too complex, and his pristine walk rates give him a solid floor. Likewise, Pagán is a tweak or two away from looking like his former, dominant self, and the Twins’ willingness to work with them perhaps speaks volumes about their player development. You don’t make this trade without imagining what Paddack and Pagán could become, then mapping out how to make it a reality.

But on second thought, we can appreciate the Padres’ course of action. The turning point, at least for me, was a report on the exact amount of money Minnesota had sent their way. Rogers is owed $7.3 million this season. By receiving $6.6 million, the Padres are essentially paying league minimum to employ a top 10 reliever. Maybe that’s suggestive of how much the Twins are enamored with Paddack and Pagán, but as it is, it looks like they’re getting the short end of the stick with Rogers.

Beyond that, though, Paddack simply isn’t that important to the Padres. Unlike the Twins, rotation depth is a point of strength for them, and they even acquired Sean Manaea from the A’s. Even if Paddack had stuck around with the organization that nurtured him, it’s likely he would have been presented with limited opportunities. The Padres probably saw the flaws within their young starter, and probably tried to address them, too. But it’s been three years now, and Paddack is treading water. Realistically, would an additional year have made the difference? The same could be said about Pagán. Looking at a graph of a pitcher’s release point doesn’t require rocket science, and yet, there’s been little change. Considering the Padres’ issues with developing talent, a change of scenery is arguably beneficial for both parties involved.

Those factors, combined with the money, prompts me to give the upper hand to San Diego, but this opinion isn’t set in stone. Besides, all things considered, both teams came out of this deal with reasons to smile. The Padres add a finishing touch to their bullpen and acquire a power bat on the down low. The Twins, on the other hand, fortify their rotation in hopes of becoming fringe contenders, gain a reliever with serious upside, and get a shot at a player to be named later. (I barely mentioned it because it’s hard to do analysis on an unknown player who won’t end up being that noteworthy.) This is a trade that will require time to parse out. But the good news? With the regular season well under way, we won’t have to speculate for much longer.





Justin is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis studying statistics and writing.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
teddyrugbyMember since 2017
4 years ago

I enjoyed the SNL Stefon style headline. I’m sure Bill Hader would approve, but I wonder, did it have MTV’s Dan Cortez?
The trade seems like a good bet for a club in Minnesota’s position.

Mahoney
4 years ago
Reply to  teddyrugby

Seems to me the key driver is that the Padres are all-in for 2022, while the Twins want to be able to pivot mid-season depending upon where they are in the race. That may be a part of what goes into the PTNBL they’re getting from San Diego.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Agreed, though I’m not quite as sold on SD’s starting depth as Ben. They’ve got a lot of guys returning from major injuries who, even at best, will probably be exhausted by September (before you start talking extended playoffs). I think SD did quite well, but it’s not like they traded Hosmer for Rogers (now *that* would have been something!)

eely225Member since 2019
4 years ago

Great analysis. I could see this going either way, but if Paddack can rebound Twins will look real smart and SD pitching development will look real bad.

Also, the first line uses the phrase “at in part,” and I assume you meant “at least in part.”

sutter
4 years ago

The last paragraph makes it sound like the Padres are receiving the PTBNL…
It’s actually the Twins that will receive that PTBNL.

jayman4Member since 2018
4 years ago

As a Padres fan, I was intrigued by Paddack. He was insanely dominant in the minors, but apparently his FB/CH combo was too much for lower level hitters. At the MLB level, it is all about his FB. The good Paddack can throw it for strikes and keeps hitters off balance and then can destroy them with the change. The CB is thrown now and then, just to mix things up. But the bad Paddack’s FB is BP for hitters and, once that is gone, they can sit FB and the CH is usually is a different spot so they know to lay off and he cannot throw it every pitch. I thought it was velocity, but the author points out it is more movement. But whatever it is, when his FB is off, he gets hit hard.

If he can fix that, he is a good 2-3 type of starter, very valuable. If he can fix it, then that says a lot about the relative coaching of San Diego and Minnesota. If not, San Diego was wise to find a taker.

Roman AjzenMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  jayman4

Completely agree with the point about Paddack’s pitch location. He throws the fastball up and the change down (often below the zone), so teams with a game plan can just look for their pitch in one spot and tee off. Not that one should necessarily copy Zach Davies, but in 2020 he was able to throw his FB and CH to the bottom of the zone and keep hitters off balance while generating GBs.

Travis LMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  jayman4

It’s worth noting that Paddack’s minor league dominance was over maybe 200 IP over 5 years, and he was good but not insane in his last stop at AA in ’18 (27%K, 3% BB rate). It looks like his key to success was pumping pitches in the zone and had decent enough stuff to beat minor league hitters.

There are dozens of guys over that time span with similar numbers, so I balk at saying he was insanely dominant. Looks a lot like Jacob Faria to me.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

I don’t know about dominance, but Paddack had a 3.78 FIP last year, and his 60.7% strand rate was the second lowest in MLB (min 100 innings). He’s never had that problem before, and it’s fair to say it drove most of the gap between his ERA and FIP. Three years of a high-3s ERA SP is pretty valuable even if he doesn’t improve.

Roman AjzenMember since 2020
4 years ago

The Padres’ developmental failures are well chronicled but Niebla was brought in (in theory) to help fix the fallen pitchers (Paddack, Pagan, Snell, Adams, Gore, Weathers, etc etc etc…). One could see this trade as Niebla saying these were guys he couldn’t fix and so the Padres sold high, such as it were.

As a Padres fan who watched too much of their 2021 season, Paddack’s problems start in his head and manifest themselves in over-reliance on the FB (what kind of a sheriff would he be without the Texas heat) and low LOB%. Even in Pagan’s best year, he gave up 1.5 HR/9, so he just can’t be trusted in a one-run game, making him the 3rd or 4th arm of the bullpen. There is talent there for sure, but turning two question marks into a top-5 closer and getting >$11m of salary relief is a nifty move even if Rooker never makes the team.

winger2765
4 years ago

A lot of good points made, but you did miss a major factor here for the Twins. Rogers is on an expiring contract and due for a big raise next season. Paddock/Pagan both have some team control remaining. Twin probably would have lost Rogers after this season. So both teams are dealing from a position of strength. That said Rogers is a fairly developed product….if slightly flawed and Pagan is a project, Paddock kind of balances the whole thing out.

sotostan
4 years ago

I feel like the Twins might win out on this trade in the long run by turning Pagan and Paddack into studs.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

This seems like a good deal for the Twins. Paddack got hit pretty hard last year but he still has the tools–the devastating changeup and the command–to be a mid-rotation starter. I don’t think he’s a finished product. Pagan has been all over the place, but it’s sometimes worth betting on relievers who have had results in the past even if they’re not getting it now. Relievers are fickle.

For the Padres, this is all about them going all-in, now. Musgrove in his last year of team control, they traded for Manaea, and now Rogers. There’s a non-zero chance those are their three most consistent pitchers, although there’s always the hope that Darvish or Lamet or Snell or Clevinger come around. I don’t have a clue what the Padres will do if they don’t make it this year, but it’s pretty clear that they are only thinking about 2022 right now.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I also think it’s a good deal for the Twins if you believe in Paddack’s FIP. The money going back to the Padres makes me like it less than I did originally, though, and the Twins definitely don’t have a clear replacement for Rogers.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

The xERA tells a less enthusiastic story than FIP does. But as long as (1) he’s not handing out free passes, and (2) he both has his fastball velocity and the changeup there’s always a decent chance he turns into a guy who makes good on the FIP. And if he does that, he’s a #3 and an absolute steal. If he doesn’t…well, he’s still probably a major league pitcher of some kind. That’s not bad.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Fair enough, although I’m still a little skeptical of all the xstats. I’d like to see a retroactive study of how well they predict anything, and I haven’t (maybe there’s one out there that I’m not aware of?)

The extremely low strand % is what jumps out to me as the easy explanation for the difference between Paddack’s ERA and FIP.

gotwins04
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agreed – the Twins definitely prioritize those extra years of control. Rogers has looked good to start the year but he did miss basically the whole 2nd half of last season with an injury. Probably would have been traded last year if not for that matter

jayman4Member since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You may be right but compared to Preller’s other win now trades (Clevenger, Nola, Snell, Darvish, Musgrove) this one seems the least destructive and maybe have a shot to come out ahead. Preller should be very, very wary whenever Cleveland, Tampa or Seattle return his calls. We shall see about Minnesota.

MorlandMember since 2020
4 years ago

One element that hasn’t been mentioned is that this is Roger’s walk year. Its apparent that the Twins thought that they couldn’t resign him or that he would cost too much so they decided to trade him while they could. They probably get more potential major league ready talent by trading him now as opposed to trading him to a contender this summer.