Paul DeJong, Nick Senzel, and the Future of Unlikely Shortstops

“Hello, I’m Paul DeJong.” (Photo: Keith Allison)

The St. Louis Cardinals selected Paul DeJong in the fourth round of the 2015 draft. DeJong was taken more for his bat than his defense. According to his alma mater Illinois State, for example, DeJong spent time at “second base, third base, catcher, right field, and as the team’s designated hitter” during his third and final season with the Redbirds. While suggestive of positional flexibility, that’s not the usual path of a defensive wizard. During that same campaign, however, DeJong also slashed .333/.427/.605 in 246 plate appearances. That kind of offensive performance can play at multiple positions.

The Cardinals used DeJong mostly third base after drafting him. He played 62 games at the hot corner in his first pro season and followed that up with 112 more starts at third in 2016 — but also 11 starts at shortstop. After some more work at short in the Arizona Fall League and a couple months in Triple-A, DeJong became the starting shortstop for the actual Cardinals, a contending major-league club. He finished second in balloting for the National League Rookie of the Year.

Minor-league third basemen don’t generally develop into major-league shortstops. If playing first base is incredibly hard, playing an adequate shortstop is nearly impossible. Even so, MLB is a copycat league. If an experiment works once, others will try it. Which brings us to the Cincinnati Reds and top prospect Nick Senzel.

The Reds selected Senzel second overall out the University of Tennessee just 19 months ago. Unlike DeJong, Senzel did play some shortstop in college. In fact, Baseball America discussed his defense in its draft report:

This spring, Senzel has shown significantly improved defense in the infield, shifting to shortstop later in the season from third base. He reacts quickly and shows solid first-step quickness. Senzel has average arm strength and projects to stay in the left side of the infield.

Six months later, Eric Longenhagen hinted at a shift to the middle of the field, though not to shortstop:

Though Senzel doesn’t have the lofty ceiling typically associated with a draft’s No. 2 pick, he’s very likely to hit for high average, yank out 18-plus homers annually and even provide some value on the bases, as he runs well enough that some amateur scouts were intrigued by the idea of trying him at second base.

Senzel ranked 30th among all prospects last year and, after a .321/.391/.514 season with a 164 wRC+ between High-A and Double-A, moved up to seventh on this year’s list. This year’s write-up reads, in part:

He’s an opportunistic power hitter who has shown dramatic improvement at third base over the last two years (he was not good at 3B as a sophomore at Tennessee) and is working to expand his defensive resume to accelerate his timetable to Cincinnati with Eugenio Suarez currently occupying third.

With Suarez’s breakout last season earning him a spot at third, Senzel’s most natural position appears to be blocked. Suarez could probably move to second base, but Jose Peraza might fit better at second than at short, and he will need to hit some to stay in the majors anyway. Leaving Suarez at third and preparing Senzel for shortstop — or, if that fails, second base — potentially creates the most value for the Reds in the present and near future.

I am not the first to draw a comparison between DeJong and Senzel. J.J. Cooper made the same link at Baseball America recently, as well. In his piece, Cooper reminded readers of the rarity of the DeJong swap.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

[I]t’s important to note that DeJong appears to be more of an exception to the rule that players don’t typically assume more difficult positions as they age. Still, if any prospect third baseman were to successfully make the switch to shortstop, Senzel is as good a candidate as anybody.

DeJong certainly is an exception. As Carson Cistulli noted a few years ago, most good MLB shortstops don’t even go to college. Consider: of the 22 qualified shortstops from 2017, only six — Tim Anderson, Zack Cozart, Brandon Crawford, Jordy Mercer, Andrelton Simmons and Dansby Swanson — went to college. Of those six, only Cozart went to a four-year school and finished among the top half of shortstops by WAR. (Trea Turner and DeJong each had solid seasons and played college ball, but both had fewer than 500 plate appearances.)

Moves like the one DeJong made and Senzel is attempting to make don’t often occur simply because players who can play shortstop usually start there and then move down the defensive spectrum as their physical skills decline. DeJong’s case is unusual. A promising basketball player at one point, DeJong’s athleticism wasn’t in question, but he lacked a regular defensive role in college to exhibit it. Senzel’s case is also somewhat rare for the degree of improvement he seems to have exhibited at third while at Tennessee.

Unusual or not, it might be worth considering whether a crop of unlikely shortstops is on the way, of third basemen sliding over towards the middle of the field. To be clear, I’m not talking about a Manny Machado-type situation. The Orioles star came up as a shortstop and only moved off the position because J.J. Hardy was a Gold Glover. Alex Bregman’s place in Houston behind Carlos Correa represents a similar case.

No, what DeJong and Senzel’s moves could portend is a legitimate move up the defensive spectrum for certain players. As clubs become more sophisticated with their positioning and as batters attempt to more frequently hit the ball in the air, teams might be willing to use defenders once thought too unskilled to handle shortstop. It might compel clubs to reconsider the virtues of certain players who, for one reason or another, have settled in at a less demanding position.

To get a sense of which other players might be candidates for such a switch, I perused last year’s draft for third basemen who might benefit from a try at shortstop. Not wanting to drift too far from the DeJong/Senzel mode, I looked for college third basemen selected within the first 10 rounds. As shortstops tend to be of a certain height and weight — a point explored in some depth by Eric Longenhagen last September — I looked for players near the six-foot mark and close to 200 pounds. I found four players worth mentioning (and passed their names by Kiley McDaniel and Longenhagen).

  • Rylan Bannon — A second baseman in high school and a third baseman at Xavier before the Dodgers selected him in the eighth round, Bannon hit well at the Rookie level last year with 10 homers and a 10% walk rate in 175 plate appearances. He’s a plus defender at third base, and a move to short might help him retain value if his bat regresses against tougher competition.
  • Andrew Bechtold –The Twins drafted Bechtold in the fifth round out of Chipola Junior College after two seasons with Maryland. Keith Law called him the steal of the Twins draft, and he might get some work at second base and shortstop after a great start in the Appalachian League. His debut was marked by a 15% walk rate that could carry him up the ladder.
  • Jordan Rodgers — A senior sign by the Braves, Rodgers’ sixth-round status might overstate his abilities. He’s not a great prospect by any stretch, but he’s already played second base, shortstop, and third base in his first pro season. Playing an adequate shortstop is likely a necessary skill for Rodgers’ advancement.
  • Joe Dunand — The Marlins’ second-round draftee is admittedly a stretch, and our experts didn’t provide a glowing review. Longenhagen doesn’t project him at short but wonders if batted-ball data would let a team get away with a lesser defender at the position. McDaniel said he was long and would require lowered expectations. Dunand did play shortstop in college and probably won’t last there in the pros, but it might be worth a shot.

One other name I’d consider who doesn’t meet any of the criteria above is Ke’Bryan Hayes. The Pirates farmhand, drafted out of high school in 2015, is one of the better prospects in baseball. Longenhagen wrote this in the Pirates prospect list:

He is a plus runner who stole 27 bases in 32 attempts last year and probably the fastest third-base prospect in baseball. He has great lateral range to his left and right, often making plays deep in foul territory behind the bag and in front of waiting shortstops. His plus arm allows him to hose runners from all kinds of odd platforms. He projects as a plus defender at third, and one source with whom I spoke has a future 70 on his glove.

The Pirates intend to try Colin Moran out at third base, and if he sticks, that could block Hayes in Pittsburgh. Given Hayes’ abilities, a go at shortstop could be better for Hayes and the Pirates long-term.

We don’t yet know if Nick Senzel will be successful, let alone any of the other players mentioned above. Even Paul DeJong has been a major-league shortstop for just a few months, and we can’t say for sure that he is going to last at the position, either. Every team is looking for an edge in player development, and turning a third baseman into a shortstop has the potential to provide that edge. This isn’t going to be the next big thing, but it might be the next small one.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

51 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

So I think the Senzel and Hayes situations are a little different, although I’m undecided how much it really matters.

Hayes is a shockingly good fielder, and could play all over. You’d move him up the defensive spectrum because he’s oozing with talent in the field and figure he could handle it…he’d be plus no matter where he plays.

Senzel’s defensive talent is nothing like Hayes. He’s the guy who “works himself into a competent fielder with reps.” You figure he might be a sub-optimal defender at shortstop, but he wasn’t going to be Matt Chapman at third anyway.

bobvipersMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Although Senzel may never be a wizard at short, he was named to the MLB Pipeline’s 2018 All-Defense Team (https://www.mlb.com/news/nats-victor-robles-tops-2018-all-defense-team/c-264694624) as the best defensive 3B in ALL of the Minors… like Chapman the year before.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  bobvipers

Why would you want to make a wizard into an apprentice (I don’t know what a jr wizard is)?

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Re: Hayes – the same could be said of every SS. Every SS could in theory be plus everywhere. The fact is that playing SS isn’t entirely athleticism -it is equal parts quickness, reads and instincts which Hayes probably doesn’t have. Sure, he could be miscast at 3B, but it is more likely that he isn’t a great SS. Good short-stops are valuable, mediocre ones are not – the exception is when you have a bat to make up for it, like Corey Seager. For my money, I wouldn’t move a guy from elite 3B to mediocre SS – you can’t assume plus. If you want to see what a monster athlete without feel looks like, then watch a little film of Royce Lewis, who will end up in CF shortly – most likely.There are a few positions on the diamond that really matter in SS, CF and C. I really believe that those need to be filled by elite talents as they have a large impact as well as the ability to hide other defensive shortcomings. Perhaps he is a SS and everyone missed it, or maybe he grew into it because that can happen too.

I think taking a Senzel-type defender and moving them up the spectrum is a mistake. I also don’t think it is actually a mistake. They are probably just doing it for his development. When I coached, I would at times make 1B take reps at 3B and 3B take reps at SS or 2B to push them a bit, which is what that most likely is. I do not see this as the future as much as it make s a good headline fitting the general progressive narrative of the FG community.

Lanidrac
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Sometimes it depends on what kind of bats you have available. If you have two really good offensive third baseman, one of whom can play a passable SS, yet no natural shortstops with a decent bat, then it makes sense to make this kind of move as the Cardinals did last year instead of putting an easy out in the everyday lineup while one of your better bats rots on the bench as an overqualified pinch-hitter. It also still leaves you the option of making a late game defensive switch or double-switch when needed.

LHPSU
8 years ago

I don’t actually remember it, but Lance Berkman moved to CF after never playing the position in the minors.

emh1969
8 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Lonnie Chisenhall did the same last year, though on a smaller scale.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Outfield conversions happen all the time. I don’t think they have anything in common with infielders moving to SS. Yelich was drafted as 1B. Kipnis played a reasonable CF last year. CF is up the spectrum, but it really is apples and oranges. Dee Gordon is going to CF this year. Simply moving from a corner to center is something anyone can do… not necessarily well but it is doable.

Vampire Weekend at Bernie's
8 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

One thing not mentioned in the article is that the Reds are going to give Nick Senzel a look in center field during spring training. With Billy Hamilton’s future in doubt, don’t be shocked if a move to center field happens before a move to shortstop.

dl80Member since 2026
8 years ago

Obviously, they won’t try it, but I wonder if Arenado could play shortstop. He’s maybe a little big at 6’2″, but his range and arm are both exceptional (at least compared to third basemen). I’m not sure if he could do the double play, given his height and modest speed.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Would you rather have an average or maybe even below SS or a gold glove 3B? I am not sure that he would have good range at SS – it is entirely different skill-set. In the middle of the diamond, players need quickness and choppy steps, but at third they are bigger steps if that makes sense. A lot of defensive deficiencies are masked at 3b – it is much more about reacting than anticipating.

Lanidrac
8 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Isn’t a good arm even more important for a third baseman to have than a shortstop?

BillClinton
8 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Isn’t Jordy Mercer 6’4?

duhbearMember since 2026
8 years ago

Jake Cronenworth is a guy worth looking at, too. Projected to be taken as a pitcher in his draft due to his plus splitter, but the Rays took him as a 2B. Then they saw him play and decided to move him to SS and he won defensive honors in his league. Weird career progression.

duhbearMember since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  duhbear

And then they went and got another guy in Tristan Gray who is also moving up the spectrum from 2B to 3B.

PC1970Member since 2024
8 years ago

Side effect of the “3 true outcomes/fly ball” revolution? Infield defense is obviously very important, but, if you see more K’s & more flyouts, which means less chances for the infielders, can you get by with a lesser fielder to get another bat in the lineup? Add in shifting & the additional knowledge that should lead to better positioning & maybe it can work. I think you expect to see this type of tradeoff more at 2B than SS, but, maybe it can work? Cal Ripken is the gold standard for the idea that an average speed SS can still be very good with smart positioning. High bar to clear, but, not like it’s never been done before.

In Stenzel’s case, I’m sure it helps that they also have Suarez, who came up as a SS & has well above average range at 3B.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

This all begins to sound a bit like the de-evolution of defense… which leads to increased offensive outcomes… which all beings to remind me of the film Idiocracy. To be clear, I think this is quite possibly already underway.

AlbyMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

I think you’re going to have to rely on more than your opinions to have any influence with folks here.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  Alby

Its not my intention to influence anyone here. You should think for yourself… and I actually believe that. Nobody has the answers here, only opinions. My opinions are more valuable than much of the analysis that I read here… certainly not any less reliable. At one point I had to argue daily that we are in a juiced ball era – those were my opinion as well… sure I had facts, but people only are interested in the facts that they want to see – so, it is all opinions. Select stats and crude metrics are no better than opinions – they are just opinions hiding behind numbers.

Roger21
8 years ago
Reply to  PC1970

There is some intuitive appeal to the idea that infield defense is less important because of the “HR/fly ball revolution,” but here is the league-wide batted ball data going back as far as we have it:

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=2&season=2017&month=0&season1=2002&ind=0&team=0,ss&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0

Fly balls in 2017 were basically as common as they were in 2002. I suppose there’s been a slight uptick since 2015, but if anything, there are fewer fly balls than there were in, say, 2007 or 2010. So, is this really enough of a chance to start de-emphasizing infield defense?

d_iMember since 2016
8 years ago

Suarez is the one who should be moving (back) to SS.

mymaus
8 years ago
Reply to  jdbolick

I get what you’re saying about Suarez at SS but I’d rather have him there and Senzel at 3b than vice versa (if those were the only 2 choices).

Shirtless George Brett
8 years ago

I’m more amazed by infielders who can transition to the OF to be honest. It may be an easier position on paper but its pretty much the exact opposite of what they have spent their entire lives doing. I’m obviously not anywhere near the athlete these guys are but my experience of trying to play the OF when asked (I was a 3B/Pitcher) was a bit like dropping me on the moon. haha.

Alex Gordon becoming a stud LF after growing up a 3B or Jason Kipnis not being a total black hole in CF (with zero time to prepare) is pretty amazing to me and shows how good these guys really are.

(We just wont talk about Matt Adams 😉 )

emh1969
8 years ago

Kipnis played CF in college so I’m sure that helped quite a bit.

Ron Gant is another who broke in as a middle infielder.

And then there’s Danny Tartabull. He was so bad in the outfield that most people don’t remember he actually broke into the majors as a….shortstop!!! (wonder if there’s any film or YouTube videos of that).

Shirtless George Brett
8 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

Now that you mention it I think I new that about Kipnis. Still though, impressive he can do both not terribly.

potcircle
8 years ago
Reply to  emh1969

kevin mitchell came up a ss, too… some great stories about him, here…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Mitchell_(baseball)

and here’s the catch… damn…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u0MzrYPm4w

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  potcircle

I know what that catch is even before clicking on it. I must have watched it two dozen times.

Lanidrac
8 years ago

I get what you mean. I have lousy depth perception and a very weak arm, so I always play the infield in church softball games.

RadermecherMember since 2018
8 years ago

DeJong is a very intelligent young player.
He loves saber,and study of baseball related sciences.
This along with his work ethic,has helped to make him ,and unlikely SS.

Slappy McSlapperson
8 years ago
Reply to  Radermecher

Also has excellent basepath etiquette

Mario MendozaMember since 2017
8 years ago

Awesome article!

Spa City
8 years ago

With advancements in defensive shifting, and more flyballs, infield defense is changing. Why not try less athletic players at short? This dynamic is probably going to be common by this time next year.

Josh Donaldson played short last year – not much, but why wouldn’t the Jays want to try him there occasionally?

I agree about Ke’bryan Hayes. He is very athletic, with good running speed quickness and reactions at 3B. What do the Bucs possibly have to lose by playing Hayes at short in AA this year? The answer is nothing… they have nothing to lose.

LHPSU
8 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

Well, he would only be able to play there on the days that Cole Tucker isn’t playing.

Spa City
8 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

I like Tucker, too. But that seems like an easy problem. No downside in getting Tucker occasional starts at 2B, 3B or CF also. Hayes could easily get 60 or more games at short, with no downside to starting the year at high A, and a likelihood Tucker moves to AAA mid-season.

Kyle Sharamitaro
8 years ago

good read. thanks Craig

Moltar
8 years ago

Wil-mer Flo-res [clap] [clap] [clapclapclap]

LHPSU
8 years ago
Reply to  Moltar

Not sure what you’re getting at – Flores played 4 years of shortstop in the Mets system before he moved to 2B/3B.

Moltar
8 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Lots of guys play SS in the minors even though everybody knows they won’t stick, and the years he played it in the minors he was as young or younger than Senzel was in college. No scout thought he had a future at SS (Flores was a top prospect for so long there’s literally years of old klawchats debating this lol). He had already come to the majors as a defensively shaky 2B-3B, then the Mets decided in lieu of signing a capable SS they would move Flores back up the spectrum, and it went predictably poor. The point being, this conversion can go wrong, especially if like the Mets you have no backup plan and/or the bat never gets strong enough to make it worthwhile.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Moltar

The whole thing with Flores…he was actually fine at first. He looked awful out there, but when he played shortstop in 2014 he did well, and actually wasn’t that terrible in 2015 either (although he was admittedly below average then).

The amazing thing about that wasn’t that it worked, because it didn’t really work, but that it didn’t fail as badly as anyone would have thought. You would think that with a guy who can really field (Ke’Bryan Hayes, for example) it might work.

ari6126
8 years ago

Didn’t Simmons go to college?

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
8 years ago

Is it out of the question that Suarez could move back to SS where he began his career? I know it’s been a while but he used to be decent, and has more experience than Senzel.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Domingo Ayala

He was bad at SS. See the link jdbolick posted above. He’s a 3rd baseman now and it’s better that way.

Domingo AyalaMember since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Noted, thanks!

abado
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Suarez was a bad defensive player at both SS and 3B from 2014 to 2016. He didn’t turn things around right when he switched to 3B. He had the tools and put in the work to become a great thirdbaseman. So it’s not quite as linear as he’s a bad SS and a good 3B. With both Senzel and Suarez, the critical questions with moving (back) to SS are: do they have the tools to be decent defensively? And will they put in the work to maximize those tools at SS?
The cement isn’t dry on Suarez, or at least it shouldn’t be. For years, he was considered a decent defensive SS with an average bat. He struggled at the position in his age 22 and 23 seasons. That doesn’t mean he can’t grow into an average defensive SS where his bat would play up.
Moving Suarez back to SS may not be a bad fall back plan should Senzel (and Peraza) not pan out there.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago

Fly balls and positioning might take off some pressure of the middle infield but I think it is a fine line, you could still easily end up with a negative 20 runs shortstop when trying that.

The As have tried to play guys out of position last year and while it worked with the power they also had one of the worst years ever with team defense.

Very often you then read next year that the team tries to improve defense.

On the one hand positioning helps the defense but on the other hand the ball and the uppercut swings make power more accessible.

Ten years ago a 22 Hr shortstop was a big asset and your glove wiz would hit 7 bombs but now your glove wiz hits 16 homers, so a dude hitting 24 is not that much of an upgrade over him.

Thus many teams now might prefer a plus defender hitting 16 over a minus 5 guy hitting low 20s.

Imo it is not really worth to tank defense for power. Many of the last years super teams had been Very good defensively (cubs , Dodgers, Indians although the Astros were not) and it is not that hard to compile a 220 homer team without ranking defense.

Now hitting is not just power but also contact and walks but it is mostly power that is negatively correlated with defense (due to body weight probably) while the other two are largely independent.

mprice11390
8 years ago

Tell em Wash

shampain
8 years ago

The converse of this arg is that it increasingly makes little sense to hide a defensive liability in the OF unless the bat is truly elite.

Lanidrac
8 years ago

Well, DeJong will likely slide over to 3rd Base once Gyorko hits free agency in 2 years, but yes it certainly is surprising that DeJong off all players turned out to be the Cardinals’ best defensive shortstop save for bench player Greg Garcia.

Lanidrac
8 years ago

So how is it that a guy like Aledmys Diaz wound up as a middle infielder when he defense is so bad that the Blue Jays should really be using him at DH as much as possible?