Picking the 2016 National League All-Stars

Yesterday, I revealed how I would put together the AL All-Star team, if I was given full authority to pick all 34 players. Today, let’s tackle the NL, and for efficiency reasons, I’ll just copy and paste the intro I wrote yesterday. If you already read that piece, you can just skip right on down to the picks themselves.

The All-Star Game is just a couple of weeks away, so it’s time for the annual tradition of deciding which really good players get acknowledged and which really good players get left out. The fact that there’s no shortage of ways to define who should make the All-Star team doesn’t help; is it about just gathering as many big name players as possible every summer, about rewarding the players who have performed the best so far this year, or some combination of the two?

I tend to lean towards rewarding in-season performance, while using career track record as secondary variable to help make the decision when picking between multiple worthy players. Yes, some guys are going to have great half-seasons and end up on the team despite not truly being long-term stars, but I prefer that over jogging out the same 34 names every summer just because they’re the guys we’re used to recognizing as stars, regardless of what they’ve actually done that season. To me, the All-Star Game is a reward for the players who are playing at a high level, and what you’ve done this season is the most important variable in selecting the rosters.

For my selections, I’m adhering to the MLB rules, so we’re picking 22 position players and 12 pitchers, and every team has to have a representative. Yes, even the Twins. Because some positions are performing much better than others — I’m looking at you, sorry sack of 2016 AL catchers — I did take some liberties with how many players get carried as reserves at each spot, but overall, I tried to pick a team that would satisfy the requirements of how the game is managed and still rewards 34 guys who deserve to make the trip to San Diego this summer. And injured players aren’t eligible for my picks, as I’m just going with players who are healthy enough to play in the game in a couple of weeks.

On to the roster!

The Starting Nine

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
NL All-Star Starters
Position Player Team 2016 WAR Past Year WAR
C Buster Posey Giants 2.5 5.1
1B Paul Goldschmidt Diamondbacks 2.9 5.5
2B Daniel Murphy Nationals 3.4 5.0
SS Corey Seager Dodgers 3.7 5.1
3B Nolan Arenado Rockies 3.4 5.4
LF Kris Bryant Cubs 4.0 7.6
CF Yoenis Cespedes Mets 2.0 6.1
RF Bryce Harper Nationals 2.9 7.4
DH Anthony Rizzo Cubs 2.9 5.0

Posey remains the best catcher in baseball, and while he’s not having as good a season at the plate as he’s had in prior years, his combination of offense and defense still put him at the head of the pack. While he usually doesn’t end up in the conversation of best players in baseball, Posey remains the primary reason the Giants are a contender in most years.

At first base, the NL overflows with quality options; Goldschmidt and Rizzo are both elite hitters who also field well, but one will likely have to start at DH anyway; they both clearly deserve to start, and that’s the only way to get them both in the line-up. The starters up the middle were fairly easy picks, even with high-quality alternatives, as both Murphy and Seager are just having remarkable seasons. At third base, I chose to go with Arenado because Bryant has played almost half his innings in the outfield, and like at first base, this allows for two deserving starters to find their way into the line-up.

In the outfield, Cespedes gets the start in center field over some other worthy candidates in part because of track record; he’s carried over his high-level of success from last year, where the other CF options are more breakout guys in the first half. Likewise, you could maybe make a case that Harper hasn’t been the best right fielder in the first half of 2016, but it’s close, and he’s clearly established himself as an upper-tier performer.

The Reserves

NL All-Star Bench
Position Player Team 2016 WAR Past Year WAR
C Wilson Ramos Nationals 2.4 1.9
C Jonathan Lucroy Brewers 2.2 3.6
1B Brandon Belt Giants 2.1 4.7
1B Wil Myers Padres 3.1 3.3
2B Ben Zobrist Cubs 2.9 4.4
2B Matt Carpenter Cardinals 3.4 6.5
SS Brandon Crawford Giants 3.3 4.9
SS Zack Cozart Reds 1.9 1.9
SS Aledmys Diaz Cardinals 1.8 1.8
3B Jake Lamb Diamondbacks 3.0 4.2
OF Marcell Ozuna Marlins 3.2 3.8
OF Gregory Polanco Pirates 2.9 4.8
OF Odubel Herrera Phillies 1.8 5.0

Ramos was one of the worst players in baseball last year, as evidenced by the fact that his Past Year WAR is lower than his 2016 WAR, but given his stellar first half, you can’t leave him off the team. Lucroy has also bounced back to perform at a high level, and would be here even if the Brewers didn’t need a representative. That they do makes him a very easy pick, though if gets traded to the AL before the game gets played, things would get complicated.

On the infield, Matt Carpenter is only on the bench because some deserving starter had to lose the coin toss; you could easily argue for him over Murphy at second or Arenado at third, but then, both of them deserve to start as well. If you want Carpenter in the line-up over one of those two, that’s perfectly reasonable, but the reality of the 2B/3B depth in the NL is that someone has to start the day on the bench, even though they’re having an All-Star Starter season.And that doesn’t even account for Zobrist, who is also having a great year!

At shortstop, we have the same problem that we had in the AL yesterday; too many great young players. I ended up carrying four to get Diaz on the team — Cozart basically had to be here because the Reds need a representative — but that spot could have easily gone to Trevor Story or Danny Espinosa, both of whom are also having excellent years.

Jake Lamb makes the team as the backup at third base, as his quiet breakout is one of the reasons the D’Backs aren’t a complete disaster despite the implosion of their pitching staff. Being behind Arenado and Carpenter on the playing time depth chart might mean he ends up relegated to pinch-hitting or something, but he’s definitely played his way onto the team.

In the outfield, there are simply too many options to choose from, and no real easy way to sort out who should go and who gets left off from the pool of deserving candidates. Herrera makes it because the Phillies need a representative and he’s their best player; if I took a guy like Dexter Fowler or Carlos Gonzalez instead, we’d end up with Jeanmar Gomez on the All-Star team, and no one should want that. Ozuna and Polanco have been legitimately excellent this year, though of course, so has Starling Marte and Christian Yelich, and Ryan Braun has hit well when he’s played.

Even Adam Duvall wouldn’t be a terrible pick if you wanted to give the Reds their representative that way. Trying to pick just six NL outfielders is impossible, but then again, I’m not sure who else I’d kick off the roster either. The NL is just loaded with top-end talent right now.

The Pitchers

For the listed WARs, I’m just using a 50/50 mix of FIP-WAR and RA9-WAR, since showing both would make the table cumbersome.

NL All-Star Pitchers
Position Player Team 2016 WAR Past Year WAR
SP Jose Fernandez Marlins 3.7 5.6
SP Noah Syndergaard Mets 3.3 5.2
SP Jake Arrieta Cubs 3.5 9.8
SP Johnny Cueto Giants 3.6 4.7
SP Madison Bumgarner Giants 3.1 5.8
SP Jon Lester Cubs 3.4 6.8
SP Julio Teheran Braves 2.6 4.2
SP Max Scherzer Nationals 2.6 4.8
RP Kenley Jansen Dodgers 1.7 2.3
RP Hector Rondon Cubs 1.1 2.2
RP Jeurys Familia Mets 1.0 2.2
RP Seung Oh Cardinals 1.2 1.2

Speaking of loaded, let’s talk about the starting pitchers over in the senior circuit. The only reason I was able to settle on these eight names is because Clayton Kershaw and Stephen Strasburg are hurt, and I’m using the healthy-guys-only designation to pick my 34 names; if they weren’t on the disabled list, I have no idea how I’d sort this group out. This is basically a who’s who of the best starting pitchers in baseball, and even without Kershaw and Strasburg, I had to go with eight starters and four relievers in order to fit the guys I thought the game couldn’t really live without. And even at that, there’s no Zack Greinke or Jacob deGrom, both of whom are excellent pitchers having good years.

At the moment, I’d probably lean towards Fernandez as the starter, but if you wanted to go with Arrieta or Syndergaard, that’d be fine too. The depth of arms here is insane, and the order in which you throw them doesn’t really matter much; this is just a collection of aces unlike anything we’ve seen for a long time.

Thankfully, the bullpen options in the NL aren’t quite as exciting, which is why I’m carrying just four relievers. Sure, this excludes some guys having good years, like Fernando Rodney, Mark Melancon, A.J. Ramos, and Arodys Vizcaino, but I’d rather have the extra spot for a starting pitcher, and Seung Oh has been insanely good for the Cardinals, so I’m carrying him as an acknowledgement of the value of non-closing relievers. If you want to swap him out for one of the others, okay, that’s fine, but Oh is a worthy pick on his own merits as well. Regardless of who gets picked for the last bullpen spot, the crazy depth of starters means that this guy probably isn’t pitching in the game anyway.

So, anyway, that’s my NL team, and even without Kershaw and Strasburg, I think it has to be favored to win. The pitching is that absurd, and the offense looks like a wrecking ball too; when Buster Posey might be the worst hitter in your line-up, you’re running out a pretty good group hitters.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
szielinski
10 years ago

Dave,

You forgot to include Starling Marte as the starting CF. I’m sure it was an oversight.

Anthony CalamisMember since 2024
10 years ago

I think I might choose to leave off Brandon Belt in favor of one of the outfielders. Technically it leaves you with only one backup 1B since Rizzo starts the day at 1B, but Posey can also play there if he’s still in, and you’re carrying a backup C in Lucroy who can also play there, and a 2B in Murphy who can also play there. Considering you kinda cheated the system to get Bryant in the starting lineup, you sorta have four third base types on the roster, three second base types, four shortstops, four first base types, and three catchers, but only six total outfield-capable players. I’d probably try to take Fowler (who will make it but I believe could still be hurt?), Marte or Yelich for the roster. I also think I might strongly consider Duvall as the Reds rep and not take Cozart. I like Diaz, Seager and Crawford, though, with Diaz’ selection as an acknowledgement of his year.

The NL roster is just too hard to pick, to be honest. Too many qualified players. Your third string team here is Lucroy or Ramos, Belt or Myers, Zobrist, Lamb, Diaz, and three OFers left off – probably Marte, Fowler and CarGo. That’s a great third-string team.

CosmoMember since 2020
10 years ago

Considering Bryant’s got the most WAR out of the starters (both this year and over the last calendar year), I wouldn’t call that cheating to get Bryant in the lineup… it’s cheating to get Arenado in. But the cubs really don’t have a starting LF since Schwarber’s been out and Bryant has played a lot in the OF.

Unique New York
10 years ago
Reply to  Cosmo

I don’t think it’s completely fair to Arenado to say that it’s cheating to get him in the NL starting lineup. He’s having a great year and has started to emerge as one of the best Top 10-15 positional players in the league. On top of that, you might just get lucky and watch him make a nasty play at 3B. The guy is a walking highlight reel at the hot corner.

CosmoMember since 2020
10 years ago

All I’m saying is that it’s not cheating to get Bryant in the game considering he’s leading the NL in WAR. As good as Arenado is, Bryant is better.

Joe
10 years ago
Reply to  Cosmo

Bryant may be the better hitter, but Arenado is the better third-baseman and its not even close. His defense is outstanding (up there with the tops among all positions) to go along with his hitting numbers which are’t really that far behind Bryant. I’ve heard that a couple of scouts are starting to make Brooks Robinson comps for Arenado which is incredible, if you step back and think about it.

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Right, Bryant is the better hitter which more than offsets the gap in defense. You’re not telling us anything we don’t know.

CosmoMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe

And WAR takes defense into consideration… Bryant has been the best player in the NL over the last year… Arenado’s defense doesn’t change that. Bryant has been the better player.

jrogersMember since 2017
10 years ago
Reply to  Cosmo

Even if Bryant is better than Arenado head-to-head, the best lineup for the NL would have Arenado at 3B and Bryant in the OF, rather than Bryant at 3B and Ozuna or whoever in the OF.

jacobfagan
10 years ago

Idk, Belt has the 4th best wRC+ in the NL. I don’t knock him or others for having worse defensive stats for half a season. Since 2013 he’s arguably been the best defensive first baseman in NL.

Hurtlocker
10 years ago

Can’t ague with most of those picks, really tough when you have to have a rep from each team.

rustydudeMember since 2021
10 years ago

Posey remains the primary reason the Giants are a contender in most years

Make that every other year, like clockwork.

John
10 years ago

We should also go ahead and announce JJ Hoover as the pitcher for the HR derby…

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  John

Why did the Padres have to trade James Shields.

Waldan
10 years ago

I had the same list, except I had MadBum as the DH. Not that Bochy would ever allow that to happen. I had Cespedes as the first string OF, but I think Matre has outperformed him.

LilMrWalkoff
10 years ago

>and while he’s not having as good a season at the plate as he’s had in prior years, his combination of offense and defense still put him at the head of the pack.

I know I watch the ASG to see catcher defense; ooh, and base running too!
#HornsUp

LHPSU
10 years ago
Reply to  LilMrWalkoff

If Ichiro gets into the ASG this year, you’d better be watching it for baserunning.

Spitball McPhee
10 years ago

I’d go Hamilton from the Reds for pinch runner /defensive replacement

Sam Samson
10 years ago

I agree with most of your selections, though I would start with Ozuna in CF. He’s been sensational.

Nats3256
10 years ago

This pitching staff is lights out. It makes the AL staff look like a t-ball team.

mateodh
10 years ago

I’m sure I’m in the minority here, but when I vote, I vote for whoever’s been the best over the past calendar year. Yes, it’s the 2016 ASG, not the 2015-2016 ASG, but to me that irregularity is made up for by giving recognition to the players who had good 2nd halves in 2015 that were never taken into consideration for the 2015 ASG. This way, you don’t have overlooked information and you aren’t going on only a half-season of data.

Notably, for me, that puts Joey Votto in as the starting 1B, despite being 7th in WAR for NL 1B for 2016.

I’m flexible when it comes to someone who is having a great 2016 that did not play much in 2015 due to injury, rookie, etc., but Seager has passed Crawford in WAR anyway.