Prince Fielder’s Baseball Career Is Over

After last season, Prince Fielder was named the American League Comeback Player of the Year. Neck problems and surgery ruined Fielder’s 2014, but he came back to run a 124 wRC+ over 158 games played. Fielder was plenty deserving of the award, and it looked like the 31-year-old had his career back on track. But this season, Fielder developed symptoms similar to the ones he had before. He was diagnosed with about the same problem, requiring a second surgery, and now Fielder’s playing days are done. Though he’s not actually retiring, he’s also not receiving clearance to return, which means functionally the same thing. The difference is important to the Rangers, but it doesn’t matter to the fans.

Situations such as these are always difficult to discuss from the outside. We know Fielder as a baseball player, and we know baseball players by their numbers. Fielder, right now, doesn’t care about his numbers; he cares about his own ability to move. He cares about what reduced flexibility could mean for his quality of life. It’s important to understand that being declared medically disabled means there’s something wrong with an actual person. As of today, Prince Fielder is one of us, and he’s hurting. Three months ago, he turned 32.

So, there’s no way for us to know what Fielder is truly going through. There’s no real way for us to connect beyond the shallowest of terms. I think the best we can do is to wish Fielder well, and to say that in his chosen line of work, he was outstanding for several years, a hitter sufficiently complete to overcome some obvious drawbacks.

On his FanGraphs page, Fielder is listed at 5’11, 275. On his Baseball-Reference page, the numbers are the same. When Fielder was drafted as a teenager, he was listed at 5’11, 286. Think about what it must be like to be a teenager with those dimensions. Think about what it must mean when you’re a teenager with those dimensions, and still you’re selected seventh, one slot after Zack Greinke.

The offensive bar for Fielder to clear was high. That didn’t take a lot of scouting skill to assert. Fielder just wasn’t going to be much of a runner, and he wasn’t going to be much of a defender. Indeed, I looked at players over the last 20 years, calculating numbers on a rate basis, and in terms of big-league baserunning value, Fielder rated in the bottom five percent. In terms of big-league defensive value, Fielder also rated in the bottom five percent. Fielder was always going to need to mash, and he’d need to be able to stay in the lineup. Otherwise, he’d become someone who’d drift around Triple-A, waiting for Septembers or go-nowhere years.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Fielder mashed, and he did so for most of a decade. As a hitter, he rated in the top 10 percent, and that’s including the time he spent playing through neck issues. He’s one of the better hitters in recent baseball history through age 29, and Fielder was never just about dingers. He hit plenty of those, sure, and he celebrated them, but Fielder was a total threat, if not quite at the Pujolsian level. As a starter, Fielder consistently walked about an eighth of the time he came up. He never once struck out a fifth of the time he came up, even with league strikeout levels rising. Fielder had both a strong bat and a quick bat, and that gave him enviable plate coverage. He didn’t have many holes, and you couldn’t get away with busting him inside.

Fielder’s build was such that it was often the punchline, even if it was left unsaid. Athletic defensive plays were entertaining — because Fielder was big. Stolen-base attempts were entertaining — because Fielder was big. His two inside-the-park home runs were entertaining — because Fielder was big. Absolutely, Fielder’s size is part of his story, but that isn’t where he began and ended. Even though he was big, he was a complete hitter. Even though he was big, he was an everyday first baseman. And even though he was big, Fielder was for a time the league’s active iron man, up until the first neck operation. I don’t know what caused the neck problems, and I don’t know how Fielder might’ve aged without them. But his weight didn’t prevent him from being a star-level baseball player. Fielder was at least a four-win player four times in six years. He twice slugged over .600.

As such, through 29, Fielder was as good a hitter as Orlando Cepeda. He was as good as Carl Yastrzemski, Harmon Killebrew, Mike Schmidt, and Gary Sheffield. Unfortunately, much of the way people think about Fielder has been colored by the events since. A questionable exchange by the Rangers sending Ian Kinsler away has worked out to be a disastrous one. And now Fielder is finished, with a contract running through 2020. According to current reports, the Rangers will be on the hook for $9 million each year until the deal is up. And the Rangers will apparently have to keep Fielder on the 40-man roster through the offseasons. That means one fewer player that could be protected from the Rule 5 Draft. Fielder, as a Ranger, was worth less than zero WAR. It’s hard to forget about his diminished state. From a baseball perspective, this has been more or less a worst-case scenario.

You just can’t ignore the human perspective. Nor can you ignore that, from a baseball perspective, much of Fielder’s career was a best-case scenario. He needed to hit like David Ortiz, and that’s what he did. That’s what he did as literally an everyday player, and everyone eventually reaches an end. Fielder’s came early. He’s no happier about it than you are.

Hopefully he can still live the private life that he wants. In his public life, he did more than enough.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

49 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
southie
10 years ago

Career home runs Cecil Fielder 319, Prince Fielder 319.

MuadDib
10 years ago
Reply to  southie

Prince’s 7 best HR years in descending order: 50, 46, 38, 34, 32, 30, 28
Cecil’s 7 best HR years in descending order: 51, 44, 39, 35, 31, 30, 28

Doorknob11
10 years ago

I still don’t know what to think about that trade, yeah the Rangers got the worse player but in doing so they allowed Odor to play everyday.

shaq_diesel
10 years ago
Reply to  Doorknob11

Releasing Kinsler would have done the same, and been a lot cheaper,

MikeySymington
10 years ago

Feel bad for Prince, he was brilliant to watch hit when he was healthy.

Out of interest, why can the Rangers not simply DFA and release him, rather than keeping him on the roster until 2020 and putting him on the 60 day DL each year? Would they forfeit the insurance money if they did this?

jdbolickMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  MikeySymington

Yes.

Arjon
10 years ago

Why does he have to remain on the 40-man roster?

vmx
10 years ago
Reply to  Arjon

too big. can’t cut him with just one DFA.

jianadaren
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

That’s really bizarre. Why are the insurance contracts structured like that? What does Grow have to say?

Doug LampertMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  jianadaren

I don’t have any details on the case, but my guess would be that the insurance company wants to be sure the team doesn’t just say about a bad player, “He’s injured, we’re DFAing him, and we want you to pay half the money”.

If he’s injured, then he’s on the roster and 60-day DLed. If he’s bad, then he’s DFAed. The insurance policy is for injury, not bad play.

Ebenezer
10 years ago
Reply to  jianadaren

I also would like to read a Nathaniel Grow post on this issue as well, not just regarding Prince Fielder, but teams insuring players in general, and different ways teams can manage risk and how effective they are (or aren’t).

Arjon
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Thanks. So it seems the reason is because MLB didn’t have the foresight to prepare for situations like this one.

JoserMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  Arjon

What does MLB have to do with it? This is between the Rangers and their insurance company. The insurance company covered for any problem from their end; it appears the Rangers didn’t think through all the possibilities from theirs.

Arjon
10 years ago
Reply to  Joser

If MLB had a permanently disabled category, it would be more straightforward for teams to insure against situations like Fielder’s so that they don’t have to choose between no payout or losing a roster slot.

sheeks9
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Can the Rangers work out some sort of settlement with Fielder that pays him the same amount of money, but he will officially retire?

I cant see a reason why Fielder wouldnt agree to something like that.

walkieMember since 2017
10 years ago
Reply to  sheeks9

The problem isn’t agreeing with Fielder, it’s agreeing with the insurance company. Prince gets his money whether they cut him or not, but the insurance company only subsidizes it if he stays on the roster.

What they might be able to do is negotiate something with the insurance company, where the insurance covers less of the total, but the Rangers are free to cut him.

(Great career eulogy Jeff. Prince Fielder was one of my favorites.)

DragonAsh
10 years ago
Reply to  walkie

Prince’s contract is for $24 million a year through 2020. Of that amount, the Rangers are on the hook for $9 million, the Tigers are paying $6 million, and insurance (taken out by the Rangers) pays out $9 million.

If Prince retires, he forfeits the entire amount – would *you* willingly give up $96 million? Me neither.

On the other hand – $40-50 million ain’t exactly pocket change. Maybe he’d accept some sort of up-front lump-sump option, if the Rangers & Tigers agreed to pay – the Tigers would probably agree to pitch in as well, right? Although I wonder if legally that’s even an option….

Also – Jeff, fantastic article. Thank you.

dl80Member since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  sheeks9

I can’t imagine either the MLBPA (sets a bad precedent of undoing guaranteed contracts) or the MLB league office (allows teams to flout the luxury tax with chicanery) would allow that to happen, even if it makes sense for the Rangers.

bglick4
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

I can’t see why the insurance company would object to MLB adding a long term disabled list that covers a situation like this. I would think he would just need to be kept in a spot where if he did miraculously get better and be able to play again, it would have to be with the Rangers. MLB shouldn’t want teams punished for something like this and the MLBPA certainly doesn’t want there to be one less roster spot in the league. I don’t see why they wouldn’t make this change.

sheeks9
10 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

Yeah, its more complicated than I gave it credit for, but it certainly seems to be in the best interest of the MLBPA and the Rangers for some sort of agreement to be made.

Arjon
10 years ago
Reply to  bglick4

I don’t see why insurers would object either. As long as they get proof the reason is permanent, where’s the problem?

Dave TMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Arjon

Insurers will always prefer, at the margin, that it’s tougher rather than easier for the team to make a disability claim. So the fact that a 40 man roster spot “costs” a team something versus just DFA’ing a player is preferable to an insurer.

That said, I agree that the difference shouldn’t be a dealbreaker for an insurer. The key point is the medical determination, which an insurer can certainly dispute if there’s disagreement. It’s also helpful from the insurer’s standpoint that the mindset of almost always players is that they want to play if they can physically do so, so very few players would be inclined to go along with a fake diagnosis of permanent disability.

LHPSU
10 years ago

We expected Fielder to decline early and maybe we could have predicted that the body type was going to cause health issues down the road, but I don’t think anyone could have expected this.

And to think that one of the things Boras touted when Fielder became a free agent was his durability.

dl80Member since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

If Fielder had been able to play all 162 games instead of 159 or 158 those first few years, he could have had 8+ years of never missing a game. That would have put him only about 1300 behind Cal.

bookbookMember since 2019
10 years ago

I’m glad you’re out there, Jeff. As sports fans, we don’t always think about human beings. All indications that I’ve seen are that Prince Fielder is a fine human being, who did not deserve these devastating injuries. Nor the early end of a very good career.

t
10 years ago
Reply to  bookbook

And thanks for the near-instant awesome take. I wanted to hear about this and didn’t want to go elsewhere. You rock.

Westside guy
10 years ago

A lot of people were concerned that Prince Fielder’s career would end early because his father’s career tanked early and they were very similar physically. But Cecil didn’t retire due to injury, he just started to suck… right?

dl80Member since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Westside guy

Or continued to be mediocre, as horrible defensive numbers dragged his overall value way down to the point where he was basically replacement level for years, aside from the 2 monster offensive years of 1990 and 1991.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
10 years ago

From 2007-11 Prince & Braun put up matching 147 wRC+ marks & ranked 3rd & 5th in batting runs behind Pujols & Miggy with Holliday in between. Those were fun years to watch the Brewers. Sheets, Yo, Weeks, Hardy & Hart rounding out a pretty nice homegrown core. Cameron, Gomez & Tony Plush in CF at various points. CC & Greinke as rented aces.

I know team chemistry is largely dismissed around these parts because it can’t begin to be measured to any reliable degree of certainty, but for whatever it is or isn’t worth the demeanor of post Fielder led Milwaukee teams hasn’t seemed to be quite the same.

stretchfest
10 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Those team had some great battles with the Cardinals. And as a Birds fan, Fielder was probably my most feared hitter for a few years. I may have sports-hated the guy for a while but this makes me sad, even if we kinda saw it coming. Best of luck to his future.

Merv Throneberry
10 years ago

Nice tribute to a great player who unfortunately has come to the end of this career. Let’s wish him well.

Mike NMN
10 years ago

Nice, balanced piece. An interesting and fun player when he was healthy. Let’s hope he heals and can enjoy a normal life.

backward galaxy
10 years ago

I really liked that you stressed both the human being discussed and the fact that he was a legit monster offensive player when healthy. This was a nice read, Jeff.

John WickMember since 2018
10 years ago

Good night, sweet prince.

StinkyPeteMember since 2016
10 years ago

I’ve always likened Fielder (one of my favorite players of the 00’s) to one of my favorite players of the 90’s, Mo Vaughn. Not only did they share a physical presence, deceptive athleticism, and penchant for majestic home runs, but their career arcs and overall production are eerily similar.

Both spent years mashing for their original teams (Milwaukee/Boston), then signed massive (and from a team standpoint, ill-advised) free agent deals (Detroit/Anaheim). After delivering on those deals for a couple of years, both were unloaded in salary dump / challenge trades (Texas/New York), after which their careers quickly fizzled.

Fielder: .283 / .382 / .506 / 319 HR / 862 R / 1028 RBI / 26.8 WAR
Vaughn: .293 / .383 / .523 / 328 HR / 861 R / 1064 RBI / 31.1 WAR

bglick4
10 years ago

I think is similar to what the Orioles faced with Joey Bell. He was physically unable to play but the insurance situation meant he couldn’t retire or be cut. He was among the highest paid Orioles during the last few years of that deal and didn’t play an inning. If Angelos and his crooked team of lawyers couldn’t figure a way to weasel out of this situation, I kind of don’t think the Rangers will be able to either. Fielder was fun to watch, it’s a shame his career was cut short.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
10 years ago

I am not accusing anyone of anything, but there would be an incentive for both the Rangers and Fielder to pretend this is career ending when it isn’t. For the Rangers, the question is whether Fielder will be worth $36 million the next 4 years. For Fielder, he is paid the same, but he can’t play (doesn’t get to or doesn’t have to, depending on your perspective). Does he even have to show up? Do anything? Regardless of the injury, Fielder must know that he’s never getting another even decent-sized contract ever again, and most likely would be unemployed by 2020 anyway.

If I’m the insurance company, I’m looking into this. You would think they would have more power in this situation than simply taking the team (and Fielder) at their words.

troybrunoMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Step 1. write “I am not accusing anyone of anything”
Step 2. accuse someones of somethings

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
10 years ago
Reply to  troybruno

No, I just said there are incentives from both sides to do this; that it is a possibility, I do find it ironic that your post does exactly what you purport to dislike.

bdhudson
10 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

You’re also assuming that there is at least one doctor putting his medical license on the line for no benefit to himself

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
10 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

Yes, that is true. Especially in this case, it is more likely the case that neither Fielder (for health reasons) or the team (for financial reasons) really put up much of a fight with the doctor’s prognosis. If this were a much younger player without the financial security Fielder enjoys (and also one that was more valuable to his team), you might see the player or team asking for a second, third, fourth, however many opinions it takes to resume his career.

JoserMember since 2021
10 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

In cases like this, the insurance company will require that Fielder and all his medical records be reviewed by a doctor(s) of their choosing. They won’t just pay without doing their own due diligence.

Arjon
10 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Of course the insurer will want verification. They’re an insurer. But who said they shouldn’t?

jdbolickMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The insurance company gets access to the medical records regarding the claim to verify its authenticity.

dudeOfTheWorld
10 years ago

I think it’s very likely the original neck injury or degradation occurred early in his final year with the Tigers (2013), and he probably re-injured it before the All-Star break last year.

He simply hasn’t been his old self in anything more than a couple of short bursts since 2012. April of 2013 was the last time he posted a SLG% above .550 until he returned from the surgery at the beginning of 2015. While his 2015 looks pretty good as a whole, his production really fell off by July, and he wasn’t a factor at all in the improved record after the All-Star break. Then, finally, this year was a disaster right from the start.

Mahoney
10 years ago

Sad to see. As someone with sleep apnea, I was hoping that Prince could get a comeback in order once the treatment has taken, just like Mike Napoli’s mini-comeback in Cleveland. He needs to take good care of himself with the apnea because of the way he is built like an NFL lineman, with a large muscular neck which not only was a likely culprit in his neck injuries, but would point towards the kind of airway that is easily restricted. Getting his apnea under control in his early 30s will not only improve his quality of life immeasurably, it could actually save it.

I wish him well.

davels
10 years ago

Jeff, great piece.

As a thought experiment… what is the value of a 40-man roster spot? Texas has had a loaded system… and already lost Odubel Herrera in the rule 5 draft.

How many more Odubels would they need to lose, before it became a better idea to just pay the $9mil that insurance covers, in order to re-claim that last roster spot?

davels
10 years ago
Reply to  davels

Nevermind… just looked at the “value” segment of Odubel’s Fangraphs page. He’s been worth 48.9mil, and he’s been paid 1mil. Sooo… 47.9mil is surplus value. (to date)

So, it would be well worth it to just cover the $9 mil that insurance would pay, rather than lose a player like Odubel. Granted, he’s an outlier. But maybe Texas will swallow hard and pay it themselves?

Who is one the fringe of their 40-man?