Projecting Javier Baez and Quantifying His Improvements
Taking full advantage of the September roster expansion, the Chicago Cubs called up 22-year-old infielder Javier Baez to help fortify the team’s middle-infield situation. This isn’t Baez’s first taste of the big leagues. In fact, he doesn’t even qualify as a rookie anymore. As you probably recall, he spent the final two months of 2014 season in the majors, where he turned in a historically bad performance as the team’s second baseman.
Just how bad was it? Baez hit a pitcher-esque .169/.227/.324 in 52 games with the Cubs last year. His on-base percentage was the lowest of any hitter who recorded at least 200 plate appearances. Most alarming of all was his 42% strikeout rate, which made him the only player in the game’s history to have a strikeout rate above 40% in more than 200 plate appearances.
After his strikeout woes continued into this year’s spring training, the Cubs had Baez open the year in Triple-A, and kept him there until last week. Baez hit pretty well following his demotion. In 70 games, he hit .324/.385/.527 — which was good enough for a 144 wRC+. That’s markedly better than his 108 wRC+ at the same level last year.
The improvement had much to do with Baez’s strikeout rate, which dropped from 30% to 24%, but the improvements didn’t stop there. Here’s a comparison between Baez’s 2014 and 2015 seasons, using stats that have been regressed for sample size and centered to league average.
Outside of the power department, Baez has improved in nearly every aspect of his game. His strikeout rate is the most notable improvement, but he also managed to hit for a higher BABIP and stole bases more frequently. At the same time, though, he’s also a year older than last season, so some amount of improvement was anticipated. The expectations for a 22-year-old are naturally higher than they are for a 21-year-old.
Still, even with his being a year older, KATOH prefers this year’s version of Baez to the Baez from last August — the time of his first call-up. Baez’s 2015 numbers earned him a forecast of 11.4 WAR through age 28, up from last year’s mark of 7.6.
One could also observe Baez’s improvement by comparing his Mahalanobis comps between this year and last. Last year’s list reads like a who’s who of failed swing-for-the-fences prospects, and Baez followed a similar trajectory in his rookie campaign. Baez was essentially a Brandon Wood reincarnate in his first go-around in Chicago.

| Rank | Mah Dist | Name | PA thru 28 | WAR thru 28 |
| 1 | 0.57 | Chad Hermansen | 541 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 1.14 | Todd Dunwoody | 986 | 0.0 |
| 3 | 1.53 | Dee Brown | 871 | 0.0 |
| 4 | 1.84 | Michael Coleman | 70 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 2.10 | Brandon Wood | 751 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 2.53 | Jared Hoying* | 0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | 2.85 | Jamie Ogden | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | 2.87 | Jonny Gomes | 1,784 | 2.7 |
| 9 | 3.07 | Cody Ransom | 117 | 0.0 |
| 10 | 3.10 | Brad Nelson | 31 | 0.0 |
But this year’s list of comps features many more successful players, from Starling Marte to Ray Durham to Curtis Granderson. Like Baez, most of these hitters didn’t make a ton of contact, but also didn’t strike out alarmingly often. They relied on a combination of modest power and speed to put together very good offensive careers.

| Rank | Mah Dist | Name | PA thru 28 | WAR thru 28 |
| 1 | 1.28 | Peter Bourjos* | 1,640 | 10.6 |
| 2 | 1.38 | Starling Marte* | 1,801 | 12.8 |
| 3 | 1.45 | Lee Tinsley | 979 | 1.4 |
| 4 | 1.52 | Roberto Mejia | 450 | 0.0 |
| 5 | 1.73 | Jimmy Paredes* | 818 | 0.0 |
| 6 | 1.75 | Ray Durham | 3,993 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 1.88 | Gerald Williams | 397 | 2.6 |
| 8 | 2.03 | Mark Little | 105 | 0.7 |
| 9 | 2.07 | Curtis Granderson | 2,896 | 20.1 |
| 10 | 2.19 | Al Martin | 2,034 | 5.6 |
As Kiley McDaniel noted in last week’s chat, the Cubs summoned Baez to the big leagues somewhat prematurely on purpose to give him a sense of what he needed to work on. Their hope was that he’d take notice of the holes in his swing, and refine his approach to patch them up. Based on his minor-league numbers, it seems he’s made some progress in this regard. His strikeout rate is still higher than you’d like to see, but it’s trending in the right direction. Even more encouragingly, he’s made these improvements without giving up much of the power output that’s made scouts drool over him since he was in high school. Perhaps that means he’ll do a little less of what’s depicted in the first 10 clips in the following GIF, which Owen Watson crafted using video form Baez’s rookie campaign.

Baez appears to be a much better player than he was this time last year, but he’s still very much a work in progress. Although he hacked six percentage points off of his Triple-A strikeout rate between this year and last, he still whiffed 24% of the time in the minors this year, and is projected for something like a 30% strikeout rate in the big leagues. To make matters worse, he accumulates many of those strikeouts by swinging through pitches in the strike zone — a trait that’s common among hitters who have trouble transitioning to the big leagues.
But there’s still plenty to like about Baez’s game. His power is obviously pretty special, he runs well, and is capable of playing the middle of the infield. And perhaps most importantly, he still has age on his side. Although it feels like Baez is teetering on the rim of the failed prospect bin, he’s still just 22. He’s still three months younger than Maikel Franco, and more than a year younger than both Stephen Piscotty and Enrique Hernandez.
Baez very well may go the route of Brandon Wood or Roberto Mejia. That’s certainly not a rare trajectory for players who have the type of swing-and-miss that Baez does. But it’s much too soon to write him off completely, especially given the improvements he made in his second tour of duty at Triple-A. As was the case a year ago, he’s still very much a boom-or-bust prospect, but the likelihood the Cubs will get to enjoy the boom appear to be growing.
Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.

Good analysis of the stats, and as a Cubs fan, I feel much better about the new Baez having some sort of MLB career than what we saw last year.
However, you make no mention of the swing and approach changes he has made to get here. Looks like a totally different guy, and now he looks legit.
200 AB’s for a 21 year old infielder with 80 grade power don’t turn a top 5 prospect on a rookie contract into a valueless bust at 22. If Baez still had rookie status, where would he sit on the prospect rankings? He outperformed Seager at AAA (144 wRC+ for Baez vs 106 for Seager) albeit 1 year older.
70 power, not 80, and it’s worth noting that Baez’s AAA success was due in part to the highest BABIP of his career despite continuing to hit a higher than average number of infield pop-ups (which typically suppresses BABIP). Baez has definitely made improvements, just as he did his second time through high-A, but even with me being down on Seager I would prefer him over Baez in the short-term due to the significantly higher floor.
A 23 PA sample is ludicrously small, but one thing to watch is if Javier continues to swing at a high percentage of pitches inside the strike zone along with a relatively low percentage of pitches outside of it. He had a 17.7% Z-Swing% minus O-Swing% split in 2014, which is awful, but has produced a 36.4% split this season with the Cubs. That’s the recipe for success with any hitter who struggles at making consistent contact, with George Springer being the gold standard at 49.3%. Baez has more natural ability than Springer yet Springer’s eye at the plate gives him a leg up right now. If Javier maintains his current rate then he has value, and if he can continue to improve it then he could become a monster.
If I am reading this right, Domingo Santana is at around 40% difference. He also has an 80% Z-Contact rate which is higher than both Baez and Springer. I still can’t figure out why this guy doesn’t get any love. Can someone elaborate? The guys high BABIP’s seem to be legitimate since he has pretty much had a ridiculously high one since 2009. Other than his height and size making it more likely he loses his speed in a couple years, why is this guy’s bat not hyped like Springer’s was?
Because he has no history of a Z-Contact% this high. He had by far the worst Z-Contact% of any Fresno hitter this season except Max Stassi and he was dead last for Oklahoma City in 2014. There’s no precedent I’m aware of for a hitter dramatically improving his major league Z-Contact% over what he did in the minor leagues, so I’m assuming that Santana’s will drop back into the low 70s.
Baez’s 1st AB against Wacha last night really impressed me, and hopefully that AB is a microcosm of the changes he has made. He was down 0-2 and worked his way to full by fouling off strikes and laying off balls. He ended the AB by lining a double down the left field line on the 9th pitch (I think). Even if he K’d or made weak contact, I still would be encouraged by the AB.
Who plays a better shortstop, Russell or Baez? Baez has the stronger arm, yes?
I would say Russell is great as SS. Javy will be a terrific 2B and would be a good shortstop too, though. Great problem to have!
Baez has the stronger arm but Russell just makes all the plays. Id give Russell the nod
Good article. Baez has unrivaled bat speed. The comp that I always like was Gary Sheffield, except as a SS/2nd baseman. Sheffield produced over 60 wins in his career. Glad to see he’s putting last year behind him and is back on track. Alex Rodriguez was terrible in his first 200 MLB ABs, and look how that turned out.
Arod was barely legal when he took his first 200 MLB swings….
I don’t understand the Sheffield comp. (Unless you are talking about the way he looks when he swings with the extram movement) Shef came up striking out less than 8% of the time. Different environment these days as the fastballs are about 3 MPH faster overall, but I have a hard time thinking that He would be striking out anymore than say, 15% in today’s game with the same skills.
It’s strictly a bat speed comp, and an exceedingly common one.
Baez is a hard player to compare to anyone due to rare bat speed and the way in which he was striking out before this season. I have heard the wrong narrative when people try to analyze his SO numbers. He doesn’t have a big whole in the mechanical part of his swing. His problem is/was he would chase anything and everything. If he can keep his SO% around/under 25% he can be a very valuable player in this league.
This is what I’m thinking, Nathan. It was an approach problem, and the reason he had it was because that bat speed made him want to try to hit absolutely everything because he can get the sweet spot of the bat in the zone so quick.
We have to remember the psyche of a guy like Baez who has that kind of talent. It’s hard to listen to a coach telling you to lay off pitches when you have that kind of electric bat. But it seems like he turned a corner and gave the change in approach a try. Much lower K rate this year. Sky’s the limit for Javy.
Javy’s swing just looks so damn awesome. It’s like watching something forbidden. You wouldn’t teach your kid to swing like that, but you can’t take your eyes away when you see it.
Sheffield on Baez, September 2014:
“Right now when I watch his swing, he has something in his swing that can be fixed real easy. He collapses his back leg. When you collapse your back leg, anything over the belt line you have to uppercut. You can’t stay on top of it. When you’re trying to create that much torque with your lower half collapsing, that’s a lot of moving parts.”
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/cubs/post/_/id/27640/sheffield-javier-baez-needs-work-on-swing
That’s interesting given: http://www.brooksbaseball.net/h_profile.php?player=595879&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=month&minmax=ci&var=whiff&s_type=13&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=09/09/2015&balls=-1&strikes=-1&b_hand=-1
except upppercuts are correct and swinging down on the ball was just proven wrong, like literally a fangraphs article, today
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/hitters-quit-chopping-wood-dont-go-for-backspin/
carter, keep in mind that the vertical drop on fastballs is measured over the full distance from release to the catcher’s mitt. A baseball bat only matches it during the small section over the plate, which features very little drop and therefore would require very little upward angle to be on the same plane.
The idea that the Cubs called him up early because they knew he would fail is preposterous
Not really. I haven’t seen any comments saying he was untouchable, but the prevailing sentiment was that he needed to be exposed so that he’d be open to change. He’d never been significantly challenged in the minors despite manifest flaws, and that is what the org felt would get his attention. Between that, the tragic death of his sister, and the wrist injury that shelved him for weeks, he had plenty of time to work out of the spotlight; the ascendance of several other Cub bats and the team’s success served as a diversion to fans and (surmise alert)a motivation to Baez. He does look different as several others have noted, so here’s hoping the wilderness years are over and he’s ready to emerge.
I remember them talking about it when he was called up last year… before he struggled. He has struggled initially at every level, then adjusts. They wanted to give him ~50 games last year without any instruction to give him an idea of what he needed to work on. If you’ve read anything that Kiley has said, him not really listening to coaches, then this makes sense. They wanted to shock him into listening.
Baez seems to have followed a consistent pattern as he climbed the ladder to the bigs. In A ball and AAA ball, Baez struggled in his first year, made corrections, and then exploded in year two. His improvements at the major league level are very encouraging to me as a Cubs fan because they follow this pattern. How common is it for players as young as Baez to perform like that? I suspect many players improve when they remain at the same level of minor league ball for several seasons, but as Baez made it to the majors when he was only 21 he seems like an aberration. Any thoughts on this?