Prospect Report: Athletics 2023 Imminent Big Leaguers

Below is an evaluation of the prospects in the Oakland Athletics farm system who readers should consider “imminent big leaguers,” players who might reasonably be expected to play in the majors at some point this year. This includes all prospects on the 40-man roster as well as those who have already established themselves in the upper levels of the minors but aren’t yet rostered. I tend to be more inclusive with pitchers and players at premium positions since their timelines are usually the ones accelerated by injuries and scarcity. Any Top 100 prospects, regardless of their ETA, are also included on this list. Reports, tool grades, and scouting information for all of the prospects below can also be found on The Board.
This is not a top-to-bottom evaluation of the A’s farm system. We like to include what’s happening in minor league and extended spring training in our reports as much as possible, since scouting high concentrations of players there allows us to incorporate real-time, first-person information into the org lists. However, this approach has led to some situations where outdated analysis (or no analysis at all) was all that existed for players who had already debuted in the majors. Skimming the imminent big leaguers off the top of a farm system will allow this time-sensitive information to make its way onto the site more quickly, better preparing readers for the upcoming season, helping fantasy players, and building site literature on relevant prospects to facilitate transaction analysis in the event that trades or injuries foist these players into major league roles. There will still be an A’s prospect list that includes Gunnar Hoglund, Max Muncy, Daniel Susac and all of the other prospects in the system who appear to be at least another season away. As such, today’s list includes no ordinal rankings. Readers are instead encouraged to focus on the players’ Future Value (FV) grades.
Let’s revisit what FV means before I offer some specific thoughts on this org. Future Value (FV) is a subjective valuation metric derived from the traditional 20-80 scouting scale (where 50 is average and each integer of 10 away from 50 represents one standard deviation) that uses WAR production to set the scale. For instance, an average regular (meaning the 15th-best guy at a given position, give or take) generally produces about 2 WAR annually, so a 50 FV prospect projects as an everyday player who will generate about that much annual WAR during his pre-free agency big league seasons.
Why not just use projected WAR as the valuation metric, then? For one, it creates a false sense of precision. This isn’t a model. While a lot of data goes into my decision-making process, a lot of subjectivity does too, in the form of my own visual evaluations, as well as other information related to the players’ careers and baseball backgrounds. A player can have a strong evaluation (emphasis on the “e”) but might be a great distance from the big leagues, or could be injury prone, or a superlative athlete, and context like that might cause one to augment the player’s valuation (no “e”). Using something more subjective like Future Value allows me to dial up and down how I’m interpreting that context.
There are also many valuable part-time players who can only generate so much WAR due to their lack of playing time. As such, FV grades below 50 tend to describe a role more than they do a particular WAR output; you can glean the projected roles from the players’ reports. In short, anyone who is a 40+ FV player or above projects as an integral big league role player or better.
Now some A’s thoughts. The A’s have bid farewell to most of their more recognizable top performers over the last year, most recently with the designation of Cristian Pache for assignment at the end of spring training (Pache, who was himself acquired as part of the Matt Olson swap, has since been picked up by the Phillies). The resulting vacuum created by that mass exodus has hoovered up several prospects, vaulting them to the bigs earlier than they might have been were they members of a less needy org. This sets up a sink-or-swim scenario, whereby even the guys who are still a bit too raw to thrive on a major league diamond (let alone navigate the unique quirks of the Oakland Coliseum) and may otherwise sink could be tasked with finding a way to stay afloat without the benefit of further minor league development. Some of them are more likely to be successful than others, with water wings provided by stunning basepath speed in the case of Esteury Ruiz, or the triple-digit tendencies of Luis Medina. In most other cases though, it’s safer to expect some dog-paddling out there while they continue to seek out a defensive home or come down from PCL-juiced slash lines.
The trio of Top 100 standouts atop this list should provide much needed support during Oakland’s ongoing rebuilding period. That said, with ever-tightening purse strings and the ongoing butting of heads between the team and the city of Oakland regarding a much-needed new ballpark, it’s hard to be optimistic about how ownership is approaching this phase of the team’s history. It’s one thing to rebuild, but it’s another to do so while your construction materials are being withheld, making it unclear if the task at hand is raising the barn or razing it in favor of greener pastures (or whatever the Las Vegas desert’s equivalent of a pasture is). As is often the case with Oakland rebuilds, the more hopeful outlook is the long-term one that sees the continued growth of the brightest spots on a relatively hazy horizon.
| Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Soderstrom | 21.4 | AAA | 1B | 2025 | 55 |
| Ken Waldichuk | 25.3 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
| Mason Miller | 24.6 | AAA | SIRP | 2025 | 50 |
| Zack Gelof | 23.5 | AAA | 3B | 2025 | 45+ |
| Kyle Muller | 25.5 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 45+ |
| Lawrence Butler | 22.8 | AA | 1B | 2024 | 45 |
| Esteury Ruiz | 24.2 | MLB | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| Luis Medina | 23.9 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40+ |
| Jordan Diaz | 22.7 | MLB | 3B | 2023 | 40+ |
| Freddy Tarnok | 24.4 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 40 |
| Shintaro Fujinami | 29.0 | MLB | MIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| Garrett Acton | 24.8 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| Logan Davidson | 25.3 | AA | SS | 2023 | 40 |
| Ryan Noda | 27.0 | MLB | 1B | 2023 | 40 |
| Conner Capel | 25.9 | MLB | OF | 2023 | 40 |
| Cal Stevenson | 26.6 | MLB | OF | 2023 | 35+ |
Tess is a contributor at FanGraphs. When she's not watching college or professional baseball, she works as a sports video editor, creating highlight reels for high school athletes. She can be found on Twitter at @tesstass.
I know JJ Bleday has technically graduated but he is in AAA right now mashing and I’d love your thoughts on how he fits in this season as well.
Well, Butler’s already K-ed 6x in his 1st 3 games of 2023 at AA, so that’s not such a good sign after the good showings late last season, at AFL and MLB ST this year. Hopefully, he gets back to the more/better disciplined approach for good…
Ken Waldichuk is up, you say? How’s he doing?
*glances at his player profile*
*sees 14.54 ERA, 9.70 xERA, 14.01 FIP*
(☉_☉)
Yes he’s even worse than Fujinami
The A’s offseason was such a mess. They signed a whole bunch of mediocre to bad players to block prospects and interesting post-prospects and it’s going even worse than anticipated.
In any case, count me in on the Freddy Tarnok bandwagon. He has the stuff to start, he has the command to start, and he gets whiffs with his fastball. You can work with that. I’m not sure if I’d take him over Waldichuk, but I’d definitely take him over Muller and definitely Medina.
Agreed. Tarnok will be a nice piece for the A’s going forward.
Yep. I think the scouting grade slightly underrates him, especially if the changeup is grading higher than the curve. The curve was an above average pitch a couple of years ago, so regaining its previous form is important.
Tarnok isn’t someone who has focused on pitching since he was a tween, and IIRC, he was valued Loren as a fresh-armed kid with big stuff rather as a polished starter prospect. The fact that he’s stayed relatively healthy and has mostly maintained his stuff while learning to command it is promising. He’s at the age where his type can suddenly put it together. At worst it seems like there’s a Tylor Megill-style righty to manifest.
Is the 55 on Diaz’ fielding correct? Based on the write up and the overall grade, seems like this might be a typo.
It seems wild to me how the A’s will do almost anything other than giving Jordan Diaz and Zack Gelof a shot. Jace Peterson is their current third baseman and he currently has a wRC+ of zero. And while I would hope that Gelof gets called up as soon as they trade or DFA Tony Kemp, I thought that would happen last year too.
This part of the writeup, however, confused the heck out of me.
“Given his defensive range and arm limitations, Gelof may in fact be the Yin to Jordan Diaz’s Yang, with the former representing a defensive second baseman with a corner bat and the latter the complementary opposite of that, which pairs them nicely in a given lineup.”
Wait, what?
The signings of Peterson and Aledmys Diaz were very confusing to me.
I think the logic in signing Peterson and Diaz, as well as the late addition of Aguilar, was to add at least major league average hitters to the line-up to raise the overall competency of the offense after last year’s atrocious run production. It has not worked out so far, but it is only 10 games into the season and Peterson and Diaz have long track records of being competent players. The other advantage they have is that Peterson and Diaz can play multiple positions, so as the A’s promote players from AAA, they can move to different positions as needed.
Tyler Soderstrom, Jordan Diaz, and Zach Gelof all have limited experience at AAA. I don’t think combined they have a full season worth of at bats there. Peterson, Diaz, and Aguilar buy the A’s time. By mid-season the A’s could promote players from AAA–given that their performance and health warrants it. The point is that I would surprised if Peterson, Diaz, and Aguilar have more than 350-400 at bats by the end of the season. I think they are only meant to be competent placeholders until the prospects are ready.
Yeah, very confusing. I get the whole Yin to Yang thing considering Gelof has range but no arm and Diaz has no range but does have an arm but I fail to see how that pairs nicely in a lineup. At least I’m pretty sure that’s not how it works. It’s not like their in a platoon where one mashes righties and the other mashes lefties.
Thank you, this is what I was trying to say but could find the words.
First, I love these posts and look forward to reading the rest.
Second, Soderstrom’s blurb cites some amazing, but sadly inaccurate, stats regarding his performance this spring. He got 9 *hits* including 3 doubles, not 9 homers and 3 triples. Still a pretty good spring for a 21 year old, especially the k rate.
Indeed re: Soderstrom. Updated!
When discussing the A’s prospects, I think 2026’s likely trade assets is also an accurate subtitle.
I’m remaining stubborn on Mason Miller starting. Have to at least give it a shot…
Nothing to lose in trying until he proves he can’t do it
Have you or anyone else tried back-testing your past FV projections to see how accurate they were? If not, why not? It seems like it’d be a relatively easy thing to be able to do?
In the intro to this piece was one of the best explanations of WAR v. FV I’ve ever read!