Prospect Report: Diamondbacks 2023 Imminent Big Leaguers

Below is an evaluation of the prospects in the Arizona Diamondbacks farm system who readers should consider “imminent big leaguers,” players who can reasonably be expected to play in the majors at some point this year. This includes all prospects on the 40-man roster as well as those who have already established themselves in the upper levels of the minors but aren’t yet rostered. Any Top 100 prospects, regardless of their ETA, are also included on this list. Reports, tool grades, and scouting information for all of the prospects below can also be found on The Board.
This is not a top-to-bottom evaluation of the Diamondbacks farm system. I like to include what’s happening in minor league and extended spring training in my reports as much as possible, since scouting high concentrations of players in Arizona and Florida allows me to incorporate real-time, first-person information into the org lists. However, this approach has led to some situations where outdated analysis (or no analysis at all) was all that existed for players who had already debuted in the majors. Skimming the imminent big leaguers off the top of a farm system will allow this time-sensitive information to make its way onto the site more quickly, better preparing readers for the upcoming season, helping fantasy players as they draft, and building site literature on relevant prospects to facilitate transaction analysis in the event that trades or injuries foist these players into major league roles. There will still be a Diamondbacks prospect list that includes Deyvison De Los Santos, Yu-Min Lin, and all of the other prospects in the system who appear to be at least another season away. As such, today’s list includes no ordinal rankings. Readers are instead encouraged to focus on the players’ Future Value (FV) grades.
Let’s revisit what FV means before I offer some specific thoughts on this org. Future Value (FV) is a subjective valuation metric derived from the traditional 20-80 scouting scale (where 50 is average and each integer of 10 away from 50 represents one standard deviation) that uses WAR production to set the scale. For instance, an average regular (meaning the 15th-best guy at a given position, give or take) generally produces about 2 WAR annually, so a 50 FV prospect projects as an everyday player who will generate about that much annual WAR during his pre-free agency big league seasons.
Why not just use projected WAR as the valuation metric, then? For one, it creates a false sense of precision. This isn’t a model. While a lot of data goes into my decision-making process, a lot of subjectivity does too, in the form of my own visual evaluations, as well as other information related to the players’ careers and baseball backgrounds. A player can have a strong evaluation (emphasis on the “e”) but might be a great distance from the big leagues, or could be injury prone, or a superlative athlete, and context like that might cause one to augment the player’s valuation (no “e”). Using something more subjective like Future Value allows me to dial up and down how I’m interpreting that context.
There are also many valuable part-time players who can only generate so much WAR due to their lack of playing time. As such, FV grades below 50 tend to describe a role more than they do a particular WAR output; you can glean the projected roles from the players’ reports. In short, anyone who is a 40+ FV player or above projects as an integral big league role player or better.
Now some Diamondbacks thoughts. Note that recently-acquired catcher Gabriel Moreno is not rookie eligible and therefore not on this list. You can find his tool grades and scouting info on the 2022 Graduates tab over on The Board; I also wrote about him again at length when I analyzed the trade that brought him over to Arizona. He would have been second on this list and third on the overall Top 100. He has already homered (on a hanging JP Sears curveball) and made several splashy defensive plays this spring.
Fantasy players will want to monitor Justin Martinez for save opportunities. Things are wide open toward the back of Arizona’s bullpen and as long as he’s throwing strikes, Martinez has perhaps the best stuff of that entire group.
With Jake McCarthy and Alek Thomas having graduated the year before, now every one of the compact little left-handed outfielders the Diamondbacks seemed so enamored with in the draft has basically made it to the big leagues. Recent college draftees Slade Cecconi and Bryce Jarvis are still prospects, but based on how they’ve performed, they’re each deep enough on the current big league depth chart to project more comfortably as 2024 spot starters. In the event that injuries force the Diamondbacks to dip into the guys who would ordinarily be post-2023 40-man adds, Pfaadt and Walston are comfortably ahead of Jarvis and Cecconi in the pecking order.
| Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corbin Carroll | 22.5 | MLB | LF | 2023 | 65 |
| Druw Jones | 19.3 | R | CF | 2028 | 60 |
| Jordan Lawlar | 20.6 | AA | SS | 2024 | 55 |
| Brandon Pfaadt | 24.4 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 55 |
| Drey Jameson | 25.5 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
| Ryne Nelson | 25.1 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
| Blake Walston | 21.7 | AA | SP | 2024 | 45 |
| Jorge Barrosa | 22.0 | AA | CF | 2023 | 45 |
| Justin Martinez | 21.6 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40+ |
| Dominic Fletcher | 25.5 | AAA | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| Carlos Vargas | 23.4 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| Blaze Alexander | 23.7 | AAA | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| Dominic Canzone | 25.5 | AAA | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| Peter Solomon | 26.5 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| Jake Rice | 25.6 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| Conor Grammes | 25.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Great stuff as always. I was wondering – the schedule for prospect week had mentioned a “post-prospects in limbo” type of article but I didn’t see it. Is that still in the works?
I think Jay mentioned in his chat earlier this week that the piece got cut for a lack of interesting guys to talk about.
Thanks. Weird, but ok.
I don’t know why they posted that it would be the last installment of prospect week then
Thought the same thing. It’d be one thing if that list was published even a month out, but to post it within the same week–wow, that’s cutting it close and you’d think there would be a better bead on that.
Jeebus, Jones’ ETA isn’t until he’s 24? I get that debuts are later, artificially so, but wowo from a HS drafted #1
Or is this ETA most based on the 40 timeline?
I suppose going away from the 40 timeline is a can of worms on the internet. I can imagine so many would demand like a full mathematical explanation for why earlier while offering none on the arbitrary amount of PAs a player totally has to take to be Ready. In-sane how easy it is for The Man to control the narrative, eh?
wut
It’s tough to project at this point considering he’s yet to even play in the minor leagues. If everything clicks and goes perfectly 2026 would still be the earliest.
It’s based on his 40-man timeline at this point.
Thanks
And should be re-labeled as such. I’m familiar with what the ETA label means, but most readers would not.
I love how every week in the comments someone asks this exact question, and every week someone has to tell them that the ETA is meaningless. It’s based off of 40 man timeline, except when it isn’t, and there’s no way for us to tell. People keep asking that question because we expect a column to mean something but it doesn’t.
Once again, I renew my plea to just put the 40 man protection year / number of options on THE BOARD instead of this. Based on that and the current level, we can probably figure it out.
Now that you mention it…oops
Ya agreed. It quite literally makes zero sense. They use 40 man, except when they don’t. Elite prospect coverage, elite analysis, but this part is mind-boggling
This article again underscores how the Diamondbacks crushed the 2019 draft:
65: Corban Caroll (1st round)
50: Drey Jamison (1c), Ryne Nelson (2)
45: Blake Walston (1-pick for not signing McClain)
40: Dom Fletcher (2c)
35+: Dom Canzone (8), Connor Grammes (5)
Arizona whiffed on Tristan English in the 3rd round, and all their later bonus signings Glennallen Hill Jr (4th), Avery Short (12), and Brock Jones (16) busted, but this is still a major haul.
And this doesn’t even include Brennan Milone (1c) who was a big part of the Starling Marte trade, and Tommy Henry (2c), who graduated.
Due to prospect capital, I always compare directly to KC’s 2018 draft, where they took Brady Singer in the 1st, Daniel Lynch and Jackson Kowar in the comp round, Kris Bubic in the competitive balance round, then Jonathan Bowlan in the 2nd and Kyle Isbel in the 3rd.
Really goes to show how leveraging a lot of high picks in a draft can totally change the course of an entire franchise.
Its too bad that Royals draft went pretty much the exact opposite direction as Arizona’s. I guess there is still time but essentially everyone you listed other than Singer is a fringe MLB player at best. And its even worse when you factor in that they took Asa Lacy with the 4th pick a couple years later. And to say he has imploded would be an insult to implosions.
You would think just out of pure luck they would have fared better than that. Its wild.
The 2020 draft was tough due to COVID, with Kjerstad, Lacy, Martin, Hancock, Gonzales, Hendrick and Bailey all ranging from highly variable to likely busts in the first 13 picks. Royals got Loftin in the comp round-we’ll see how that turns out.
The truly egregious error they made was in the 2021 draft when they decided they wanted to spread their bonus pool around to a bunch of high school overslots and chose Frank Mozzicato over Andrew Painter. None of those guys have popped yet. Then they reversed course and chose college players with their first 17 picks in the 2022 draft. That year-to-year oscillation makes me nervous.
Wth happened to Hill Jr? I really liked him in that draft…phew
Badass draft already
I’ve been following Blaze Jordan and Blaze Alexander for a while because I think it’s funny when guys named “Blaze” are below average runners. I know what Eric said, but if you’re looking for a surprise feel-good story, I kind of think he might be it. I could totally see him making the majors and turning into a competent regular for a few months before pitchers figure him out. Newspaper columnists, fascinated by his 80 grad arm strength and good-enough bat, will run articles like “what will we do with Jordan Lawlar and Blaze Alexander” which will age terribly because eventually major league pitchers will probably figure out Alexander. And which may happen right around the time Lawlar is knocking on the door of the majors anyway.
This is a cool basis for an article. Hope to see one for all teams.
I also hope the team prospects lists start up again soon…
Pretty cool feature, appreciate all the work that goes into these lists.
I guess I missed the “some 25-30 home run seasons” in Carroll’s Top 200 prospect write-up. That was surprising to me.
I’ve been on the Carroll train for about a year now, but this has me a bit skeptical. A 25-30 home run season, with a .400+ OBP, and 80-grade speed with, I dunno, 40 SBs would be the #1 player in fantasy.
Does anyone think there’s a chance this outcome happens?
A 25 homer, 25 SB season (over, say, 600 PAs) with a .375 OBP is something like a 140 or 150 wRC+. I’m not sure what the league norms are now with the new balls, but that’s my best guess. Combine that with a 70 fielding grade (and a likely spot in CF, at least for a few years) and you’re looking at an easy 6+ win player. That’s not just the #1 player in fantasy, that’s a guy who is a Top 5 position player in major league baseball in any given year.
A 30-30 season with a .400 OBP puts you in striking position of the best player that year. That’s like 2018 Yelich territory, except in a less potent offensive environment and positive defensive value. That was 7.7 wins.
Wish we could see this sort of smart prospect analysis on a timeline that would draw fantasy players as more clicks would mean more ad revenue and potentially more members for an otherwise good and historically important website.
But as things stand now, fantasy players can turn to dozens of other online sources for prospect coverage that is delivered early enough to be useful. There are 2023 prospect reports on only eight of 30 MLB teams, now a ninth on imminent big leaguers, but no announced plans on when there will be reports on the remaining 21 teams with just 25 days until opening day and far less for many fantasy league drafts/auctions.
Again, the quality of the analysis in outstanding, but the lack of timeliness will cost FG revenue, and it’s not like this is the first year prospect reporting has lagged the window used by fantasy players. Perhaps its too small a niche in which to invest in, but if so, there are a whole lot of websites, many subscription-based, which are chasing that investment.
It seems like this Imminent stuff is an attempt to address that, but if so, it’s the sort of initiative that benefits most from early planning; it should shape research from the latter part of the prior season so that FG can commit to an early and planned release. I hope that is doable for future seasons.
I know what it’s like to deliver quality when faced with time and budget constraints. I hope you find ways to navigate those challenges.
I disagree. All the relevant players can be evaluated by looking at the previous season’s lists, which are done way before all these other places. You have all of Loneghagen’s writing and eval.work from pre-2022, AND a whole season of minor league play, AND any winter ball play to evaluate them for 2023 fantasy. Also, Eric is one, human, guy.
Thanks for sharing your perspective. Respectfully, I disagree, and your suggestion to rely upon a year-old evaluation is precisely why.
Take, as an example, Julio Rodriguez, the AL rookie of the year and one of the more exciting debuts for a rookie in the past decade. In 2022, FG published Eric’s Mariners review on May 13, 2022, five weeks after the season started. So if we were to follow your suggestion and instead used what FG published in 2021 about Julio, here’s what Eric wrote:
“His approach in Dominicana was bad, and his swing’s front foot variability, which I wrote about last year, was gone. Julio is now a bucket strider: he strides open like he’s trying to pull everything. Some hitters can do this and still manage to really get their arms extended to cover the outer half of the plate (Eddie Rosario, Kirilloff), and Rodríguez absolutely has the strength to do damage the other way if he turns out to be this kind of hitter. But he swung inside an awful lot of well-located sliders in LIDOM. Not nasty sliders — a bunch of fringe big leaguers and indy ball guys pitch in LIDOM — just well-located ones, something there’s no shortage of in the big leagues. He either needs to be in position to dive and spoil some of these, or just do a better job of laying off them entirely. The calling card power and makeup are still present, and Rodríguez’s 35-plus homer, All-Star slugger ceiling remain the same, but to me his 2020 was an indication that adjustments might slow his ascent through the system and that I was overconfident in stuffing him in last year’s top 10.”
That same 2021 evaluation rated JRod’s present and future value speed at 40, as Eric had to rely on 2019 numbers, long before Julio lost weight, re-shaped his body and gained tremendous speed that would see him steal 21 bases in 74 games in 2021.
The truth is that the reason prospect ranking are update at least once a year is because so many prospects change their standing from season to season. And in fantasy baseball, at least in leagues in which owners gain an edge by acquiring prospects, timeliness is everything: There is no gain to be had if a rival scoops up a prospect before you do.
You are right that each of us can do our own research that considers data and scouting reports not yet evaluated by FG. At least in deeper, keeper or dynasty style leagues, such research is important, and it’s one of the things I have enjoyed doing for many years. But to the extent that research includes considering the perspective of prospect writers — and to some degree it often does — fantasy players often turn to other sources than FG because this website has been unable to report those perspectives in a timely, predictable way.
That lack of timeliness is unfortunate because other websites have rushed in to try to fill the vacuum, and while I enjoy some of those other websites and writers, I have a rooting interest in FG doing well, having worked years ago as a fantasy writer with HardBallTimes. I also think Eric adds real value to the prospect landscape, as he does a great job blending scouting reports and data analysis.
My comments are not a criticism of Eric; quite the contrary, I only advocate for timeliness because his work is excellent. If it were not, I wouldn’t care about timeliness. I know better than most the tension between seeking quality and meeting deadlines, having worked for decades as an investigative journalist. To manage that tension, a publication or website needs a team approach — it is not something that can be fixed by a single writer. It also needs sufficient resources and management of those resources so those resources are focused on goals that are meaningful and achievable. Those resources, increasingly, are difficult to acquire.
Wishful thinking, that you guys would continue to include a guy like Alek Thomas on these lists who ended the season in AAA even though he was up long enough to lose rookie eligibility.