Prospect Report: Diamondbacks 2023 Imminent Big Leaguers
Below is an evaluation of the prospects in the Arizona Diamondbacks farm system who readers should consider “imminent big leaguers,” players who can reasonably be expected to play in the majors at some point this year. This includes all prospects on the 40-man roster as well as those who have already established themselves in the upper levels of the minors but aren’t yet rostered. Any Top 100 prospects, regardless of their ETA, are also included on this list. Reports, tool grades, and scouting information for all of the prospects below can also be found on The Board.
This is not a top-to-bottom evaluation of the Diamondbacks farm system. I like to include what’s happening in minor league and extended spring training in my reports as much as possible, since scouting high concentrations of players in Arizona and Florida allows me to incorporate real-time, first-person information into the org lists. However, this approach has led to some situations where outdated analysis (or no analysis at all) was all that existed for players who had already debuted in the majors. Skimming the imminent big leaguers off the top of a farm system will allow this time-sensitive information to make its way onto the site more quickly, better preparing readers for the upcoming season, helping fantasy players as they draft, and building site literature on relevant prospects to facilitate transaction analysis in the event that trades or injuries foist these players into major league roles. There will still be a Diamondbacks prospect list that includes Deyvison De Los Santos, Yu-Min Lin, and all of the other prospects in the system who appear to be at least another season away. As such, today’s list includes no ordinal rankings. Readers are instead encouraged to focus on the players’ Future Value (FV) grades.
Let’s revisit what FV means before I offer some specific thoughts on this org. Future Value (FV) is a subjective valuation metric derived from the traditional 20-80 scouting scale (where 50 is average and each integer of 10 away from 50 represents one standard deviation) that uses WAR production to set the scale. For instance, an average regular (meaning the 15th-best guy at a given position, give or take) generally produces about 2 WAR annually, so a 50 FV prospect projects as an everyday player who will generate about that much annual WAR during his pre-free agency big league seasons.
Why not just use projected WAR as the valuation metric, then? For one, it creates a false sense of precision. This isn’t a model. While a lot of data goes into my decision-making process, a lot of subjectivity does too, in the form of my own visual evaluations, as well as other information related to the players’ careers and baseball backgrounds. A player can have a strong evaluation (emphasis on the “e”) but might be a great distance from the big leagues, or could be injury prone, or a superlative athlete, and context like that might cause one to augment the player’s valuation (no “e”). Using something more subjective like Future Value allows me to dial up and down how I’m interpreting that context.
There are also many valuable part-time players who can only generate so much WAR due to their lack of playing time. As such, FV grades below 50 tend to describe a role more than they do a particular WAR output; you can glean the projected roles from the players’ reports. In short, anyone who is a 40+ FV player or above projects as an integral big league role player or better.
Now some Diamondbacks thoughts. Note that recently-acquired catcher Gabriel Moreno is not rookie eligible and therefore not on this list. You can find his tool grades and scouting info on the 2022 Graduates tab over on The Board; I also wrote about him again at length when I analyzed the trade that brought him over to Arizona. He would have been second on this list and third on the overall Top 100. He has already homered (on a hanging JP Sears curveball) and made several splashy defensive plays this spring.
Fantasy players will want to monitor Justin Martinez for save opportunities. Things are wide open toward the back of Arizona’s bullpen and as long as he’s throwing strikes, Martinez has perhaps the best stuff of that entire group.
With Jake McCarthy and Alek Thomas having graduated the year before, now every one of the compact little left-handed outfielders the Diamondbacks seemed so enamored with in the draft has basically made it to the big leagues. Recent college draftees Slade Cecconi and Bryce Jarvis are still prospects, but based on how they’ve performed, they’re each deep enough on the current big league depth chart to project more comfortably as 2024 spot starters. In the event that injuries force the Diamondbacks to dip into the guys who would ordinarily be post-2023 40-man adds, Pfaadt and Walston are comfortably ahead of Jarvis and Cecconi in the pecking order.
Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corbin Carroll | 22.5 | MLB | LF | 2023 | 65 |
Druw Jones | 19.3 | R | CF | 2028 | 60 |
Jordan Lawlar | 20.6 | AA | SS | 2024 | 55 |
Brandon Pfaadt | 24.4 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 55 |
Drey Jameson | 25.5 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
Ryne Nelson | 25.1 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
Blake Walston | 21.7 | AA | SP | 2024 | 45 |
Jorge Barrosa | 22.0 | AA | CF | 2023 | 45 |
Justin Martinez | 21.6 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40+ |
Dominic Fletcher | 25.5 | AAA | CF | 2023 | 40 |
Carlos Vargas | 23.4 | AAA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
Blaze Alexander | 23.7 | AAA | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
Dominic Canzone | 25.5 | AAA | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
Peter Solomon | 26.5 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
Jake Rice | 25.6 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
Conor Grammes | 25.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Great stuff as always. I was wondering – the schedule for prospect week had mentioned a “post-prospects in limbo” type of article but I didn’t see it. Is that still in the works?
I think Jay mentioned in his chat earlier this week that the piece got cut for a lack of interesting guys to talk about.
Thanks. Weird, but ok.
I don’t know why they posted that it would be the last installment of prospect week then
Thought the same thing. It’d be one thing if that list was published even a month out, but to post it within the same week–wow, that’s cutting it close and you’d think there would be a better bead on that.