Prospect Report: Red Sox 2023 Imminent Big Leaguers

Below is an evaluation of the prospects in the Boston Red Sox farm system who readers should consider “imminent big leaguers,” players who might reasonably be expected to play in the majors at some point this year. This includes all prospects on the 40-man roster as well as those who have already established themselves in the upper levels of the minors but aren’t yet rostered. I tend to be more inclusive with pitchers and players at premium positions since their timelines are usually the ones accelerated by injuries and scarcity. Any Top 100 prospects, regardless of their ETA, are also included on this list. Reports, tool grades, and scouting information for all of the prospects below can also be found on The Board.
This is not a top-to-bottom evaluation of the Red Sox farm system. I like to include what’s happening in minor league and extended spring training in my reports as much as possible, since scouting high concentrations of players in Arizona and Florida allows me to incorporate real-time, first-person information into the org lists. However, this approach has led to some situations where outdated analysis (or no analysis at all) was all that existed for players who had already debuted in the majors. Skimming the imminent big leaguers off the top of a farm system will allow this time-sensitive information to make its way onto the site more quickly, better preparing readers for the upcoming season, helping fantasy players as they draft, and building site literature on relevant prospects to facilitate transaction analysis in the event that trades or injuries foist these players into major league roles. There will still be a Red Sox prospect list that includes Mikey Romero, Eddinson Paulino, Wikelman Gonzalez and all of the other prospects in the system who appear to be at least another season away. As such, today’s list includes no ordinal rankings. Readers are instead encouraged to focus on the players’ Future Value (FV) grades.
Let’s revisit what FV means before I offer some specific thoughts on this org. Future Value (FV) is a subjective valuation metric derived from the traditional 20-80 scouting scale (where 50 is average and each integer of 10 away from 50 represents one standard deviation) that uses WAR production to set the scale. For instance, an average regular (meaning the 15th-best guy at a given position, give or take) generally produces about 2 WAR annually, so a 50 FV prospect projects as an everyday player who will generate about that much annual WAR during his pre-free agency big league seasons.
Why not just use projected WAR as the valuation metric, then? For one, it creates a false sense of precision. This isn’t a model. While a lot of data goes into my decision-making process, a lot of subjectivity does too, in the form of my own visual evaluations, as well as other information related to the players’ careers and baseball backgrounds. A player can have a strong evaluation (emphasis on the “e”) but might be a great distance from the big leagues, or could be injury prone, or a superlative athlete, and context like that might cause one to augment the player’s valuation (no “e”). Using something more subjective like Future Value allows me to dial up and down how I’m interpreting that context.
There are also many valuable part-time players who can only generate so much WAR due to their lack of playing time. As such, FV grades below 50 tend to describe a role more than they do a particular WAR output; you can glean the projected roles from the players’ reports. In short, anyone who is a 40+ FV player or above projects as an integral big league role player or better.
Now some Red Sox thoughts. Boston has added to the big league club like someone sifting through the $6 DVD bin at the new and used record store. Masataka Yoshida is a Criterion Blu-ray, but the rest of the offseason additions from the past couple years tend to be older guys coming off a tough stretch, usually players who have had hit tool-driven success throughout their careers. That includes Justin Turner, Rob Refsnyder, Raimel Tapia, Christian Arroyo, and a few power-first guys like Jorge Alfaro and Adam Duvall. I think the hit rate on players like this tends to be pretty good (Refsnyder and Arroyo’s 2022 seasons are good examples), but the Fenway Sports Group doesn’t have to build like this and could stand to open the wallet more often. Chaim Bloom’s farm-building strategy in Tampa Bay has carried over to Boston, where he’s often getting multiple pieces back in trades to try to create a huge swell of prospects, which is good for creating the pitching depth teams need to deal with injuries, allows you to trade prospects for big leaguers when the time is right without having a barren system afterwards, and protects from the inevitability of prospect busts and entropy. Boston also loves a Player to Be Named Later lately, most recently getting Angel Pierre from Kansas City after just a little backfield activity in Arizona. Some of the ways Bloom has touched the system are starting to arrive in the form of Valdez, Abreu, Broadway, and hopefully soon Yorke.
| Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Mayer | 20.3 | A+ | SS | 2025 | 55 |
| Miguel Bleis | 19.1 | R | CF | 2026 | 55 |
| Triston Casas | 23.2 | MLB | 1B | 2023 | 55 |
| Ceddanne Rafaela | 22.5 | AA | CF | 2024 | 50 |
| Nick Yorke | 21.0 | A+ | 2B | 2025 | 50 |
| Masataka Yoshida | 29.7 | MLB | LF | 2023 | 45+ |
| Brandon Walter | 26.5 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 45+ |
| Enmanuel Valdez | 24.2 | AAA | 2B | 2023 | 45 |
| Bryan Mata | 23.9 | AAA | MIRP | 2023 | 45 |
| Chris Murphy | 24.8 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 40 |
| David Hamilton | 25.5 | AA | SS | 2023 | 40 |
| Wilyer Abreu | 23.8 | AA | RF | 2023 | 40 |
| Taylor Broadway | 26.0 | AA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| Ronaldo Hernández | 25.4 | AAA | C | 2023 | 40 |
| Niko Kavadas | 24.4 | AA | DH | 2024 | 35+ |
| Zack Kelly | 28.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| Christian Koss | 25.2 | AA | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| Stephen Scott | 25.8 | AA | C | 2024 | 35+ |
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
This was a nice surprise write up for this Sox fan. I can’t help but feel that Chaim Bloom personally called Eric and said hey, the fanbase is getting really antsy, can you help me sell the idea that something is “going to be awesome” soon? Like, this year?
Haha, wow, lot of sensitive people here. Obviously Bloom isn’t calling Eric, but given the talk these days, I couldn’t resist commenting on the timing. Relax, downvoters. Don’t take yourselves so seriously.
Miguel Bleis is 19 and hasn’t played above complex ball, and his sky-high evaluation is based more on potential than polish. There’s a reasonable chance he gets called up to the big leagues at some point this year?
Maybe he’s on the Vaughn Grissom career path…
In the opening paragraph Eric states that any top 100 prospect regardless of ETA is included on this list, which explains Mayer and Yorke (102) appearing here as well.
This was fun and covered a lot more players than I thought from the title. A couple questions on Yoshida (who else?):
“When Yoshida first appeared on The Board a couple of years ago, he was evaluated in a way that pegged him as a fun part-time weapon (I compared him to Lenny Harris) rather than the $100 million player the Red Sox believe him to be.”
He was still rated this way (35+ I think?) at the end of last season, right? What happened during this past offseason to change your mind? Was it the contract, additional feedback from scouts, something else?
“Will some version of this hold up against MLB pitching? When you isolate Yoshida’s performance against hard fastballs, you start to get a better idea of how things might look over here. Versus fastballs 93 mph and above (202 pitches), he hit .273/.333/.455; against 94 mph and up (153 pitches), he hit .279/.340/.395; and against 95 mph (88 pitches) and above, his line was .296/.345/.370 (all of this is from Synergy Sports).”
This is fascinating but I feel like I don’t have enough context to understand it. How do those numbers stack up against the average Major Leaguer? How do your comps Benintendi and Verdugo do?
Thanks!
It would also be interesting to see Seiya Suzuki’s velocity numbers.
And how do you calculate the slash lines? What does a taken strike count as? A taken ball? A foul ball?
Just based on the writeup and tool grades it sure sounds like Wilyer Abreu is more likely to be a good major league someday than Enmanuel Valdez. Valdez will probably get a chance sooner since he is further along and the depth at 2B is pretty thin, but Valdez sounds like a LF/DH only type in the Willie Calhoun mold which puts a ton of pressure on the bat. And the numbers aren’t that different; it’s not like Abreu is K’ing that much more than Valdez, and some of that is pitch selection that could be fixed.
Valdez to me reminds me of Nunez who was a bench player forced into a MI role but could at least be an MLB player w/ a bat first role, but that seems like his peak. Abreu if everything clicks could be an OF with 15+ pop in a corner but a lot needs to click. IMHO trading a free agent 30+ yr old catcher for 2 months and getting flyers on players like this is what a rebuilding org should do.
*edit* : Nunez is a stretch comparison, but a possible MLB bat forced into 2B because of defensive limitations/arm and not being powerful enough to be a DH
EL is a great resource and produces a ton of great content. This new series is fun. But…
FanGraphs is WAY behind other sites regarding team prospect lists. Maybe FanGraphs does not have the same internal deadlines as other sites. It appears the prospect lists are not on track to be completed prior to any “mid season update” type articles.
Why not just focus on the team lists?
Probably not enough manpower. Those write ups are epic, and if only one or two people are working on them, I don’t know when they would find time to eat or sleep if they were forced to churn them out quickly.
This is most of it. The other part is that Eric is obsessed with including every hidden gem in complex ball and the DSL, which I don’t really think most of us would miss. I do think that one of two things needs to happen:
1) FG hires another person to help Eric–full time
2) Eric doesn’t give us full writeups of prospects below 40 and the “other prospects of note” list gets way longer.
So it could be better. That said, this is a lot better than last year, and the content is incredible, so it doesn’t really bother me that much…maybe next year if the same things happen then I will be.
Ever think of writing here yourself, ST? Some of your comments could probably turn into full articles with some expansion, I imagine.
Or do 40-45 FV and up in the spring, and then add in the lower tiers and players to watch in April / May / June.
Beyond the timing itself, the biggest problem with it is that the rankings and evals are no longer of a moment in time. We are humans and new news filters into our brain even if we try to block it out.
Gotta be honest… this new format seems to be getting further away from what the readers have been asking for. And it’s one of several reasons that I’m no longer a member… because the Fangraphs brass still doesn’t seem to be listening to their customers.
Eric’s work is the best in the business, but the publishing of it just isn’t timely. What about the FG readership suggests that “proximity to majors” is of greater interest than “long-term value”? I’d like to know Eric’s take on Eddinson Paulino, whom I like a lot more than Valdez or Hamilton. Profiling a 25-year old who is most likely the next Terrance Gore just because he’s close to the majors isn’t what most of us are asking for.
Please, Fangraphs, get Eric some help and get a format in place that honors the quality of the work itself. And please understand that not having Eric’s work before our fantasy league dynasty drafts is costing big-time… and not having it before I go to spring training is costing me a lot of the fun I used to enjoy on the backfields… and such as.
I’ll chime in because I’m in your boat. I’m not renewing primarily because the lists just aren’t timely. There have been a bunch of newer hires starting late last year, but none where the site needs it most and where FG actually has a niche in the marketplace–prospect writing. That’s what makes FG unique right now, and there seems to be no effort towards expanding staffing there. If I wanted “Rhys’ Pieces”, there are many other websites I can go to for that. These “imminent” reports are just a half measure that continue to draw attention to the point that reports for most of the league won’t be ready by the time the season starts.
I also use them for fantasy purposes, and the other members in my league are so active and on top of things that they’re using other prospect sources and scouting statlines themselves to find risers. I can’t just sit back and hope they don’t report on a guy until June and hope everyone in my league misses him too. It’s definitely a part of my consideration, although really it just felt so dumb last year to be getting “pre-season” prospect reviews for the Mets/Astros/Nats in July. Eric needs a team behind him to support work of this quality and depth, but I haven’t gotten the impression that it’s happening.
Well, I’m renewing because I’m interested in the whole, not one part or two, of the site. Sure, would love to see more prospect write ups, rankings with comments, Ottoneu content, etc. However, maybe there aren’t enough FG-like writers out there willing to put in the time and words that readers here have come to expect. It also wasn’t long ago that this site seemed to be blatantly transparent about the challenge of maintaining funds during the pandemic. It’s also entirely possible that the money isn’t there to hire someone(s) given some of the competition out there.
Like other publications that I think are valuable by merely existing, I’ll support Fangraphs because I really appreciate the articles they *are* able to write given what they have.