Randal Grichuk’s Doing Something Very Unusual
I write a lot about player adjustments. I write so often about player adjustments I start to get a little self-conscious about it. I just do it because I love doing it, and because sometimes I forget what else there is to cover. I love it when a pitcher tries to add a new pitch. I love it when he adjusts an old pitch, or when he starts using the same pitches in different ways. It interests me when a hitter starts putting more or fewer balls in play on the ground. Or, there are the cases where hitters pull the ball more, or spray the ball more. There are so many types of adjustments. There’s one in particular we very seldom see. One we also dream about players making. Randal Grichuk, for his part, is giving it a go.
Grichuk has had a familiar hitting profile: big power, but limited by wavering control of the strike zone. He’s been the hitter equivalent of a talented pitcher with overwhelming stuff but inconsistent command. Those pitchers can still be valuable, but more often than not, they never figure out how to throw strike after strike. And, even more often than not, aggressive hitters tend to stay aggressive. It’s easy to observe when a guy is swinging too much, but it’s not an easy thing to improve.
In his last 10 games, Grichuk has drawn nine walks. He’s struck out six times. To put it another way, Grichuk has drawn a quarter of his career walks in the most recent 7% of plate appearances. Obviously, it’s too soon to say anything for certain, but it’s incredible we’re even here in the first place.
There’s a story to go along with this, that’s made the Internet rounds. The article was published Monday, and it was written by Derrick Goold. The gist is that discipline has been the one thing Grichuk has worked most hard on lately. He got off to a terrible start, so he began taking time in front of a pitching machine, trying to better identify balls and strikes. There’s no use in my trying to quickly summarize the article — you should definitely read it, because it’s great. But the Cardinals have had Grichuk try to improve his understanding of the zone, and there have been immediate returns.
Since beginning with the drills, Grichuk has seen 75 pitches in the PITCHf/x strike zone, and 84 pitches out of it. Compared to career rates, he’s been similarly aggressive within the zone, but he’s been controlled without it. He’s swung at 17 of those would-be balls. At his career rate, he would’ve swung at 29. Of course, that’s a difference of just a dozen swings, but it feels like it’s something. For reference, here’s Grichuk’s entire career, shown over 10-game averages.
Lately, by Z-Swing%, Grichuk is only a little bit down. By O-Swing%, however, he’s well down from the norm. The most recent 10-game stretch is actually Grichuk’s lowest point. In the closest previous 10-game stretch, Grichuk saw just 33 pitches out of the zone, so the sample was a lot smaller. It is important to understand that these numbers fluctuate, and Grichuk has appeared disciplined by this measure before. But this is also some new territory. Grichuk hasn’t looked this disciplined, statistically, before. So even though it’s a week and a half, it’s notable. This looks like something, and it’s something countless players have struggled with.
Here are all the pitches from the 10-game stretch. This doesn’t show anything about pitch type or context or what have you, but it’s enough to just see swings and non-swings. Here’s Grichuk’s recent zone:
It’s not like he’s eliminated swings at balls, but there are plenty of takes around the borders. There’s an enormous cluster of swings in the zone right over the plate. Grichuk hasn’t been challenged much low and in. Not in the past 10 games. But he’s been good about avoiding swings at the bulk of the pitches over and beyond the outer third. That’s mostly been Grichuk’s focus, and, so far, so good. He has more walks than strikeouts, and he’s slugged .517.
For whatever it’s worth, this is a sample plate appearance. Here’s Grichuk drawing a walk, which, previously, he very well might not have drawn.
One plate appearance doesn’t tell you very much, but Grichuk laid off a first-pitch fastball over the heart. He laid off a second-pitch fastball just off the edge. After swinging through a changeup, he easily took a fastball in the dirt, then he avoided swinging at a 3-and-1 heater up and over. That last one could’ve been tempting, but Grichuk thought better. Consciously or subconsciously, I don’t know.
I’m going to guess this isn’t the first time Grichuk has tried to harness his aggression. Or at least, it’s not the first time he’s had his aggression targeted. It’s not like the Cardinals just realized he’s had a tendency to over-swing. But it could be something about the approach this time allowed it to click, where it didn’t click before. Or! Maybe it hasn’t clicked, and this is anomalous! 10 games. It’s just rare you see a plan implemented, and then it pays off right away. Grichuk specifically worked on his eye. He’s also worked on his mental approach, which can never be discounted. Since trying to become a new hitter, Randal Grichuk has resembled a new hitter. You can’t say it’s not intriguing.
I’m going to get wayyy ahead of myself, just for fun. Let’s just pretend like Grichuk’s new O-Swing% is for real. Pretend he’s going to run a 20% rate this year. That would be a drop from last year of about 16 percentage points. Since 2008, the biggest season-to-season drop in O-Swing% is 12 percentage points, given a minimum of 200 trips to the plate in successive seasons. The second-biggest is under 11, and the third-biggest is under 10. These rates tend to stay fairly stable. One easy way to shave points off your O-Swing% is to also shave points off your Z-Swing% by just swinging less in general, but Grichuk has still gone after strikes, two-thirds of the time. I’m not saying he is disciplined now. I’m saying if he were a disciplined hitter, this is what he would look like.
I’m interested in all adjustments, but I’m particularly interested in this one because it’s so unusual. Specifically because it’s so unusual, we have to keep a close eye on it. Could all turn out to be a blip. It’s just worth giving some benefit of the doubt, and then seeing if opposing pitchers decide to attack Grichuk differently. Maybe they’ll find a part of the strike zone he doesn’t want to cover now, and then he’ll be exposed until he swings. Then he’ll be predisposed to swing more often, and so on and so forth. You see how baseball is cyclical. Just think about what we have. Randal Grichuk had one big weakness. He’s successfully taken some measures to eliminate it. This isn’t just any old change. This is maybe the hardest one to make.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



Pitchers hate it!
Walk #9 Will Blow Your Mind!!!
Grichuk’s wRC+ is also down 40 points from what it was last year. HIs Babip is low, but Jeff, I’m wondering if you think this is going to improve Grichuk as a hitter if he sustains it for an entire year.
It definitely should and therefore is a very encouraging trend. O-Contact% is typically not viewed as that much of an issue compared to Z-Contact% precisely because it’s difficult to do much with a pitch outside of the zone even if you do hit it, so swinging less often at those pitches not only puts you in better counts but should improve overall performance on contact made. The fact that Grichuk’s O-Swing% has decreased without his Z-Swing% being significantly affected indicates that this is not simply a function of being more passive, he’s judging pitches more accurately.
I have to think so. Even if Grichuk doesn’t do better than last year’s line, I think something like this would make it more likely that he *repeats* last year’s line.
For full season numbers, it’s worth noting that Grichuk started out the year 1-14 with 8 K’s and no walks. That’s prior to the ten game stretch that Jeff is talking about, and it’s also prior to the drills that are discussed in the linked article. Grichuk’s wRC+ is 164 since beginning those drills (pretty much the 10 game stretch that Jeff is discussing).
Obviously small sample size caveats all around, and that some in-season drills have made that much difference (or “flipped a switch” in changing approach) intuitively seems too good to be true. But maybe the drills really have helped him change approach, and it’s a great post by Jeff breaking it down.
One other point I’ll also note is that the 10-game sample of “disciplined Grichuk” includes 8 games against the Braves, Brewers, and Reds. Those 3 pitching staffs aren’t expected to be very good and are so far living down to that expectation (3 of the worst 8 team FIP’s in MLB this season). So level of competition is another variable in the mix in thinking about whether any changes are sustainable.
Maybe wRC+ is affected by. his pre-adjustment games. Last 10 games, he was:
8 for 32
four XBHs.
7 RBIS.
Before the adjustment:
1 for 15
No XBHs
0 RBIS
Jeff, I noticed that the entire league’s o-swing% is down from last year, at 28% from 30%. But then I looked at April splits going back to 2010, and noticed this seems to happen every year to a small degree, where o-swing% starts the year at 28-29% and rises to 30%-31% over the rest of the season.
Maybe another idea for a story? Does the entire league start the year trying to chase less and then slowly lose their discipline, or is it pitchers who are commanding better as the year goes on and inducing more swings on tougher pitches?
On the other hand, chase rates seem to have gone up pretty dramatically since fangraphs’s first year of data in 2002 and maybe this is all just blips in the data from how it’s acquired, but I’d think the methods should be stable over the course of each individual year.
It’s possible that hitters lose some discipline as the season wears on, which I’m sure is draining both physically and mentally. Personally, by the time my third at bat of game two of a July doubleheader rolls around I’m pretty much swinging at anything close.
I’d have to say it’s more likely tied to better command by the pitchers, as the general consensus is that the pitchers are further behind the hitters in Spring Training.
Altuve (OSwing% down 12%) and Rasmus (5%) on the Astros have also been more selective to start the year. They are swinging less at all pitches though not just pitches outside the strike zone. It’s a tiny sample but it will be interesting to see if they, like Grichuk, can continue it.
As a Cubs fan, this makes me a little nervous. Grichuk has pretty outstanding power, but could be exposed last year. Lots and lots of K’s very, very few walks.
If he commands the strike zone better he could become a real offensive force.
And yes, I know he was very good offensively last year, but that wasn’t likely to continue if he kept K’ing 30+% of the time while walking 5-6% of the time.
I remember having a similar conversation among Reds fans about Jonny Gomes in 2011. While never a notably impatient hitter, he was being a lot more patient and was walking a ton. Through the end of April, he walked 20 times, good for a 19.2% BB rate. It didn’t last. He walked just 28 times in his remaining 268, a 10.4% BB rate that was much closer to his career norm.
I own Grichuk in fantasy and would love to see him add some patience to his game. But I’ll be reserving judgment for at least a few more weeks.
Thing about that Gomes season, which was weird: he dropped his O-Swing% by 11 points, but he also dropped his Z-Swing% by 18 points. He wasn’t really showing more discipline; he was showing more patience. That’s different, and less encouraging, I think, long-term.
Excellent point. I’d cast the difference as being between Plate Discipline (batting strategy) and Pitch Recognition (perceptual skill). They can go together, but not necessarily. The “patience” you describe is probably PD without PR.
He just hit the waiver wire in my league, so I came here to study him. Looks like he has fallen apart since this article.