Rangers Go for Trifecta With Kyle Gibson Signing

Two winters ago, the Rangers weren’t looking to contend, but they were looking for undervalued pitching. They gave reliever money to starter-turned-very-good-reliever Mike Minor in early December to join the rotation with a three-year, $28 million deal that has proved to be a massive bargain, as Minor’s 6.7 WAR over the last two seasons ranks 29th among all pitchers. Last December, the still-rebuilding Rangers signed Lance Lynn, whose very good FIP in 2018 was marred by an ugly 4.77 ERA across stints with the Twins and Yankees, to a three-year deal worth $30 million. Lynn delivered with a seven-win season and a fifth-place finish in the AL Cy Young award voting. Now the Rangers have reached a three-year deal with Kyle Gibson worth $30 million, according to Jeff Passan, with Jon Morosi first reporting the team and player.

How Gibson fits in with Lynn and Minor goes beyond just the identical contracts. Over the last two years, Gibson put together a pair of solid 2.6-WAR seasons with the Twins, but a low BABIP in 2018 meant a 3.62 ERA, while a higher one last season resulted in a 4.84 ERA that made him look worse than he deserved. Gibson’s strikeout rate climbed to 23% with his walk rate dropping to 8%, all while maintaining his high groundball rate. His home run rate went up in a fashion consistent with the rest of the league. With his sinker, assuming a good infield defense (yet to be determined, given that the Rangers likely aren’t done making moves), he should put up very good numbers even in a hitter’s park (we don’t yet know how Texas’ new ballpark will play).

Gibson’s peripheral numbers aren’t the only aspect of his game that could make him an underrated signing. The prescient Kiley McDaniel had this to say in FanGraphs’ Top 50 Free Agents post:

It’ll surely hurt the Division Champion Twins to lose 9.6 WAR and 60% of their rotation with Gibson, Odorizzi, and Pineda hitting free agency. Gibson was the player with the most helium amongst team-side analyst-types consulted for the first iteration of this list. Some have him over Keuchel, in part because his 92-95 mph heater gives more margin for error in games, in projecting his future, and in projecting a role in a playoff rotation. His ERA indicators suggest he’s a sub-4 ERA type and he’s made 25-plus starts six years in a row. Gibson seems like a solid candidate for a sneaky big and/or early deal from a club confident he offers the best value among the 10 or so starters with a solid chance at a multi-year contract.

Gibson’s contract splits the difference between McDaniel’s $45 million estimate and the crowd’s $20 million figure, but Texas certainly struck early. At the end of August, Gibson’s 4.04 FIP put him just shy of three wins above replacement and his 4.54 ERA was above average considering the home run environment. A strong September might have netted a four-year deal him. Unfortunately, Gibson had lost about 10 pounds over the previous six weeks and with his strength waning, he was ultimately diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. Gibson went on the IL and in a handful of appearances in the season’s final month, split between starting and relief, he was unable to get his strength back; the bad month caused some of his numbers to plummet.

With a full offseason to regain his strength and hopefully gain a better understanding of his condition, Gibson should look a lot more like the pitcher who had been successful for much of 2018 and 2019. While there is some downside risk given the way Gibson finished, the Rangers’ salary commitment isn’t sizable enough to cause concern should he fail to recover completely. If Gibson is the same pitcher he was prior to his illness, the Rangers will again have gotten a bargain on the free agent market.

Gibson’s signing isn’t exactly like Minor and Lynn’s in that the Rangers were rebuilding the last few years. Signing an undervalued starter to plug into the rotation was a very good strategy as the team committed a small amount to net a potentially large return, either in performance or return in trade. The Rangers elected to hold on to Minor at the trade deadline, presumably because they weren’t blown way by any of the offers they received, but also because Minor is a pitcher who can help the team contend in 2020. Gibson’s signing wasn’t made with an eye toward potential trade value. Minor and Lynn helped accelerate the Rangers rebuild and with Gibson, they’ll probably jump into the top 10 projected rotations even without much quality outside of their top three.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

But while recognizing that the Gibson signing puts the Rangers closer to contention, it comes with the obvious realization that the team still has a ton of work to do. The Rangers could certainly use another starting pitcher. Gerrit Cole might give the team the best rotation in baseball. More than Cole, though, they need to fill an absurd number of holes across the diamond. Right now, our Depth Chart projections put the Rangers ahead of only the Marlins, Tigers, and Orioles on the position player side. Only Joey Gallo projects as an above-average player. Six of the nine positions project for 1.5 WAR or fewer, and two (catcher and first base) are at replacement level. Kyle Gibson gives the Rangers a great start to filling their needs to compete next year, but he’s still just a start. The Rangers should have a very busy offseason ahead if they want to get back to the playoffs.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
SucramRenrutMember since 2017
6 years ago

Is there any anecdotal evidence on where Minor’s velocity came from? It seems like he added velo as a reliever, which is standard, but then retained some when he returned to the rotation. You wonder if some of this is just mindset/approach and if a guy like Pomeranz could return to the rotation, exert more ‘effort’ twice through the order, and have success.

OddBall Herrera
6 years ago

3/30 in this market? I am shocked no one beat that, particularly the Twins. It’s barely more AAV than Pomeranz, who is the opposite of the valuable average-ish innings eater Gibson has been.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

I actually think 3/30 is a pretty fair deal. Reliable starter, not a star, not going to be a star, and relatively low chance of imploding on you. I don’t think the Pomeranz deal is a great comparison, since that deal looks like it has a high chance of busting for various reasons and because Pomeranz is likely being viewed as a reliever.

OddBall Herrera
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Still, you’re paying the guy at the rate of, what, 1.2 WAR/season when over the last five he’s averaged about 2.2.

Then again, maybe that ‘no income tax’ thing makes the deal a lot closer. In MN he’d be out, what, 10% of any deal he signed there? (I have not researched mn tax brackets thoroughly)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

If the expected $/win figure doesn’t line up with the observed values, that would indicate that either the $/win figure is inaccurate/no longer valid or there’s something else going on here that is hurting his value. From a slightly different perspective, I would argue that the Minor and Lynn deals established that 2-3 win pitchers that aren’t too old get about 3 years and $30M. And really, do we expect to pay more than that for what essentially amounts to a fourth starter? He is probably also being hurt by the huge number of guys who are just a little worse than him that are available–Cole Hamels is a pretty close comp, and Pineda, Porcello, Tanner Roark, and Alex Wood are a little bit worse.

averagejoe15Member since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s been talked about before, but as far as free agency is concerned, teams aren’t valuing the first couple of wins as highly as the 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc. Intuitively it makes sense as it’s certainly easier to find 1 or 2 wins in a single asset than 3+ wins.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
6 years ago

Kyle Gibson, perhaps as much as anyone, exemplifies why I have such a difficult time accepting WAR as a measure of value. The discrepancy between his fWAR, 2.6 and his bWAR, 0.4 is enormous when it is used as a measure of value. He has never passed the ERA test. He has recent back to back years in which his ERA was above 5 and only one of his last 4 years is it below 4.84. Gibson has always been little more than an innings eater and seemed to be staying just ahead of being DFA. I was quite surprised when Kylie McDaniel suggested a 3/45 offer when he was making his free agent predictions. 3/30 still strikes me as an overpay but I guess if a guy with major league experience can still get the ball to the plate in the air he can command this type of deal. Rick Porcello will certainly put that question on the test.

averagejoe15Member since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

Well fWAR and bWAR aren’t exactly interchangeable. fWAR is theoretically more indicative of actual talent level even if FIP as a whole is imperfect. Using ERA as an input makes bWAR more noisy and less suited for pure talent evaluation. I don’t think FIP or ERA are perfect inputs and agree WAR is not the greatest hypothetical evaluation tool, but it’s one of the best public ones available and matches with the consensus quite often atop leaderboards so it has its merits as long as you understand it’s weaknesses.

Statcast-based WAR measurements will do a better job than either version of WAR.

rhswanzey
6 years ago

Kyle Gibson against >.500 teams, 2019: 63.2 IP, 5.65 ERA, 1.74 WHIP, 1.62 K/BB, .293/.381/.498

I think he’s a good innings eating #4, but I think anticipating anything more than that or projecting him as a clear cut playoff caliber top 3 guy is aggressive for a guy going into his age 32 year. I don’t know that Gibson has the upside that Minor or Lynn had going into their contracts.

jdtTX
6 years ago

Texas paid Drew Smyly and Shelby Miller a combined $9,000,000 last year to start 17 games (play 32) for – 1.7 bwar

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  jdtTX

and it looks like they just threw some more money away in this deal.

averagejoe15Member since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  jdtTX

Well at least they aren’t the Padres and paying both Hosmer and Myers

SertoriusMember since 2023
6 years ago
Reply to  jdtTX

Well we paid Lynn and Minor $20,000,000 combined to start 65 games for 15.2 bwar. So if we had 4 gambles for a combined 29 mil to get 13.5 bwar. That’s pretty good by my count. If we keep at that efficiency (~2 mil/bwar) we’ll have a 5 bwar season from Gibson. So hopefully we this works out half as well as last offseason.