Ray Searage Did It Again
You had, probably, heard of Arquimedes Caminero before. This is because his full name is Arquimedes Euclides Caminero, and that speaks for itself. His existence as a baseballer was something of a curiosity, but that was more or less the extent of it. However much you knew about Caminero, you probably knew next to nothing about his actual talent. In January, he was designated for assignment by the Marlins. Some days later, he was acquired by the Pirates for cash considerations. He was added to the spring-training pile of guys competing for a major-league bullpen spot. These are the transactions you ignore, and you’re usually justified in doing so. Most of the time, the Camineros of the world remain the Camineros, only a little bit older every year.
And to be fair, it’s April 14. It’s been two and a half months since the Marlins gave Caminero up, so it’s not like we can know the rest of his career. But, in February, I polled the audience about pitching coaches, and Pirates fans liked theirs the most. Big fans of Ray Searage, those Pirates people. Searage has developed a reputation for getting the most out of troubled live arms, and based on early indications, with Caminero, Searage can count for himself another unlikely win.
You know Caminero’s history, even without knowing it. He’s had a very familiar profile. Big, mid-90s fastball, sometimes approaching triple digits. And he’d work in some other pitches, but while the power was there, the command was not. In other words: good arm, too wild. Pitchers like this are everywhere, and some of them are in big-league bullpens, but those guys don’t have much job security, because there are others like them just looking for a chance.
You can totally get why the Marlins decided to cut bait, even if it might’ve been a bit hasty. You can also totally get why the Pirates expressed interest. There wasn’t much harm in taking a chance. And soon after Caminero arrived, Searage went to work on his mechanics. An excerpt:
“[Searage] got me to see things that were there, I just didn’t notice them that much,” Caminero said. “I was trying to throw too hard. He said, ‘Go easier. The ball’s still going to fly, and you’ll be even better.’ Once you see that work, you’re confident doing it, and hitting my target becomes more important.”
Searage encouraged Caminero to simplify his delivery, staying away from overthrowing. The No. 1 priority is getting Caminero to be able to better locate his pitches. Additionally, even by simplifying, Caminero wouldn’t lose any of his power. Mechanics can be counter-intuitive in that way.
In terms of evidence of improvement, right now we have only so much. Caminero has thrown 68% of his pitches for strikes, but then, this year, he’s also thrown just 47 pitches, so that barely means anything. But if you’ll allow me this potential confirmation bias: there was also spring training. In 13.1 spring-training innings with the Pirates, Caminero walked one batter while striking out 21. The walk came in his first appearance. We know what we’re supposed to make of this stuff, but we can at least say it’s hard to generate those kinds of numbers by accident.
Speaking of numbers you don’t generate by accident: on the podcast the other day, Dave and Carson were talking about how you hardly need a big sample size to identify velocity changes. Great. Now, keep in mind, Caminero has always thrown hard. It’s what’s allowed him to get chances. I decided to look at velocity changes between 2014 – 2015, isolating average fastball speeds. I compared pitchers to themselves in the same role — starters were compared to starters, and relievers were compared to relievers. Here are the biggest velocity gainers:
- Arquimedes Caminero, +3.5 mph (RP)
- Mike Pelfrey, +3.1 mph (SP)
- Brian Schlitter, +2.0 mph (RP)
- Zach McAllister, +2.0 mph (SP)
- Chris Young, +1.9 mph (RP)
Caminero is in first so far, by four-tenths of a tick. And, last year, Pelfrey pitched through an elbow injury, that sapped his strength. He’s simply regained velocity that last year he lost. Throw that point out and Caminero is in first by much much more. The fastest average fastball in baseball so far? It’s not Aroldis Chapman’s. It’s Caminero’s, at 99.0 miles per hour. Brooks Baseball puts him up at 99.8. He also throws a cutter and a splitter, both of which come in north of 90. Think about that again: Arquimedes Caminero has been throwing three different pitches at or above 90 mph. Somehow, the hard thrower gained more velocity, under Searage. He’s also so far scrapped a slower breaking ball, though we’ll see if that returns.
What are the changes that Searage has introduced? We can try to look at this visually, though it’s not like I’ve spoken to Searage himself. Below, a 2014 fastball and a 2015 fastball (from spring training to get the desired camera angle):
If you just look at the .gifs quickly, they look similar. They are similar — nothing here was overhauled. But, in 2015, Caminero has a higher leg lift, and as his leg comes up, he’s more vertical, eliminating last year’s slight hunch. It also appears he’s reduced his drop on his back leg, and as he comes around, he remains more straight-up. Finally, at release, a year ago, Caminero had some tilt toward the first-base side, with his left knee at an awkward angle. This year, there’s less tilt, and less of that angle, with Caminero’s body aiming him toward the catcher, which channels his energy. His arm, hip, and legs are working together, improving his mechanical efficiency. In this way, a simplified delivery can also squeeze more speed out of all the connective bits.
The one thing we know for sure: Ray Searage has taken an interesting arm and turned it into an interesting pitcher. There’s no getting around the fact that you can’t just make up Caminero’s velocity gain, and that’s significant. He throws even harder, which is something he didn’t have to do. Whether Caminero goes on to throw enough strikes, we’ll see. It’s early, and the spring-training data is spring-training data. But all signs right now are positive. It’s not that the Marlins let go of Caminero too early. Maybe he doesn’t ever improve as a Marlin. But he’s already improved as a Pirate. A lot of pitchers do. It’s kind of one of their things.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.


I sent Mr. Sullivan a tweet today, but I’m not sure how often he checks such things, or if it will get lost in the presumably overwhelming social media popularity of said sports-writer. In any case, I’ll post here instead:
NEWSFLASH
Jon Lester attempted not one, but TWO pickoff attempts last night against the Reds. The results were interesting, to say the least. For one, they were impossibly awkward, as one might expect of one doing something one hasn’t done for literally several years. More importantly the Cubs ACTUALLY GOT AN OUT after the second one when the throw sailed into left field and Cincinnati’s Zack Cozart was thrown out trying to advance to third!
Please, please, please write an article about this, kthanxbye.
It’s interesting because Cafardo in the Boston Globe has been beating on Lester’s lack of a move since Lester had the temerity to become an ex-Red Sox. If Lester actually improves at this, he may have to send Carfardo a nice watch to reward him. I’m definitely interesting in a piece–maybe after a few more starts and a few more pickoff attempts
Yeah except you can’t listen to anything Cafardo says, he might be the biggest idiot in sports writing.
+1
“he might be the biggest idiot in sports writing.”
HA! You must have forgotten that I exist?!
I challenge you to a stupid contest. Guarantee I’d win….
It’s not like Cafardo was the first or only person to point it out. Lester and his coaches have definitely been aware of this for a long time, but they had no reason to publicly state it in case other teams hadn’t picked up on him too. Kind of ridiculous to say that Lester owes improving his game to a sportswriter who points out what is obvious.
I think you meant right field. The throw sailed over the first baseman’s head and into right field.
Pitchers sign with the Pirates because of Searage and Benedict. Money cannot buy this resource save for keeping the two salary happy.
This just keeps happening with Searage. Holdzkom, Volquez, Liriano, Burnett, Melancon, other guys. You gotta give credit where credit is due, the man is a freaking genius.
“Arquimedes Euclides Caminero” was voted Coolest Name in the MLB by a plurality of Banknotes readers earlier this month. Can’t say I disagree.
That name might actually be the winner of the First Name/Middle Name/Last Name Triple Crown.
Arquimedes Euclides Quackenbush.
Amen.
*of guys currently on their MLB 25-man roster
There is a doctor in town named “Quackenbush.” I have to admit, that’s a better use of the name than a baseball player, and that takes a bit of the shine off of it as a baseball name.
Euclides, however, is beautiful.
I still think Giancarlo “Don’t Call me Michael” Stanton has the best middle name in baseball.
Wonderful Terrific Monds might have something to say about this.
Wonderful Terrific Quackenbush = an excellent name for a superhero.
This is actually a pretty consistent approach the Pirates take with their pitchers. I know they’re doing it with Taillon right now, and I think it’s also a focus with Glasnow. Anyone who throws hard, they get staying high on their back leg and driving straight toward the plate. The idea is maximize both command and plane. It seems to have worked for Caminero. Signs are good with Holdzkom, too.
OK now, this is supposed to be musical. Somewhat operatic, if you must:
Ar-chi-me-des Ca-min-yer-o (Latin pronunciation here)
He was always throw a zer-o
Ar-chi-me-des Ca-min-yer-o
He will always be my her-o
Uh, typo in the second line:
He will always throw a zer-o
Por un Caminero
Yo te fue a buscar
Muy lejos camine,
Pero a fin te encountre.
1.1 scoreless tonight, lived in the strike zone. He did issue a walk, but it was after a pitch down the middle was called a ball with 2 strikes. Should have been a K instead.
But man, that stuff. It’s just unfair.
Dialing back a max effort delivery and simplifying a delivery are tools by every major league pitching coach and no doubt most if not all minor league ones. Some pitchers do poorly with Searage. Let me guess: its not related to coaching, right?
So he gets no credit because he doesn’t improve all pitchers and because he has not discovered some unique holy grail?
His successes are commonplace, his failures abound and, rather than suggesting he might be a top-quality pitching coach, we should all hope he gets fired and replaced by a generic replacement pitching coach – any major leaguer or most if not all minor leaguers?
Any monkey can show you where you need to go. It takes a real teacher to show you how to get there.
Applies to all education-related fields.
I wouldn’t let a monkey show me where to go. Damn dirty apes.
Which pitchers have done poorly under Searage? Are you suggesting he has made people worse? Not sure what you are trying to say…
Spoken like the true Brewer fan you are.
I always read the “Fish or cut bait” phrase differently. Like, not that “cut bait” was “get rid of something you don’t see any point in” but just that sometimes you have to make a choice between two equally important alternatives. Looked it up and I guess our different interpretations of the phrase is reflective of one that really exists between people who think it is just about making a decision and those who think cutting bait means giving up on something pointless. The more you know.