Ronny Mauricio’s Torn ACL Makes the Mets’ Third Base Situation Messier Than Ever

Ronny Mauricio
Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

Last winter, Mets prospect Ronny Mauricio took the Dominican Winter League by storm, slashing .287/.335/.468 for Los Tigres del Licey and earning MVP honors. The 22-year-old was off to an even better start in the 2023–24 season, batting .433 with four extra-base hits in seven games, but all that ground to a halt on Monday. Facing rivals Las Águilas Cibaeñas, Mauricio attempted to steal second, but when he tried to make a sudden stop, his right leg buckled. On Tuesday, SNY’s Andy Martino reported that the injury is a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Although the Mets won’t put a timetable on his return until after he undergoes surgery, even the most aggressive rehab schedule would have him missing at least the first half of the season before getting his legs back under him in the minors. It’s grim news for a young player who was primed to get his first real shot at breaking camp with the big club.

A switch-hitting shortstop, the 6-foot-3 Mauricio has loud tools but runs an eye-watering chase rate. The Mets signed him in 2017, and he climbed the ladder via a series of solid but not spectacular seasons. Aside from an eight-game stint in rookie ball in 2018 and another eight-game stint in Double-A in 2021, he never posted a wRC+ below 93 or above 108 in an any of his minor league stops, even as he put up consecutive 20–20 seasons with Double-A Binghamton in 2022 and Triple-A Syracuse in ’23. He made his debut with the Mets on September 1, launching a 117.3-mph double, the team’s hardest-hit ball in over two years (and the fourth-hardest a Met has ever recorded).

Mauricio ran an 80 wRC+ over 26 games, playing second and third base. At the time of his call-up, Eric Longenhagen had this to say about him on Effectively Wild: “Mauricio’s risky. He’s going to strike out a ton. He is kind of a physical freak where he’s a 6-foot-3 switch-hitting shortstop with huge power.” Francisco Lindor’s presence at shortstop, though, puts a ceiling on the value that Mauricio would actually be able to provide to the Mets. While in Syracuse, he had been seeing time at second, short, third, and left field, although the outfield experiment did not go particularly well. Here’s how Eric described the situation:

I have Ronny Mo’ evaluated in a vacuum, right? Where he can play shortstop, and that’s a big part of carrying real world baseball weight when you’re evaluating this guy, because ultimately only so many guys can actually hack it at shortstop at the big-league level. It’s a very difficult thing to do. Because he’s not going to do that in all probability for the Mets, if I’m predicting how he’s going to pan out from a value standpoint, it’s probably below where I have him evaluated in a vacuum as a shortstop, right? He’s probably going to be a streaky, somewhat frustrating, but also very exciting — and again, dangerous, the power element here makes him dangerous — utility guy for the Mets next year … Ultimately on a contending Mets team this guy is probably playing in all over the place, filling in when guys get hurt…

With shortstop blocked by Lindor, then, Mauricio looked like a potential addition to the Mets’ current third base options of Brett Baty and Mark Vientos. Baty has a bit more plate discipline, and Mauricio has the speed and positional flexibility, but all three have yet to translate their success in Syracuse to success in Flushing. All three have struggled to prove that they can play a decent third base. All three can make very loud contact but are plagued by too much swing-and-miss and an inability to elevate the baseball. Though both Baty and Vientos had real chances to claim the third base job after the Mets traded Eduardo Escobar in June, neither came particularly close to putting things together. The team ended up with an MLB-worst -1.3 WAR at the position, without a single player providing positive value there.

Looking at Mauricio, Baty and Vientos specifically, there’s not all that much daylight between the stats the three young players put up in Flushing last season:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
Mets of a Feather
Name PA wRC+ BB% K% Best Speed GB/FB LA Barrel%
Brett Baty 389 68 7.5% 28.0% 101.6 1.84 6.6 7.6%
Mark Vientos 233 69 4.3% 30.5% 103.4 1.64 9.5 10.7%
Ronny Mauricio 108 80 6.5% 28.7% 101.4 1.74 7.6 5.7%

Vientos has been working on his defense with Lindor in Puerto Rico, and Lindor told Newsday’s Laura Albanese that he has also invited Baty down to work out. On the first day of Winter Meetings, Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns said definitively that the Mets would not be adding a third basemen during the offseason, telling reporters, “We will have that covered internally.” He added, “I don’t have anyone in my head right now that’s got the job. And we may not go into Opening Day with anyone who’s got the job.” He also indicated that Mauricio would at the very least get a chance to compete for the job, telling reporters that he needed reps at the position, but that his hands and reflexes were good enough to play there.

Along with waiver claim Zack Short, Joey Wendle, signed to a one-year, $2 million contract with additional playing time bonuses, was supposed to be the team’s infield insurance policy. But with Mauricio out of the picture, the calculus has changed. Martino, along with Tim Britton and Will Sammon of The Athletic, reported that the Mets are now expected to look outside the organization for help. In a sense, the team is right back where it started in 2022, hoping that Baty or Vientos will grab the job but hedging that bet with a veteran option who can contribute and still allow them to get enough reps to progress.

Excluding Matt Chapman, who ranked seventh on our Top 50 Free Agents list and represents a whole lot more than the supplementary piece the Mets have in mind, the free-agent pool features plenty of options but few slam dunks. Martino floated Justin Turner as a possible fit in a third base-slash-designated hitter role, but while Turner put up a 114 wRC+ in Boston, he played just 50 games in the field in 2023, and just seven times at third (and with particularly bad defensive numbers over that tiny sample size). Among third basemen in their late 30s who can still contribute with the bat, though, Turner represents the safest bet, followed by options like Donovan Solano, Evan Longoria, Josh Donaldson, and Jean Segura. Provided that he’s fully healthy, the 32-year-old Gio Urshela would make a lot of sense as a bounce back candidate. He played just 62 games before fracturing his pelvis in June, posting a 92 wRC+ with passable defense for the Angels, but Steamer sees him as exactly league-average in 2024, putting up a wRC+ of 100 and 0.0 runs on defense.

It’s worth noting that none of the aforementioned players features the positional flexibility that Mauricio would have provided. For that, the Mets might have to go for a lesser option at the bat, such as Isiah Kiner-Falefa or Enrique Hernández, both of whom can play the outfield. After that, there aren’t many players who represent that much more upside than Wendle. Lastly, the team could also take a sentimental route, reuniting with Escobar or bringing back Luis Guillorme.

Mauricio’s injury is devastating for a player who seemed so close to making it happen after years of waiting. There’s no way of knowing how his 2024 season would have gone, but in one fell swoop, his injury robs the Mets of upside, depth, and flexibility. Regardless of whether they trust the options they have or look to add, if the team is going to succeed, Baty or Vientos need to start hitting.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
fartinyourface
2 years ago

I’m fine with giving the job to Baty. The Mets don’t need to sign Longo, Turner or some other veteran way past their prime.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Luis Guillorme is still looking for a job…

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Okay, seriously though, it’s totally fine to turn it into a 2-person competition between Baty and Vientos. The Mets need to know what they have out there.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Vientos can’t play the position and with his horrific contact rates(especially his in zone contact rate), and plate discipline and non existent walk rate I’m pretty sure he can’t hit either.

jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Vientos has shown decent plate discipline in his minor league career– he’s got a career BB% over 9%. At AAA, his BB% is almost 11%. He’s not as patient as Baty, but Baty still strikes out nearly as much. He also seems to have shown more ability to adapt throughout his career than Baty; and he hits the ball harder and with a better launch angle.

I don’t have much to offer about his defense, except that he hasn’t had nearly the opportunity as Baty in terms of consistent playing time, and it’s good to see him working on it in the offseason.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  jb1205

Fair point but the patience hasn’t been there so far in a sss in the majors and his in zone contact rate and contact rate overall is woeful.

jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

So: I just figured out how to look up Z-Contact% and Contact% on the Leaders page here. Vientos ranks pretty low! But also: it looks like his numbers in those categories were higher than those for Aaron Judge and James Outman, among others. Guys like JD Martinez, JD Davis, and Nick Castellanos are also in the same vicinity.

CC AFCMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree, but I think it’s awfully telling that one day they’re like “we’ve got it covered internally” and then Mauricio gets hurt and now they’re looking outside. Tells me a lot about how they evaluate Baty and Vientos internally. I had Mauricio as the clear best option of the 3 and it seems like they did, too.

But anyway, it’s still better to see if one of Baty and Vientos can make a jump than run in some stopgap.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Only telling about Vientos imo Baty is the heavy favorite to start at third base now and they want a better insurance policy than Vientos.

hebrewMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

So far it’s only been analysts speculating that they’re going to make a move, though.

Considering the amount of depth they’ve spent the first part of the off-season acquiring, I would be surprised if they actually signed someone to start at third

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah. This is mostly bad news for Mauricio himself, who really can’t catch a break, and for those of us who were betting on his Hulk Smash-level max EVs to start to pay off once he got a little more comfortable in the majors. It still strikes me as a reasonable bet that one of the two remaining guys will be able to play at or above replacement level.

David Klein
2 years ago

Poor Ronny sometimes baseball is a cruel game and poor Endy Rodriguez too as he got hurt in winter ball as well and will miss the 2024 season. Hopefully Ronny is back and able to strut his stuff in the majors either in late 2024 or early 2025. I would bring in some insurance for Baty in case Baty can’t cut the mustard I don’t view Vientos as a good plan b.

gettwobrute79Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Hoping we get a similar article for the Pirates and the impact of losing Endy. I was already pessimistic about this season, as they’ve done next to nothing. And then the Endy news broke.

AlbyMember since 2017
2 years ago

Wishing the best to this exciting young talent. Seeing how Acuña came back from a torn ACL gives hope that he’ll bounce back as good as ever.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  Alby

it took Acuna a year to get back to his dynamic self— I believe his 2022 was his least productive season before he had his monster 2023.

AlbyMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

True, and that 2022 had me worried. But it also makes me less likely to leap to a pessimistic conclusion if Mauricio takes a while.

jb1205Member since 2022
2 years ago

This truly sucks for Mauricio, and it eliminates a candidate at 3B for the Mets- but was Mauricio really going to be the solution there? Maybe, but he has a career total of 7 starts at 3B in the majors and the minors combined; and nobody knows yet how well he’ll hit in the majors. I have to hope that the Mets weren’t putting too many of their eggs into that basket.

Vientos and Baty both put up huge numbers in multiple samples at AA/AAA, with more consistent power and better plate discipline than Mauricio has yet shown- ideally, at least one of the two would be able to figure it out at the MLB level. Vientos showed more improvement than Baty at the end of last year; it would be fantastic if his extra work with Lindor on defense paid off. It would be really unfortunate if the team doesn’t find some ways to get both of them some consistent opportunities- they have nothing left to prove in the minors, and it feels way too early to give up on them.

LongTimeFan
2 years ago

Left unsaid is Mauricio’s foot speed, competitiveness, energy and base stealing, 4 things that will be missed along with his athleticism and overall threat on both sides of the ball. Bad for the Mets, bad for Mauricio, bad for Mets fans.

I don’t think he should have been playing winter ball. If he’s going to get hurt, it shouldn’t occur in the off season playing for another team, and playing nearly year round. This is the second serious off season knee injury sustained by an important NY Met in consecutive seasons. One was enough. Both preventable.

Among the potential free agent replacements mentioned in this article, I think Kike Hernandez and Jean Segura fit best in terms of versatility and a speed element…something a little above average. Urshela provides more bat but is rather slow. Turner is even slower but I was already in favor of his Mets return prior to Mauricio’s injury, for part time defense and regular DH, bona fide, proven mid lineup bat.

David Klein
2 years ago
Reply to  LongTimeFan

Jean Segura was one of the worst if not the worst player in the majors this past year I think he’s done.

LongTimeFan
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

Yes, he had awful season – an outlier. I was looking at his track record, puts the ball in play, has some pop, offers positional versatility and that his foot speed is above 27.0 feet per second. He was solid offensively in 2021 and 2022. He turns 34 in March.

baltfanMember since 2025
2 years ago

Why wouldn’t they try to trade for one of the many Orioles infielders. Hell, Urias would likely be cheap and fine.